Rodney King died too young on June 17, 2012. He was beaten nearly to death by Los Angeles police officers on March 4, 1991. He lived over 21 years after his beating. Michael Brown did not survive his encounter with Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson. Which outcome was more outrageous?
Once the nation’s eyes were trained on the LAPD, it wasn’t long before we learned that it was an embarrassingly corrupt organization. The same has proven true for St. Louis County, which runs “a system that raises money for itself by deluging a largely-black population with fines and tickets for minor civic infractions, then punishes them again and again with arrests and imprisonment for not being able to navigate a convoluted judicial system.”
They run a system where the prosecutor acts as the police departments’ defense attorney, which is a highly anomalous scenario:
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. attorneys prosecuted 162,000 federal cases in 2010, the most recent year for which we have data. Grand juries declined to return an indictment in 11 of them.
The authorities didn’t even want to have a grand jury in this case. When the threat of civil unrest compelled them to convene one, the prosecutor threw the case, blaming the 24-hour news cycle and social media for creating the expectation that justice might be done in the broad daylight murder of Michael Brown. After the prosecutor announced the grand jury’s decision, Michael Brown’s mother Lesley McSpadden said, simply, “They still don’t care. They ain’t never gon’ care.”
As Jamelle Bouie puts it:
Unfortunately, we don’t live in a society that gives dignity and respect to people like Michael Brown and John Crawford and Rekia Boyd. Instead, we’ve organized our country to deny it wherever possible, through negative stereotypes of criminality, through segregation and neglect, and through the spectacle we see in Ferguson and the greater St. Louis area, where police are empowered to terrorize without consequence, and residents are condemned and attacked when they try to resist.
It should come as no surprise that black leaders in this country are expressing exasperation:
“This decision seems to underscore an unwritten rule that Black lives hold no value; that you may kill Black men in this country without consequences or repercussions. This is a frightening narrative for every parent and guardian of Black and brown children, and another setback for race relations in America,” Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH) said in a statement.
The congresswoman called it a “slap in the face to Americans nationwide who continue to hope and believe that justice will prevail” and expressed solidarity with “the loved ones of all the Michael Browns we have buried in this country.”
Despite glaring racial disparities in the attitude to this case, there are no shortage of white people who are disappointed, saddened, or outraged by the “legality” of Michael Brown’s murder. But they will never feel what it is like to have their children threatened and devalued like this. They won’t know the fear and uncertainty this causes even for our president, First Lady, and Attorney General, all of whom have children who could one day be guilty of walking down the middle of the street when a man in a patrol car rolls up and tells them to “get the f*ck on the sidewalk.” And then guns them down in cold blood, collects a half million dollars from racist fans, and walks off scot-free to an early retirement.
You’ll hear all manner of justification for this outcome. You’ll hear that the evidence was inconsistent. You’ll hear that Michael Brown was a thug who looked like a demon. But he was an 18 year old boy who was minding his own business one minute and was left dead in the street the next. He was left there in a pool of blood for hours. There was no incident report. The victim was smeared. Grand jury testimony was selectively leaked.
Officer Darren Wilson should have been given the opportunity to defend his actions in a court of law. He could well have won an acquittal. But what’s clear is that the moment after he ended Michael Brown’s life, the system went into overdrive to protect him and to justify what he had done. They made sure that killing Michael Brown was not a crime. It wasn’t even maybe a crime. It was just what police officers do in America without having to worry that they might have to answer for it in court.
Americans can debate this all they want, but unless they know firsthand how this system feels to those who have to live their lives in terror, their opinions aren’t worth much.
Amen Booman
Just feel so sad
The sad fact is, we don’t want to know.
The reality of the history is just too jarring for people to accept. It destroys the comfortable facade that we, who have been the majority for so long, have spent generations constructing. But that doesn’t change the fact that it is real. And for those who have had to live it, and to see it perpetuated, generation after generation, it has to be simply soul-crushing in its sad inevitability.
“American (white American, that is) exceptionalism” is one of the deadliest delusions on the planet.
I’m sick and in despair today. I can’t even begin to imagine how black people feel. To have it demonstrated over and over again, in deadliest and most concrete possible way, that your life, and the lives of your children, have no value?
