Tunisia Attack: Cameron Clueless, Declares War!

Just read his peer of 30 years ago how “Iron Lady” Margareth Thatcher would wipe out terrorism. UK’s PM Cameron doesn’t have a strategy and is striking blows and threats in all directions, not a single word about failed foreign policy. He can chair COBRA a hundred times, it won’t make a difference and it won’t stop radicalization. The refugee migrants will continue to pour across European borders as North Africa and the Middle East nations sink into further chaos, unemployment and hope for a better future.

    A national minute’s silence will be held across Britain at midday on Friday, exactly a week after an ISIS gunman killed 38 holidaymakers in Tunisia. [30 Britons were killed]

    David Cameron said the whole country would want to ‘share in a moment of remembrance’ as he announced plans would also be drawn up for a permanent memorial.

    The Prime Minister said ISIS posed an existential threat to the British way of life, but vowed: ‘We will now cower in the face of terrorism.’

British media continues fearmongering by their failure to provide factual analysis of events. It was not Daesh that was responsible for the attack, more likely is the killer a lone wolf and radicalized in a cell of a few persons. On-line radicalization is not the same as a planned terror attack by al-Qaeda or the Islamic State (IS or Daesh). The media and PM Cameron is making IS look larger than it is, same what happened during the Iraq War and the Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi who left torture and imprisonment to become the US boogeyman for many years. After a few years, Saudi national of Yemeni origin Osama Bin Laden and Egyptian national of the Muslim Brotherhood Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, the fugitive leadership of Al Qaeda, accepted him in the fold of AQ. Very similar to the second generation that followed in Iraq, IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was imprisoned by US Forces, tortured and released. UK, Jordan, Israel and the US creating the monsters that come back with the result of failed states. Similar to the Zarqawi death announcement on multiple occasions, al-Baghdadi was announced dead as early as in 2010.

Tunisia killers have declared war on Britain, says David Cameron | The Guardian |

David Cameron has pledged that Britain will not give up its way of life or cower in the face of terrorism as he urged the country to hold a minute’s silence at midday on Friday in memory of the UK citizens killed in Tunisia.

The minute’s silence will come exactly a week after the massacre in Sousse left up to 30 Britons dead, the biggest loss of British life to terrorism since the 7/7 bombings in London in 2005.

Cameron said the killers had declared war on Britain, adding the government would provide a “full spectrum” response including helping the injured return to the UK within 24 hours, assisting with security in Tunisia and tracking down any accomplices of the killers, as well as combating the narrative of Islamic fascism in the UK.


In a Commons statement lasting 100 minutes, Cameron said the Cobra emergency committee had decided not to change the travel advice to Tunisian coastal resorts, arguing the killers were trying to wipe out the Tunisian tourist industry which represents 15% of the country’s economy.

Acknowledging that it was a difficult judgment, he said this advice could change if the Tunisian authorities were unable to provide assurances about upgrading protection for tourists, including in hotels.

He repeatedly said he was determined to change the narrative so that those people drawn to Islamic extremism were combated more effectively. The government will publish a new counter-extremism strategy shortly that is likely to proscribe more organisations and clamp down on extremist messages through social media and satellite TV channels to mosques.

Why not?

If we are going to allow the state to execute folks, then why all this complicatedness?  Why not just provide sufficient amounts of heroin for the condemned to overdose?  It seems like heroin is sufficiently deadly, and, based on what I’ve heard, and the large number of users worldwide, is fairly painless.

Based on “The Wire,” it seems like about $100 worth could end the life of anyone on death row.  And we could buy it in bulk from our Afghani friends, saving the taxpayers even more.

Trump is Perfect for the White House

With NBC severing all ties with Donald Trump, his campaign message seems to be that he’s too racist for network television but perfect for the White House. But before he can get that far, he has to win the Republican Party nomination.

That seems rather unlikely, but I don’t think his main problem will be his stance on immigration. Getting fired by a major network is probably an asset for him as he can play the victim and accuse the liberal media executives of cowardice in the face of the political correctness police. It’s like a badge of honor to be silenced by media executives in New York City. I bet that Bobby Jindal would love to get hired by CBS just so he could say something so outrageous that it would get his contract ripped up and he could milk it for all it’s worth.

Normal rules no longer apply to Republican politics, so you can pretty much piss off the establishment in almost any way you want to and not have it hurt your standing with the Republican base. In most cases, making respectable people shudder in horror is the surest way to get a boost in the polls. Donald Trump certainly understands this.

