With some initial polling showing Arkansas incumbent Senator Mark Pryor comfortably ahead in his reelection race, I guess it is time to take a very preliminary look at the 2014 Senate outlook. It’s a bad year for the Democrats both because they have to defend more seats and because they are defending several in red states while having two opportunities (New Jersey and Maine) to pick up seats in blue states.
Currently, there are 52 Democrats plus two independents (Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Angus King of Maine) who caucus with the Democrats, and there are 46 Republicans. Because the vice-president breaks ties in the Senate, the Republicans need 51 seats (a net gain of five) to win control of the chamber. However, there will be a special election this fall in New Jersey in which the Democrats (most likely, Newark Mayor Cory Booker) are highly favored. So, it’s most likely a net gain of six seats that the Republicans will need to wrest control of the upper chamber from Harry Reid.
To do an analysis, it’s best to start with the easiest calls. Which seats are unlikely to change hands in terms of party control?
SAFE
Alabama- Sen. Jeff Sessions (R) is a sub-mental racist, but he won last time with 63% of the vote and no one has yet emerged to challenge him. I see no signs that he is even remotely vulnerable.
Colorado- Sen. Mark Udall (D) won his freshman contest with only 53% of the vote, but the Dems are ascendant in Colorado and no strong contenders have emerged to challenge him.
Delaware- Sen. Chris Coons (D) took over Joe Biden’s seat and has acquitted himself very well. His committee assignments on Appropriations, Budget, Foreign Relations, and Judiciary speak for themselves. He’s a man on the rise.
Hawai’i (special election, Class III)- Governor Neil Abercrombie disregarded Sen. Daniel Inouye’s dying wish that he be replaced by Rep. Colleen Hanabusa and appointed his Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz instead. Rep. Hanabusa is going to challenge Sen. Schatz in a primary, and she may well win. But, either way, the seat is unlikely to fall into the Republicans’ hands.
Idaho- Sen. Jim Risch (R) has one of the most conservative voting records in Congress, but the Idaho voters like it that way. He doesn’t have much clout in the Senate and doesn’t have any plum committee assignments. He tends to stay out of the headlines, but that also means that he doesn’t arouse much opposition. Plus, the Democrats have no bench.
Illinois- Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D) will serve as long as he wants to serve. The real question is whether or not he would be able to beat Chuck Schumer in any effort to replace Harry Reid as Majority Leader.
Kansas- Pat Roberts (R) is another fairly anonymous senator, but with positions on the Finance and Rules committees, it’s clear that the Republican leadership values his contributions. He won his last race with 60% of the vote, and he really has little to worry about except his age (he’ll be 78 on Election Day in 2014). I suppose a primary challenger could emerge but the seat is solidly red.
Massachusetts- Sen. Ed Markey just won this seat in a special election, and he’ll hold it.
Minnesota- It may seem strange to say it considering that Sen. Al Franken (D) only won this seat with 42% of the vote, and after a lengthy recount, but Sen. Franken has done nothing to endanger his reelection and he currently faces no serious opposition.
Mississippi- Thad Cochran (R) has been in the Senate since 1979, and he can stay as long as he wants. If he retires, which he might, it’s unlikely but not impossible that the Democrats could pry the seat away. First, they’d need a candidate.
New Hampshire- Popular ex-governor Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D) seems established in the seat and currently faces no serious opposition.
New Mexico- Sen. Tom Udall (D) looks totally unbeatable and New Mexico, with its massive Latino population, is trending strongly against the Republicans.
Oklahoma- Sen. Jim Inhofe (R) will turn 80 a few days after the November 2014 elections, so retirement is a real possibility. But Oklahoma could be the reddest state in the country right now. Unless someone from the Boren family runs on the Democratic side, this seat seems safe for the GOP.
Oregon- Sen. Jeff Merkley won a tight race in 2008, but he’s established himself nicely in the Senate with slots on Appropriations, Banking, Budget, and Environment. Oregon voters are pleased.
Rhode Island- With the pending retirement of Carl Levin (D) of Michigan, Sen. Jack Reed (D) is poised to become the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and one of the most powerful members of Congress. The former paratrooper and strong liberal is not going anywhere.
