Bask in the Glow

This election shouldn’t be close and it is. But tonight we got what we wanted and I think we all hope it was enough to close the deal. Everyone has been worried. I think we deserve a few hours to relax and breath a sigh of relief before we all get back to work dissecting Romney’s MANY lies and doing our GOTV and persuasion efforts. So, for tonight, let’s just enjoy our strong victory and do what any sensible person does in circumstances like this: listen to Curtis William DeVaughn.

I know you feel better now.

Well, I Had Fun

I enjoyed it when Mitt Romney asked the president if he was really totally seriously for-real trying to say that he called the Benghazi attacks “acts of terror” in the Rose Garden the day after they occurred. And Obama was like, “Proceed, Governor, proceed with your waddle into the threshing blades.” And then Candy Crowley was all like, “Nah-ah, Romney, he so did too call them terrorists.” And Romney was like “Wuh, wuh? Well, then, let me politicize those people’s deaths a little more just to make the president’s point that I’m offensive.” By which point, Romney had created another immortal moment in debate history.

Also fun was when Romney was asked about an assault weapons ban, and he was like “I am so not for that.” And then it was like, “but you did it in Massachusetts.” And Mitt was like, “Bipartisanship!” And Crowley was like, “Uh, so you’ll take a stand if you have the votes?” And Romney was like, “Erk-gulp…I think I just sharted.”

That was wicked cool.

Pre-Debate Emotions

I was happy to see some newly registered teenagers around here express actual excitement and anticipation for tonight’s debate. I can’t honestly say that I am experiencing the same set of emotions, but it’s refreshing to see youthful optimism and political engagement. Personally, I feel like the parent of an Olympic gymnast. After all the work that has been put into this election, I don’t know if Obama is going to stick the landing or fall off the beam. And he’s lost his margin for error. He cannot afford to flop tonight. We can’t afford it. We live in a very stupid country.

How are your nerves?

Update [2012-10-16 19:55:37 by CabinGirl]: Just so we’re all on the same page with the facts, here’s a link to Romney’s Tax Plan.

Getting the Crazy Out of the Philly Burbs

Here is why people in Philadelphia’s Sixth and Eighth suburban congressional districts need to vote out Jim Gerlach and Mike Fitzpatrick. They have acted in an inexcusable and reckless manner on the country’s budget, debt, and credit rating. Let’s review.

When Bill Clinton left office, the government was taking in more money than it was spending. Then George W. Bush passed big tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 promising that they would lead to economic growth sufficient to make up for the lost revenue. That never happened. Then Bush started deficit spending like a drunken sailor. In effect, Bush borrowed all the money he used to wage war in Afghanistan and Iraq. He borrowed all the money he used on No Child Left Behind. He borrowed all the money he used to create a prescription drug benefit for seniors, and he refused to negotiate with the pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices. He borrowed all the money he needed to create and operate the Department of Homeland Security. You can see the result in the following chart:

Of course, things really got bad in 2007 and 2008, as Bush’s economy came to resemble something the country hadn’t seen since Herbert Hoover was president in the 1930’s. He handed President Obama an economy that was shedding as many as 700,000 jobs a month.

To help put things in perspective, many of the costs that Bush put in place are permanent, or nearly so, while Obama’s deficit spending was temporary. For example, Obama’s stimulus is over now but Bush’s tax cuts have been in place during his whole first term. The Medicare Part D prescription drug program is still in place, we still can’t negotiate drug prices, and it is now more generous since ObamaCare started closing the donut hole. Millions of veteran’s are now owed lifetime benefits, and many of them will need expensive medical care. The Homeland Security Department isn’t going anywhere and will cost us hundreds of millions of dollars.

These are the reasons that the Republicans’ behavior during the debt ceiling crisis was totally hypocritical and, as Steve Benen put it, “the worst thing an American major party has done, at least in domestic politics, since the Civil War.”

