I see that Roll Call currently believes that the Democrats will pick up about eight seats in the House of Representatives, which is far short of the twenty-five they need to retake the House. I have not done my independent race-by-race analysis for this cycle yet, but my instincts tell me that they are a bit bearish on the Dems’ chances. The Republican Party is beginning to show multiple signs of internal stress. For example, one of Speaker Boehner’s closest friends, Rep. Steve LaTourette (R-OH), abruptly announced his retirement this week, citing a toxic environment for independent-minded thinking within the GOP caucus. In another example, Reps. Mary Bono Mack (R-CA) and Robert Dold (R-IL) confronted Eric Cantor on the House floor last night to complain about their vote on a bill that would in some circumstances force victims of rape and incest in the District of Columbia to carry their pregnancies to term even if the health of the mother is as risk.
Those events came on the heels of the harsh comments Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY) leveled at his party.
“If all people do is go down there [to DC] and join a team, and the team is invested in winning and you have something that looks very similar to the shirts and the skins, there’s not a lot of value there,” he told The Syracuse Post-Standard editorial board on Monday, according to the paper. He called his Democratic friends “much more congenial” than Republican ones.
He then went on to warn that House Republicans are becoming “incapable of governing” by habitually deferring to “extremes.”
It is not just a few backbenchers from swing districts who are upset. Sen. Linsey Graham of South Carolina is begging Mitt Romney to authorize the party members to strike a deal on revenues, in defiance of Grover Norquist. Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who is known as Doctor No for his willingness to obstruct procedure, recently attacked Norquist and his “tortured definition of tax purity” in the pages of the New York Times.
You don’t see any equivalent infighting on the Democratic side of the aisle. The Democrats seem to know what they want to do. The Republicans are struggling to come to a consensus on their mission. Rep. LaTourette explained it nicely in his retirement announcement:
[LaTourette] also singled out legislation he said used to sail through Congress “like a hot knife through butter”: the farm bill, a student loan rate extension and especially the transportation bill, which stalled in the House until a short-term extension was passed and used as the House position in a conference with the Senate.
“We’re talking about building roads and bridges for Christ’s sake. We’re not talking about big Democratic and Republican initiatives. … I think [it is] an embarrassment to the House of Representatives,” he railed. “But more than being an embarrassment to the House of Representatives, it was indicative of the fact that people are more interested in fighting with each other than they are in getting the no-brainers done and governing.”
At its root, the problem is that a sizable percentage of the GOP caucuses in Congress are opposed to so much of what the federal government does that those who want to actually legislate are being marginalized and ostracized. The GOP tends to walk in lockstep, but there is no consensus on where they’re going. On top of that, Mitt Romney isn’t helping. His campaign is totally opaque and utterly lacking in any kind of ideological leadership. It even seems likely that many Republicans would prefer that he lose rather than turn over control of the party to his Massachusetts-based team. In any case, I’m beginning to suspect that commentators like George Will and Charles Krauthammer feel that way, considering their willingness to blast Romney for, respectively, not releasing his tax returns and allowing his wife to enter a dressage horse in the Olympics.
With the weakness of Mitt Romney as a candidate and the lack of coherence and loyalty within the Republican caucuses, it may be a mistake to predict the outcome of congressional elections based on the 2008 results in those districts. It’s hard to say. The wheels definitely came off the GOP clown car in September and October of 2008. I think the wheels are starting to come off a little earlier this time around.
Can the GOP avoid terrifying swing-voters at their convention? Can Romney overcome his foot-in-mouth disease? Will outside money make all the difference?
I have said for a couple of years that this would not be a close election. I have believed for a long time that the American people would be more decisive this time, one way or the other, than they have been in recent times. I still believe that. And my gut tells me that the House of Representatives is in play.
I am extremely skeptical about any claim that a Democratic Rep. who won his or her 2010 race will lose in 2012, yet the author talks about endangered Democratic seats.
well, we do have redrawn districts. Plus, California has a whole new system of elections.
I am also optimistic about retaking the House. A lot will depend on how Dems run in tehir respective races. The old maxim is that politics are local, but in this case, a lot of the local issues are similar around the country.
In 2010 a lot of GOP seats were won from Dem seats for three reasons:
I don’t think 3 will be there this year. A lot of the GOP candidates can’t really run on the economy (much as they would like to) because if the Dem candidate has any smarts at all he/she will hammer the fact that the House has not passed any jobs legislation and has in fact voted down legislation that woudl create jobs.
And I think a lot of Dems will start running on what happened in 2008-2010, specially in regards to Obamacare, as its favorables have gone up.
We are seeing a lot more consistency from the Dem side as well in terms of unity of messaging.
And finally, Obama is right now focusing on defining Romney to prevent his ceiling from rising. He is only partially running against the “Do-nothing” GOP Congress. I expect this to change and I am willing to bet (figuratively of course) that you will see him at a lot of events with candidates for the House, even in states where he is comfortably ahead. A lot of Dems in 2010 tried to distance themselves from Obama. I don’t think that will happen this year.
There are reports that although he is still favored to win, that even Cantor is vulnerable. Just to have him considered vulnerable says something.
Mr. Willis & japa both make great points. In answer to OW’s question: Yes, the convention is going to terrify the Undecideds. Romney isn’t “leading” any wing of his Party, & won’t be able to prevent a veritable circus of Batshit Krazy. There will be more Freak Flags flying in Tampa than at a Pride parade, in San Francisco, on Free Ecstacy Day. Shariah boogeymen, Agenda 21, & blatant racism are catnip for the Base, but it’s gonna scare a lot of people who just want to hear about jobs.
