Jason Zengerle has written a really important piece for The New Republic about what has happened politically in the Deep South over the past decade, and particularly since the 2010 elections. It mainly focuses on the state legislature in Alabama, but it’s relevant to our national politics. Here’s a basic summary of its importance:
The Southern historian C. Vann Woodward famously described the civil rights movement as the Second Reconstruction. The First Reconstruction, of course, began at the conclusion of the Civil War and led to the election of hundreds of black politicians across the South. One of those black politicians, a South Carolina legislator named Thomas Miller, later described the era with great pride: “We had built schoolhouses, established charitable institutions, built and maintained the penitentiary system, provided for the education of the deaf and dumb … rebuilt the bridges and reestablished the ferries. In short, we had reconstructed the State and placed it upon the road to prosperity.”
But in 1877, the Republican Party agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South in exchange for putting its presidential candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, in the White House, and the period of biracial democratic government came to an end. White “Redeemers,” as they were known, undid all the Reconstruction-era reforms they could. They shuttered the new schools and charities; they stopped building bridges and funding ferries. “Spend nothing unless absolutely necessary,” Florida’s new Democratic governor instructed his legislature in 1877. Most crucially, they designed laws to eliminate the black vote and enforced those laws with waves of vigilante violence. A mere dozen years after it began, the First Reconstruction was over.
The end of the Second Reconstruction will not be so dramatic. But the systematic way in which Republican majorities in Southern statehouses are undoing so many of the hard-won gains of the civil rights movement suggests that the end is nigh. Whether it’s by imposing new voter-ID laws, slashing public assistance, refusing Medicaid expansion, or repealing progressive legislation like North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act, the GOP-controlled governments of Southern states are behaving in ways that are at times as hostile to the interests of their African American citizens as Jim Crow Democrats were half a century ago. As David Bositis told me, “Black people in the South have less political power now than at any time since the start of the civil rights movement.”
It makes for some pretty bleak reading, and it makes me wonder if the reverse black migration back to the south is going to continue. Because, on the local level at least, I don’t think things are going to get better any time soon.
I live in north Alabama, my congressman is Mo Brooks, the guy in the news recently saying ridiculous stuff. The district covers the Huntsville area…with it’s space and NASA and many diverse technical and engineering businesses, it’s considered the moderate part of the state. But Brooks is such a lock there is no Dem on the ballot against him.
It’s beyond discouraging. Alabama is my home and I love it here but I wish I could say something positive about our political situation.
The guy who Brooks replaced…Parker Griffith…was elected as a Dem Congressman, but switched parties and started slinging offense GOP rhetoric around. When he ran for re-election as a Repub, Brooks beat him in the primary. I think Brooks was the first Repub to hold that seat in around 100 years, and now he’s a lock. Despite, or because of his idiotic talk.
And to make things even more special for local Dems, Parker Griffith has now switched back, and is running as a Dem for Governor.
I did recently have an extended discussion with Griffith. I asked him to explain things he did that disappointed me. (Such as voting against the Lilly Ledbetter Act, switching parties, repeating disgusting GOP rhetoric, and on and on.) He wanted me to give him my approval along with my vote this fall. I told him he could count on my vote but I would be holding my nose doing it.
His response…”You will vote for me because I’m the cleanest dirty shirt.” That’s verbatim. And very discouraging.
I hear this here all the time. Wanting a politician with with a clean shirt is called (derisively) “wanting a pony”.
You can lay that at the feet of Alabama’s sorry assed state party. They’re worthless good ol’ boys and they’ve been in their seats too long. Brooks doesn’t have to represent the district but the state party tells potential competition they’re unelectable. And potential competition doesn’t know how to campaign. The ground game is non existent and they don’t let potential supporters know they exist.
And the real estate developers, road construction companies, and beer dealers are paying good money to keep the Democratic Party ineffective, if Alabama is like other red states.
It is no coincidence that a fracking law passed in North Carolina by an “oops” vote of a Democratic legislator.
The corruption of the Democratic Party is killing us–even in New York and Chicago.
For my money you can strikeout the word “even”.