His problems are different. He doesn’t know what he’s supposed to say. And he’s going to have a problem passing the basic electability sniff test. Thrilling the Republican base isn’t enough on its own to win the nomination because there are practical voters who have the ability to think rationally enough to figure out that, yes, Alan Keyes may be making an enormous amount of sense, but he will never be acceptable to most voters whose cerebral cortex is still connected to their central nervous system. So, for Trump, he loses some base voters for not knowing their script and he fails to make up for it with “common sense” conservatives who still have enough empathy to project accurately about what normal people will think is insane.

Trump will lose, but not because the media treat him as a pariah or because he’s too racist.

Lacking Social Life, Road to Radicalization In White Supremacy

Doing some search to available information from SPLC and news sources, there seems to be a profound link to white supremacists located in St. Louis, Missouri. The city and metropolitan area has a troubled past in segregation by political and economic power of the white elites. I spend some years in Creve Coeur and just a few days ago our family recovered 8mm films shot in 1958. My sister recalled a grammar school trip to a park in rural St. Louis County. On the day of the school outing, three Afro-American children didn’t show up. At the entrance to the park in private ownership, there was a welcoming sign: “For Whites Only.”  Unbelievable!

Charleston suspect’s life a troubled road to radicalization | AP |

In March, a police officer searched his car when he [Dylann Storm Roof] was found loitering at a park and found six empty 40-round magazines for an AR-15 assault rifle in his trunk, according to a police report. Roof told the officer he was saving up to buy an AR-15, the report said.

In April, he was arrested again on a charge of trespassing at the mall, where he’d been banned.

He had become a recluse. He never responded to an invitation to [his sister] Amber’s wedding — which had been planned for last weekend but was postponed after the massacre. He also appears to have begun a journey into the world of Internet hate sites, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks those sites.

A man adrift, Roof was the perfect candidate for the websites, said Keegan Hanks, of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“If you don’t have much of a social life in the real world, this is a way for you to interact with other individuals and be affirmed and encouraged,” Hanks said.

Roof appeared to be “AryanBlood1488,” who began posting on the white supremacist site the Daily Stormer in August, Hanks said. In comments over several months, “AryanBlood1488” described how he typed “black on white crime” into a Google search, ending up at the Council of Conservative Citizens [St. Louis, Mo.] site and then descended into radicalism from there.

    St. Louis enters the action here. The Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC) is incorporated – as a tax-free non-profit entity – in Missouri. Its roots lie in St. Louis white supremacists Gordon Baum, who is deceased, and Earl P. Holt IIII, who has moved to Texas. Baum and Holt were radicalized to fight desegregation in the St. Louis region, so the racist radicalization that led to the massacre at Mother Emanuel passed through arch segregationists right here in St. Louis, if the post was written by Roof.

     « click for more info
    Dylann Roof had two dozen comments at Daily Stormer, none later than Feb. 2015 (SPL Center)

Kyle Rogers [cached], a member of the Council of Conservative Citizens who lives in Summerville, South Carolina, denied Roof had any direct dealings with the group. A federal law enforcement source close to the investigation said the FBI is investigating Roof’s possible links to the Daily Stormer. The source spoke anonymously because he was not authorized to discuss the investigation publicly.

Roof also posted a photo on Facebook of himself wearing a jacket with the flags of the defunct white-supremacist regimes in South Africa and Rhodesia.

St. Louis Hate Group Leader, Earl Holt, Continues to Host Radio Show After Posting Racist Diatribe Online

Political cartoon about the East St. Louis massacres of 1917. Portrayed on the document he holds, the caption reads, “Mr. President, why not make America safe for democracy?”, referring to Wilson’s phrase in his speech before Congress upon the U.S. entering World War I “the world must be made safe for democracy.”

Obama Turncoats: CNN Facilitates UANI Advocate Pro-Israel

A pro-Israel and anti-Iran stance written in a Letter to Obama on the P5+1 negotiations shortly before reaching the June 30 deadline, covered by CNN GPS host Fareed Zakaria on Sunday.

    “It was signed by 18 experts, including five former top Obama administration officials who were critical advisers on Iran. Those senior advisers include former State Department official Robert Einhorn, former White House official Gary Samore, former State Department adviser Dennis Ross and retired Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright.

    Members of a bipartisan group of experts have been meeting regularly within the last three years, under the auspices of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy [WINEP] to discuss the Iran nuclear issue, the letter said.”

