That’s what Jerry Brown called climate change skeptics. Actually he was a little more precise in his remarks: he called them political lemmings whose “cult-like behavior…would take us over the cliff.”
Brown made his comments addressing a high level climate conference at California Academy of Sciences. Also in attendance were the last Republican governor of California, Arnold Schwartzeneggar and Schwarzenegger, and Virgin Group founder Richard Branson, the popular billionaire who has made climate issues a focus of his philanthropic activities. That the current Democratic Governor, Mr. Brown and Schwatzenegger would be on the same side when it comes to the threat climate change poses is hardly surprising. After all, California has experienced and is experiencing severe negative climate effects now, and all legitimate studies conducted by scientists (other than hack denialists funded by Big Oil) predict that the effects on our nation’s climate, people and economy will become more severe the longer we do nothing to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Brown said climate change has lengthened the state’s fire season and quickened its snowmelt, affecting agriculture and taxing public infrastructure.
He acknowledged Californians have been “squeezed” by the flagging economy, but he said investment is necessary to stem the effect of global warming. Brown is expected next year to propose a peripheral canal or other way to move water through or around the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
“It will cost money,” he said. “But if we don’t do that, and the levees collapse in one of these extreme events, we could run out of fresh water.”
Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/15/133268/calif-gov-brown-calls-doubters.html#ixzz1giCutNiU
If the world was governed by reason and logic former governors of Texas, Arizona and other states hard hit by severe droughts, wildfires, floods and other extreme weather events would join Brown and Schwartzenegger in seeking ways to mitigate the now unlikely unstoppable consequences of climate change. But, of course we don’t live in that world.
We live in a world where formerly relatively moderate Republicans like Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman, and even that crazed bomb thrower Newt Gingrinch, all of whom formerly agreed that climate change was one of the most important issues facing the world, have changed their tune. Of course, they are Republicans who rely heavily on money from the fossil fuel industries to support their presidential runs. As for Rick Perry, well no governor of Texas has attacked the science of climate change more than he has, despite the severe drought and worst wildfire years on record for his state. Texas politicians are owned by Big Oil to a far greater extent than the even US Congress, as Dick Durbin admitted, is owned by Wall Street.
Furthermore, the hard core Republican base has been convinced by a massive disinformation campaign, led in no small part by Fox News, to a degree I still find hard to believe, that man made global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy foisted upon us by Al Gore and money grubbing scientists. No GOP candidate for any office (outside the State of Maine perhaps) can embrace the reality of the danger posed by climate change without losing a majority of GOP voters to other Republican candidates who will toe the “party” line on this issue.
So yes, Brown is right to call these republican political figures “political lemmings.” And undoubtedly the fact that Schwartzenneger cannot run for the Presidency has a lot to do with the fact that he signed into law the most extensive environmental legislation regarding climate by any state in America.
But whether Republican politicians are acting out of political self interest or political necessity in promoting the lies and deceits of the climate change deniers is beside the point. Other than the few Progressives in Congress what has the Obama administration done to address this issue. Oh, admittedly they are not as bad as the Bush administration, but that isn’t saying much. After Obama failed in 2009 and 2010 to pass a climate change bill through Congress, his administration pushed this issue to the back burner, the one that has been turned off.
In some respects its hard to blame him, considering the reluctance of so many Democrats in the House and Senate to push hard for that legislation. Many ran scared, fearing a backlash in the 2010 elections, but that merely showed voters how lacking in their conviction and how weak Congressional Democrats really were. And of course, many conservadems (those inimitable Blue Dogs) simply wouldn’t pass anything that they believed might hurt their re-election chances, much less a climate change bill. Not that it helped them any when the mid-terms were held — they still lost.
It seems there are a lot of political lemmings running around these days when to comes to climate issues. What once used to be a somewhat bi-partisan issue, has now become the third rail in American politics, though in a negative way. We see that cutting social security and medicare are no longer sacrosanct (thanks most recently to Ron Wyden for reminding of us of that new reality), but outside California and perhaps a few other states, and certainly at the Federal level, no one seems willing to touch the hot potato (no pun intended) of Climate Change, other than to talk about it endlessly.
And that, my friends, makes lemmings of us all, willing or not.
The smart thing to do would to have pushed another bill, defeated by a larger margin, with even less practical effect, in 2011.
And therefore, push something practicable onto the back burner.
They’d have a lot easier time selling the public on taking immediate large-scale action to get off of fossil fuels if they’d start talking about peak oil in these sorts of high profile events.
Richard Branson himself was one of 5 major British industrialists who commissioned a peak oil report – flip a couple of pages in and you’ll see him right there with an urgent warning about it.
Yet here in the U.S. there’s no discussion about it and I get the sense most climate change activists aren’t really up to speed on the facts about oil. I think in bad economic times it’s easier to convince folks of taking action to help their pocketbook, and peak oil will help make that case in a way that’s harder to do with climate change.
What about CAFE standards and all the green energy investment from the ARRA?
