The president’s remarks on the situation in Egypt are interesting, and not only for his unorthodox rendering of President Morsi’s name. The most striking element is the expression of “deep concern” about the military’s action. It’s not like Gen. Abdul-Fattah el-Sisi hasn’t been in close consultation with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey.
Statement by President Barack Obama on Egypt
As I have said since the Egyptian Revolution, the United States supports a set of core principles, including opposition to violence, protection of universal human rights, and reform that meets the legitimate aspirations of the people. The United States does not support particular individuals or political parties, but we are committed to the democratic process and respect for the rule of law. Since the current unrest in Egypt began, we have called on all parties to work together to address the legitimate grievances of the Egyptian people, in accordance with the democratic process, and without recourse to violence or the use of force.
The United States is monitoring the very fluid situation in Egypt, and we believe that ultimately the future of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people. Nevertheless, we are deeply concerned by the decision of the Egyptian Armed Forces to remove President Morsy and suspend the Egyptian constitution. I now call on the Egyptian military to move quickly and responsibly to return full authority back to a democratically elected civilian government as soon as possible through an inclusive and transparent process, and to avoid any arbitrary arrests of President Morsy and his supporters. Given today’s developments, I have also directed the relevant departments and agencies to review the implications under U.S. law for our assistance to the Government of Egypt.
The United States continues to believe firmly that the best foundation for lasting stability in Egypt is a democratic political order with participation from all sides and all political parties —secular and religious, civilian and military. During this uncertain period, we expect the military to ensure that the rights of all Egyptian men and women are protected, including the right to peaceful assembly, due process, and free and fair trials in civilian courts. Moreover, the goal of any political process should be a government that respects the rights of all people, majority and minority; that institutionalizes the checks and balances upon which democracy depends; and that places the interests of the people above party or faction. The voices of all those who have protested peacefully must be heard – including those who welcomed today’s developments, and those who have supported President Morsy. In the interim, I urge all sides to avoid violence and come together to ensure the lasting restoration of Egypt’s democracy.
No transition to democracy comes without difficulty, but in the end it must stay true to the will of the people. An honest, capable and representative government is what ordinary Egyptians seek and what they deserve. The longstanding partnership between the United States and Egypt is based on shared interests and values, and we will continue to work with the Egyptian people to ensure that Egypt’s transition to democracy succeeds.
There is a quiet rebuke of President Morsi in there: “the goal of any political process should be a government that respects the rights of all people, majority and minority; that institutionalizes the checks and balances upon which democracy depends; and that places the interests of the people above party or faction.”
I can’t say that the U.S. is behind this coup, but it almost definitely welcomes it. Apparently, it just doesn’t want to admit it.
The impetus for the coup were the nationwide protests. They deserve the most credit.
That being said, Obama lost some goodwill (not his fault from a diplomatic pov) from being identified as pro-Morsi or reluctant to criticize him long after Morsi lost legitimacy with the Egyptian secular and liberal public. Add to that statements and actions from our Ambassador in Cairo that infuriated many.
Add to that statements and actions from our Ambassador in Cairo that infuriated many.
What are those?
Visiting with Brotherhood officials and saying that the protesters needed to respect the democratic process. This sounds good to our ears but not necessarily good to those who considered Morsi to have lost legitimacy.
Be that as it may, I sense Obama has done a great job behind the scenes, being clear with the Egyptian military as to how much leeway it has before American aid comes into question. He all but said so in his statement. He’s warning them quite clearly.
I’m asking because I genuinely want to know and not because I’m trying to make a rhetorical point: would open criticism from President Obama have helped matters at all? Or would that have given the appearance that the United States was interfering in Egyptian political affairs and riled things up even more?
It’s a good question and I’m not sure there’s a good answer. Ted Cruz had an op-ed on foreignpolicy.org criticizing the President for not challenging Morsi or something along those lines. I think we can all agree that he is an opportunist whose foreign policy views are suspect.
My own opinion is that we should probably avoid meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign countries so I can’t really fault Obama for straddling the fence. It easy for us to criticize when we’re not the ones making decisions.
My sense of US policy in the revolution against Mubarak and again in this situation is that it leverages the long military-to-military relationship of the officer corps to counsel an apolitical but stabilizing role for the SCAF. That seems to be the way that Sisi is playing it for now.
The main concern in the Twitterverse is that the SCAF has to preserve order without forcing the Moslem Brotherhood underground. There has to be a role in the process for the Moslem Brotherhood, but they cannot be allowed to run away with the process like they did in the last round.
Juan Cole compares Morsy to Michelle Bachmann. I find that a bit harsh but true in the respects of being religio-ideological motivated and politically clueless about overreaching. Morsy cannot be said to know how to boil a frog.
