When he was running for the office, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker made a promise to create 250,000 private sector jobs and 10,000 new businesses in his state by the end of his first term. He is not making good progress. So far, under his leadership, Wisconsin has added only 5,900 private sector jobs. The governor got off to a bad start. In his first year in office, Wisconsin was dead-last in the country in job creation. It was the only time in twenty years of record keeping that Wisconsin suffered that indignity. The federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) showed that Wisconsin was the only state in the nation to suffer statistically significant job losses between March 2011 and March 2012. That was in large part because the state shed nearly 18,000 public sector jobs.
The public sector has been under sustained attack since Walker took over the government. In addition to massive lay-offs and the revocation of collective bargaining rights, the workers who remain are spending an average of 3,000 additional dollars a year on their health care plans and have taken a collective pay-cut estimated at $700 million. Another nearly billion dollars has been taken out of the Wisconsin economy through cuts to state programs and projects.
Walker’s radicalism has done damage across the board. By outright rejecting $553 million in federal funds ($390 million for high-speed rail and $130 million for Medicaid), the governor destroyed an estimated 4,700 private-sector jobs. In explaining Wisconsin’s anemic jobs performance, Walker can’t point to a down economy or outside forces. His state has been the worst performer in the country, and he has no one to blame but himself.
In the normal course of things, you’d think major industrialists and capitalists would be profoundly disappointed in Governor Walker’s performance in office. He’s not making anyone money. Wisconsin isn’t a place they want to invest. There has been no explosion of new businesses opening up. But these aren’t normal times, and Walker isn’t being judged on normal factors. Consider the biggest donors to his recall effort:
Walker’s biggest donors include Sheldon Adelson, the casino magnate who kept Newt Gingrich afloat and fed $250,000 to the first-term governor; Rich DeVos, the Orlando Magic owner and Christian conservative founder of Amway, who also kicked in a quarter-million; and Texas home builder Bob Perry, known for bankrolling Republican causes ranging from Mitt Romney’s campaign to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who gave Walker $240,000. Foster Friess, who earned renown as Rick Santorum’s benefactor, gave $100,000. Americans for Prosperity, funded by the conservative Koch brothers, shelled out $700,000 to run TV ads in Wisconsin. ”We’re helping him, as we should. We’ve gotten pretty good at this over the years,” Koch told a reporter from the Palm Beach Post in February.
For these billionaire conservatives, funding Walker isn’t about creating jobs in Wisconsin. It’s part of an ideological battle to destroy unions and privatize everything that isn’t nailed down. Just by applying some downward pressure on wages, Walker is making his benefactors happy.
Meanwhile, a 12th person has been granted immunity in a case close enough to Scott Walker that he was allowed to create a legal defense fund.
In Wisconsin, they have a governor who has the worst job creation record in the country, who is funded by ideological billionaires, who is under active investigation for committing crimes when he was the County Commissioner of Milwaukee, and whose actions have been so radical and polarizing that he could become only the third governor in the nation’s history to be recalled from office. Yet, a Rasmussen poll out today says he’s going to win. And he might. He has a better than 20-to-1 cash advantage on his opponent, Tom Barrett.
What else is Ras going to say? They are a GOP outlet.
Other polls are close though I don’t know of any more recent than Marquette:
https:/law.marquette.edu/poll/2012/05/02/marquette-law-school-poll-shows-barrett-leads-falk-in-reca
ll-primary-walker-and-barrett-within-single-percentage-point
I’m nervous and am thinking of sending in a contribution to Barrett tomorrow. I don’t live in WI, but sheesh, those guys there have done it all for organizing against Walker and co-conspirators and I hate to see them (and us) lose this recall.
Democrats have handled the recall process about as poorly as one can here in 2012, short of settling on a candidate with a criminal history or something.
I’m sympathetic to the notion that since the recall momentum was at its peak two winters ago, the legally mandated year long waiting period to get down to business was a killer, but jesus.
First there were judicial elections, then one set of recall elections, then another set, then the Democratic primaries, next the governor recall, then the Republican primaries, and finally, finally the general election in November. That’s a lot of elections. There’s gotta be real burnout among the electorate. And as such, growing sympathy for Walker + deep polarization = 50/50 shot at Barrett winning. At best.
By the way, nice job on policing proprietary trading Dodd-Frank. Way to get down to brass tacks in a timely fashion.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/jpmorgan-discloses-significant-losses-in-trading-group/?hp
Great job Republicans in congress and the oh so vaunted SEC, way to make sure it isn’t possible for a firm to lose a couple billion dollars every now and then…
I <3 the free market.
And on this note, seeing Jamie Dimon eat crow is a wonderful sight. Thanks for sharing, I didn’t see that.
How could it be handled better if your criticism is the long set of elections? I suppose you’re arguing that they should have simply let Walker go once they didn’t flip the Senate? Or just focused on Walker rather than the other recalls?
They get a lot of signatures, but they haven’t shown much capacity to turn that into electoral inevitability. With a month to go, if the governor is still the favorite, that means they either underestimated their strength or failed to make a lasting case against him.
I hope the recall succeeds, but I won’t be surprised if Walker wins 51-49 in a not-quite-large-enough turnout election a month from now.
Part of the problem is that the Democrats didn’t have a strong candidate ready to go when they were circulating the recall petitions. Barrett is OK, but he’s a little dull, and he has already lost to Scott Walker once, and it wasn’t that close. I think people were hoping or even expecting that Russ Feingold or Herb Kohl would jump in, but they didn’t.
Herb Kohl? He’s 200 years old!!!
He’s old, but that would have helped him in the election. His campaign would have been that Walker divided the state, and Kohl would come in for two years and fix the mess, bring people together, and then retire. Since he wasn’t going to run for re-election, he would be running out of public spirit and not ambition.
It’s even worse than what. I live in Milwaukee, and there have already been three elections here so far this year. There were municipal elections in April, for which there was a primary in February. Yesterday was the primary for the recall, and next month, we vote for that. If Barrett wins, his current job as mayor, to which we just re-elected him last month, becomes vacant, and there will be a primary and a general for the special election to fill the vacancy. And there’s still a primary in August for the Senate seat and other offices on the November ballot. It’s crazy.
Of course it is. But are you going to let Walker trash Wisconsin for another 2 years?
“Yet, a Rasmussen poll out today says he’s going to win.”
Barrett’s been the Dem candidate for what — three days?
Barrett lost to Walker last time round 52/47.
But now Walker will run on his record. And his record is spectacularly putrid by any standard. I think Barrett’s got a chance.
He has a chance. But he needs dedicated help.
Part of Walker’s rationale for going after the public unions was to balance the budget after giving enormous tax breaks to businesses in the state. Of course those tax breaks were to result in tons of new jobs.
Meanwhile, across the border in Illinois, at roughly the same time, over Republican opposition, the legilature raised the corporate and personal tax rate. The gllom and doom forecasters were out there talking about how businesses would be leaving in droves. In fact, Wisconsin ran ads down here to draw businesses to that fair state.
Result, job growth in Illinois is way up and job growth in Wisconsin is virtually nil.