Yeah, I’m looking at you, Lindsey Graham, you bedwetter:
Democrats and the White House hailed the conviction of Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law in a New York court Wednesday as vindication of the administration’s approach to trying terror suspects in civilian courts.
Attorney General Eric Holder on Wednesday said it was important that Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, an al Qaeda spokesman “who publicly rejoiced over the attacks on the World Trade Center, faced trial in the shadow of where those buildings once stood.”
Holder said the conviction hopefully puts to bed any doubts about the process, which some Republicans have criticized.
“We never doubted the ability of our Article III court system to administer justice swiftly in this case, as it has in hundreds of other cases involving terrorism defendants,” he said in a statement. “It would be a good thing for the country if this case has the result of putting that political debate to rest.”
Abu Ghaith is the highest-ranking al Qaeda leader to face trial in a civilian court.
He was convicted on a pair of conspiracy charges to kill Americans and provide support to al Qaeda. He was also convicted of providing support to the terrorist group. Sentencing will begin Sept. 8.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) echoed Holder, saying she expected Abu Ghaith to spend the rest of his life in a maximum-security prison. Feinstein noted that the conspiracy charges used against him are not currently being used at Guantánamo, pending further review.
“This successful prosecution again shows that the criminal justice system is not just a valid way to prosecute al-Qaeda terrorists, but a better and more reliable way,” she said in a statement.
She ticked through a number of other terrorists convicted in civilian courts and said she is looking forward to more.
“This is long overdue and possibly the only option for some detainees aside from indefinite detention or release,” she said.
“We can and should be proud of our courts, and we are not afraid to prosecute terrorists in them,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said in a statement.
Some Republicans last year had called for Abu Ghaith to be tried in a military court at Guantánamo. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), at the time, said he had a real problem holding the trial in a civilian court.
“We’ve got a good courtroom down there. We should use it,” Graham said at the time, alluding to Guantánamo.
When the newly-minted President Obama tried to close down Gitmo in 2009 and try the suspects in civilian courts, the Republicans went nuts and way too many Democrats crapped their pants.
It was a national disgrace, and it’s ridiculous that Gitmo is still open five years later. I don’t think there is a single issue that has made me more livid during the Obama administration than the way his own party treated him when he tried to close Gitmo. But it’s still primarily the Republicans’ fault. They created Gitmo and they insisted on turning our country into a nation of bedwetters. Lindsey Graham could single-handedly keep Depend® Adult Diapers in business.
