Obama Created the Pathways Programs

On December 17, 2010, President Obama issued executive order 13562 which created the Pathways Program. It was done to help the federal government better compete with the private sector for employees who lack significant and relevant prior work experience. In the September/October issue of the Washington Monthly, Rachel Cohen has a piece on How to Find a Job with Uncle Sam that details how the Pathways programs work in practice.

The Internship Program, designed for current students, provides paid work opportunities in federal agencies for a limited period of time. Interns can work either on a part-time or full-time basis.

Next there is the Recent Graduates Program, which is open to individuals who have completed, within the previous two years, an associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, professional, doctorate, vocational, or technical degree or certificate from a qualifying educational institution. These recent graduates can work in federal agencies while also taking advantage of substantial career training and mentorship opportunities.

Lastly, the Presidential Management Fellows Program is a leadership and career-development program for those with newly minted graduate degrees.

In all three divisions of the Pathways Programs, if you successfully complete the term of service you can receive what is known as “noncompetitive eligibility” when applying for federal jobs. This means that your employer can convert you straight from a Pathways participant into a permanent employee or you can apply for other federal positions without having to go through the standard, and highly competitive, USAJOBS application process.

The advantages of these programs are that they give you a better chance of landing a job within the Federal Government and that they give you an opportunity to learn the culture of our various bureaucracies in advance so that you can determine if they are a good fit for you. Prior to the issuance of this executive order, the Federal Government heavily favored applicants with significant prior work experience, which made it difficult for college students and recent graduates to get employment.

Tomorrow a Preliminary, Final Report On MH-17 Within a Year

Dutch Safety Board: Preliminary Report with Black Box Data Results on Sept. 9, 2014

Investigation into #MH17 will continue
unabated after issuing preliminary report.
Final report expected within a year.

Kevin Lewis @klewis924

@Onderzoeksraad See question 7. WHY
won’t DSB release ALL black box data, voice
and other evidence? Makes no sense!

Bloggers already “know” the conclusion of the DSB  report: The Russians did it! Expect more western propaganda.

The whodunit question won’t be answered by the Dutch Safety Board tomorrow, nor in the final report. It’s not their task to point to a culprit, that’s what the criminal investigation is set up for. It will be a lengthy road, all experts are firm, the person ultimately responsible will never face justice.

See renowned attorney International Law Geert Jan Knoops and today’s NRC dagblad Benjamin Ferencz, prosecutor at Nuremburg trial.

As I predicted, propaganda machinery start churning.

Continued below the fold …
From PM Cameron’s propaganda station, regurgitating the same old bull from the early reports. Nothing substantial, will the BBC be held accountable? This article gets propagated via social media, such a dud. I’m quite disappointed Derek Sauer joined this crowd!

MH17 shoot-down suspects ‘were Russian’ claim eyewitnesses | BBC News | 5 hrs ago |

The crew of the BUK missile launcher suspected of shooting down the Malaysian Airways passenger jet MH17 on 17 July were Russian soldiers, according to eyewitnesses interviewed by BBC Panorama.

Reporter John Sweeney told the Today programme that three eyewitnesses separately told the programme that they saw the BUK in rebel-held territory a few hours before the Boeing jet was hit. He added that one eyewitness said that the BUK’s crew “spoke with Russian Moscow accents”.

See the full story on BBC Panorama: Putin’s Gamble, BBC One, 8.30 BST, Monday 8 September.

Will Scotland Declare Its Independence?

I am not British and so I have no real stake in whether or not Scotland chooses to leave the United Kingdom and strike out on their own. I believe that Scottish independence will result in a more or less permanently conservative bent to the Parliament in London, accompanied by a very socialist government in Scotland. I’m not sure that I look forward to the likely repercussions of that political future, although they will surely be mixed.

I do agree with Boris Johnson, however, that the very character of Britishness will be destroyed with this split. I’m uncertain if the Northern Irish and the Welsh will continue to see Britishness as a thing that is worth maintaining. I hope Scotland doesn’t blow the whole thing up, but I will at least be entertained by what ensues if they choose independence.

