This has to be the most unintentionally funny headline to a blog post in the history of the intertubes: Left is getting desperate over Pajama Boy. Who the hell is Pajama Boy, you ask?
Here he is:
For some reason, conservatives have latched on to this ad and think it has some kind of significance. Jay Michaelson thinks the reason is anti-semitism.
Yes, Virginia, Pajama Boy is a member of the tribe. Look at him. Pale Ashkenazic skin, Jew-fro’d black curls, Woody Allen specs. Even the smart-ass expression on his face screams of the Wise Son from the Passover Seder.
Oddly, Pajama Boy does look undeniably Jewish, but he also looks like he’s enjoyably waiting for his next present from under the Christmas tree, or perhaps taking some pleasure in watching a younger brother or cousin open a new toy.
Is he manly? Does he prefer men to women? Is he “a metrosexual in a plaid onesie” or “an insufferable man-child” as conservatives have claimed?
Is Charles Cooke correct that “the vaguely androgynous, student-glasses-wearing, Williamsburg hipster” with his “priggish facial expression” proves “the harsh truth…that the advertising machine behind the Obama administration seems not to really know what normal human beings are like”?
Of course, in Williamsburg, Pajama Boy looks like a normal human being. That’s because Jews live there, along with other normal-looking Puerto Rican and Dominican human beings. That Cooke mentioned Williamsburg wasn’t some accident. It was no subtler than a derisive reference to Brandeis University from the mouth of Pat Buchanan.
So, yeah, just so we’re clear, slight spindly Jew-Boys are not normal human beings and, “suffice it to say, are people you do not want quartered anywhere near you.”
We get it.
That’s why we keep comparing you to fascists.