Tennessee- Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) gave up a position in the leadership to have more freedom of action. It seems to me like he isn’t enjoying his time in the Senate too much lately, but I haven’t heard any retirement rumors. He can have six more years if he wants them, but I’m not confident that he does. On the other hand, Tennessee has been trending strongly red in recents years and a Democrat will struggle to win even an open seat there.
Texas- Sen. John Cornyn (R) has risen to the number two slot in the Republican Senate leadership and serves as Minority Whip. On the other hand, he only won a mediocre 55% of the vote in 2008, and demographics are beginning to catch up to the Republicans in Texas. Still, until a well-financed opponent emerges, I am keeping this in the safe category.
Virginia- Sen. Mark Warner (D) could be the safest Democrat in the country. But that’s a testament to his personal popularity, not his purple state. I doubt any serious Republican will waste their time challenging him. But does he want to serve another term in the gridlocked Senate?
Wyoming- Sen. Mike Enzi (R) is a low-profile conservative workhorse who is facing an unexpected primary challenge from Liz Cheney. If it gets bloody enough, I suppose a strong Democrat could win here. Alan Simpson predicted that this could happen. I am not so sure.
Now let’s talk about seats that could more plausibly change hands.
COMPETITIVE
Alaska- Sen. Mark Begich (D) won election with 48% against a scandal-plauged Ted Stevens. On paper, he’s one of the most vulnerable members of the Senate. But Alaskans value seniority more than the people of any state except maybe Hawai’i. As you might expect, the Democrats sought to protect Begich with a seat on Appropriations, and it’s a strategy that is likely to work. He hasn’t attracted a strong opponent, as of yet, although Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, who has formed an exploratory committee, would provide a challenge.
Arkansas- Sen. Mark Pryor (D), as I mentioned at the top, is looking good in early polling against Rep. Tom Cotton. But this is an increasingly red state that is hostile to the Obama administration, and Cotton is considered a top pick-up. This is a prime opportunity for the Republicans.
Georgia- Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R) is retiring and the Republican primary field to replace him is a frightening assemblage of wingnuts and mouth-breathers that is so extreme that they could easily produce a nominee too radical to beat the Democrats’ candidate, Michelle Nunn. Ms. Nunn is the daughter of popular ex-Sen. Sam Nunn, who is most famous for working with Dick Lugar on Soviet nuclear disarmament issues. Herman Cain aside, Ms. Nunn can count on the near-universal support of black Georgians, so she doesn’t have to cut too deeply into the white vote to win. This could be an even better pick-up opportunity than Kentucky.
Iowa- Sen. Tom Harkin (D) is retiring, unfortunately, but the Democrats have lined up Rep. Bruce Braley (D) as his replacement. So far, the Republicans have produced no one formidable to contest him, but that could change. This modestly blue state keeps comfortably reelecting Chuck Grassley and has a Republican governor, so I can’t call this a safe retention for the Dems. But it’s looks good.
Kentucky- This is the big one. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is polling terribly in his home state and he has a nasty primary challenge. Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes (D) is a serious threat. Don’t believe me? Watch this:
Now you are convinced. This is the Democrats’ best pick up opportunity right now.
Louisiana- In 2008, Mary Landrieu (D) somehow managed to win election in a post-Katrina presidential-year election. How can you bet against her? But no Democrat can be confident of winning a state-wide election in Louisiana anymore. Rep. Bill Cassidy (R) has a real shot here.
Maine- Maine voters like moderates and independents, and Sen. Susan Collins (R) fits the bill. She thumped (61%-39%) a very qualified Rep. Tom Allen (D) in the 2008 election, even as Obama was easily carrying her state. Yet, her colleague Sen. Olympia Snowe grew weary of Republican bullying and partisan gridlock and retired. Could Sen. Collins feel similarly? It won’t be easy to beat Collins if she runs, but it is a blue state.
Michigan- Sen. Carl Levin (D) is retiring and the nomination will probably go to Rep. Gary Peters, who should be heavily favored to retain the seat for the Democrats. But, it’s early, and Rep. Dave Camp is considering getting in the race, which could make it competitive.