This is a very civil way of having a civil war, but just try to imagine if this country had actually split apart in the 1860’s. I don’t think we’d be happy with the result.

Bush Failed For Same Reason Obama Will Ultimately Fail

    “You cannot kill an idea with a gun, you can
    only stop them if you have a better idea.
    And we have a better idea … You must teach
    people that law is always better than war.”
     

    – Benjamin Ferencz

No man should have power to decide who dies and who should live. When I heard governor of Texas George Bush speak in an interview in 2000, I understood he represented evil, he was morally corrupt. History has proven me right. In the end, Governor Bush even lacked the honesty to do the work in deciding whether to pardon someone.

I see and heard in the actions and words of President Obama he has passed into the same moral abyss where George Bush lived. Obama believes someone invested in him the authority to decide between life and death. The drone attack to murder U.S. citizens was illegal and immoral. Nothing good has come to pass.

George Bush lauded the Iraq War is over on May 1, 2003, he was wrong. Barack Obama declared the war on terror of Al Qaeda over in 2012, he was wrong.

I have been troubled by too many decisions coming out of the Obama administration in actions and words. Obama was wrong on Libya, Syria and the Ukraine. NATO needs to be stopped, it was meant as a defense pact a deterrent against an expanding sphere of influence of Communism in Western Europe. The Vietnam War was fought for the same reason in the Far East. NATO has become a force of neocon policy, an aggressive expansionist policy, a tool for greed of capitalism. Much will be destroyed before the masses in Europe realize they have been fooled once again.

The Last Man at Nuremberg
Emma Green | The Atlantic | May 9, 2014 at 12:25 PM ET |

Benjamin Ferencz was 27 when the Einsatzgruppen trial began in 1947. There were 22 defendants, all men, all members of the German SS. “One of the counsel has characterized this trial as the biggest murder trial in history,” the military tribunal wrote. “In this case, the defendants are not … charged with sitting in an office hundreds and thousands of miles away from the slaughter…. These men were in the field actively superintending, controlling, directing, and taking an active part in the bloody harvest.” Put simply, the Einsatzgruppen were exterminators: Their squads traveled to towns throughout Eastern Europe, rounding up Jews and shooting them with mechanized efficiency. Some mass graves were filled with hundreds of bodies; others, thousands.

Otto Ohlendorf, Paul Blobel, and almost two dozen others led these divisions of Hitler’s army; after the war, they were indicted for crimes against humanity. Benjamin Ferencz was 27, and he was the chief prosecutor responsible for convicting 22 men on trial for murdering 1 million men, women, and children.

Nazi Einsatzgruppen and  Ukrainian auxiliaries murdered Jewish women and children at Bila Tserkva

Continued below the fold …

A German Nazi war criminal, an SS- Standartenführer Paul Blobel

Paul Blobel (August 13, 1894 – June 7, 1951) was a German Nazi war criminal, an SS-Standartenführer (Colonel) and a member of the SD. Born in the city of Potsdam, he participated in the First World War, where by all accounts he served well and was decorated with the Iron Cross first class. After the war, Blobel studied architecture and practiced this profession from 1924 until 1931, when upon losing his job, he joined the Nazi Party, the SA and the SS (he had joined all of these by 1 December 1931).

In 1933 he joined the police force in Düsseldorf. In June 1934 he was recruited into the SD. In June 1941 he became the commanding officer of Sonderkommando 4a of Einsatzgruppe C that was active in Ukraine. Following Wehrmacht troops into Ukraine, the Einsatzgruppen would be responsible for liquidating political and racial undesirables. In August 1941 Blobel decided to create a ghetto in Zhytomyr to enclose 3,000 Jews who would be murdered a month later. On 10 or 11 August 1941, Friedrich Jeckeln ordered him, on behalf of Adolf Hitler, to exterminate the whole Jewish population. On 22 August 1941 the Sonderkommando and its Ukrainian auxiliaries murdered Jewish women and children at Bila Tserkva with the consent of field marshal Walther von Reichenau, commander of the 6th Army. SS-Obersturmführer August Häfner testified at his own trial.