For the first time I’m voting for an (R) for state rep this Fall, he’s the more progressive one. He’s anti-abortion and I hate that part, but my (D) rep started out good but now he’s thoroughly corrupted and stopped fighting for us and started fighting for big business, supporting (actually authoring) tax breaks for Sears and voting to screw state workers on their pensions. I did think long and hard on this as I’m a member of NARAL, but the economics is overwhelming. And, no, term limits are not the answer. Not blindly voting for Party is the answer.
Likewise, at the top of the ticket, I will be voting Green for Governor and Senator. I despise Rauner and Oberweis and I hope they lose, but I also hope Quinn and Durbin win by the skin of their teeth to encourage others in future primarys. There were no real challengers in this year’s primary. I’m not saying I believe in sour grapes or PUMA, but when we don’t get a choice in Spring, I’ll make one in Fall. One way or another, my voice will be heard, if only in protest.
When I see voting Green, I think about Ralph Nader’s 97,421 votes he received in Florida in the 2000 presidential election. I’ll be voting for Gov. Quinn and Senator Durbin.
You would rather that 97,421 voted for W in protest or just stayed home so pundits could talk about voter apathy? It’s the candidate’s fault for offering himself as a choice?
For the record, I despise Ralph Nader as a person and would vote for Cheney over him.
97,421 votes sounds like a lot, but it was only 1.67% of the votes cast in Florida. If this 1.67% didn’t vote, I don’t think the media would have concluded that voters were apathetic that year. Since the majority of those 97,421 votes were Democrat votes, Gore would have won Florida and the presidency. For starters, I wouldn’t be looking at Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito today, nor the Iraq mess. Now wouldn’t that be nice?
Yes, it would have been, but you should blame Gore and his poor campaign, not the voters.
Sorta the same story one state to your east. But, at least the Nunn and Carter campaigns have sort of a ground game going. We shall see if it’s effective. I read Zengerle’s article yesterday early and emailed the author (who lives in NC) and thanked him for such a true picture of what’s happened here in the South since 2008 and particularly since 2010. African Americans have really been marginalized, politically. Virtually no power to affect policy at all. It really is very discouraging. Zengerly was very appreciative of my email and agreed with my take that 2010 election outcome was preordained by the 2008 national election, i.e. the election of a Black man as President.
Democrats have to have a ground game. And, it must be ongoing and must be focused on voter registration and on actually fielding candidates everywhere and winning some races. I do wish I felt better about a Hillary candidacy.
I work with several black people born and raised in Chicago who have relatives in Alabama and Mississippi. All swear they would never move there no matter how dire Chicago employment gets.
First Reconstruction ended when the non-South decided that it did not want to confront what was politely referred to at the turn of the 20th century as “The Negro Problem”, a euphemism for their own practices of segregation, racism, and discrimination.
The end of Second Reconstruction says more about the politics of the non-South than the South. It signals that the non-South (such as Missouri or New York City) does not want to deal with its systematic discrimination and continued impoverishment of minorities and will return to sitting on the sidelines and pointing fingers at the “decadent” South.
The Southern Strategy came out of the political team for candidates from Southern California. The racism it relegitimized has not infected the politics of Wisconsin, especially Michigan, Illinois and to a lesser degree Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
The federal government, now instead of checking it, is collaborating with it in all branches of the government. The media use tokens to ignore what’s going on or in service to the bigots.
And the Democratic Party has been MIA on this issue for 35 years.
And defeatist crap like the neoliberal New Republic does not help. It shows the collaboration of “white folk of good will” in the resegregation of America on a national basis this time. Because unlike the 1960s when big money wanted racial peace and freedom to show the Russkies what capitalism could do, now the big money wants an ethnic war of all against all for jobs and dignity. And minorities are the designated losers in advance.
Black people are taking to the streets to regain their political power (or maybe you’ve been hiding from that fact). And they are being met with the police power of the state to suppress their assemblies, the silence of the media, and the collaboration of federal Homeland Security Fusion Centers in suppressing their protests. Meanwhile the “stand your ground” and “open carry” nutcakes carry out their open campaign of intimidation. White non-Southern white America looks on and laughs.
We are heading to a series of white pogroms in black and Hispanic neighborhoods while the fine liberal white folks look on in “helpless” horror and continue their tut-tuttting about what is practical and doable.
Meanwhile the assassinations of young black men continue. And our US Attorney General wants “fulsome” investigations. And cop after murderous cop gets a short paid vacation and then walks to go back and kill again.