Montana- Powerful Finance chairman Sen. Max Baucus (D) is retiring. So far, no strong candidates have emerged on either side. Montana is a red state that likes to elect Democrats to state-wide office. How can we know how it will shake out until we have some candidates to look at? On paper, this is a prime pick-up opportunity for the Republicans.
Nebraska- This is a similar situation to Montana. Sen. Mike Johanns (R) is sick of the Senate after only one term. His retirement creates an open seat, but it’s a red state that is more reluctant than Montana to consider Democrats. Former State Treasurer Shane Osborn (R) is running and should be considered the early favorite to retain this seat for the Republicans.
New Jersey- This seat is currently held by the Republicans, but the Democrats are favored to win it back this November. Most likely the next senator from New Jersey will be Newark mayor Cory Booker, although Reps. Frank Pallone and Rush Holt are strong candidates who are running for the nomination. If the Dems don’t own this seat after the November 2014 elections, we’re going to have bigger problems.
North Carolina- The Tarheel State is experiencing a Republican revolution at the moment, but that doesn’t mean it is popular. Sen. Kay Hagan (D) won election in 2008 with 53% of the vote. She’s low-key, which is good because she doesn’t create enemies. Her position on the Banking Committee is important to Charlotte and her position on the Armed Services Committee helps her with the big military population. So far, she faces only a fringe Tea Party challenger. But we can’t call her safe, yet.
South Carolina- Ah, yes, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R). He just got a major headache when Nancy Mace announced that she would challenge him in a primary. Ms. Mace is the first-ever female graduate of The Citadel. Sen. Graham arouses a lot of controversy in Republican circles and a large percentage of South Carolina Republicans think he is not conservative enough. His push for immigration reform is a big vulnerability. I am confident that this primary will be so bruising that Graham will not be able to count on many of Mace’s voters in the general election. A strong Democratic candidate could conceivably defeat a wounded Graham.
South Carolina (Special, Class III)- When Sen. Jim DeMint retired unexpectedly to head the Heritage Foundation, Gov. Nikki Haley tapped Rep. Tim Scott as his temporary replacement. Sen. Scott is currently the only black member of the Senate, but his politics are strictly Tea Party. Who can divine the inner workings of the Republicans’ mind in South Carolina. How many white conservatives will vote against Scott because he’s black? How many moderate conservatives will vote against him because he’s crazy? The Democrats have two tough, but doable, races to challenge in the Palmetto State. They just need candidates.
South Dakota- Sen. Tim Johnson (D) is retiring and Governor Mike Rounds (R) is going to take his seat. Any other outcome will shock me. Still, Rick Weiland is running and he deserves support. This is the Republicans best pick-up opportunity.
West Virginia- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D) is retiring and Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R) is running for his seat. She is the heavy favorite at the moment, but West Virginians haven’t had a Republican senator in memory. They almost never elect Republicans to statewide office. Still, the state is very conservative and the Democrats haven’t recruited anyone.
BOTTOM LINE
Here’s how I call them, with party control changes bolded:
LEAN DEM: Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina
LEAN GOP: Maine, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Carolina (Class III), South Dakota, West Virginia
TOSS-UP: Kentucky, Georgia, Montana
What does this mean? It means that the Democrats will pick up one seat (New Jersey) and lose two seats (South Dakota and West Virginia), with Kentucky, Georgia, and Montana too close to call.
We should go into election night with a 55-45 advantage (having picked up the New Jersey seat). Quite likely, we will end the night with a 53-47 advantage, having retained New Jersey but lost South Dakota and West Virginia. If the GOP adds Montana, we will be down to 52-48. If we save Montana and win either (but not both) Kentucky and Georgia, we will be where we are now (54-46). If we hold Montana and win both Kentucky and Georgia then we’ll be where we started (55-45).
To have a great night, we need to figure out a way to steal a seat in Maine, Nebraska, South Carolina (two available) or Nebraska.
In any case, somewhere between 52-48 and 55-45 is what I expect, although things could turn either way to make the margins bigger.