Blobel, in conjunction with von Reichenau and Friedrich Jeckeln’s units, organized the Babi Yar massacre in late September 1941 in Kiev, where 33,771 Jews were murdered. In November 1941 Blobel received and activated the first gas vans at Poltava. In June 1942 he was put in charge of Aktion 1005, with the task of destroying the evidence of all Nazi atrocities in Eastern Europe.

Per Anders Rudling: Warfare or War Criminality?

Yushchenko’s legitimizing historians presented a narrative of suffering, resistance, and redemption, in which a heroic representation of the Bandera wing of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (Bandera) (OUN[b]) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) were key components.

V’iatrovych externalizes Soviet rule as a genocidal occupation against which the Ukrainian people conducted a heroic resistance. He argues that a state-sponsored cult of personality is needed, since, he maintains,without these “national heroes” there would not be a Ukraine.

    The Ukrainian struggle for independence is one of the cornerstones of our national self-identication. Because without UPA, without Bandera, without Shukhevych there would not be a contemporary Ukrainian state, there would not be a contemporary Ukrainian nation… The very example of the insurgents’ uncompromising struggle also inspired future generations of fighters for human rights and national unity – from the participants of the dissident movement to the activists of the Orange Revolution.

V’iatrovych presents history as a teleological, whiggish narrative; themarch of the Ukrainian nation toward statehood. With its heavy emphasis on patrimonial national heroes and martyrs this curiously anachronistic narrative is a spitting image of Soviet history writing. V’iatrovych describes OUN founder Evhen Konovalets‘ as a “hero of Ukraine,” “of which the entire Ukrainian nation needs to be proud… Konovalets’ and Stepan Bandera are figures of all-Ukrainian stature and the place of such heroes should be a National Pantheon, which ought to be constructed in Kyiv.”

NOTE: Volodymyr Viatrovych’s book “Ставлення ОУН до євреїв: формування позиції на тлі катастрофи” (“The OUN’s position towards the Jews: Formulation of a position against the backdrop of a catastrophe”) has been criticized by John-Paul Himka, Taras Kurylo, Per Anders Rudling and Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe. The critics claim that this book is an attempt to deny the crimes of Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) on Jews and to dismiss the allegations of its anti-Semitism.

Nuremberg Prosecutor Makes The Case For Trying Assad

When he was just 27 years old, helped prosecute Nazi leaders in the Nuremburg war crimes trial after World War II. In the years since, the Harvard-educated lawyer has continued to focus on issues of international criminal justice.

As he considers the possibility the U.S. might launch strikes on Syria, Benjamin Ferencz raises the idea of using the International Criminal Court to try Syrian President Bashar Assad for the alleged use of chemical weapons.

But, he tells NPR’s Rachel Martin, “the United States has been opposed, unfortunately … to using that court because we value our sovereignty and we want to decide for ourselves when we go to war and when we don’t. A very, very dangerous practice, as we’re now discovering.”

Using the ICC to bring someone to justice can take years, something Ferencz admits he’s not comfortable with. “I wish we could go into court and have a trial over in three days as I did in Nuremberg,” he says.

“But the fact we are not comfortable is not the test. The test is whether it’s just or not. Is it just for an individual in any country to conclude that some individual in another country is guilty of supreme crimes and therefore he should be punished, without a trial of any kind? Is that just?”

See also my earlier diaries.

Nazi Collaboration by Banderists in East Galicia
Ukraine’s Coup d’ État – George Marshall, OSS, Bissell and Gladio
Estonia Celebrates Annual Waffen SS Division Heroes

How Is This Legal?

How is it legal for the Republican Party of New York to hire a private investigator who then places a GPS device on a Democratic assemblyman’s car in an effort to ascertain if he really lives in the district he represents?