Based on what I’ve seen this morning, I can already tell that I am going to have to stay away from my Facebook timeline for a few days. The shit that I am seeing from people is simply abominable. Events such as this bring out sides of friends and family that I would be better off not knowing. The conscious ignorance is what bothers me the most. And because peoples biases and tribal instincts are so deep, it is simply impossible to even get them to consider that their view could be skewed or founded on fallacious ideas. There is simply no rationality possible on this subject. If you want to discuss it, it can only happen at the reptilian level of their brain.
Much like the gay rights issue, it seems like people have to know someone who they love and who is personally impacted by these kinds of events in order to break through that shell of ignorance and make it possible to even begin to change their thought process on it. It’s sad. Very sad.
was shot was because whites have an irrational fear of young black men. This fear is based on the countless portraits of young black men.
They are described as hopeless, poor and violent.
Some facts:
2% of all murders are committed by young blacks. As one study concluded:
http://www.cjcj.org/news/6523
Crime and other problems have dropped across the board for young people – kids today are less likely to get pregnant, do drugs, kill each other, kill you, knock down the local liquor store, etc, etc. They have many more requirements for graduation from HS, too.
And all this has happened at the same time the younger generations have grown increasingly diverse.
It is an interesting contrast to public assumptions.
Irrational fear of black men could have played a role here. We can never know what is really in someone’s heart, only what they do. But Michael Brown weighs around 290 pounds, is 6′ 4” tall, and had just tried to take the officers gun before turning back toward him. The blood spatter evidence indicates he was again moving toward the officer. I’d say in those circumstances some of the officer’s fear was rational. His fear of being overpowered by a much bigger and stronger adversary doesn’t necessarily justify the shooting, but it is a factor, independent of the race of the shooting victim.
Michael was 153 feet away when the fatal shots were fired. No matter how big he was, how dangerous was he from half a football field away?
Mr Brown was 153 feet from the officer’s SUV at the time of the shooting, but the officer had chased him. I am not aware of any physical evidence that reliably determined the distance between the officer and Mr. Brown. At least one witness put the distance as little as 10-15 feet as the office chased him down the street.
So we’re supposed to believe that the officer was chasing this young man, and also so terrified of him that he had no choice but to shoot him in the head? Really? If he was so freaking scared, why not stop chasing? And if he wasn’t terrified, why not a non-lethal shot? How does this make sense?
Doesn’t make sense. But under the law which often doesn’t make sense, Wilson was within police guidelines.
I don’t want to make excuses for Officer Wilson, who made a terrible mess of what should have been a routine situation IMO. But he might have felt it was his duty to give chase to a suspect, whether or not he was terrified.
he wasn’t a suspect at that time, Wilson was after him for walking in the street instead of sidewalk. and is it verified that Brown tried to take his gun??
Wilson chased Brown for assault not walking down the middle of the street. Here’s the NYTimes partial transcript of Wilson’s GJ testimony.
Funny thing. Back in August the police chief had a slightly different take on Wilson’s knowledge about any connection of Brown to the convenience store robbery.
Well, duh. Cops lie; people lie. (On a jury, I voted to acquit a young Black woman because it was obvious to me that the white cop testifying for the prosecution was lying. Did the defendant lie? Probably. But it didn’t matter because the prosecution had the burden of proof and a lying cop meant that it couldn’t meet that requirement.) iirc Brown’s friend Johnson denied any theft until the video surfaced.
The theft may have been irrelevant to what went down between Brown and Wilson. It may have had something or nothing to do with Brown’s state of mind. Wilson should have heard the radio report, but maybe he didn’t or maybe he did and didn’t connect it to Brown and Johnson. It does become irrelevant the moment Brown assaulted Wilson.
lie, i.e. in this instance, changed story with retrospective info in order to blame Brown. Earliest reports said no knowledge of cigarillo situation (and he could see the cigarillos from that distance???)
Technically, we don’t know if Wilson changed his story. What was heard months ago was a third party telling what he thought was Wilson’s story.