I’ve got Georgia on my mind. That is a nice combination of factors for a state (similar to NC) that has been infiltrated by damned yankees and others of azure hue, migrating in order to work in Atlanta.
The perpetual illusion about the Sunbelt. Yankees as many or more racist Republicans as they do Democrats of any stripe. And the moderate Republicans very quickly “go native”.
I’m talking about migration. And yeah, I was dumb to leave out migrating hispanics, but for better or worse, I sometimes leave out the most obvious facts in comments in order to focus on other interesting aspects. It was sloppy.
NC and GA are among the top 5 states for destinations of migration and have been for probably at least 2 decades. I’ve seen some interesting data of migrating people to NC and GA and their political demographics and am trying to dig it up for you.
In case others were reading into my comment something I didn’t intend, “yankee” to me doesn’t mean white. It’s a regional thing.
Very hard for me to see Dems having any shot at all in SC. Who would they run? Jim Clyburn? The ghost of Fritz Hollings? I have a feeling the SC electorate would elect a golden retriever wearing a birthday cone so long as he pledged (barked?) allegiance to limited government.
I find it equally hard to believe that Lindsay friggin’ Graham will survive a primary challenge in the historic home of the fire-eaters.
Actually, Wikipedia says that Fritz Hollings is still alive at the ripe old age of 91. Which is more or less the median age of a US Senator, so maybe he’d have a shot after all.
Of states that Obama lost, only Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Missouri and Indiana were closer than South Carolina. And Obama won North Carolina and Indiana the first time around. South Carolina is not as much of a long shot as most people think. We have senators in North Carolina, Missouri and Indiana, as well as Alaska which voted modestly more Republican than South Carolina.
Richard Riley is 80.
But your point is correct. South Carolina does not have a strong bench of well-known candidates. A sad case of letting the Fowler family run the party operations much too long.
Whoever it is better file on the last day to avoid another Alvin Greene fiasco.
And most likely they would have to already be well-known and liked in a field other than politics. And Stephen Colbert’s experiment showed that he doesn’t have traction.
but I heard they just opened a new state wide party headquarters in SC
Sounds about right. I would expect the effect of the Tea Party (nominees, third-party challenges) to bump that up to the higher end of your estimate.
So after years of Republican extremism, freakishly waving the banner of reactionary saboteurs, the best we can do in a bad cycle, after years of being manifestly reasonable and mature and willing to compromise, is break even?
I was hoping you, at least, were gonna say we’d win a few seats! Now I’m depressed.
We could win a seat or two. But we’d have win the toss-ups, limit our losses to two, and find some lean GOP seats to win.
There’s no way we’re coming out of this election better the 54-46. If we are, drinks are on me.
You’re on!!
It’s not that I am confident that you’re wrong, but you picked within my range, so how can I not take the bet?
In this context, “in a bad cycle” doesn’t refer to public opinion; it refers to the map of the 1/3 of the senate that is up for election.
In 2016, the Democrats are going to rout the Republicans and pick up a bunch of seats, even if the atmosphere is much worse for the Democrats than it is today.
The economy is the wild card and will Obama continue to try to cut Social Security? Will Senate Dems endorse this? Obviously, Obama doesn’t consider this the third rail any more.
Pressure is building up in Springfield (IL). A Dem meltdown over pensions could rebound against all Dem incumbents, including Durbin.
Governor Quinn won re-election taking only Cook County (Chicago), Sangamon County (Springfield) and East Saint Louis (poor and black). The rest of the state is red. Dem voters don’t have to switch parties. Just staying home with an enthused Rep electorate (an assumption) might do the trick. I do believe that Illinois could follow Wisconsin and Michigan into red hands due to gross mismanagement in Springfield and Rahm Emanuel’s City Hall. Remember, this time no Barack Obama to pull the black turnout. Rahm is closing schools in black neighborhoods and Springfield’s fiscal crisis could result in reduced services in Chicago.