    [Source: The Hill]

I had expressed my low opinion of the GPS Show here in a comment to Booman’s fp story My Hunch On Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Nuclear Bomb.

Former Obama aides slam the Iran nuclear deal | MSM – Business Insider – Reuters |

A group of prominent American security advisers, including five with ties to President Barrack Obama’s first term, warned on Wednesday that a deal on curbing Iran’s nuclear program was at risk of failing to provide adequate safeguards.

In an open letter, the group of former U.S. officials and foreign policy experts cautioned that an Iran nuclear deal would “fall short of meeting the administration’s own standard of a ‘good’ agreement” unless it included a tougher line on United Nations nuclear inspections and conditions for sanctions relief.

The release of the letter, which was signed by Dennis Ross, an adviser [to Hillary Clinton] on Iran and the Middle East in Obama’s first term, comes as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry prepares to fly to Vienna on Friday to join the talks.

Negotiations between Iran and six major powers are aimed at reaching an agreement under which Tehran would curtail its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

“Most of us would have preferred a stronger agreement,” the letter released by the Washington Institute said. “The agreement will not prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapons capability. It will not require the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. It will, however, reduce that infrastructure for the next 10 to 15 years.”

In addition to Ross, the letter was signed by David Petraeus, former CIA director [plea deal convict breach of US Secrets Act] and U.S. commander in Iraq, Robert Einhorn, a former member of the U.S. negotiating team with Iran, retired U.S. General James Cartwright and Gary Samore [Clinton-era NSC official], an Obama adviser on nuclear policy turned president of the [pro-Israel] advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran.

    Gary Samore is an academic and former White House adviser who serves as president of United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), an advocacy group that promotes a hardline U.S. stance on Iran’s nuclear enrichment program. He is also the executive director of Harvard University’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, which has hosted foreign policy hawks like Eric Edelman, Meghan O’Sullivan, Paula Dobriansky, and Robert Zoellick.

    Samore, who was a founding member of UANI’s advisory board, was hired to lead the organization in September 2013, just as negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 powers appeared to be gaining momentum. Although UANI claims to have a politically centrist posture, its board has been heavily weighted with neoconservatives and rightwing nationalists, including James Woolsey, Roger Noriega, Henry Sokolski, Mike Gerson, Mark Lagon, and Otto Reich.

    [Source: RightWeb – profiles]

The letter was also signed by Stephen Hadley [edited Colin Powell’s UN presentation full of lies to go to war in Iraq] , a national security adviser [Neocon and advocate for the removal of president Assad in Syria] to both former President George W. Bush and his brother, Republican presidential contender Jeb Bush.

Iran is hoping to reach a deal with six world powers — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — in exchange for relief from international sanctions. Negotiations are widely expected to slide past a self-imposed June 30 deadline.

Coalition of the Willing Against Iran: US Justice Dept, Ungar, UANI and Mossad

Where is U.S. Foreign policy drafted? In think-tanks, billionaires, political friends and business alliances? WTF

(Pakistan Defense Forum) – Mark D. Wallace, chief executive of United Against Nuclear Iran and a former Bush administration official, also would not discuss it. In court documents, the group’s lawyers call Mr. Restis’s lawsuit “little more than a thinly veiled effort to silence a U.S. organization’s efforts to prevent business transactions with Iran and thwart Iran’s efforts to obtain nuclear weapons.”

    Founded in 2008, United Against Nuclear Iran is run and advised by a long list of former government officials. Its advisers include Joseph I. Lieberman, the former Democratic senator from Connecticut; Francis Townsend, the former homeland security adviser to President George W. Bush; Dennis B. Ross, a former Middle East adviser to both Republican and Democratic presidents; and former intelligence chiefs from Israel, Germany and Britain.

    “It is not clear what the government believes it risks from the revelation of the group’s donor list and internal documents. According to the Times, the government is prohibited from secretly working with non-government groups to influence public opinion.

    Among others, Restis wants to subpoena Meir Dagan, a former chief of the Israeli Mossad spy agency who is an adviser to the group, and Rami Ungar, an Israeli businessman Restis claims approached him on behalf of backers of United Against Nuclear Iran in order to settle the case.”

With about $1.7 million a year in donations, the group has lobbied Congress and helped draft legislation. But it is best known for its “name and shame” campaigns, which unearth information about Western companies suspected of doing business with Iran. Using news releases, letters, Facebook and its website, the group pressures them to stop.

