In another stunning legislative maneuver, Michigan Republicans passed a bill last night (attached as an amendment to an appropriations measure) that provides Michigan grocery store clerks may refuse to accept Food Stamps (under the Federal Government’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance program or SNAP as it is more commonly known) for payment of qualifying purchases if they have “moral objections” or believe that accepting food stamps as payment for food is a “matter of conscience.” Furthermore, the clerks may not be fired by or otherwise penalized by their employers for refusing to accept food stamps or other means of federal food assistance such as EBT cards. The Obama administration has refused to make an announcement regarding the legislation until Governor Snyder signs the Bill into law, which he is expected to do later today. However, several activist organization have indicated they intend to file lawsuits to overturn the legislation.
A separate bill expected to come to a vote today proposes to remove charitable status from shelters and soup kitchens that provide meals to the homeless, as well as local food banks. Sponsors of the bill say they believe they have the necessary votes needed to pass the legislation before adjournment.
State Senator Rob D. Poor defended the measure this morning at 4:00 a.m. when contacted at his suite at the East Lansing Marriott Residence Inn. “Listen,” he said, “hard working people should not be required to subsidize lazy, unemployed bums with their tax dollars just because the Federal Government is currently headed by a dedicated Marxist determined to turn this country into a socialist hellhole.” He went on to add that “if people refuse to work they shouldn’t expect the rest of us to feed them or their kids with our money. Where I come from I call that extortion.”
When questioned if this wasn’t a hardship for the many unemployed and economically stressed individuals in Michigan unable to find work or those who have jobs that don’t pay enough to cover food, health care and other necessary expenses, he claimed all that would be resolved by the recent Right to Work law passed by the lame duck Republican controlled legislature. “Our state will soon be flooded with new jobs, so I don’t really see that as an issue. Anyone who wants to work will be able to find a job, assuming they are willing to work hard and accept the going wage for their labor.”
When questioned about the Congressional Research Service statistics that show “right to work” states have a significant decline in workers’ income, and that other studies demonstrate right to work laws have provided no statistically significant increase in job creation, he dismissed the question by saying, “There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. Why should I accept the word of some lazy communist bureaucrats in Washington or pointy-headed professors at secular liberal colleges. I know for a fact that once we eliminate the power of unions in this state, which hold back the economic engine of free markets, we will experience a surge in economic growth like Michigan has never before seen in its history.”
What should families on food stamps do in the meantime if supermarkets, grocery stores and store clerks refuse to accept their food stamps, he was asked. “Most of these folks have refrigerators, don’t they, along with their Cadillacs, 50 inch HDTV’s, smartphones and video game players,” he responded. “Well, they can sell some of that crap for real American money and buy their food the old fashioned way. Better yet let them suck ice cubes. Most of them are fat slobs anyway, and could afford to lose some weight. Last I heard ice cubes are a great diet food. Now watch me drink this martini! Shaken not stirred!”
Yes, it’s satire. For now.
But brilliant satire, Steven. The conscience clause for accepting food stamps sounds exactly like something these fantasists would come up with. Even when it got to the end, Rep. Poor’s statements were implausible less because he said them, and more because he said them to a reporter.
This Rep. Rob D. Poor seems like kind of an asshole.
The first part isn’t totally satire, and plenty of liberals and Democrats already espouse such views when they try and nanny-state the poors by demanding to control what they buy and where they can spend THEIR food stamp money. Putting the benefits on debit cards and then blocking the purchase of certain items happens all the time, and it’s bullshit.
This whole post fooled me. Given what has happened in Michigan this week, I totally bought it.
Me too. Its entirely believable.
I bought it till “Rob D. Poor” — “Hmmm….” I thought, “that’s an awfully appropriate name for…. Waitaminnit!”
So I think we can accurately predict that this will be part of the GOP state-level agenda within two years.
Over the past 15 years every time someone has attempted satire of the GOP through exaggeration the satire has turned true within 2 years. Remember the Onion article before GWB’s first inaugeration about “Our long national nightmare of peace and propserity is finally over” and how he planned an economic crisis and a couple of wars.
Then there were the pretend articles about the GOP openly supporting torture – then trying to kill Social Security – then trying to ban birth control. All satire – all became true.
There is literally no extreme position that the GOP won’t take given a little time.
Yeah, I was believing StevenD through most of the first paragraph, not just because of the horrendous, radical actions of this lame duck in Michigan, but because conservatives are completely willing to do things which are not in their self-interest when it feeds their emotional ideology. It would make no sense for grocery stores to refuse paying customers regardless of how the customer got the money, yet…
An episode of the radio program This American Life dealt with decisions being made about public services in Colorado Springs. Republicans on the City Council recently supported a tax which would support basic services. The people were warned that if the tax was rejected, a comprehensive set of extremely basic services would cease, including the extinguishing of streetlights throughout town. The tax was rejected. Off went the lights, and a lot of other things.
One of the Republican City Councilmembers told a story at the end of the report. She described talking to a citizen who recited with pride that be had responded to a jerry-rigged plan which allowed him to contribute $300 so that the streetlights could be turned back on in his neighborhood.
The Councilmember responded, “The tax the people rejected would only have cost you $200, and for that you could have had your streetlights, maintenance of your parks and roads, and everything else the City provides for you and everyone else.”
Briskly and testily, the constituent said “I will never, NEVER, vote to raise taxes.”
Well, there you go.
I think Steven has grasped the essence of the world I am being forced to accept as normal. As I say to my rightie acquaintentces, “have a nice day”. 😉
These are the people that Obama wants to negotiate with and bring into the cabinet.