This is the 1920s and the Obama administration is behaving like the Calvin Coolidge administration on these issues. The fear in the administration is evident and Republicans are exploiting it to increase racial discrimination.
“But Hillary being President will make them play nice with us.” The Democratic Party has some latent bigotry. I’ll never forgive those bastards for enabling the shit Obama goes through. I’ve noticed 2016’s front runner not helping during the mid terms. Fuck her as well.
Geez we need an alternate to HRC.
You have Martin O’Malley.
Don’t get me wrong, CityStats was some highly questionable bullshit, but, he is an alternative.
Don’t know much about his economic views but I think they are close to Hillary’s. We need a Howard Dean, but if we had one, the press would trash him with lies too.
You have Howard Dean and Martin O’Malley mixed up.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2014/6/22/8454/24987
A recent Washington Post poll showed O’Malley with fairly impressive approval numbers (55%-39%), but lagging Hillary Clinton badly (72%-6%) in a prospective presidential run. He is also among the most polarizing governors in America. Having legalized gay marriage, raised the minimum wage, enacted stricter gun control laws, eased access to college for undocumented people, and banned the death penalty, O’Malley has the support of only 19% of Republicans, while 79% of Democrats report that they are satisfied with his performance.
Still nothing about his economic policy. Our owners don’t care about abortion, gay marriage, legal pot or anything but grinding more and more money out of the 99%.
There was that part in my previous post about the minimum wage and easing of access to college for immigrants.
Still not satisfied? Okay, fine. Here are some more of his policies.
By way of wikipedia:
By way of Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gov-martin-omalley/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/martin-omalley-job-approval-numbers-break-along-part
y-lines-in-washington-post-poll/2014/02/22/37617902-9b02-11e3-975d-107dfef7b668_story.html
Not crazy about the Judge Dredd robot traffic cameras. Here in Illinois they are purely for revenue enhancement with the lion’s share going to the connected private company that run’s them. I got fined $100 by a private company for the crime of entering an intersection 3/8ths of a second late. I saw a commercial truck barrel through the same intersection at full speed at least four seconds after it was red. The camera never flashed. It flashed for me as I made my right turn 3/8ths of a second late. Rahm Emanuel put those speed cameras in Chicago. Lot’s of complaints. I won’t even go into Chicago any more.
Spending cuts and regulatory “reform” can cover a lot of DLC sins.
What about bringing manufacturing back from China and software back from India? How about bringing clothing manufacture back or at least imposing standards on imports so that Dickensonian sweat shops don’t flourish in Bangladesh?
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-omalley-entrepreneurship-20140720,0,3240110.stor
y
Also, Maryland isn’t monetarily sovereign. It can’t deficit spend its way for very long. The Maryland state government balanced its budget on the backs of the rich and through the alcohol and tobacco industry rather than with regressive taxes or budget cuts.
Seriously, I don’t know what the fuck more do you want from this guy. I don’t care for Maryland deciding to go all United Kingdom with CCTVs and his signature claim to governor legitimacy (the titanic drop in crime in Baltimore) is a bunch of classist bullshit. However both his economic and social liberal cred is rock solid until you can show otherwise. I can think of like two nationally recognizable figures that can beat him on the economic liberal front and that’s Sherrod Brown and Elizabeth Warren. If they run then awesome. However, I know for sure that O’Malley’s running and complaining that he’s going to be the liberal standard bearer for 2016 is like complaining that you got only one free donut when you bought a box of a dozen when you were expecting two.
Not complaining. Just waiting to be convinced that he’s better than Hilary on economic issues. And, for the record, I think Hillary is as bad as Bush there.
Not complaining. Just waiting to be convinced that he’s better than Hilary on economic issues.
Yes, you are complaining. Just in a passive-aggressive way that allows you to just repeat ‘I’m not convinced’ ad infinitum.
Martin O’Malley’s government raised the minimum wage, kept Maryland’s education system #1 by putting more money into schools, got a grudging compliment from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce despite them whining endlessly about taxes about Maryland being one of the top five states for future job growth, raised taxes on the rich, and is investing in high-tech industries.
What more do you want? What policy could Martin O’Malley’s government have plausibly implemented that he didn’t?