74 US corporations business dealings with Iran

Still a damning article on why Hillary Clinton should not be nominated by the Democrats to run as their candidate for President of the United States of America …

Our Hawk Running the State Department with USIP Support by Oui on June 9, 2012

A Love Story

(The above is a photograph of the two of us on our wedding day, 29 years ago)

We have called ourselves partners forever, it seems. She wasn’t fond of the term girlfriend, or later wife, and it never mattered to me. But partners, she liked. It made us equals, and if there is one thing I know about my partner, it’s that she insists on being treated as the equal of anyone.

We met at the University of Colorado School of Law in Boulder, CO, during our first year. My earliest memory of her is me approaching her to bum a cigarette because I noticed she was a smoker. I had quit – sort of – by which I mean I’d stopped buying cigarettes for myself. I learned she smoked menthols (for the record I hate menthols). I smoked it anyway. Her smile, when it appeared suddenly was wide, beaming and infectious. She had beautiful long, blue-black hair that hung down below her waist. Yeah, I noticed her more after that.

(Hey, the rest is below the fold, so why don’t you check it out?)
Her clearest first memory of me was that – in her opinion – I was one of those idiots who asked questions in class about stuff that had no relation to anything she thought would be on the final exam. She had a point. One of the few times I was able to put aside my inherent shyness back in the day was in the classroom. And I did ask questions in class about – to be fair – legal issues that some might consider esoteric. To me the study of law was like a big intellectual puzzle, and it fascinated me. To her, I was simply one of those annoying people who raised their hands rather than wait to be called upon. One of the know-it-alls. One of the show-offs. Maybe she has a point, but in my defense, I didn’t have much self confidence – except in the classroom. There, I felt transported out of my normal, self-conscious, socially awkward persona into a better, more articulate, less fearful self (she would tell you this is all malarkey, by the way).

After our first semester finals, our class had a big party at a local dance bar. She and I ended up in the same group of people somehow. Then she gave me a ride to a downtown bar/restaurant on the Pearl Street Mall. Then we ended up going out dancing, and I learned she was a fantastic dancer, far better than me. Somehow we ended spending the entire night together, talking, talking and more talking. But she was in a relationship, so things never progressed very far after that. Until the summer when that relationship ended and she invited me up to her house in Boulder. I was back living in Denver, driving a cab and renting a room in a friend’s house. I accepted her invitation with – how shall I put this? – alacrity. I drove my 400cc Honda motorcycle for an hour on a 90 plus degree day and arrived, parched and a fairly beaten down by the sun and the wind, to find her sunbathing in her backyard, asleep, baby oil slathered all over her dark skin. I learned she loved the sunshine.

We started dating when school resumed. I hadn’t dated much for a couple of years, but being with her was easy. Her intelligence was more than my match, her wit sharper and keener than mine, and she could carry the conversation when I got tongue tied. And for some reason I couldn’t fathom, she didn’t seem to mind my company. Our classmates noticed we hung out together. We had become a thing, as they say, though I’m not sure we looked at it that way. Both of us had been burned badly in prior relationships, and we both proceeded cautiously. We were just friends with benefits, I suppose you could call it. Well, we were until the night that changed everything.

It was a Friday night and we had made plans to go see The Big Chill, which was the must see date movie that fall. We’d missed out a couple of times before when the theater sold out, so we planned to leave early this time. I left the law school library on my bike (the aforementioned Honda) to go home – a rental shared with two other students, one getting his PhD in physics and the other a journalism major – to shower, shave, and change clothes. You know – make myself pretty, or at least presentable. That was around 6:00 pm. I never made it. The last thing I remember was turning left onto Baseline from Broadway.

She and I had arranged for me to drop by at 8:00 that evening in plenty of time to get tickets for nine-thirty showing. By eight-thirty when I hadn’t arrived yet, she called my house, but my roommates had no clue where I was. She called a mutual friend (I’ll call her Janet here), a woman we both knew well. Janet was pissed. She said I was standing my future partner to be up.

[I should probably introduce my beloved at this point: her first name’s Clara, for Clara Schumann. Her father was big into classical music. Not surprisingly, he bought a piano, and Clara began taking lessons at the age of five. She was very talented and could have gone to Julliard, but chose Barnard instead to study psychology. Lucky for me that she did. But I digress …]

Janet could be very righteous in the defense of what she considered injustice, and a man standing one of Janet’s best friends up on Friday night was a major injustice in Janet’s eyes. Janet came right over to Clara’s house. As the time ticked off, Janet told Clara something to the effect that if I didn’t show my face in the next 15 minutes, the two of them were going to leave and go out on their own, and to hell with my sorry, no good, lying, disrespectful ass. I think that covered the gist of her remarks, though it is hearsay. I wasn’t there after all.