Prior to the 2011 Debt Ceiling Crisis, Congress had raised the debt ceiling 68 times. Normally, it was routine, but sometimes the minority party used the occasion to score political points and accuse the majority of profligate spending. But at no point prior to 2011 had Congress seriously considered defaulting on America’s debts. Here’s a fuller version of Steve Benen’s reaction:

It was a move without parallel. The entirety of a party [the GOP] threatened to deliberately hurt the country unless their rivals paid a hefty ransom — in this case, debt reduction. It didn’t matter that Republicans were largely responsible for the debt in the first place, and it didn’t matter that Republicans routinely raised the debt ceiling dozens of times over the last several decades.

This wasn’t just another partisan dispute; it was a scandal for the ages. This one radical scheme helped lead to the first-ever downgrade of U.S. debt; it riled financial markets and generated widespread uncertainty about the stability of the American system; and it severely undermined American credibility on the global stage. Indeed, in many parts of the world, observers didn’t just lose respect for us, they were actually laughing at us.

It’s the kind of thing that should have scarred the Republican Party for a generation.

It was a totally unnecessary self-inflicted wound on our country. Standards & Poor downgraded our country’s credit rating and largely blamed the Republicans for weakening America’s institutions and bringing dysfunction to Washington DC.

The Obama administration wanted a clean vote on raising the debt ceiling, but when the House Republicans finally gave it to them, they poisoned the well. First, they used a procedural move requiring a two-thirds majority for passage. Then they accused the Democrats of refusing to address debt reduction even though the Democrats and the administration were willing to make significant concessions if the Republicans would do the same. But they wouldn’t make even one small symbolic concession. They demanded a 100% win for themselves, refusing even 10 dollars in cuts for every dollar in new revenue. When the clean vote was held, no Republicans voted for it. Jim Gerlach and Mike Fitzpatrick, just like every other Republican member of Congress, chose to trash our country’s credit rating rather than pay the bills for the debt they ran up.

I have already written about how Gerlach and Fitzpatrick co-sponsored a bill to completely defund Planned Parenthood and which originally sought to distinguish between forcible and ordinary rape. I wrote about how both Gerlach and Fitzpatrick voted to turn Medicare into an inadequate voucher system, slash Medicare with draconian cuts, and use the savings to line the pockets of rich people like Mitt Romney rather than to pay down the debt. But their willingness to hold our government hostage because they didn’t want to pay for the disaster they created is their worst sin of all. Gerlach and Fitzpatrick like to pass themselves off as moderates, but on all these critical issues they voted in lockstep with the most conservative members of the Republican Party. This is why I have called the modern GOP the worst American political party since the Civil War. Yes, I ultimately had to agree with Steve Benen about that. Plus, according to the Wall Street Journal, President Obama has presided over the slowest growth of federal spending in the last sixty years.

We need to replace Jim Gerlach with Manan Trivedi and Mike Fitzpatrick with Kathy Boockvar.

[The author is a consultant for Democracy for America]

Bring Back the Flip-Flop Attack

I think this is good advice for the president. He should be prepared for Mitt Romney to step to the mic tonight and shake his Etch a Sketch repeatedly. There seems to be almost price for him to move dramatically to the center, and the president needs to be prepared for it. Back in the spring, the campaign moved away from the flip-flop attack in favor of the plutocrat attack. It worked very well, but it came at a cost that he is paying now. If the flip-flop attack had been pursued, Romney would be afraid to change positions as it would reinforce people’s strongest negative impressions of him. But he has that freedom now because the flip-flop attack was dropped. Obama needs to use that attack preemptively if he can, and he needs to keep on it throughout the debate and in the hours and days following the debate.

Republican Debaters: Ignorant, Tough Or Dirty?

Maybe this is nothing.  But in case it’s something, I’m mentioning it now, so it’s on record before tonight’s debate.

