Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Tuesday entered the turbulent political waters of voting rights, signaling that the Justice Department would be aggressive in reviewing new voting laws that civil rights advocates say will dampen minority participation in next year’s elections.
…Mr. Holder also laid out a case for replacing the “antiquated” voter registration system by automatically registering all eligible voters; for barring state legislators from gerrymandering their own districts, and for creating a federal statute prohibiting the dissemination of fraudulent information to deceive people into not voting.
We now have a decade’s worth of evidence that vote fraud, of the type that involves unregistered people voting or people voting multiple times, is so rare as to be inconsequential, while reports of voter suppression (almost all by Republicans) have over the same period been epidemic.
Holder and the Obama administration should run with this. It is, first of all, morally the right thing to do. Secondly, it’s politically advantageous, given who is primarily being targeted by these local efforts. But it is also a winning argument. On the one side, you have Republicans engaging in self-serving behavior ostensibly to combat a problem that according to the experts does not exist. On the other side, you have a large group of Americans being denied a fundamental constitutional right.
It’s also good to see that Holder is expanding this discussion beyond voter ID laws, and treating such laws, gerrymandering, and voter suppression tactics as of a piece. Hopefully he will add caging, frivolous voter eligibility challenges, and other vote suppression tactics to his agenda. And in the best of all worlds his people will also explore and highlight the coordinated national effort to enact such laws on the local level.
Politically, taking on this issue should be a no-brainer for the Obama administration, particularly since it’s not just minorities but also the elderly, disabled, and young adults who are disproportionately affected by many of these tactics. It’s always easy to scare people, and Fox News has raised it to an art form. But there are probably literally millions of people who can tell stories of being shut out from their own democracy, where a straight line can be drawn from their stories to the coordinated Republican efforts to shut them out. That sort of storytelling needs to happen. If the civil rights division of the Department of Justice can document the abuses and get some of these laws shut down, great. But even the effort to do so has the benefit of telling a story: Republicans don’t want you to vote.
Also, too, there’s no reason the White House and civil rights advocates should be taking this on alone. Hopefully, somewhere, some PAC is making a slick “I deserve to vote” TV ad with a rainbow of people (young, old, white, minority) describing how some politicians are passing laws and enacting policies and regulations because they’re afraid of us exercising our constitutional rights. It dovetails perfectly with the 99% narrative, too, since most of the politicians pursuing that agenda are in the pocket of the one percent. It’s an issue that needs to be pushed. Hard.
Oh dear sweet Jesus, if this ever got enacted, it would be worth supporting Obama for it all by itself. My friends in Norway are baffled that we have to actually register in order to vote. They’re all confused, and they ask, “Wait, aren’t you automatically allowed to vote when you reach voting age? I don’t understand this ‘registration’ process…”
Once again, like universal health care and our version of it, they just don’t understand our voter registration system.
“Your papers please; you can’t vote, drive a car, go fishing/hunting, protest, make purchases, etc., etc., without your papers”.
Your friends in Norway probably have an entire weekend to cast their votes (as is the case in most EU nations and elsewhere around the world), whereas here it’s limited to a twelve hour period on a single weekday/school day.
Again, what it amounts to is almost everything the U.S. does is wrong.
My friends in Norway are baffled that we have to actually register in order to vote.
seabe is right. There is no need to register, but the most cautious will actually check the ‘cencus’ [manntall] list to verify they are counted (I never bothered).
From a translated Norwegian wiki page:
Voting is easy. Early voting can be done from any public library in the nation, regardless of what district you belong to. Two years ago I did that for the parliamentary elections (I have been an expat for some 25 years, but happened to be back there just a week before the elections). My vote went to the Socialist Left Party.
Two points come immediately to mind:
But they’re good noises, and I’m glad to see someone in such a high position of authority making them. Now if we could stop the Justice Dept’s general attempt to be some sort of federal vice squad (as in MedMarj or online poker), maybe we address some of these more urgent matters.
I’m not holding my breath, but I’m watching with guarded optimism.
Any laws or policies that have led to the systematic disenfranchisement of people of color – as all of the items Holder mentioned, and all of the ones I added, have – fall under the civil rights division.
Electronic voting fraud wouldn’t be on that particular list b/c there’s no evidence that I’m aware of that it has been particularly used to disenfranchise minorities, as opposed to being used to manipulate totals from random samples of all voters. There are other laws that would fall under, of course, but so far as I’m aware the DoJ, the White House and the Dems have not been very concerned about the issue.
But reading an article on the subject made it sound like the issue that Holder is focusing on is “deceptive campaign literature”…the stuff that tells people that the wrong election day, or that they have to have paid-up child support, etc.
I mean, fine, but it’s pretty weak tea compared to the voter ID crap.
Actually, it would be best if Holder DENIED, in the strongest possible terms, that IRS agents will be waiting to select random people for audits in wealthy precints.
…precincts, even.
I would hope this doesn’t distract from the problem most evident to those paying attention: electronic manipulation. The rarity of actual fraud and the investigations of voter suppression (almost all by Republicans) are butterflies, are a boondoggle (look it up;)).
The longer we allow electronic voting, at least in its current iteration, the more acceptable, the more entrenched it becomes, and the more difficult to get rid of. And there lies the fraud (almost all by Republicans).
Again with the weak baby steps; the lack of action by the Obama administration.
As the diarist points out, this has been going on for ten years. Obama/Holder have been aware of this since day one in office, yet only now, going into their fourth year in office, do they decide to take action.
Further, where’s the DCCC and DNC on this?? Totally missing in action, ZERO. Going to the DCCC’s website this morning, I see a giant advert on their front page hawking t-shirts and hats. There’s nothing regarding voter suppression.
Weak, very weak.
the DOJ, the administration AND the Democrats have been sounding the alarm and suing over voter ID laws. Where have they been? where the hell is the left? You think this story just exploded over night? Dems have been pushing and pushing this story to become national news for a long time.
I’m sorry, I genuinely have to ask: when you say “where are the left,” who do you mean by “the left?” Brad Friedman comes to mind, if that’s a serious question, but there are a ton of others who’ve been sounding this alarm from the beginning as loud as they’ve been able. The question really isn’t “where is the left,” it’s “where’s the Dem leadership?”
“Where’s the left?” is yet another red herring.
I get this all the time over at the orange site, i.e. voters are supposed tackle and resolve corruption/bogus-ness in the democratic party, and the “leadership” organizations, ostensibly the DCCC and DNC.
HUH?? Sorry, I don’t have time/energy/money to UNbogus the massive bogus-ness at every turn.
The disconnect here (which almost everyone ignores) is that we have representational government– you know, we have a congress that is supposed to be doing certain things.. they have a JOB to do, correct?
INcorrect. Congress is not doing their job, that is why their approval rating hovers near a feeble ten percent.
Seriously, it is naive to think the DOJ just picked this up and haven’t been paying attention.
Uh, yeah, the Democrats have been doing nothing.
Kindly remind me what George Bush’s Attorney General was forced to resign.