As George W. Bush prepares to open his 9/11-themed presidential library tomorrow, we should all pause to realize that the hell he unleashed on Iraq has not abated.
BAGHDAD — In what appeared to be a new phase in an intensifying conflict that has raised fears of greater bloodshed and a wider sectarian war, Iraqi soldiers opened fire from helicopters on Sunni gunmen hiding in a northern village on Wednesday, officials said.
The air attack was among clashes throughout the country between forces of the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government and Sunni gunmen that left at least 27 people dead and dozens wounded. The Sunni tribesmen were continuing a fight that began on Tuesday after the Iraqi Army stormed a Sunni protest encampment in the village of Hawija, leaving dozens dead and injured.
Several others were killed on Wednesday in explosions, including the detonation of a car bomb at a public market in the evening in a Shiite neighborhood north of Baghdad, and a roadside bomb attack on an army patrol in Tikrit, also in the north.
The deadliest battles occurred near Hawija and Sulaiman Pek, northern towns near Kirkuk, and battles were still raging in the early evening. In Hawija, the army shut off electricity, and troops shouted through loudspeakers, urging civilians to evacuate, witnesses said. Government helicopters also fired at Sunni gunmen on the ground in Sulaiman Pek.
Iraq was a miserable place before we invaded and, all criticisms of the sanctions regime aside, I still blame Saddam Hussein for most his country’s suffering. But pre-invasion Iraq was a paradise compared to what the people there experience today. The body count of Bush’s folly is like those billboards that calculate the growing national debt in real time. If we collected all the blood that has been spilled since Bush said “Fuck Saddam, we’re taking him out,” we could fill the 14,000-square-foot museum to the sky lights.
Remember this tidbit from Ron Suskind’s 2006 book, The One Percent Doctrine?
[George] Tenet and his loyalists also settle a few scores with the White House here. The book’s opening anecdote tells of an unnamed CIA briefer who flew to Bush’s Texas ranch during the scary summer of 2001, amid a flurry of reports of a pending al-Qaeda attack, to call the president’s attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.” Bush reportedly heard the briefer out and replied: “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.”
Almost 3,000 Americans lost their lives because Bush didn’t take that briefing (and many prior briefings) seriously enough. But he has made his library into a 9/11 museum annex that is supposed to excuse his decisions to use the 9/11 attacks to ram home the Patriot Act, terrorize the American people with color-coded terror charts and talk of duct tape and plastic sheeting and survival supplies. It’s supposed to excuse his decision to use 9/11 as a pretext to invade Iraq while leaving Afghanistan to the wolves. It’s supposed to excuse his decision to open the prison that cannot be closed in Guantanamo Bay and to make torture an official Justice Department-endorsed policy of the United States. It’s supposed to excuse the complete lack of post-war planning for the occupation of Iraq.
The only thing Bush ever touched that didn’t turn to shit is his wife.
I particularly enjoyed this:
In the “Decision Points” theatre, also the name of Bush’s 2010 memoir, guests can explore the behind-the-scenes thinking that drove Bush during the invasion of Iraq, the run-up to the surge, Hurricane Katrina and the financial crisis. Former White House chiefs of staff explain the options, and visitors pick from one of three choices. Then Bush appears on video to explain why he did what he did.
“Some of the problems President Bush faced were unexpected … Other problems were looming on the horizon before he entered office,” a sign says. “In each case, President Bush led by defining a vision, articulating principles, listening to others, weighing different options, and making decisions.”
The Comedy Channel or Saturday Night Live could have a field day parodying that display.
I’m glad he and his patrons did this. I really am. They’re so shameless about their countless crimes against humanity that I have zero doubt the entire “library” can be entered into evidence for the prosecution if Bush ever faces trial in The Hague.
I know I’m a dreamer. But I’m not the only one…
Seems an awfully big building just to hold one copy of “My Pet Goat.”
Win.
Pedantic note: the book is actually called The Pet Goat. And the White House stenog – er, press corps being what it was and is, nobody ever reported whether Bush understood all of the words.
MISS HIM YET????????????????????????????????????
