Former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson has some advice for Mitt Romney. If you want to improve your standing with women (or Latinos or blacks) pretend to give a damn about them. Find some issue, like failing schools or black unemployment and start talking passionately about it. Show some humanity. Bring back some compassionate conservatism. Don’t act like a Tea Bagger.
This is not hopeless. A number of eventual presidents, including Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, emerged weakened from their nomination battles. And Romney is not a radical figure. During the heat of the primaries, he was accused of being a closet pragmatist. Now he can finally come out.
Once again with the Etch A Sketch.
The problem is that Romney has already amply demonstrated that he doesn’t give a damn about women or blacks or Latinos (unless he’s getting bad press for employing them to mow his lawn, for Pete’s sake). This is the Digital Age, and you don’t get any mulligans.
Romney has campaigned on destroying the health care coverage of millions of people by repealing the Affordable Care Act and replacing it with nothing. He’s supported the Ryan budget plan that would end Medicare as we know it and throw millions off Medicaid. He’s supported the Blunt Amendment that would prevent women from having contraceptive coverage. He supported an Ohio law that would have destroyed public sector unions. He took the toughest stand of any candidate against Latino immigration, going so far as to support the ridiculous unconstitutional Arizona Latino harassment law. He hasn’t said one thing that could be construed as caring about anything in the black community.
And nothing about his life up to now suggests that he cares about anyone but himself and people in his tax bracket. He made his fortune destroying ordinary folks’ lives. And he’s running for the opportunity to do that on a global scale. He can try to fake some compassion, but it’s too late for it to work.
THIS THIS
1000 times THIS!!!
Oh please oh please oh please can Paul Ryan make it on Romney’s ticket? PLEASE?
Not too worried about Mitt getting traction with the compassionate crew. In any case I can’t really hear him over the sound of Obama delivering smoking broadsides like “social darwinism” on his sorry hide.
Is Ryan really worse that the most likely alternatives? Honest question.
Worse politically? I couldn’t say. I can’t imagine he’s much better. But I think a public discussion of Ryan’s plan would draw the sharpest possible contrast between the two parties. And I’m tired of the teabagger worship. If he’s such hot shit, put him out there on the ticket. Sell America this plan you’re so proud of.
“Worse” would be MY Senator, Rand Paul.
Kentuckians have much to answer for. Rand Paul is the only Tea Party Senate candidate who was not rejected like a bad transplant.
Well, to be fair, he made it quite plain that he would never call Sandra Fluke, or presumably anyone else, either a slut or a prostitute. That’s a point in his favor, right? Surely his campaign team can work with that. And you have to admit, while he might have supported the Blunt Amendment, he didn’t actually vote for it. You could make a robocall out of that, right? “And the women of America can feel safe knowing that Mitt Romney didn’t vote for the Blunt Amendment…”
Man, I’m glad that isn’t my job.