“.. even Cantor is vulnerable. Just to have him considered vulnerable says something.”
Yes, yes it does.
these mofos VOTED TWICE for the Ryan Budget.
hell fuckin’ yes, we should be able to retake the House.
I have been saying here for a while that the Obama team has been aiming towards a landslide and that many decisions of the first term and their timing were due to this overarching goal. The reasons are obvious: the mess Obama inherited was never going to be cleaned up in a single term; a close election could and probably would be stolen; and eking out a Presidential win without one or both branches of Congress would make it difficult to do as much as is needed. This is the first time I can remember you saying, Booman, that you thought the House may be in play.
The Obama team’s goal was first to help nudge Romney towards the nomination and then, when it was clear he had it, to set out to destroy him and take down his party with him. Evidence of this can be seen in the way the Obama operation has been prosecuting the case against Romney and in the way they have stockpiled political weaponry to deploy at strategically advantageous moments. The latest example of this is the selection of Julian Castro as the keynote speaker at the Democratic Convention (this in addition to of Elizabeth Warren, Bill Clinton and Michelle). The announcement of Castro’s speech came in a video released by the convention organizers that featured Castro himself, and was first (and strategically) reported by Univision. The audience for the speech will be large and the afterlife of the speech will be equally large.
My prediction: Romney will reach a tipping point by October or sooner in which, like Bob Dole, he is cut loose by the party and even the billionaire’s club backing him. The race will then be a full scale effort to salvage the House and possibly the Senate. There will at first be a trickle of Republican defections, as we’re beginning to see now, but that will rapidly turn into a panicked rush for the exits. Romney is a toxically bad politician, he is hated within his own party, and he will increasingly be seen as a loser.
I see Harry Reid’s mischievous story about Romney not paying taxes for 10 years to be another tell. That Reid, a fellow Mormon, would take this step now is significant. Much of the Mormon community will eventually turn on Willard, not wanting his very toxicity to poison the position the Church has worked hard to achieve. Likewise even Wall Street and vulture capitalists will turn on him when his radioactivity threatens to take the whole traitorous lot of them down.
I wish I could be as optimistic. I think there’s a good chance we’ll take significant House seats. I’m not seeing us retake the House. Really hope I’m wrong.
Much of the problem is us. Too many Democrats have been like spoiled children when it comes to politics, demanding ideological perfection from Obama, imagining him to have limitless magical powers. Booman has done as much as anyone to set things straight. Unfortunately, this is an hole-in-the-wall tavern in an internet megalopolis. Plus the fact that we’ve been forming circular firing squads for the last 50 years is a lot to overcome.
I’ve long thought and argued that it is play and likely winnable, based on the fear of rightwingnuttery, and the focus on self-interest that this election is gonna produce in the coming months.
In the coming months, whether the product of the pres debates or by other means, the voting public is gonna clearly understand the bright line of demarcation between the two camps well illustrated today with this http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3812 that shows a repeat of the Bush tax cuts, leaving such gems as the Ryan plan as just another club to smite the 1% stooges with.
Haven’t done the math or checked with some of my associates who map this shit out (and are usually better than the paid professionals), but as of right now I’m not as optimistic. I think we could take it in 2014. Not now.
I’m enthused with the prospect of retaking the IN-9th seat because of a new candidate on the political scene here. She’s hitting every public event in the district – hard. I’ll be with her entourage tomorrow night to meet with local business leaders and wind up doing a meet and greet at the county fair. Watch this race – it is shaping up to be a good one.
yeah, I’ve been sending her $$ for a few months now. I first got interested because of her name. Yoder is one of about 12 common surnames for the conservative Amish. I figure that alone to be worth 45K votes in any state with an Amish Presence.
Not from the Amish, they don’t vote or run for office. The votes will come from those who respect the work ethic and absolute honesty of the religionists. Apples don’t fall far from the tree and all that.
Yeah, if you need a barn built around southern IN, they’re the folks to call.
Very impressive candidate.
I’ve never heard that phrase before. Is it East Coast slang?
Applies to pick uo basketball games. You knew who was on which side by whether they were wearing a shirt or not.
Thank You!
Not east coast slang. We did the same thing in the upper midwest.
In my day, we did pickup softball, not basketball.
We’re buried in snow half the year, indoor basketball is cheaper and easier than indoor softball.
That said, I think baseball is the greatest sport ever. 😉
I fear all will come unglued in a barrage of Koch Brothers TV ads closer to the election. The only way to counter that is a ground game based on volunteers talking to people in their own neighborhoods.
Obama will win because he is the incumbent and Romney is Romney. Sort of the inverse of the 1980 election. Twice as many Democratic Senate seats are up as Republican seats and a lot of them are in plains states and other GOP strongholds. The Illinois House delegation is projected to switch from 2/3 R to 2/3 D, largely based on redistricting, but more states redistricted with R maps.
I have no evidence but I am guessing LaTourette resigned because of personal skeletons or a vendetta against party leaders. It smells that way.
I think what I heard overall redistricting across the country has been basically a wash electorally with even a slight advantage to the Dems. In part because of IL’s gerrymandering and the CA public redistricting project.
FWIW, republicans are currently ahead in the generic ballot, 43-40:
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2012-national-house-race
This is not insurmountable, but we do need to improve this if we hope to take back the House.
Permalink bookmarked.
“The GOP tends to walk in lockstep, but there is no consensus on where they’re going.”
They’re not going anywhere. They’re totally reactive and reactionary. Even their “serious” initiatives are not serious, just window dressing fir the “base”.