What about opening up more off shore drilling?
American off-shore drilling is a rounding error.
You understand this when Republicans talk about gas prices, but you forget it when it’s convenient to do so.
If you want to move the goal posts on your statement, go right ahead.
And of course, many conservadems (those inimitable Blue Dogs) simply wouldn’t pass anything that they believed might hurt their re-election chances, much less a climate change bill. Not that it helped them any when the mid-terms were held — they still lost.
And who recruited a lot of those Blue Dogs? The President’s former CoS. The Democrats in DC have no one to blame but themselves. Why? Because they continue to recruit weasel-y Blue Dog types no matter what the district is like.
…because so many of those blue dogs represent blue districts.
Oh, wait, that’s completely the reverse of reality.
I go by the Cook PVI. And yes, I know that plenty of Blue Dogs, mostly former, represent blue districts. Take the odious John Barrow and Dan Lipinski for starters.
Obama has only put climate change on the back burner if you’re only paying attention to splashy legislative victories.
The carbon regs coming out of the EPA are a big deal.
The clean-air regs, which disproportionately target coal plants, are a big deal. These regulations have done a lot to hasten the decline of coal and the growth of natural gas plants.
The recent international protocol is a big deal.
CAFE and the ARRA green energy spending (which isn’t actually very efficient as short-term stimulus, but lays the groundwork for major long-term growth in the sector) is a big deal.
The renewable energy production tax credits are a big deal.
The recent $2 billion program to retrofit federal buildings are a big deal.
The military – always an early adopter of technologies, helping to push them into the widespread deployment phase – has been spending billions on alternative fuels and green energy.
The refusal to engage in the climate talks in Durban …
The efforts, years before Durban, to push for a similar accord in Copenhagen.
Neither of which amounts to a hill of beans compared to the multi-front war the EPA is waging on the coal industry.
I agree that these are all good things. But when you add them up, they’re unbelievably far from what we need to address climate change.
But here’s the worse news: they’re even farther from adding up to an effective response to peak oil. (Peak oil is less severe, in my opinion, of a problem than climate change, but it’s more immediate/short-term.) Renewable energy projects broadly speaking do nothing to help deal with peak oil because they don’t substitute for oil in the short term. (Deployment of electric vehicles, especially for personal use, is a multi-decade transition at best.)
What could the administration do about it? Well, I guess acknowledging the problem is a start. But I will admit that with Republicans blocking progress in congress the actions would mostly be via executive authority.
But when you add them up, they’re unbelievably far from what we need to address climate change.
“What we need to address climate change” will take decades. It’s absurd to try hold out as the standard, the accomplishment of everything we need to do to address climate change in a three-year period.
By any sensible measure, the whacks that Lisa Jackson is taking out of the coal industry are a monumental step, all by themselves. Coal-generated power has literally twice the carbon footprint of natural gas, and coal is right now out biggest source of commercial power. It might not be apparent to you what the EPA’s diverse set of actions adds up to, but it is rocking the power industry’s world. We’re going to see the American coal industry shrivel up and die over the next decade or so, because of this administration.
On the Death of the Climate Bill
Lisa Jackson has been drawing the noose ever-tighter. It’s coming from every direction. The Clean Water Act to restrict mountain top removal. Coal ash disposal. Mercury/Toxics. GHG regs.
Here are some awesome salty wingnut tears:
http://soitgoesinshreveport.blogspot.com/2011/07/obama-keeps-promise-to-bankrupt-coal.html
Right now – right now, at this moment! – it’s cheaper to generate commercial power from natural gas than from coal, and it’s just going to get worse for the coal industry.
Climate change isn’t on the back burner – he’s just going after it quietly.
And yet none of this will do anything about peak oil or oil depletion. Don’t get me wrong, addressing coal is important. But we’re talking about permanently declining global oil production in ~2-3 years. CAFE standards won’t cut it because they affect longer-term behavior. Shutting down coal plants does basically zero to address it as well. The main issue is that appropriate peak oil mitigations generally double as climate change responses whereas climate responses don’t always help with peak oil. We need to address both.
Anyway, I’m going to try to write something up at dkos tomorrow on why there’s a split between those who look at climate change and those who focus on energy (and peak oil) alone.
So what? It isn’t supposed to “do anything about peak oil.”
Sure. I guess my point is that nothing is being done about peak oil. That’s a huge, near-term energy problem that is basically being ignored…
Actually, the rise of natural gas – the flip side and a major driving force of the decline of coal – is part of the solution to peak oil, if we can get the transportation fleet to shift in a significant way to electric vehicles and CNG.
So many people overlook the great big issue lurking in the background.
Some people are concerned to leave a safe and healthy planet for future generations, though perhaps not at any great cost to themselves.
Others are perfectly OK with running the planet into the ground, so to speak, for the sake of very great gains to themselves.
Of the two groups, guess which the rich, selfish bastards driving the conservative surge in general and global warming denial in particular belong to.