Memories are always reconstructions based on the small amount of information that we take in and later store. That’s why “eyewitness” reports are so error prone. Particularly in sudden and high stress situations. Then the little bits and pieces get construction through a propensity to make oneself look better or more central to the event and the narrative gets rehearsed and repeated as if it reflects the real events. Best to discount most of it
third party = police chief. not the same thing as “third party” which implies some buddy or other witness. police chief is his superior and, we may assume, had superior knowledge of what info had been sent out in the dept. I really don’t need a mini lecture on memory.
stopping for walking in the middle of the street is consistent with the “shakedown” scam, articles to which Boo links
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/09/04/st_louis_fines_system_washington_post_reports_on_t
ickets_arrests_in_ferguson.html
btw did any of you catch the video a few months ago from FL of woman tased by police for walking in the street , walking away from them, in neighborhood where there is no sidewalk?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7d-XLYA6d0
I don’t see the unedited video from the neighbor, – if anyone has the link, will appreciate
Let’s not excuse trigger happy and poor police work with “the cop was so scared.” Wilson is a big guy that could have stayed in his big-ass SUV and called for back-up. So what if Brown got away? It’s not as if there are that many young men in the area that match Brown’s physical description.
I don’t excuse it. IMO Wilson should not be a cop given the way he screwed up a perfectly routine situation.
had the robbery been reported already? I read that Wilson did not know of the robbery at that time
Yes, the robbery had been reported. Wilson claimed that he heard the radio report before the altercation with Brown.
It’s my understanding they are/ were the same height
May your words and observations be spread a thousandfold.
The American Dream, a land build by immigrants. I came to America in 1957 and found a place to live in Creve Coeur, Mo. The bubble of segregation burst open once again. My heart goes out to all, the people in the Florissant Road area of Ferguson. The people of Greater St. Louis, the gateway to the West. There are great citizens in St. Louis, people stand-up for your neighbour, stand shoulder to shoulder.
Where is McCain and Lyndsey Graham on homeland security for its citizens?
They show up in northern Syria, they walk the streets in Baghdad with “no protection”, they join the racists on Maidan to protest in Kiev, he was there in Georgia in 2008 and in Jerusalem to preserve the jewishness of a racist Israel. Always on the wrong side of history. No guts to walk the streets of Ferguson Missouri?
From my earlier diary – An Officer Shot A Black Teen, And St. Louis Rioted — In 1962.
Second to last paragraph nails it.
Apparently tyranny only becomes “TYRANY!!111” when Authority moves against an angry <strike>black person</strike> Republican.
When has Authority moved against any angry Republican?
All Authority has to do is intend to do something that Republicans don’t like.
Yes. And since Missouri is an open carry state, imagine the reaction if this were a group of differently-pigmented humans duly exercising their second amendment rights on the streets of greater Ferguson. Would we see Wayne LaPierre and his compadres marching arm in arm with them down the middle of the street? Somehow, I doubt we would be seeing them portrayed as some kind of modern-day freedom fighter.
imagine the reaction if this were a group of differently-pigmented humans duly exercising their second amendment rights on the streets of greater Ferguson.
Not sure what your point is.
Mass demonstrations with a constant danger of degeneration into violence are not places for any civilians to be allowed to go armed.
Not a chance in hell.
Already heard enough white privilege asininity today to turn my stomach.
LAPD Was known long before the King beating as corrupt by those living in minority and poorer communities. But to link the King matter to the Rampart scandal is incorrect. Too much time between the two.
Yet, somehow LA did indict four cops for beating King. They weren’t convicted; so, riots ensued. (I lived within a mile of the edge of the riots.) Fifty-three people were killed and a thousand injured. Was that justice?
Worth it to get the attention of the US Justice Dept that indicted the four cops for violation of King’s civil rights and secured two convictions? Not my community; so, it’s not my call.
The reality is that US laws favor the police — by a wide margin. (When there’s doubt, killer cops walk and cop killers get life (David Gilbert, Mumia Abu-Jamal and Leonard Peltier). And the US is a racist country. There will be no more justice for Dillon Taylor than there was for Michael Brown. Or Oscar Grant.
And so it goes. Another, most often Black and young, man is killed by a cop. Another school massacre. Shock, outrage, anger, rage — we all play our well known and rehearsed parts. And nothing changes.
Except that crime continues to plummet.
The murder rate among young African Americans is down 83% since 1990.
We are a much less violent country than 25 years ago by any measure.
Really?
How did that happen? Did we all sit around singing Kumbaya? Careful with your answer because to accept that we’re a less violent country, there is no good liberal/progressive explanation.
include the removal of lead from the environment.
The reason numbers like the one I cited are not known is no one likes the result. For conservatives it is the ultimate disproof of the idea that the change in the role of women and the breakdown of the nuclear family is the cause of every social problem.
For liberals it is the ultimate disproof that everything is simply a product of economic inequality.
So liberals repeat what you wrote. And right wingers write what they write.