Yeah, pensions are going to badly damage the Dems in IL. And if the decision is made to return pension responsibility to local taxing districts, there will be hell to pay. Property taxes in parts of IL are absolutely ridiculously high. It used to be that state income taxes were lower and property taxes were higher, and it evened out in comparison to neighboring states. However, now income taxes are comparable, and property taxes remain ridiculous.
In IL, there are more units of government than in any other state. This is mostly due to the township system, which does road maintainance at astronomically high levels of salaries. For each county, there are multiple townships, each with a president and office staff. Since they are under the radar, they get away will all kinds of shit.
If the pension thing is not fixed quick or is fixed in a way that screws local taxpayers with the full cost of the bloated, scandal-ridden, loopholed pension system, you may see a tidal wave of anger in IL. IL is NOT a blue state. It is a state with blue and red parts, and the Chicago collar counties tell the tale of how the state goes. If the property taxes go up, you could see a WI/MI/PA style revolutionary upheaval. Do NOT count out the Republicans.
When was the last time the Illinois GOP ran the state legislature? My impression was that the governorship has switched from time to time, but IL Dems have a stranglehold on the legislature.
Maybe that’s a badly-formed impression, but that’s how I viewed it.
Dick Durbin is not going to lose.
It’s not like Ted Kennedy in Massachusetts. It’s possible for him to lose, but I’m not going to bet against you.
Township road maintenance is common in the Great Lakes states. It allows rapid snow removal, among other benefits. The idea of township government it for it to be close to the people and thus not be under the radar. And in rural areas that does seem to be the case.
The problem with the pension system is that the state has been lowballing contributions to it for decades just like every other state, thinking that they can catch up later. Well this is later. But screwing faithful state employees and ignoring the corrosive effects of corrupt politicians like “Paul Powell, Secretary of State” who made off with millions of license fees through the instructions for signing checks at the DOT hardly seems like justice.
The appropriate fix for pensions is a one-time huge tax assessment of the too-big-to-fail banks that ripped off the states.
I’ve lived in a rural township for the last 17 years and have to say, the support we receive is fantastic. In no more than 10 minutes, I can be at the front door of any of my township trustees or the township road maintenance supervisor. And they will all greet me by name and always pay prompt attention to any concerns. They are all Republicans, but they are good neighbors and just plain, good people. We are very fortunate.
So what are the liberal solutions to these problems?
Honestly, I have no clue myself. The problems need to be solved.
One of the truly infuriating things about IL (and probably other states) is that there are huge loopholes which assholes like the piece of crap Richard Daley used. He was gonna get a decent pension from IL. there is this loophole in the pension system where if you work for a short time in an old job, you can boost that section of the pension to the full amount. So, he worked as a low paid worker for the Legislature, and just before he retired, he worked for them for an additional month. Doubled his pension by that single month. There are case after case like that, and that is one reason why the system is totally fucked over.
One reason why Walker has done well in WI is by exploiting the envy of low-wage workers for state workers. This could happen in IL, and if the Dems do not fix the system, it might. And one reason they do not want to fix it is because THEY want to use these loopholes themselves.
Gov. Quinn did not win Sangamon County. He won Cook, St. Clair (Metro-East area) and Alexander County, the southernmost county in Illinois. Alexander County has a high level of minorities. There are approximately 8,200 people in the county.
My comment above is speculative and aimed at dampening complacency. While I think IL is a fine opportunity for Republicans what I think will happen is that the GOP will commit suicide by running unsavory nutcases like Oberweiss for Governor and Senator and that Durbin will cruise to re-election and whoever wins the gubernatorial dogfight between Quinn and Daley will claw out a razor thin victory over a Teabagger.
But it’s not a done deal. If the GOP can find candidates of the caliber of Topinka or Thompson, they could sweep the state. Granted, that’s a big “if”.
Just as I said and you said, it all depends on pension reform.
Alison Lundergan Grimes has definitely GOT MY VOTE!
Unfortunately I’m not registered in Kentucky. But a lot of people are, and I sure hope they vote for her, she gives a very good account of herself.
There’s no way either SC seat is competitive…we have zero bench, and the strongest statewide Democratic candidate (Vince Shaheen) is going for Round 2 v. Nikki Haley. If Collins doesn’t retire, she’s not going to lose.