I understand that it’s a dastardly deed, but the way it is being reported is that there wasn’t any actual crime. So, in New York State it is legal for anyone to track me with a GPS device if they hire a private investigator to do the job?

“I don’t know what’s worse — attempting to mislead the court in a lawsuit claiming I don’t live here, or having some creep crawl under my family car to place a GPS tracking device to stalk us,” [Assemblyman Edward] Hennessey (D-Suffolk) said. “With this disturbing behavior, [Republican Dean] Murray has taken negative campaigning to a new low. The judge affirmed I live in the district, and now voters should question whether this man who has gone to such bizarre lengths to prove otherwise is really fit for public office.”

If there isn’t a law against putting tracking devices on people’s cars, there is something wrong with the law.

How about a lawyer explain this to me?

Bob Weir Makes a Lot of Money

I’m kind of amazed that the Grateful Dead’s Bob Weir is the best paid singer in the world. Even among Deadheads, there is a kind of love/laugh at relationship with Weir. He’s always been a little ridiculous in an adorable kind of way. But we ultimately do love him.

Here is Bobby being simultaneously ridiculous and adorable from the heyday of my time on tour.

Now I have to check out the Bob Weir Seduction fashion line.

The Problem(s) Of Centrism

Booman has become a dedicated centrist. (Read his most recent Obama apologia for absolute proof of the matter: Right Back Atcha.)

A rough translation and condensation of the piece?


Sure. Here’s one.

“Either/or, both have their merits. Harrumph, harrumph!!!”

And so on.

So sad!!!

Why?

Because there are a number of problems with centrism in general, that’s why.

Read on for more.

Much more.
The most basic problem with a centrist stance like this is that nothing is ever “either/or.” They are only “either/or” in a two-dimensional world, at best. You…know…like two party Permanent Government politics?

It’s a free country. You got yer choice. DemRats or RatPubs. What more could’ya want? Now go out and vote!!!

Like dat.

In reality there are always other dimensions to be considered.

Another problem is that…as we have seen so clearly during Obama’s entire presidency…once one is fully enmeshed in “centrism,” further movement becomes nearly impossible.  The phrase “Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. Here I am, stuck in the middle with you” very nicely sums up that centrist predicament.

Obama’s problems?

Quite plainly right there in the bridge of this song:

Oh well you started off with nothing,
And you’re proud that you’re a self-made man,
(Yeah you are)
And your friends, they all come callin’,
Slap you on the back and say,
“Please… Please…”
(Come on!!!)

Please!!!

C’mon, Booman.

It’s all over but the shouting.

NEXT!!!???” say the kingmakers as they fill their red, white and blue balloons with nothing but hot air.

                “Who’s next in the barrel? Step right up!!!”

Meanwhile, back at the ranch…here’s another centrist problem. The worst one of all.

No matter which way you look, you are always surrounded.

Up, down, back and forth, side-to-side…surrounded like a motherfucker!!!

As Socrates Fortlow…perhaps my all-time favorite fictional character…found out, you are Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned in the center of things.

Anxiety-producing, to say the least.

A terrible place to be.

Bet on it.

Move on, Booman.

Move on.

This approach simply ain’t working.

The center turns us all into jokers.

“Punchlines of the world, unite!!!” say the controllers.

From outside of the circle, of course.

Way outside. (Like Mike Bloomberg’s little Bermuda getaway above.)

Bet on it.

WTFU?

SUAF!!! (“Stand Up and Fight!!!”, goddammit.)

VAYA!!!

AG

Right Back Atcha

This is one way of looking at things:

“A “coalition of the willing” that mainly comprises Anglo-American militaries that shatter Arab lands, along with Arab and Asian autocrats in whose jails the seeds of Al-Qaeda were incubated in the 1980s, is not a serious venture to fight Islamist military and extremism. Such a combination of states is the very force that has given birth and sustenance to them.”