The deadline came and went. Janet was dragging Clara out the door when the phone rang. Janet told her not to answer it. Lucky me, she did anyway.

The person on the other end of the line was not me, just so you know. It was a nurse at Boulder Community Hospital. The conversation, as I understand it from numerous re-tellings over the years went something like this (obviously, the following reconstructed dialogue is nowhere near an accurate word-for-word recitation, but it’ll do]:

Nurse: Is this Clara?

Clara: Yes. [I add here that she was more than a little surprised to be receiving a call from the hospital. “Confused and bemused” would seem to be a fair description of her state of mind based on what she’s told me.]

Nurse: Do you know a Steven Searls?

Clara: Yes. [pause of indeterminate length] Why?

Nurse: He was in an motor vehicle accident and sustained a serious head injury. We have him in the ER. He can’t remember anything, but he recalled your phone number and asked us to call you. [Note – its possible she said I insisted. In any event, I like to think that was in fact the case]. Can you come down to the ER to see him?

Needless to say, Clara went. Here’s why I was there. A drunk driver in a 70’s era Cadillac had made a left turn directly into my path at an intersection about four blocks or so from my house. I wasn’t wearing a helmet, because I’d trashed mine two weeks before when someone cut me off and I had to dump my bike. When the Caddy hit me, I flew off my bike and the crown of my head struck the fender – pardon the pun – head on. When the police initially arrived on the scene they thought I was dead, because I was laid out on the asphalt unconscious and unmoving. They assumed I’d broken my bloody neck. Turns out, luckily for my kids, they were poor diagnosticians.

I did incur a concussion severe enough to cause me to lose consciousness. Later at the emergency room when I regained some semblance of consciousness, I exhibited post-traumatic amnesia. Here’s a link to a brief description of what that is like.

Post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) is a state of confusion that occurs immediately following a traumatic brain injury in which the injured person is disoriented and unable to remember events that occur after the injury.[1] The person may be unable to state his or her name, where he or she is, and what time it is.[1] When continuous memory returns, PTA is considered to have resolved.[2] While PTA lasts, new events cannot be stored in the memory.

For me, I couldn’t remember my name. I couldn’t remember I was attending law school. I couldn’t recall my parents, my siblings, or anything to do with my former life. I couldn’t remember I was in the hospital, that I’d been in an accident, where I lived, the date, the time or really anything, even after being told many, many times. Nothing. That’s how it worked for me. Apparently, the only thing I did remember was Clara’s name and phone number. When she got to the hospital, the nurse brought her to my bed and then said something to the effect of “call us if he has a seizure, loses consciousness or whatever other bad things might happen to someone after a severe head injury.” Then that nurse took off, and left Clara to deal with me.

For the next several hours I kept asking her the same questions, every five minutes on average. Where am I. Why am I here? What’s my name? And she answered them every time, though she told me it got to be a bit boring after about the one hundredth iteration.

The only thing that kept her amused, she said was my reaction to being told I was in law school. She said I would look okay for a second, but then get a very concerned, fearful expression on my face, and ask her, in an meek, barely audible voice, “How am I doing?” (i.e., how were my grades, class rank, that kind of thing). Each time she told me I was doing very well, indeed, she says I got (and I can quote her accurately here because I’ve heard here repeat this part of our story countless times over the years), “the biggest, shit-eating grin” she’d ever seen in her life. And then five minutes later I’d forget everything she’d just told me, and the cycle would start all over.

I once asked her if she was ever tempted to tell me I was flunking out of law school, and she said the thought may have briefly crossed her mind, but that she never considered doing something that needlessly cruel. I take her at her word. I know her sense of humor pretty well now, and it wouldn’t be much fun for her if the other person didn’t get the joke.

Anyway …. around two or three in the morning the hospital wanted to kick me out because my amnesia symptoms had mostly gone away and my “continuous memory” had returned. Besides, I only had student health insurance and that didn’t pay diddly squat. The last thing they wanted to do was admit me.