But it is wrong. Oh, and the abortion rate and the rate of teenage pregnancy is at 50 years too.
We are MUCH less violent country.
Why is that so hard to accept? Because it doesn’t fit with our preconceived notions.
Economic inequality is a variable in crime rates –but only one of many. No real liberal would claim that it’s more than that. It’s the rightwing that claims that’s what liberals claim and then proceed to mock the false claim.
If we set the crime rate baseline for a year in the 1960s, the correct statement wouldn’t be that we’ve become a less violent country since then but are back to that level of violence.
Are you including US military violence around the world? It was low between 1975 and 1990. Law enforcement violence which is generally not reported. Are we sure that people feel as safe to report crimes as they did a couple of decades ago. I don’t have any answers to those questions, but I’m also not asserting a simplified cause and effect relationships based on preconceived notions.
As tempting as it is to accept the lead-violence hypothesis because lead is extremely damaging to developing brains — the evidence to date is correlation (and very macro at that) and not causation. Same with the abortion hypothesis even if I personally think it has merit. (Don’t care if the abortion rate is low or high; only care that no girl or woman should be denied access to all forms of birth control. Also better doesn’t mean “good enough,” Despite the drastic drops in U.S. teen birth rates, Haub notes that the new low of 26.6 is 5.5 times higher than in Western Europe, where rates are in single digits. The most recent United Nations data shows Switzerland at a low of 1.9 and Luxembourg at a high of 8.3, with most others in the area at 5 or 6 per 1,000 teens.
The rightwing likes those reduced crime rate numbers because it supports their position that locking up five times as many people, expanding the number of people on parole even more than 500%, more gun ownership/more semi-automatics/more assault weapons, and militarizing local police forces has led to lower crime rates (assuming that’s true). Perhaps — or could also be nothing more than correlation.
Why are you choosing the 60’s as the baseline? But US military violence was higher in the 60’s than it is now. Vietnam and all that.
The best evidence is that we are near an 100 year low in murder rates generally. The numbers before 1960 are not easily comparable. It is very possibly they are the lowest in US history.
I could write, and have, at great length regarding lead. It is true, correlation doesn’t equal causation. But the evidence is more than macro level – data on some cities shows similar part of the city with divergent crime rates and divergent lead reduction rates. It does not account for all of the difference.
What I find interesting is how resistant you are to the data. There has been an 83% decline in murder committed by black teenagers. The number is staggering. There are others: the rate for youth incarceration is down 45% since 1995.
The data is ignored because it does not support an ideological explanation. Both the left and the right ignore it.
It may be that increased incarceration was partially responsible. It may be that it was a change in policing. It may be that video games allow an escape that reduces the need for actual violence.
If we actually cared about violence we would start by asking why it is going down. You can look far and wide and see few attempts at a systemic explanation.
We didn’t know why it increased (and recall crime “experts” were predicting in 1990 that it would continue to increase at alarming rates) and we’re just as puzzled by the decline. Will it continue to decline because we are becoming a less violent country? Or is it because we’re just becoming an older country? Older in general and much older for whites.
But it’s weak analysis to pick and choose data by one’s preferred explanation. Leave no data behind. For example wrt youth incarceration:
Neither the group of states that had declines or those that had increases are consistent with the lead or abortion hypotheses.
When I was a child, we let ourselves into the house after school. The adults were busy doing grown up stuff, and kids, in general, were not the focus. Starting around ’84, you started seeing “Baby on Board” signs. Kids had become precious. It was a generational change. Historians Strauss and Howe have written numerous books about the generational cycle. The increasing interest in children, and subsequent drop in childhood dangers, is part of that cycle. In short, if you take better care of your kids, you get better kids. It may not have been a government action, but it certainly supports liberal views.
Or maybe it’s because as a percentage of the population, white folks have been declining. Too bad that correlation is only evident in the 1990-2010 period.
The “Baby on Board” placards replaced the St. Christopher statues that Catholics put on their dashboards in earlier decades to keep their babies safe.
This journalistic cliche, easy to fall into–once I was onto this, I had to constantly catch myself–automatically privileges the police and the system of injustice. And it distorts the events.
The St. Louis PD, which (1) took the case from the Ferguson PD before a police report was written about the killing (but not before a police report was written about the alleged strongarm robbery), (2) handled the forensic examination, the results of which are in the document drop of last night, and (3) responded with overwhelming force to a community demonstration as if there were already “civil unrest”, were not deterred by the prospect of civil unrest. They were ready for it. They had equipped themselves to fight it with weapons. They seemed to treat Ferguson as a training exercise.