Not much he can do as Mayor or Governor, although I’m glad he has the experience. It shows he knows how to make things happen, which regrettably Obama doesn’t know (no executive experience).
I’m still waiting to hear his national economy proposals. If they are nothing more than token goodies at the bottom and trickle down at the top, then he’s the same as Hilary.
I know he has ability. I want to see the vision. And it’s for him to convince me, not the other way around.
Everything I hear about O’Malley tells me that he’s a good liberal, but way short on the charisma. And,I second a Howard Dean type candidate, preferably Howard Dean himself.
Maybe Hillary is pre-ordained, but we’d all be better off with a left version of the Tea Party to pull her back left and quell those hawkish neocon tendencies of hers.
Charisma is important, but Hillary has none except for identity politics. Obama is charming and can reach outside his group. Can Hilary reach outside of old white women?
That is a bleak assessment. Unfortunately, it seems on the money. And the corruption goes on and on in the name of liberalism.
It goes on because local Democrats have not succeeded yet in wresting control of the local parties from the grubby hands of the corrupt. And because too many progressives do not involve themselves in the attempt to reform the party. The presence of big money, employer intimidation, and disapproval from friends, family, neighbors, and co-workers intimidates over half of the progressives into silence.
And there remain no socialists and commies to organize freedom rides and even fewer white folks willing to risk becoming martyrs at the hands of vigilantes or the police. Especially since the media tell outright lies about what is going on. Don’t want to jeopardize their access to the authorities for crime scoops.
As one who’s working in elections at the local level for state and federal offices, I can certainly attest to this:
It really is a matter of being ever so slightly ostracized to be a white Democrat in these parts. One’s neighbors, co-workers, and relatives look upon me with surprise and horror when they find out that I support Democratic candidates. Come to think of it, we need a lot more Howard Deans to head up these state parties.
This is the 1920s and the Obama administration is behaving like the Calvin Coolidge administration on these issues. The fear in the administration is evident and Republicans are exploiting it to increase racial discrimination.
You mean things like Shirley Sherrod? It’s so telling that they didn’t investigate where the charges came from, then dismiss them when they did learn. Also telling that Obama threw his long time friend Daschle overboard for being a small-time tax cheat(on a position that didn’t need to be confirmed by the Senate), yet Geithner was a tax cheat too and hardly a peep was made about him. Don’t get me wrong. I despise both Daschle and Geithner. Just think it shows what the real priorities were.
I was actually thinking about the capitulation to austerity and the silence of so many white Democrats in Congress about the rise of racism and gun nut culture. It’s like the bipartisan capitulation to the KKK in the 1920s.
Of course reverse black migration to the South will continue if folks can find good jobs near their relatives or retire comfortably back near where they grew up. It is much easier to change low-population Southern states through migration than it is to change Illinois or Michigan or New York.
The Hispanic population is also growing in Southern states.
Guess what the white panic in the Republican Party is all about. Guess what Thad Cochran’s triangulation is all about. Moderately affluent black migration and upwardly mobile Hispanic entrepreneurship. That’s what threatens them because as citizens those folks will vote.
Here in Illinois, the Republicans are recruiting plenty of Hispanic candidates. The existing Democratic Machine doesn’t have room for another ethnic group, somebody else would have to give up a spot.
When I spoke below about people not wanting to go South, I should have clarified that these are people in the 50-65 age group who remember Bull Connor et al, especially Emmet Till at least from TV news. That is all ancient history for young people I suppose.
Yep, they will and they do.
they are fucking racists.
this is who they’ve always been.
there isn’t a lick of anything that’s surprising in that article.
this is how their ancestors were during Jim Crow.
And this is James Crow, Esquire.
same racist ass muthafuckas.
What’s different is telling you that you are stuck with them forever because non-Southern white America is in the tank with the neo-Confederates.
That is not news that you can really use to form a strategy with–other than keep hunkering down, praying, and hoping.
I’m seeing 50 years of very hard and risky work by lots of people slipping down the drain. It’s depressing as hell.
What do we do about it? Seriously what do we do about it? Because I’m not willing to give in to the depression. The only thing I know to do is knock on doors to get people registered and out to vote and to do more of the “persuasion phone calling”, particularly during the hot humid dog days of an August summer in the South.