Early in the first presidential debate, Barack Obama repeatedly stated that Mitt Romney had a plan to cut taxes by $5 trillion in the next decade.  Romney’s response (lie, actually) was that he didn’t have a $5 trillion tax cut plan, and that “Look, I’ve got five boys. I’m used to people saying something that’s not always true but just keep repeating it and ultimately hoping I’ll believe it. But that is not the case.”  If you think Romney was, in a not-too-roundabout way calling Obama “boy”, you aren’t wrong.

Early in the vice-presidential debate, Paul Ryan told a story to illustrate Mitt Romney’s great compassion.  It was a story about a family whose sons had been paralyzed in a car crash.  Romney showed up unannounced, bearing gifts, expressing sympathy and offering to defray expenses.  If you think Ryan shouldn’t have brought up devastating car crashes to an opponent whose young wife and infant daughter were killed in a car crash 40 years ago, you’re not alone.

These could be coincidences.  They could be accidents.  They could mean nothing.  They could merely be obtuse comments by a presidential candidate who’s ignorant of the history of using “boy” to demean African-American men, and a vice-presidential candidate who’s ignorant of an event that happened when he was two years old.

They also could be, in one or both cases, intentional debate tactics aimed at rattling Obama and Biden, attempting to throw them off-balance emotionally.

If so, depending on one’s view, they could be savvy, hardball tactics used by candidates who want to win a campaign; or they could be dirty, below-the-belt tactics used by candidates of a party that venerates Lee Atwater and Karl Rove as exemplars of great political operatives.  Heck, it doesn’t have to be either/or; it could be both/and.

Just something to watch for in tonight’s debate.

Crossposted at: http://masscommons.wordpress.com/

Ayn Rand Sez: Fake-Wash Some Dishes

I’m pretty sure that Ayn Rand’s first law of political action was to show up late to soup kitchens and fake-wash their clean dishes.
This shows compassion without any necessity to worry about getting lice.

“Had they asked for permission, it wouldn’t have been granted. … But I certainly wouldn’t have let him wash clean pans, and then take a picture.”

The Ryans were at this location for a mere 15 minutes. It was just enough time to don the aprons they brought with them and pretend to clean their kitchen. Of course, the charity’s bylaws precluded them from hosting political candidates or taking any partisan positions. The Ryans should never have come on the property in the first place.

This is what people who have contempt for the poor do when they try to show that they actually care.

The head of a northeast Ohio charity says that the Romney campaign last week “ramrodded their way” into the group’s Youngstown soup kitchen so that GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan could get his picture taken washing dishes in the dining hall.

Brian J. Antal, president of the Mahoning County St. Vincent De Paul Society, said that he was not contacted by the Romney campaign ahead of the Saturday morning visit by Ryan, who stopped by the soup kitchen after a town hall at Youngstown State University.

“We’re a faith-based organization; we are apolitical because the majority of our funding is from private donations,” Antal said in a phone interview Monday afternoon. “It’s strictly in our bylaws not to do it. They showed up there, and they did not have permission. They got one of the volunteers to open up the doors.”

He added: “The photo-op they did wasn’t even accurate. He did nothing. He just came in here to get his picture taken at the dining hall.”

I will leave you with some scripture that Paul Ryan should already be familiar with but apparently doesn’t care about.

“Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven. “Thus, when you give to the needy, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.” – Gospel According to Matthew, Chapter 6, Verses 1:4

According to Jesus, Paul Ryan is a hypocrite who will get no reward from his Father in Heaven.

Clinton On (Mis)handling Benghazi Security [Update]

Update [2012-10-17 04:30am EST by Oui]

President Barack Obama took responsibility and control over the issue last night and slammed apprentice Willard Romney on using dead Americans for political gain. A game changer and thanking CNN moderator Candy Crowley.

Decisive Moment in Debate on Terror Act in Libya

HEMPSTEAD, New York (Buzzfeed)— Barack Obama turned his administration’s worst foreign policy disaster into a dramatic victory in Tuesday’s debate when Mitt Romney sought to stretch the criticism of the Obama Administration’s handling of the incident.