Seriously though, it sounds like he’s gonna make his library as mendacious and dishonest as his administration was. I guess it’s only fitting. I also love that he still thinks he’s Truman, and that people will grow to see how awesome he was over time. Good fucking luck with that, Bush.
He remains the figurehead of the Republican party. And until Republicans come to terms with him, honestly, they will never be able to come to terms with the country.
Disagree. I think they’d be better off continuing to pretend that he didn’t exist.
Apparently, rather than do that, J-Rube is getting the gang together to rehash the “At least he kept us safe” lines. That’s even worse than coming to terms with his failures…
Starlee Kine’s Kid Politics on an elementary school class field trip to the Reagan Library and what she experienced as a kid at the Nixon Library reveals that they function as propaganda for the next generations. Better these rogues, half-wits, and murderous thugs be swept into the dustbin of history than erect shrines to their crimes.
I’m just wondering something. Will there be this big a media circle-jerk in 10 years when the Obama Presidential Library opens in Chicago or Hawaii?
No! Wired for Republicans etc.
True.
I remember when Clinton’s library opened, it rained. The media just cackled with delight over his bad luck.
No stone was left unturned – they even savaged the building’s interior and exterior’s architecture, slamming it as a “trailer park”.
but not as horrible as Obama.
Sure puts the LIE in LIEbrary.
It’s a library, isn’t it. Where is the book?
The one book we know he read.
Since every president back to Herbert Hoover has a library, 43 has a new distinction: Worst president with a library. Bush’s rivals for the title of worst president ever all predate Hoover.
I liken the Bush library to the Creation Museum. A building where people who are detached from reality can go to get validation for a lot of things that never happened and reinforce all the imaginary things they believe in.
Well, donnah, I hit POST and then found out you had the same idea I did. Beat me to the punch!
Great minds think alike, Mike. And we’re both from Ohio, sooo….;-)
Must be something in this Miami River valley water. 😉
I seem to remember that was a common idea among Bush defenders. That somehow a decision made “on principle” was automatically imbued with a degree of credibility and virtuosity. But a cursory examination of history shows that it is rife with all kinds of horrific decisions made “on principle”.
This kind of argument always puzzled me, because it seemed so obviously nonsensical. And while it sounds like making decisions “on principle” is an admirable trait, it totally ignores the fact that sometimes a person’s principles are just plainly wrong. It is pretty much an axiom that decisions should be made, firstly, based on evidence. And when the evidence contradicts ones principles, then maybe it’s time one rethinks their views.
Reading the Politico story, my mind kept coming back to another well known place which proffers the same kind of revisionism, factual cherry picking and outright mischaracterization of history. And that place would be The Creation Museum. The Bush Library sounds to me like the political equivalent of The Creation Museum. Somehow, that seems like a fitting analogy for the worst American President in modern times.
On CNN this morning W said the library is not supposed to defend his presidency. It is supposed to show what it is like to be president.
On that I have to agree. There is no defending him presidency. And his museum shows that is is a really tough job demanding perhaps the greatest leadership skills on the planet.
He is a perfect example of how overmatched an under achieving, over privileged, self styled good ol boy, with no talent for picking talent to surround him, who values loyalty and principles more than actual thinking, evidence and accountability is for the job of leader of the free world.
But about 20% of America will always hold this as a shrine to his “courage” and the rest of America and the world will hold it as exhibit A for his idiocy and war crimes trial.
That twenty-something percent who conflate pigheadedness with courage seems to equate to the percentage of self identified Tea Partiers in the Republican Party.
Coincidence??? I think not.
how bad a President was George W. Bush?
In response to him, the country elected a Black man as President.
When I say this, I never ever take away the remarkable candidate that was Barack Obama.
But, I’ve been Black in America longer than 3 days, and Black folks don’t get opportunities like this, when times are good.
I thought we elected an intelligent man (despite reactions to his race) because george was obviously not a thinking man.
This “library” is already a national joke.
“how bad a President was George W. Bush?”
When Gerarld Ford died during his presidency, the country when through weeks of idolization and nostalgia. For Gerald Ford.
That bad.
So President Obama laid it on thick for W and the rest of the Former Presidents Club at the dedication of the Al Gore Memorial Library.
Wonder if, for W, vanity outweighed shredding?