What compelled the convening of the grand jury was the national attention that was brought to St. Louis when Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, and Chris Hayes decided to report remotely from Ferguson. You might argue that the media was captured by the possibility of burning buildings and police vs. community violence. If it bleeds, it leads, you know. But the actual actions that captured their attention was the police overreaction in arresting two of their print journalistic brethren and the drama of police seizing and arresting totally non-violent protesters after body-slamming them. Call it 24 drama.
Civil unrest doesn’t compel grand juries, it compels the sending in of the 82nd Airborne and nationalizing of the National Guard.
State claims of civil unrest from the beginning of the Republic have been used to suppress people who are seeking redress of grievances and most often in a non-violent but civilly disobedient way.
What has happened is a second exercise in the attempt to shut down legitimate speech and assembly through the use of overwhelming military-policing force orchestrated through the DHS Fusion Center command structure.
In the current homeland security environment, it is difficult to imagine a movement like that of the Greensboro Sit-Ins of 1961 or the Birmingham demonstrations of 1963 succeeding in bringing about a Civil Rights Act, much less the end of de jure segregation through the courts. There is no Robert F. Kennedy to ensure that the FBI works to defend instead of entrap the protesters. And the through the Fusion Centers, all levels of law enforcement are pledged and build the culture of supporting even the corrupt units in the system. It is difficult to imagine federal law enforcement acting as a check on state or local abuses any more–because of the context of fear of domestic terrorism.
I have had that experience of facing firsthand for 32 hours that system in which the rules do not apply. I know what that feels like.
It is instructive that the police facilities to which I was taken were in a black neighborhood in Chicago. Ironically, it was one in which I lived while going to graduate school 46 years ago, and worked with trying to get more educational resources into the community. I even remember the petition drive in the community to get one of the facilities located there because it would mean jobs.
I cannot imagine living day in and day out with the threat of that arbitrary authority randomly falling on me or my family.
You know what this “grave injustice” really is? One of the things it is, anyway? It’s that this scared shitless cop is likely to be yet another victim of an ongoing white supremacist system just as have been so many millions of minority people. Nothing else will change. The police departments won’t change because they are doing the job that has been set up for them to do by the controllers who reap untold riches from the labor of underpaid, purposely undereducated workers. The police departments will just add another level of PC bullshit to their act, maybe hire a few more minority cops and do some “community outreach” shit like the D.A.R.E. thing. We can see how well that’s working, right?
Riiiiight…
These efforts don’t work to change things on a basic level. They’re just band-aids. Until we change the legal graft system as it now stands up and down the governmental system of the United States there will be no real change. It’s really not about “racism,” it’s about worker abuse. It’s always been about worker abuse. The race thing…or the religion thing or country of origin thing…is simply a convenient marker that is used to create a worker substratum which is then forced to do the dirty work of the society. It was only a little more than a century ago that the working ghettoes of the U.S. were filled w/the Irish, the Italians and the Jews. When they managed to integrate into the middle class…a task made much easier by their overall skin color…the burden fell on black Americans and over time on latinos…easier to manage because of their physical markers.
All of this leftiness blah-blah over Ferguson is just the usual ineffective left-wing crocodile tears. Once some form of order is restored in Ferguson and whatever other areas that show signs of protest…and it will be restored, at the point of a gun if necessary…then the PermaGov prevarication will begin and this will be subsumed by yet another hottest-thing-ever emergency.
Bet on it. Maybe the Ferguson cop will have a hard time of it for while; maybe he’ll even have to endure a civil suit, but somehow, some way the controllers will get the message out to all of the other scared shitless cops of every race that they are an important part of America’s valiant shield against whatever menace is most convenient to use at the time. Here are some more guns, ammunition and heavy armament to defend your beleaguered position and that will be that.
Have fun.
Riiiiight…
WTFU.
AG
Rodney King died too young on June 17, 2012. He was beaten nearly to death by Los Angeles police officers on March 4, 1991. He lived over 21 years after his beating. Michael Brown did not survive his encounter with Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson. Which outcome was more outrageous?
The acquittal of Rodney King’s attackers was outrageous. “We were trained that way” is no better than “just following orders” from an Auschwitz guard.
The Brown killing appears to have been righteous.