I was still pretty shaky on my feet, and felt like I’d been run over by a truck (close enough), so they told Clara what she needed to do to care for me over the next few days. I think they assumed she was responsible because obviously we must have a very close relationship. I remembered her phone number after all, and she had come when called. I am of the opinion that I told her that she didn’t have to do that, and to just drop me off back at my place, but she insisted on taking me to her home. She recalls that I was in no condition to remember anything of the sort (hard for me to argue with her on that point) but she flet sorry for me and she took me to her home where I moved into her bedroom. And then I just never left. [That’s the part of the story that always gets the biggest laugh when she tells it]

And it’s true, I never left. I did end up spending an inordinate amount of time that semester in her bedroom, and missed a lot of classes, because the ER folks hadn’t discovered that the nasty head banging the Cadillac gave me had also resulted in a cracked cochlea in my right ear, from which fluid leaked. Ultimately, I’d be diagnosed with Meniere’s Disease induced by trauma. That injury led to a number of vertigo attacks, nausea and general difficulty standing, much less going to class.

On the many days I missed classes, people lent me their notes, and I learned something else about Clara. No one took better, more detailed, more precise notes than she did. Reviewing her notes was like reading a chapter from a textbook, that’s how detailed they were. Of course, before law school she had worked as a legal secretary back when they still had to know shorthand, so she would take her notes in shorthand and then type them up after class. Oh, did I tell you she could type around 80-100 words a minute with no mistakes? Well, she could. Must have had something to do with her aptitude as a pianist.

The short of it is that within a little more than a year, I asked her to marry me – before I bought the ring! One night in bed, it just came over me to ask. I knew I loved her. I hoped she’d have me. Lucky me, she said yes, and right away, too, even though she has never been big on the spontaneous thing. Not having a ring turned out to be a blessing in disguise, because she wanted to pick out the jewels and fashion a ring based on her own design (a former lover of hers had been a jeweler). So, in a way that was my present to her. At least, that’s how I see it.

We told both our families of our engagement on our graduation day. That was also the first time I met her parents, two immigrants from Japan who came here after the war when Japanese citizens where generally banned from immigrating to the United States. Clara’s father, however, had a unique skill set, as we call it these days. He was a physicist who had by accident become a tropical storm researcher. He was also one of the brightest people I ever met. They made exceptions back in the fifties for people from former enemy combatants if they were smart enough and worked in scientific fields. So, lucky me, again, because otherwise Clara never would have been born in the United States, I we never would have met.

We married on one of the hottest days of the year in 1987 in the only church in Denver that had a minister who spoke Japanese – an important requirement as Clara’s grandmother (her Oba-chan) and two aunts came over from Tokyo to attend the wedding of the odest grandchild in the family. It was a wonderful ceremony, and an even better reception. We had a live jazz band for dancing, sushi as part of our catered dinner – that raised more than a few eyebrows among my extended family – and a wedding cake with two porcelain penguin figurines atop it instead of the traditional Bride and Groom.

Remember what I said about being equal partners? Well, Clara had been adamant that we would not have a cake with a bride and groom on it. To her that reeked if inequality and I wanted her to be happy. Eventually we came across the two penguins in some little knick-knacks shop, and (according to my recollection anyway) we made the decision the moment we saw them that that two penguins were the perfect topper for our cake. They were the symbols we chose to represent our relationship. Yeah, it confused a lot of people, especially the older ones on my side, but what the hell. It wasn’t their wedding. We did receive penguin themed gifts for years to come after that from my family, however, so I guess it did make an impression. We still have the original penguins from the cake, too!

It’s been a long time since our wedding. Good times and tough times. Our first born son, a year earlier than planned. Our baby daughter six years later, after we had abandoned all hope of having another child. A move from Colorado to Western New York so Clara could live in the same city as her brother, one that I struggled with for a long time. My chronic autoimmune disorder that caused me to retire from the practice of law only a few years after making partner. Clara’s diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, and the chemotherapy treatments that may have saved her life, but devastated her brain, leading to severe cognitive deficits – confusion, short term memory loss, difficulty concentrating, anxiety attacks, depression and so forth. And all the other, common trials and tribulations that two people in a committed relationship inevitably go through.

But through it all, we stayed committed to our partnership, even in our darkest hours. And tonight we are going to celebrate at a local restaurant. Seafood. Clara loves her some crab. I don’t know what I’ll be able to eat from the menu – one of the issues related to my illness are lots of dietary restrictions – but it won’t really matter. We’ll be with each other. Still standing, as they say. Still – partners.

What Social Conservatives Don’t Get

Perusing the many reactions of social conservatives to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, I have some degree of sympathy for their fear that their sincerely held religious beliefs will be infringed somehow, either legally or just through brutal cultural suppression.