That said, I agree with your ‘bottom line’ analysis, except for the below:
My upset pick (and this may be me thinking with my heart more than my brain) is that Grimes beats McConnell by a not-insignificant margin. The guy is so unlikeable, and it seems like no one in the state actually likes the guy – they just like his power. Grimes is young, fresh, and despite a wobbly rollout, seems to be on-point now. Very solid numbers from PPP and Mellman (despite being Democratic, both have proven very accurate) confirm this is going to be close. DSCC + our super PACs have got to pour a bunch of firepower into this, as well as the state Democrats (who I think control most of the statewide offices still). I don’t like Tom Daschle, but this would be sweet revenge for what they did to him in 2004.
If I had to bet today, we take NJ and KY, but we lose in MT, SD, WV, and AR. We hold the majority going in 2016, when (hopefully) Hillary Clinton on top of the ticket means we make massive gains in the Senate, rolling back some of those 2010 victories that the Republicans don’t deserve (namely PA, WI, and OH. Heck, maybe we’ll even get FL if we’re lucky)
I would say this – Grimes needs to be a phenomenal candidate. If she runs a boilerplate campaign in KY, she’s going to get run over by McConnell. Hopefully she’s using local consultants and the people who help get local Dems elected to statewide office, not whatever clowns the DSCC may try to force on the campaign.
This far out, I am reluctant to put a whole lot of stock in the absence of obvious candidates. I’m much more willing to take note of a strong candidate than the lack of any candidate.
So, with that in mind, neither Lindsey Graham or Tim Scott is going to be in a strong position.
If you don’t think we can recruit anyone, that’s fine, but I am not going to assume that we cannot.
As to Maine, I don’t think what I said really is any different than what you said, except that I left the door open that Collins could lose in theory. She could also be primaried by some loon.
I’m happy to assume we won’t recruit anyone in SC. Remember that some clown / stalker named Alvin Greene managed to win the Democratic primary in 2010 to face off against DeMint? We literally have zero bench there. Unless John Spratt decided he wanted to make a comeback by trying for a statewide seat, there’s no way in hell we’re winning either SC Senate seat. (I also give their voting population little credence on the intelligence front – maybe if Shaheen beats Haley, I’ll start acknowledging it exists)
Collins won’t lose – I don’t think there are enough teabaggers in ME for her to lose (the only reason LePage got elected is that the Democratic candidate was not lackluster enough for Eliot Cutler to win as a left-leaning independent). Tom Allen was a solid candidate on paper, and she whacked him by 20+ points in one of the most favorable years for a Democratic candidate in recent memory.
The history of strong third-party candidates in Maine is another potential reason Collins could lose. But I don’t disagree that she’s in solid shape.
As for not having any bench in South Carolina, that’s true if you restrict yourself to politicians.
But let me remind of some recent events that were totally unexpected.
I’d also note that there a few senators like Franken, Klobuchar, Warren, Paul, and Cruz who little to no electoral experience before they ran for Senate.
I think you would need multiple colossal fuckups to get to the stage where the race will even be competitive. Most of the Dems you list above at least had some kind of stature (Tester was State Senate President; Anchorage is the largest city in Alaska, by far; Donnelly was a House Rep.; Heitkamp was state AG, etc.)…we literally have no one in statewide government in SC. Our lone house Rep. (Clyburn) is not going to run, nor would he win statewide. If we can’t win a damn race with Stephen Colbert’s sister against Mr. Appalachian Trail-Hiker himself, there’s no way we’re going to win against either Graham or Scott.
I will be more than glad to be proven wrong on these counts, but there is zero probability in my mind that there will be a Democrat representing SC in the US Senate next election – or anytime soon, for that matter. The state’s full of batshit crazy.
It’s full of batshit crazy, but so is Pennsylvania. Montana and North Dakota were much more pro-Romney than South Carolina. At some point, you have to look at numbers, not just levels of crazy.
South Carolina is the least Democratic state in the Atlantic South, but it is still more Democratic than any Interior South state, including Louisiana and Arkansas.
The Democrats will win South Carolina before they win West Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, or Tennessee.
