I like this piece from Jim Wright which I came to through Jay Ackroyd. It’s a worthy rant, and it’s on a topic I keep coming back to over and over. Fear.
Fear and its role in politics is the key that unlocks the puzzle and best explains the last hundred years of American politics. Hell, it undoubtedly goes back further than that, but we can’t learn as much from history that bears little resemblance to today.
We had the Palmer Raids and the Red Scare and the Great Depression and the rise of fascism and Pearl Harbor and the Holocaust and the Atomic Bomb and McCarthyism and the Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam. We almost blew up the world. We came very, very close to blowing up the world. And the reason we almost blew up the world was because we were so damn afraid.
Fear is why some professor from Texas feels compelled to ask us to risk a nuclear exchange in Korea and can get it published in the New York Times. “Oh, maybe bombing North Korea might cause a war between North and South Korea, but it’s worth the risk. Maybe China might react the same way they did they last time we occupied North Korea and go to war with us, but they probably won’t.” Why would we risk this? Why would we imperil so many people, including, potentially, all of mankind? The answer is fear. It’s the nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror that Franklin Roosevelt warned us about in his first inaugural address. It’s why Congress won’t allow the president to close down the disastrous prison in Guantanamo Bay. It’s what led Dick Cheney, once he emerged from his underground bunker on 9/11, to adopt the one-percent doctrine.
“If there’s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It’s not about our analysis … It’s about our response.”
It’s actually about fear. Terror. It’s about people who wet their pants when they are scared.
And let’s be frank. Fear is just more of a factor in the conservative mind than it is in the liberal mind. Liberals often choose to live in violent urban environments among people of different races and religions who speak different languages. They know how to handle the unknown and the unfamiliar. They know how to live with and manage fear.
But it’s more than that. The Republican Party has lived off fear since at least the 1930’s. Fear of communism. Fear of crime. Fear that someone might be getting something for nothing. Fear that people are having the wrong kind of sex. Fear of the Ayatollah or Gaddafi or Noriega or Saddam or al-Qaeda. Fear of death panels. Fear of ACORN. Fear that there’s a War on Christmas.
You know, some of these fears are or were rational. No one wants Soviet nuclear missiles parked 90 miles off our shore. But you have to be able to manage your fear. Fear causes people to make mistakes. If JFK had listened to his advisors, we’d all be dead. Or, if you are like me, you would have never been born. But JFK knew how to manage his fear and find another way.
There will always be scaredy-cats. Some people are just wired that way. But we don’t have to have a political party that lives and thrives on stoking those fears. What is Fox News, anyway, if it not just a magnified Two Minutes Hate?
Here is what you have to fear. Here are your enemies. Here’s who is undermining your religion. Here’s who is stealing your elections. Here’s who is disrespecting you. Here’s who is trying to kill you. All day long, seven days a week, 365 days a year, the oilless Wurlitzer grinds on, stoking the fear. It doesn’t merely take advantage of people’s stupidity; it weaponizes their stupidity. It turns their gullibility into fear. It takes their fears and converts them into terrors. It makes them worse people. It makes them more miserable people. It makes them want to strike back and out at their enemies, who are mostly imaginary. This is what the conservative movement does in order to get political power. It drives us all toward conflict and war.
The centrality of this problem in my thinking is one of the reasons why my focus is so heavily on keeping Republicans out of power. There are thousands of other political things I care about, but it’s this malicious consciousness that corrodes and distorts our country and that imperils mankind that I am committed to oppose.
This is also why I am still committed to nuclear disarmament and anti-proliferation efforts. It’s very important that we achieve a de-nuclearized Korean peninsula. But we don’t have to start a war in order to prevent one. I don’t like to be threatened any more than you do, but I’m not going to risk getting hundreds of millions of people killed or even tens of thousands of innocent Koreans killed, just because I cannot manage my fear.
Have you read The Shock Doctrine? Fear is an instrument of control, just like greed and pride.
There is a report that the mountains between North Korea and China might contain as much as $6 Trillion in minerals, the most valuable being rare earth minerals used in electronics and other modern materials. Right now China is the technological leader in electronic fabrication because they have their own supplies of rare earth materials. No doubt for some “policy analysts” there is more than fear involved.
And there is good old patriotic pride. An entire segment of conservatives considers the Korean War unfinished, in the same sense of lack of unconditional surrender that they felt over the First Gulf War.
It’s a feedback loop within a closely related family of kneejerks: fear –> greed –> aggression –> and round and round it goes.
This one should be set aside for the Booman anthology you’ll self-publish 20 years from now. Absolutely one of the best things you’ve written.
this wasn’t a response to Steve M., but it could have been.
I don’t particularly care about the respectability of the professor in Austin. All I know about him is his argument for bombing the North Korean missile site and his cavalier attitude about the potential consequences of such an action.
I also am not predicting that we about to follow this professor’s advice, nor am I making predictions about what the Republicans will publicly ask the president to do in this case.
