I have no idea how they expect this to work:
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), an active Romney surrogate, put the budding relationship between senior Republican congressional leaders and their presumptive nominee’s campaign this way: “I don’t think it’ll be a big, wet, slobbery French kiss. But they’ll be holding hands from time to time.”
First of all, Rep. Chaffetz is anything but a “senior Republican congressional leader.” He’s a sophomore who was elected in 2008. He has a couple of nice appointments on the Judiciary and Budget committees, but he has no seniority. The only subcommittee he chairs is a backwater slot on the Government Oversight and Homeland Security Committee. He’s famous for three things: his father was once married to Michael Dukakis’s wife Kitty, he was the place-kicker for Brigham Young University, and he sleeps on a cot in his congressional office rather than getting an apartment in Washington DC.
But all of that speaks more about the author of this article than the point of the article. The point is that congressional leaders are looking to defer to the Romney campaign and do its bidding. But Republicans in Congress have no more clue what Romney stands for than Romney does. And why would Romney want to have anything to do with Congress?
A senior Romney official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the campaign will look to its GOP allies on the Hill to amplify its message in the Capitol and keep close tabs on the congressional agenda.
“We’re not going to be 100 percent linked up, but I do think as a general rule, we would like to see our friends up there as allies,” the official said. “I think ultimately, we are all in the same mindset here: We would like to defeat President Obama.”
Asked if Romney will keep his distance from congressional Republicans given Congress’s rock-bottom approval ratings, the official said: “What I would say is that there’s a time to work with folks up there, and there may be other times where we may pursue our own path.”
Let me put it this way. The Obama administration and every Democratic activist in the country is going to be spending twelve hours a day linking Romney to Cantor, Boehner, and McConnell, and twelve hours a day linking Romney to the governors of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Florida, Arizona, and elsewhere. If Romney wants to be close to them, I couldn’t be happier about that. And if he wants to get some separation from the Tea Party, he’s going to alienate his own base. He can ask John Boehner how easy it is to move to the middle in this environment.
Ever see someone throw a fish on a pier? That’s going to be Mitt Romney. Flip-flip-flopping and gasping for air. The only natural reaction to that is to take a long look at the suffering fish, and then throw it back.
I think you read that wrong. Surely Chaffetz knows the relationship between senior Republicans and the Romney campaign. It doesn’t say he is a senior Republican; it says he’s a Romney surrogate. But yeah, not the point.
how would he know?
That’s like saying that I know the relationship between Obama and Pelosi. I don’t have a clue.
I don’t know. I guess in this environment it’s hard to tell. After all, why would he lie unless he was exaggerated how well Romney, Boehner, Cantor, McConnell get along? Doesn’t make sense that he’d say it’d be lukewarm. Unless that’s what Romney wants people to perceive…but then he has a base problem. I guess with Romney, it’s harder to tell.
Or: kill it, gut it, clean it, and eat it. Grilled, with lemon and some grilled veggies and garnish.
Just sayin’.
Have you seen the RomneyFish? I’m not eating that.
Fair point. I hear its natural habitat has a lot of heavy metal contaminants.
Just wait untill Walker wins his recall–link all day!
Well, if there are enough simpletons in Wisconsin to keep the guy around, I suppose they get what they deserve. The fact that he’s in danger of being recalled at all is rather telling, though, if you ask me.
Last time I drove through Western Wisconsin 90% of the signs I saw were in favor of the recall. It appears that Walker’s defenders are a bit shy. Maybe they will still show up, hoping to “stick it” to the “welfare queens” and the “Mexicans” or whatever their current bogeyman is, but anyone who cares about whether Wisconsin avoids becoming Mississippi with frostbite should probably hope they don’t.
Union Thugs are very visible…
Yeah those damned middle school teachers sure are scary…if you’re a moron.
Well…middle school teachers earning 80K per year while producing students who live in Wisconsin who can’t find Wisconsin on a map is pretty scary.
Stop. $80k a year? In what universe do teachers earn $80k a year? Granted, in Virginia teachers can’t unionize, but in my county they START at $37k. They top out at $75k after 35 years. And that’s assuming they were in this district for those 35 years.
Seabe…don’t forget the benefits! Public workers crush private workers when you factor in benefits…in fact, if the Supreme Court doesn’t strike down Obamacare, I will have no choice but to pay my employees less, or charge my customers more…or go out of business (won’t be good for the unemployment rate)…which do you prefer?
You said $80k. They don’t make $80k. They don’t even get great benefits. I’m sorry that assholes in the private sector made pensions go byebye and that your class envy wants to strip away what little they have, but that’s not the issue. You said they bring home $80k. It’s not true. End of story.
I never said they “bring home” 80K… When you consider the costs of benefits, it costs the employer, i.e., the taxpayers, 80K to employ tenured teachers…and I’m sorry, as a rule students are not well educated.
No, it doesn’t. And you’re attempting to obfuscate the debate by bringing in oranges when we’re discussing apples. Simple bait and switch. If you ever talked about people in the private sector, and what they make, you’d never, ever, bring in their benefits and health insurance. You’d only mention their salaries. You only try to mention benefits here to make it seem like they’re living high on the docket. You were caught. You fail. Accept it.
Also, as a rule, students generally do better when they’re treated as equals without competition, and when they’re given equal opportunity…like in Finland. So, fail again.
How silly is this. These people don’t understand that their preferred policies will turn Wisconsin into Alabama. Educational outcomes will not improve with teachers at salary levels not much above the poverty line.
And next time do your research. Wisconsin’s educational system has been ranked top ten in the US for years.
They truly are social darwinists.
Ishmael… How can you possibly deny that our education system is broken? We spend more per pupil for poor results…this is why increasing productivity has not yielded higher wages…your pathetic Government school monopoly is the single biggest cause of the “vanishing Middle Class”!
Also, this is apt:
Who “gives” the rich money? Do you mean the customers who buy their goods or services? Or do you mean our almighty Government that allows them to keep what their customers “gave” them?
You’re a stereotypical right-wing asshole. And I know plenty of dumbasses just like you. Unfortunately.
Oh goody, maybe he can continue his losing streak and keep the state in the position of second worst economic growth in the nation after Alaska. Dude and his union busting have had huge negative economic on Wisconsin. WI was at or above regional economic and job growth before the Walker budget passed. Then we dropped off a cliff and we’ve been second to last nationally and dead last in our region, performing significantly below our neighbors. Walkers’s like a walking talking advertisement for how to destroy a state economy.
We’ll see if Wisconsin voters agree with your analysis…
Well, as a Wisconsin voter myself, I sure as hell agree with it. Also, not analysis so much as simple statement of the data. An analysis would talk about why Walker’s policies are failing. I’m just pointing out the numbers.
Walker’s as likely to win because of voter fatigue as any other factor. Some people I know have no love for Walker but are simply exhausted/disillusioned by the recall process, and believe that elections have consequences. I don’t know how widespread that belief is, but I suspect that there may be a fair number of “process voters” who will either vote for Walker or abstain, and that a victory by Walker therefore shouldn’t be considered some sort of mandate.
LFA hijacked this entire thread with a completely unrelated comment on Wisconsin.
Don’t feed the troll, people.
It’s not completely unrelated…Boo was the one who mentioned tying Romney to Evil Republican Governors…my point is–Go Ahead! They are more popular than you think!
Also, Geovv, I don’t need to “be fed”…if I can’t sleep, I’ll feed myself all night long!
Geov Parrish said.
He’s not so much a troll as a goblin with delusions of grandeur.
the fish imagery is hilarious and on point