I don’t mind New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s advocacy for gun control, but no single human being should be able to throw hundreds of thousands of dollars into a congressional campaign regardless of whether they are doing it to fight the National Rifle Association or because they want closer relations with Israel or because they want less scrutiny of their casino empire. Mayor Bloomberg is supporting both Republicans and Democrats, but the problem isn’t who he supports. It’s that he is giving $2 million to a Democrat in Florida and $1 million to a Republican in Illinois and $3.3 million to oust a Democrat in California. He gave over one million dollars to Connecticut Republican Andrew Roraback, and they have never even spoken to each other. How does Bloomberg know that Roraback has the character to serve in Congress? From perusing his website? Who hands a million dollars to someone without even talking to them to make sure they aren’t going to be the next Eric Massa, Anthony Weiner, or John Edwards?
Overall, more than 80% of the dark money that was spent in this cycle went to support Republican candidates. So, I am just guessing that most Republicans are okay with a campaign finance system that so completely favors their side. But they can get a taste of this medicine in a few places from Bloomberg and his big government gun-confiscating socialism. How does it feel to have a billionaire swoop into your district and hand more than a million dollars to the Democrat? If we are going to fix our campaign finance laws, we are going to have to reach out to the Republicans who agree with us that democracy ought to be about equality and not about who can woo the most billionaires. You could even argue that the billionaires who floated Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum’s campaigns cost Mitt Romney dearly by delaying his ability to organize his campaign against Obama and forcing him to squander resources while getting bad-mouthed by fellow Republicans for months on end. Without the Citizens United ruling, Romney would have won the nomination in February. Of course, that’s because he’s a billionaire.
In any case, we have to get back to a system where no individual can contribute enough on their own to decide the outcome of an election. This current system is ridiculous. This year we saw whole presidential campaigns financed by basically one person. That’s as crazy as it can get. Right?
Agree current system is ridiculous, also frightening. OT, I know, but speaking of Bloomberg, I didn’t realize until I read a diary about it last night on kos that he had turned down Obama’s offer of FEMA help? and didn’t emphasize evacuation of at risk zones? what was that about?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/02/1154279/-As-a-New-Yorker-Bloomberg-has-failed-the-city-with
-Sandy-immensely
The gas shortage is making ppl crazy here.
There are eight of them. I counted. Or nine. One kept putting his hand up and down.
Look, their whole party is predicated on the premise that wealth equals virtue. Getting a tame billionaire to support you is like getting the ghosts of both Reuther brothers to endorse a Democrat.
I don’t understand your analogy at the end, but I agree with the first part. There are no Republicans who agree with this. The only reason they even tolerate democracy is because they haven’t figured out how to do away with it yet.
Mises.org — the home of Glibertarians — frequently talk about how to get rid of democracy. Peter Thiel has admitted it already:
“I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
By freedom he of course means, “God damn these people won’t vote the way I want, so obviously it’s not compatible.”
Hmm. I would have thought him too busy looking for a way to have a 4th term.
what is he going to do after this term is over? look for another big city to mess up?