I am saying that this professor is a bedwetter who is willing to risk the lives of people he doesn’t know because he doesn’t like feeling scared. And that instinct is at the root of a national pathology that has plagued us since at least the beginning of the Cold War.
It’s an incredibly powerful and dangerous instinct that fuels the Republican Party in every aspect, from the most silly and mundane to the most lethal and destructive.
It must be identified and combated everywhere it threatens to mutate into senseless war.
FDR had it right. If only we on the Dem side could use that against the GOP terrorists.
A big part of overcoming fear is increasing you empathy for others. Walking a mile in their shoes, etc., so you see how life is from the other person’s perspective. By doing so you make the other person less “other” and therefore less scary.
Conservatives really struggle with empathy. Much like young children, they’re not very good with it. But we all need them to grow up now.
That struggle with empathy is not limited to conservatives. In those to the left of conservatives, it often shows up as silent indifference or echoing conservative themes. Yes, North Korea’s leaders are easy to satirize–and satire seems to be the progressive response to most politics–but often that satire comes out of unexamined assumptions about the situation that are the detritus of conservative fearmongering.
It also shows up in accepting bad ideas to prevent worse ones.
Fear is the most useless of emotions. Its responses are limited to fight and flight (well actually fight, flight, and freeze) and yet it created human history. It is the Great Womb that spews out its offspring, hate and greed, without end. Philosophers, religious leaders and even politicians have pushed empathy, kindness, forbearance and so forth for millennia with very little to show for it. But fear creates tribes, nations, oligarchies, wars, genocides, slavery and most of the other evils that pollute our planet.
Fear, especially in this country, is strangely selective. Fear of total destruction by a ruined climate system is easily trumped by fear of a hit to corporate profits. Fear of the consequences that arise from a grossly unjust society are drowned in the fear that somebody will buy a bag of potato chips with food stamps. Fear of war loses to fear that some country somewhere will challenge the validity of capitalist dogma.
Unfortunately the uses of fear are no Republican monopoly. Truman and JFK were no better than Eisenhower and Nixon when it came to wielding the “communist menace” card for political advantage. Democrats today are barely less culpable than Reps in leveraging deficit panic in service of their own tepid visions. Booman, in this very piece, is using fear to try and keep Dems in power (rationally, in this case).
We went to the moon and the planets, we have devices that pretty much match the magicks imagined by ancient dreamers, and yet we seem helpless against the equally ancient prods of fear and its progeny. I think the old curse is about to bring our species to a quick end. Perhaps one day some other species will find our remains in the rubble and wonder, “Did he who made the Hubble make thee?”
I think the worst of it is that we have so much potential too.
Well, blame evolution. We evolved with fear, and fear is common to most animals though perhaps you would describe it differently. Fight/Flight/Freeze is extremely useful in the wild.
Boo, this is an outstanding essay. Thank you.
Thank you, Geov.
You’ve actually said very eloquently what I’ve been saying for many years about (the mostly Republican driven) US foreign and defense policy in general. I put it down to a somewhat childish black and white, self and other, good and evil, dichotomous view of life drawn largely form christian dualistic theologies. Unfortunately life is more complex and comes in many shades of grey – including yourself and your own interests.
I also have a theory that the Germans who stayed in Germany learned the bitter lessons of racial hatred, internal spying and world war, whilst those who emigrated to the US before the war didn’t.
It also comes, to a degree from the extreme individualism of the US view of society. At a selfish level, it may well make sense for me to carry a gun to improve my personal safety and to enable me to intimidate those I want to intimidate. It makes a lot less sense when almost everybody carries a gun, and some have bigger guns than mine (or are more expert or more willing to use them).
The problem with N. Korea is that it has such a comic book caricature of a leader, that it maybe one of those very few cases where a simple black and white analysis seems plausible. However I wonder what are the real politics behind the power struggle currently taking place there. The problem is we know so little of what is really going on.
Fear has been a part of the American psyche ever since we stole the natives’ land and enslaved Africans, and felt like we had to look over our shoulders all the time because the dark people would retaliate and steal everything back.
Our so-called sacred right to private property is based on that very fear. It’s not about fearing that the government will just take your property–it’s about fearing that the government will take your shit and give it back to black people or natives or whomever freaks us out the most at the moment.
It’s what the fear of communism was based on. It’s what the fear of an economically strong Japan was (or that of China is) based on. It’s what the fear of “reparations” is based on–and therefore of Obama and healthcare and higher tax rates and all the rest.
There is a uniquely American brand of fear that is the only thing that’s sustained this country ever since Day One in Jamestown: the thief’s fear of losing what he stole.
Ah, Jim Wright of Stonekettle Station — had you never encountered him before, Boo? You really must spend some time wandering through his stuff; he’s magnificent.
You might start with his take on the great gun debate, for example. Linkie to part 6, which begins with links to the preceding five parts:
http://www.stonekettle.com/2013/02/bang-bang-crazy-part-6.html
Or just start with the most recent entry and keep working back.
This post seems to have even more meaning today.