    “The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people and the world that we are going to to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we’re going to hunt down those who committed this crime. And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with their families. And the suggestion that anyone on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That’s not what we do. That’s not what I do as president. That’s not what I do as commander-in-chief.”   h/t Mac G

Tweets on Romney’s “Binders full of women”

I was a lone voice at the pond warning the Democrats to get on the same page on the Benghazi Ansar al-Sharia raid or risk an election liability. Romney jumped the gun and got beaten back by Washington and the pundits. This should have given the Obama administration enough time to get their facts right. None of this happened. Five days after the Benghazi raid U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice vented an opinion that was flatly erroneous. More troubling are the statements made by VP Joe Biden in the debate with Paul Ryan. Biden’s remarks have become a target for easy bashing by Romney, fellow Republicans and the pundits. This sad series of events has given Mitt Romney an opportunity to advance himself on issue of foreign policy. Issue has gotten so much bad publicity for the Obama campaign, Hillary Clinton came forth with a mea culpa …

Clinton: I’m responsible for diplomats’ security

LIMA, Peru (CNN) – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried to douse a political firestorm over the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she’s responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.

“I take responsibility,” Clinton said during a visit to Peru. “I’m in charge of the State Department’s 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts. The president and the vice president wouldn’t be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals. They’re the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision.”

But she said an investigation now under way will ultimately determine what happened at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, where Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed on September 11. [Video]

“I take this very personally,” Clinton said. “So we’re going to get to the bottom of it, and then we’re going to do everything we can to work to prevent it from happening again, and then we’re going to work to bring whoever did this to us to justice.”

With criticism growing, Vice President Joe Biden said during last week’s vice presidential debate that the White House did not know of requests to enhance security at Benghazi, contradicting testimony by State Department employees that requests had been made and rejected.

More below the fold …
The US consulate in Benghazi was indefensible for such a violent raid as it was a temporary location without a secure perimeter. The official US embassy in Tripoli had no such weakness and would have been a safe place for Ambassador Stevens. It was the local security analysis that allowed him to travel to Benghazi on the 10th of September and stay for a few nights. Benghazi has a number of militias who were involved in a security arrangement with the national administration of Libya. However, the unrest had been increasing for several months and as a result the insecurity for all foreigners traveling or staying in Benghazi, the heart of the uprising and opposition to Gadhafi. Perhaps Ambassador Stevens felt secure because he was seen as a hero of the uprising and his support for the Libyan people. For elemnts loyal to the global jihad of Al-Qaeda he had become a target and prize fora n assassination as a reprisal for the US raid in Abbottabad and the succesful assassination of its top leadership by drones in Pakistan and Yemen.

Paul Ryan and his budget cuts on State Department funds for our diplomats and embassies world-wide. Contrary to this article, I do believe pressure on budget was part of Lamb’s decision how to provide security for the Benghazi mission. Another problem was the reluctance of the Libyan government to approve more foreign security forces within their sovereign territory. However as we have seen in the uncovered documents of the US mission in Benghazi, Libya was unable to provide adequate security. The bad choice for an joint British-Libyan private security corporation was an indication there was political pressure from Libya.

Another great worry is the revelation by Republicans during the Congressional hearing of a CIA footing within the Benghazi mission.

Electing Obama Saved Roe v. Wade

If John McCain had been elected president four years ago, the chances are very strong that Roe v. Wade would have already been overturned. How many women (or men) know that? In the last four years, two pro-choice Supreme Court Justices retired. They were replaced by two pro-choice Justices, which meant that the Court retained a 5-4 majority in favor of choice. If Romney wins the election, he will have at least four years to try to replace one of those five pro-choice Justices, and the chances are not bad that he will succeed. So, what would that mean? Here’s an article from 2008 that looked at the stakes back then. The situation wasn’t as dire in 2008 as it is now. That’s because the Republicans did incredibly well at the state level during the 2010 elections. But even in 2008, the best estimate was that 21 states would immediately ban abortion. Do your friends know about this? Would they care if they did know?