South Carolina is where Virginia was, what, 10 years ago? 15?
South Carolina gave Obama a higher % of the vote in 2008 than Virginia gave to Gore in 2000.
You’re both right and wrong.
You’re correct on the numbers but you are ignoring the power of incumbency. In McConnell’s case, it’s a liability. In the other cases, it’s an asset.
I didin’t mean that as a prediction about specific races this year, just as background.
I’m not sure that too much batshit crazy is the issue as much as not pitching enough difference for some of the more moderate Republicans and independents to vote for them or not going populist enough to pull in some of the non-religious working folks. (Or even some of the religious ones.).
My impression from being an SC native and still having (mostly GOP friends) there is that another low-key middle-aged Democratic smooth-talking lawyer is not going to be a winning candidate. If you’re going to have a competitive race there’s got to be a little entertainment value in paying attention to the Democratic candidate. And there’s got to be a substantial personal network buzz (favorably) about the candidate.
And my impression right now is that there are substantial numbers of Republican-voting women looking for an alternative. Scott is the most vulnerable. But Lindsay Graham is not a shoo-in like in past years.
And given the vote on Amash-Conyers, the NSA issue seems to have some traction with SC voters (or at least their House members think so.)
she was just getting started though; maybe she should run
But let me remind of some recent events that were totally unexpected.
The Mayor of Anchorage beat Ted Stevens because of a criminal matter.
Little known Jon Tester upset the Dems preferred candidate and took out Conrad Burns.
Joe Donnelly’s opponent said God loves rape babies.
Todd Akin talked about legitimate rape.
George Allen said Macaca.
Heidi Heitkamp won in North Dakota while Obama was been slaughtered.
Jon Tester was reelected.
Russ Feingold got taken out by a lunatic.
Scott Brown won Teddy Kennedy’s seat.
Jeff Merkley was like the Dems 4th or 5th choice in Oregon.
Tester and Merkley were unexpected by whom? They were both well known in their respective states. Both were either equivalent to Reid or Pelosi(when she was Speaker) in their respective states.
Do you know who the state Majority Leader or Speaker are? If you do, you’re a rare bird.
How about Elizabeth Colbert-Busch
If she can’t win her base, with elite connections, she can’t win statewide.
what happened?
Mark Sanford beat her in her geographic base, Charleston. She’s not likely to get stronger support than there. And if she can’t count on a strong vote in the LowCountry, she’s not going to overpower the Tea Party bunch in the UpCountry.
Colbert-Busch voiced support for crap like RTW. Why would any Democrat vote for her under those conditions? No wonder she lost Charleston. Besides, it’s not like a win would have made Pelosi Speaker again.
One thing to keep in mind with Arkansas: it is true that the state’s legislature flipped from D to R within a few election cycles. The Tea Party wave of 2010 turned supermajorities into thin majorities. The 2012 election cycle definitely consolidated what happened in 2010 (that would be Max Brantley’s take), giving the state’s Senate a solid R majority, and the state’s House a 51 (R) -48 (D) -1 (G) majority. The state is more like its neighbors now. However, there is some question about how solid the Republican hold on the House is – and some reason to believe that they may see it flip back and forth at least another time or two. In the US Senate, Cotton is off to a rough start against the incumbent (Pryor). Pryor won’t be primaried, and has money to burn. His favorability ratings aren’t great, but they are not in the toilet either. Folks there are not enthusiastic about him, but I am unsure if the left wing of the ADP is all that eager to sit out this election as a protest. It’ll still be a coin flip. Club For Growth really wants Cotton as a seat-warmer in the US Senate. A lot will depend on how the state-wide races shape up and what kinds of ballot initiatives the voters there get. A lot of unknowns there.
Of course, all of this prognosticating assumes (1) no major intervening events that dramatically shift the landscape and (2) no dramatic change in political culture.
OT:
Welcome to Moral Monday – Chicago (ALEC) Style
Six demonstrators were just arrested inside the Palmer House Hilton for staging sit in to protest upcoming #ALEC conference. JAIL SUPPORT will be at 18th & State.