But what I find more troubling is their total silence about why people have decided that it’s wrong to deny gay couples the right to get married, adopt kids, be parents, and otherwise enjoy the same rights as other committed heterosexual couples. After all, there are still moral judgments about certain sexual behaviors, like destructive promiscuity and coercion, that are untouched by the Supreme Court’s decision. What people are doing is taking into consideration that people don’t control either same-sex or opposite-sex attraction. Kids these days simply don’t think there is a moral failing involved in being attracted to people of your own gender, nor do they think there is any virtue in abstinence outside of the intent to reproduce children. In other words, there’s a biological understanding of human sexuality that doesn’t give license to people to act any way they want sexually, but does allow them to have same-sex relationships if that is what they want. And it doesn’t wrongly insist that it’s healthier to suppress and deny your feelings and impulses than to express them freely and then act responsibly about them.

The social conservatives act like the motivation here is to marginalize their beliefs or to destroy religion, but it is really so much simpler than that. This is really about accepting people for who they are and not stigmatizing them for being different.

Greece: The next step; introducing the Euriou

Let us assume for the moment that the Greek people reject the Eurogroup ultimatum by an overwhelming margin and that the EU/Troika/Council/EuroGroup continue their childish stance of throwing sand in the face of Tsipras/Varoufakis every time they make a proposal. Let us further assume that despite running a structural primary surplus the Greek Government runs out cash in the near future: so much so that it has to default on its IMF loans and has difficulty paying wages, pensions and contractors.

This will be mainly because the current crisis has further depressed the economy and created a crisis of confidence which will result in the citizenry and businesses hoarding cash thereby depressing tax revenues further. Banks will also struggle for liquidity in the absence of further ELA assistance from the ECB. Thus, even though the state and the banks may still be technically solvent, liquidity will become a huge problem, the more so because the cash cow of the tourist industry appears to be in severe recession.

What will happen then?  The suggestion mooted here and elsewhere is that the Greek Government will start part-paying its staff, pensioners and contractors in Tax IOU’s denominated in Euros (Eurious). Thus a contractor might be paid 60% in hard cash Euros, and 40% in Tax IOU’s also denominated in Euros, but not trade-able internationally, because they will have been printed by the Greek Central bank without the approval of the ECB. This new “money” can be used to pay tax and perhaps certain utility, health and education bills on a basis pari passu with hard currency.

In fact this new currency will be a Euro in all but name, but not useable to pay for imports because it will not be accepted outside Greece. Of course traders inside Greece, who obtain many of their goods from abroad will not be very happy to accept payment in Eurious, and some will doubtless refuse to accept them. A grey market may well develop where Euro cash rich businesses (tourism sector) will trade Euros for Eurious and use the later to settle their tax bills. Should a Euriou trade at say 80% of a Euro, tourism sector industries will be able to achieve an effective 20% reduction in their tax bill (thus largely offsetting the VAT tax hike which the Government may still have to impose to improve its liquidity and solvency).

Not everyone will be happy. A state employee paid 40% in Eurious who only pays tax at an effective rate of 20% will still have 20% of his salary in Eurious – perhaps more than he needs to pay his utility, health and education bills or on purely local produce. If he chooses to exchange this for Euros on the grey market, he will effectively be accepting a 20% cut on that part of his salary. A salary cut in all but name.  However there is no reason why domestically produced Greek goods should cost any more in Eurious than in Euros and the state may well introduce laws requiring all or most traders to accept Eurious at face value.  This would systematically discourage imports and promote indigenous produce.

The beauty of this solution is that at no stage does it require Greece to formally leave the Eurozone. The problem of liquidity will have been resolved, and an effective internal devaluation will have improved the competitive position of the Greek economy. (Exporters will of course continue to earn hard Euros as normal). The Eurozone countries will doubtless rage and call foul and seek to have Greece expelled for issuing “counterfeit” money.  But in fact no counterfeit will have been issued – there is no pretense that the Euriou is identical to the Euro, and there is no mechanism for expelling Greece from the Eurozone.  Many countries – Macedonia, Malta, Serbia, the Vatican – do in practice accept Euros in parallel with their own currency even though they are not formally part of the Eurozone. (Euros are even widely accepted in parts of the UK – e.g. N. Ireland).

Assisted by this effective internal devaluation and freed from the immediate requirement to pay off IMF loans and introduce further grossly deflationary measures, confidence (and national pride) may soon return to Greece. The structural primary surplus may soon assert itself (as the economy recovers from the immediate crisis) leading the Government to a position where it can start winding down the creation of new Eurious and perhaps wipe them out altogether by exchanging them for hard euros.