Another way of looking at things is to ask if a militant and backward-looking form of political Islam has made things better or worse for the people who live in Islamic countries. They must, after all, contend with the world as it is, and the real world has global powers and multinational energy corporations, and a nuclear-armed Israel. We might fantasize about an alternate world where foreign non-Islamic powers don’t have financial and national security interests in the Islamic world, but that alternative world does not and never will exist. There are people who finance the growth of militant Islam, and people who preach it, and those people have agency. They have to take responsibility for their actions, too. They can’t just point at the Russians and Europeans and Americans and say “you made us do this.”

America, for example, may have broken Iraq, but we didn’t advise or encourage Sunnis and Shiites to kill each other in droves. That was a decision that other people made, some of whom may be in positions of power in governments that are formerly allied with the United States.

Frankly, America takes the blame when we intervene and we take the blame when we do not. When we help autocratic regimes maintain order, preventing their countries from shattering, we are hypocrites. When we stand by and watch Syria fall apart, we are heartless.

Rami G. Khouri is correct to recommend that foreign policy advisers stand back and think about the success rate of combating Islamic militancy. We absolutely should do that. We definitely need to do an honest assessment of what works and what doesn’t.

But the exact same thing is true of anyone who thinks that supporting this particular kind of militancy is the best way to defend Islam or create better societies in their own countries. If you’re going to tell me that it’s unrealistic to ask for this kind of introspection, I will respond that it’s unrealistic to think that the West and other global powers are going to stand by and watch the Middle East turn into a Sunni Caliphate that eradicates anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their fucked up version of their religion.

Some things that are unrealistic need to become realistic. On both sides.

The Real Skewed Polls

Here are some fun facts for you.

In 2012, President Obama got almost four million more votes than George W. Bush received in his successful 2004 reelection. Mitt Romney got about 800,000 fewer votes than John McCain had won four years earlier.

After all the 2012 votes were tallied, President Obama won the popular vote by 3.8%, which was quite a bit more than when Steve Singiser took a first shot at comparing the likely voter (LV) and registered voter (RV) screens and discovered that the registered voter screens were more accurate.

The most accurate prediction came from Ipsos/Reuters’ registered voter poll. All of the likely voter screens were far too optimistic for Romney.

You should keep this in mind when you look at the latest CNN/ORC poll (pdf) out of Arkansas. This poll has Tom Cotton beating Mark Pryor 49%-47% among likely voters but losing 38%-47% among registered voters.

That’s a huge Republican-tilting screen. That doesn’t mean that it is necessarily wrong, but the recent track record for these types of screens speaks for itself. Singiser looked at the 2004 and 2008 polling, as well, and found that registered voter polls fared better overall in those elections cycles, too. However, those were presidential years. We know that Democratic voter drop off is often pronounced in midterm elections. Still, if polling outfits can’t figure out who is actually going to vote in presidential cycles, why should we trust them to figure it out in midterms?

Finally, I think it is impossible to research, but I have no doubt that President Obama’s final numbers were harmed by the persistently wrong skew of the likely voter polls which gave the impression that the election was closer than it was. It prevented demoralization on the Republican side which kept the volunteers active, kept the donations flowing, and colored how the media portrayed the contest to the public. I still believe there was a time right around the time of the first debate when Romney and the Republicans were on the verge of collapse and that a real blowout was possible. Obama’s poor performance in that first debate stopped Romney’s downward trajectory, but the race was never really close. It only looked kind of close because of those likely voters screens that turned out to be completely wrong.

So, I still think the aggregate of polls is very accurate, but you have to drill down into individual polls to know what you are looking at. A poll that showed Mark Pryor with a huge lead among registered voters is being reported as a narrow deficit among likely voters. And that helps Tom Cotton raise money, avoid questions about why his campaign is floundering, and maintain the enthusiasm of his base.

Is it true that registered voters in Arkansas overwhelmingly support their Democratic senator but that he is going to be narrowly defeated anyway?

Could be. But, I wouldn’t bet on it.