Clergy, unions, and community organizations took part in this kick-off to the protests against ALEC’s 40th annual meeting in Chicago, dropping banners and chanting inside the hotel for nearly and hour.
Will Rahm be the keynote speaker at ALEC?
OT:
Important article.
Hugh Gusterson, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Not all secrets are alike
OT:
Asheville Police estimate 10,000 at today’s #MoralMonday in the mountains!
My favorite area of the state. Lived there every summer for 5 years.
Living there year-round gives you a different perspective. And living in the mountain boonies at the end of the 1970s and early 1980s was one of my best experiences.
My hippie aunt would agree. She was a reporter at Mother Earth News.
Though I guess that was more Brevard and Hendersonville than Asheville.
I hate to say. I seriously do but…
….actual legislative effects, any?
There is a progressive coalition behind this movement, anchored by the NAACP. The legislature confiscated Asheville’s watershed and placed it under state control without compensation — likely to allow development within the watershed boundaries (a patently stupid water quality move). The legislature confiscated Charlotte’s airport and placed it under state control–not sure of the logic there. The legislature is forcing the City of Durham to run water and sewer to a development that folks in the City have opposed because it does not have an adequate buffer to a lake that is the water source for Cary.
So that high-handed action against Asheville, Charlotte, Cary, and Durham. That should have some legislative consequences in November 2014. Especially if a good anti-ALEC campaign gets mounted.
I’ll believe it if I see it.
I am so god damn fucking sick of hearing “Democrats have to play defense in the senate.” Year after year after year after year. This is not fucking fair.
The Senate inherently favors Republicans, so get used to it.
That said, we do get to play offense in 2016 – so look forward to that.
To get used to it is acquiesce.
Unless there’s a grand plan to amend the Constitution, it ain’t going to change anytime soon – regardless of how much we tailor our policies to the rural states.
I’ve already suggested a national convention in a previous thread last month. I would certainly prefer a parliamentary democracy with proportional representation and a vestigial upper house.
…and a pony.
A national constitutional convention is essentially giving the power of re-writing of the constitution over to the yahoos whom you will shortly see in town meetings with their vacationing Congresscritters.
No personalities equal low turnout equals domination by the most outraged. We’re inured to our elective-monarchy approach to elections.
You’ve said this before and I explained why you’re wrong before.
It would be the singular political event generating interest, you apparently give 0 chance that anyone with any worth would have input (a lot of the left is pretty fucking outraged these days), and proposals would still have to garner 38 states worth of support.
Your comment about Mark Udall in Colorado got me thinking. Yes he should win Colorado comfortably. 53% in 2008, a very pro-Democratic year, but in 2012 the surging Latino vote pushed the state +3 or so towards the Dems relative to 2008 so he’s in good position.
More to the point, though, Colorado is your typical purple-leaning-blue state. We’ve got committed Dems, committed wingnuts, and the low info voters in the middle who ultimately decide the thing. In past years the low info voters could be conned by the CONservatives but here in Colorado the local GOP went full wingnut by 2010 but now has doubled down on full wingnut, and is doing so again. You’ve heard a corner of the state wants to secede? Ok, stupid, I know, but what’s interesting are the issues that are driving them bats: background checks for gun purchases, solar power requirements for rural co-ops, and – horror of horrors – a bike rental program in central Denver (which is an extremely walkable city now). Background checks are actually extremely popular amongst the low info voters – you may have heard about some shooting incidents we’ve had in the Denver metro area the past 1.5 decades – and the low info voters are generally thinking the wingnuts are off their rocker when they equate background checks to genocide.
So, it will be interesting to watch. Maybe we don’t need a competent Democratic party after all, maybe we just need the wingnuts to feel free to express themselves the way they’ve always wanted.
I will truly never understand their freakout over the bike rentals. We’ve had them in DC for a while…it’s great.
Don’t you know that it’s all part of a UN plot turn Murikans into European trash?
It’s the bicycle shorts. Skintight shorts on powerful male thighs, pumping furiously….
Don’t you see? It’s all part of the Gay Agenda to seduce every red-blooded American man!