The long term fate of democracy in Egypt is probably in as good hands now as it was a week ago. Governmental authority may have passed from Morsi to the Generals, but legitimacy still seems to rest with the people.
Everyone expects this process to be bloodless and civil. Yet, as we celebrate the Fourth tomorrow, let’s remember the Newburgh Mutiny, Shays’s Rebellion, the failures of the Articles government, the contentious arguments over the Constitution that nearly led to more civil unrest, the nastiness of politics from 1794-1816 and things like the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Democracy does not birth easily into the world. It takes time, failure and patience.
Don’t get trapped in the breathlessness of the 24 hour news cycle and the instantaneousness of the Internet.
Brilliant comment.
.
Millions showed their will with peaceful demonstrations, the police and armed forces no longer took dictates from dictator Morsi. Morsi and the MB minority rewrote the Constitution, suspended or fired judges, appointed his cronies in newsrooms and governorships, decided to support sending Egyptians to fight a foreign war in Syria on behalve of Islamic fundamentalist monarchies of rich Arab Gulf states, did not protect free press nor women’s rights, did nothing to compromise with other parties of the first revolution and those who supported his election as President of Egypt.
In the first round of the presidential election, Morsi got a bare 5.8 million votes!
On the petition for his removal, 22 million Egyptians signed that paper!
A LEGITIMATE OVERTHROW BY THE PEOPLE!!
Let this be a wise lesson for other leaders in the region who follow the deslusional path of Erdogan’s Muslim Brotherhood in Turkey. Of course the Obama administration was opposed as are many here on BooMan’s blog. Assad is not surprised and praises the overthrow of Morsi. The backers of foreign intervantion to overthrow Assad by military means arenot happy today. Just a show of colors. I do hope the many decades of US training and bribes have given the Egyptian generals sufficient moral fibers to do what is best for the Egyptian people and nation.
I’m just as elated as the Egyptians are throughout their nation with cheers and fireworks. I have trust and hope in the people’s movement towards a true democracy, not one hijacked by religious fanatics.
Let’s not worry about the refusal by US Congress to fund 1.5bn for Egypt’s military, that money was a bribe to keep the peace treaty with Israel anyway.
What is the status there? The last I heard, they were going to go through with destroying the park anyway.
A people’s coup? Or The Egyptian Revolution 2.0?
KSA might be sweating a bit over this after the success of the counter-revolution. And has lost a key backer in taking down Assad and in the longer run, remaking Iran.
.
Amazing how one day after Morsi’s defeat, so few say they were friends!
WINNER
Solely the People of Egypt, well done!
LOSERS
Morsi, his cronies placed in high governing positions and the extreme Muslim Brotherhood.
QATAR – gave full political support and funds to the MB in Egypt
TURKEY – Erdogan was thrilled Morsi would follow his leadership to change a secular state to a theocracy. Perhaps the women in Turkey can loosen their veils now.
STATES
UAE – the MB is outlawed and just sentenced 8 men in absentia to 15 year jail terms.
SAUDI ARABIA – the Salafist party which gave full support to Morsi in the 2nd round of the election were sidelined in the political proces, is not forgotten by King Abdullah.
ISRAEL – will just adjust to whomever grabs power in Egypt, appears to have a good relationship with Egypt’s intelligence and military for cooperation in the Sinai and border with Gaza.
USA – Obama is a constitutionalist, so he must bide some time to come to terms with the changed state d’affairs in Egypt’s capital Cairo. Prefers to listen to people in power as the distance to main street grows every year. Perhaps Michelle could offer some wisdom.
In addition, Obama can give Judge Adly Mansour a call, head of the Supreme Constitutional Court and the new interim president of Egypt. [Opinion elections 2012]
Al-Ahram – Egypt’s new interim president: Judge Adly Mansour
.
Egypt’s “Revocouption” and the future of Democracy on the Nile
In fact, there certainly was a popular revolutionary element to the events, with literally millions of protesters coming out on Sunday and after, in the biggest demonstrations in Egyptian history. You can’t dismiss that as merely a coup d’etat from on top by a handful of officers.
Read on …
Studiously avoiding taking sides is the smart play here. This only ends without the streets running red if all three sides – the military hierarchy, the MB, and the opposition – are able to work with each other.
God knows what the hell it means.
He’s happy with the Egyptian army playing the role Ataturk assigned the Turkish army, and all the liberals of the world cheered when the current Islamist in charge beat the shit out of the Turkish generals?
As to those Turkish generals, a lot of folks may yet wish they were still around.
A lot of Turks, if not many liberals.