Meanwhile the Eurogroup leaders will be standing by impotently but absolutely seething with rage. Their bluff, bullying and blundering will have been called for what it truly is.  All sorts of “sanctions” against Greece will have been mooted and threatened, and perhaps some even implemented with or without legal sanction. But so long as the Greek Government can pay its way, they will be powerless over it. At some stage, seeing that they risk a total loss of their Greek “assets”, they may agree a debt restructuring and come to a deal to “normalize” the situation.  But they will then be doing so on Greece’s terms.

Not only will the Austerians be revealed for the anti-scientific, sadistic morons that they are, but the neo-liberal fever that has griped Europe will have been broken.  Podemos et al will ensure that a generational shift in European political leadership happens sooner rather than later. Once again, we will all be in debt to Greek democracy.

End of EU: Grexit Near – Waiting for Brexit

After the financial banking crisis … saving the banks and putting the burden on manistreet … the austerity measures have left debts and obligations the ECB can’t cope with. Greece is the canary in the mine. The “last chance” for an agreement this weekend was rejected by the Eurozone political establishment. There was a Greece  compromise on the table supported by the IMF and EU negotiators (Dijsselbloem). The ECB just announced the institute has shut down the credit line for Greece banks … the end is near for the banks to be able to supply cash at the ATMs. The Eurozone and ECB will now implement Plan B for Greece. [no one knows the specifics] There will be no victors in this Greek tragedy. The European Union is disjoined on many controversial issues and unable to move forward on key issues: migrants entering Italy and Greece, coping with ME extremism  and the blowback of jihadists returning, and the aggresive stance towards Russia, gas supply and the Ukraine crisis. All that without mentioning the negotiations for selling out Europe to US style capitalism through the dictate of TTIP. Perhaps instigating war with Russia is a short-term solution … in chaos decision-makers get more control
and freedom to act.

See recent diary by Frank Schnittger – End Game in Greece?.

Later more …

Definitions:
Grexit or Greek withdrawal from the Eurozone.
Brexit or Brixit or UK secession from the EU, a threat by PM Cameron to keep UKIP off his back at the election. A cowardly stance to pressure Brussels to grant the UK a privileged status on immigration (keeping Muslims out) and perhaps closer ties to Anglo-American financial regulations keeping London City untouchable. To remind you, the Brits were a leading supporter [as old colonial power] for a military footprint with the US in Iraq, Libya and Syria. When the blowback comes, Britain reminds everyone it’s really an island not part of Europe. Cameron’s “Britain First.”

 
BBC News Dateline London panel discussion

More below the fold …
BBC News Dateline London panel discussion covered today’s headlines. I’m glad I watched the debate and learned quickly true colors of the participants. Much respect for a columnist for The Independent: Yasmin Alibhai – Brown. Not so for New York Times correspondent Roger Cohen who underwrites the root cause of succes by ISIS [US invasion of Iraq, torture, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay] but not the consequences how to restore relations with religion of Islam and the world Muslim community. His stance on Iran relations is courageous though.

    A journalist on the New Statesman magazine in the early 1980s, Alibhai-Brown now contributes a weekly column to The Independent. She has also written for The Guardian, The Observer, The New York Times, Time magazine, Newsweek and the Daily Mail, and has appeared on the current affairs TV shows Dateline London and The Wright Stuff. Alibhai-Brown has won numerous awards for her journalism, including the EMMA Media Personality of the Year in 2000, the George Orwell Prize for Political Journalism in 2002 and the EMMA Award for Journalism in 2004.

    Alibhai-Brown was a research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a think tank associated with New Labour, from 1996 to 2001, though she ended her connection with the Labour Party over the war in Iraq and other issues, and supported the Liberal Democrats in the 2005 and 2010 general elections. She is Senior Research Associate at the Foreign Policy Centre, an Honorary Fellow at Liverpool John Moores University and Honorary Visiting Professor at Cardiff and Lincoln Universities.

    In the New Year Honours 2001 Alibhai-Brown was appointed a Member of the Order of the British Empire “for services to journalism”. In 2003 Benjamin Zephaniah’s public refusal of an OBE inspired her to return the award. She wrote that her decision had been made partly in a growing spirit of republicanism and partly in protest at the Labour government, particularly its conduct of the war in Iraq.

    [Source: Wikipedia]