There are plenty of people on the left who, reluctantly or otherwise, supported Rand Paul’s 13-hour “filibuster” of John Brennan’s confirmation as CIA director. Did he bring an important subject to the attention of the American people? I suppose he did, although he did it in about the stupidest way imaginable. The incident was actually less interesting for what it taught us about drones than what it taught us about the current state of the Republican Party.
Last year, Ron Paul didn’t do very well in his effort to win the Republican nomination for the presidency, but his ground game was better than the candidate. A lot of delegates at the Republican National Convention were Paulistas. Ron Paul and his son Rand are clearly insane, but they are also implacable opponents of the neo-conservatives who are now represented most strongly in Washington by the John McCain-Lindsey Graham-Kelly Ayotte troika. McCain and Graham had dinner with Obama the night of Rand’s blabfest, and they went to the floor of the Senate the next morning to ridicule Rand and defend the president. The thing is, they don’t have as much company as you would think. After all, even Minority Leader Mitch McConnell briefly joined Rand Paul’s filibuster. And there is Newt Gingrich:
“What I find sad about Sen. McCain’s recent comments both to Ted Cruz, when Ted Cruz was frankly raising legitimate questions [about Benghazi] and with Rand Paul, is, you know, when I first knew John McCain in the House — he was a maverick. In the Senate, for years, he was a maverick,” Gingrich said Thursday on Fox News.
He continued: “Of everybody I know in the Senate, I didn’t know anybody who had a better record of bucking the leadership, doing what he thought mattered, marching to his own drummer. And I think that it’s unfortunate. But I think frankly it doesn’t hurt Ted Cruz and it doesn’t hurt Rand Paul — it hurts John McCain. The country is moving on, we’re in a new era, people know that these are legitimate questions.”
Gingrich was reacting not only to McCain’s comments on the Senate floor and during a recent hearing, but to his conversation with Jon Ward of the Huffington Post, in which he referred to Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mi) as “wacko birds.”
Another sign that the militant wing of the Republican Party is in decline is that the Sequester has gone into effect despite the deep defense cuts it contains. If Obama miscalculated about anything, it was in not realizing how ascendent the Paulistas would be after the 2012 election. The Sequester was designed to be a fool-proof deterrent, but it didn’t turn out that way. It didn’t turn out that way because defense hawks like John McCain have gone from being the dominant force in American politics during the Bush years, to being lonely voices that are dismissed by Newt Gingrich as irrelevant relics of the past.
And looked at from 3000 miles away, it also seems that the Paulistas offer the Republicans a way out of their current cul de sac. There are a lot of Democrats who could live with the Paulistas’ concerns about military over-reaach, the war on drugs, and state surveillance of just about everything. If the Democrats aren’t careful, they could find themselves outflanked from the left on those issues. Time for Obama to have a re-think on the MIC and the war on drugs.
No one here in Portland is upset that Wyden voted against Brennan. And our man Earl Blumenauer is pushing to legalize pot at the federal level.
OH yes!!!
A new “new coalition” is beginning to form here in the U.S.
Watch.
2016 is going to be very interesting.
Watch that as well.
Watch.
AG
You fell for the “mavericky” McCain act when every time push came to shove John McCain folded?
Thanks to “maverick” McCain we have military commissions (trials) in which the CIA assumes the power to invade attorney-client privilege and interrupt the media coverage of the testimony without the judge’s consent. Nice due process there, John.
Only on McCain-Feingold was McCain allowed to be mavericky because the GOP knew they had the Supreme Court wired.
I would echo Frank Schnittger’s advice for the Democrats. Sanders-Paul (the bill that got an audit of the Fed’s handling of the financial crisis) could be the type of working alliance in Congress that splits both parties on financial shenanigans, civil liberties, and military overreach. Already some firebaggers are warning about not getting to close to the black helicopter aficionados.
I fell?
Didn’t think so.
It was Gingrich who claims he fell for the act. Sorry. I misread that.
After all of the death, destruction, and wasted treasure people like McCain have left in their wake, I find it difficult to care thatc “the militant wing of the Republican party is in decline.”
I think Rand Paul is, generally, an idiot. But I sure like it when he makes a stink over civil liberties, drones, and our stupid wars.
If the erosion of civil liberties, the use of drones and other assassination techniques, and our continuing stupid wars are the true roots of our problems…which I wholeheartedly believe…then why do you think that he’s an idiot?
Because the media…including Booman…told you so?
Lord!!! What fools these mortals be!!!
Yours truly…
Puck
have you ever heard the saying “a stopped clock is right twice a day”.
That’s how I see Rand Paul. Overall, an idiot. But he’s right about one or two things, just like his old man.
It’s kind of like saying someone is right about marijuana legalization because, even though they don’t support legalization for pot, they support it for hemp.
Or, like being right about Pakistan harboring the terrorists who planned 9/11, but invading Iraq instead.
Or being correct that the winner of the NHL finals wins a trophy but thinking it is called the Livingstone Cup.
Rand Paul isn’t even right in this instance. He just seems like he might be right.
I am sorry, Booman, but I have come to the conclusion that your partisanship is totally blindered. I don”t know why and I do not really care any more top tell you the truth. It could be just the way you are built or it could have more…practical…reasons.
Either way…stay happy, Bubba.
At least you’re not a Republican.
Right?
AG
Yeah, I have blinders on and you don’t. Give me a break.
I am sorry, Booman, but I have come to the conclusion that your partisanship is totally blindered.
Wow. BooMan, you going to be ok?
Big hugs.
Long term?
2016?
I fear not.
So it goes.
AG
He and his father are not even right on these issues, Brendan. It’s not enough to come to the right conclusion; how you got there — no matter what Glenn Greenwald thinks — matters.
When one doesn’t have a strong analytical framework, it is very tempting to buy into that popular “third position” refrain that “we need to look beyond the false left-right paradigm” (a claim that, in my experience, virtually always comes from someone who turns out to be some kind of (crypto-)fascist) and assume that similar superficial positions are what matters, and not the radically different underlying principles.
See Steve M. for evidence of this:
http://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2013/03/since-republicans-are-so-progressive-now.html
Well, civil liberties for people who are white and preferably Christian. If you want to build a mosque on your own property in New York City, well, your civil liberties don’t count according to Rand Paul.
I began a comment on this post. It grew. Now a stand-alone article.
Out Of The Mouths Of Babes In The Woods
WTFU.
AG
Now that I find myself on the wrong side of the sequester, I wish we had gone over the fiscal cliff. That way everyone could be eating from the same bowl of dicks that I am.
Thinking that Ron Paul is your friend because of this filibuster is like thinking that the Tea Party is your friend because of “Keep the Government’s Hands Off My Medicare!”
Wow, hey, look at that! They’re against cuts to entitlement benefits, too, just like me!
I was wrong about Republicans folding on Defense spending. OTOH, it seems these cuts are falling mostly on military operations and civil servants, so the contracts continue so R’s are OK with the cuts. Try to cancel F-35? That’s another story.