Chris Hedges on Bernie Sanders and the Corporate Democrats
Bernie Sanders is the only major party candidate for President who favors a single payer national health insurance system.
What’s not to like?
That was the question Ralph Nader asked Chris Hedges on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour.
“Bernie Sanders wants to break up the New York banks, he wants to impose a Wall Street transaction tax, he wants to regulate drug prices, he’s for full Medicare for all — everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital — he wants to get rid of these corporate tax havens, he’s pushing for a $15 dollar an hour minimum wage, he wants to stronger labor unions. What’s not to like?” Nader asked Hedges.
And here is the truth of the matter.
Read on.
“Because he did it within the Democratic establishment,” Hedges said. “He’s lending credibility to a party that is completely corporatized. He has agreed that he will endorse the candidate, which, unless there is some miracle, will probably be Hillary Clinton.”
“So what he does is he takes all of that energy, he raises all of these legitimate issues and he funnels it back into a dead political system so that by April it’s over.”
“That was the role of Van Jones in the last election,” Hedges said.
“He was running around, using the language of Occupy — Occupy the Vote — and that is what Bernie has done. I don’t understand. He fought the Democratic establishment in Vermont his entire career. Now he has sold out to it.”
“Bernie has also not confronted the military industrial complex at all,” Hedges said. “On a personal level, having spent seven years in the Middle East, I’m just not willing to forgive him for abandoning the Palestinians and giving carte blanche to Israel. He was one of 100 Senators who stood up like AIPAC wind up dolls and approved Israel’s 51-day slaughter last summer of Palestinians in Gaza — the Palestinians who have no army, no navy, artillery, mechanized units, command and control.”
–snip–
My fear is that by this time next year, Bernie Sanders is running around once again repeating this mantra of the least worst and stoking fears against whoever the Republican candidate is. And we’ve gone nowhere.”
–snip–
Ralph Nader Radio Hour co-host Steve Skrovan asked Hedges what a liberal feeding frenzy within the Democratic Party would look like and why the Democratic Party was so afraid of a vigorous debate.
“Because the party is completely captive to corporate power,” Hedges said. “And Bernie has cut a Faustian deal with the Democrats. And that’s not even speculation. I did an event with him and Bill McKibben, Naomi Klein and Kshama Sawant in New York the day before the Climate March. And Kshama Sawant ,the Socialist City Councilwoman from Seattle and I asked Sanders why he wanted to run as a Democrat. And he said — because I don’t want to end up like Nader.”
“He didn’t want to end up pushed out of the establishment,” Hedges said. “He wanted to keep his committee chairmanships, he wanted to keep his Senate seat. And he knew the forms of retribution, punishment that would be visited upon him if he applied his critique to the Democratic establishment. So he won’t.”
—snip—
Nader said that the retribution by the Democratic Party against their left is pretty harsh, “but not against their right.”
“Senator Joe Lieberman — he goes (in 2008) and he endorses McCain at the Republican National Convention against Obama and he comes back after Obama wins to Washington and they give him a major chair of a major Senate committee,” Nader said.
Like dat.
WTFU
AG
More tap-dancing.
So it goes.
We get Trump for Preznit?
You asked for it, you got it.
Trumpola.
He gets in, he’s gonna make Reagan look like Socrates.
Bet on it.
AG
Ralph Nader is an asshole.
Does he think Bernie should run as an independent like he did? You see how much good that did.
Ralph Nader is an egotistical asshole.
the Democratic party is every bit as bad as Hedges says, but it’s what we have. Outside the party is irrelevance. You’re not only pushed out of “the establishment”, you’re outside any media coverage and you’re starting with the admission that you’re a protest candidate with zero chance of winning.
I prefer to look to actual revolutionaries how “working within the party” worked out. Not precisely the best analogy, as the Democratic Party is not revolutionary, and Bernie Sanders is clearly not a revolutionary anymore even if he may have once been.
The point stands that the ability to wield power means working within existing power structures, or overthrowing them. I don’t necessarily mind the latter, but I’ve seen no real evidence it’s fruitful in the American context. If people would like to build their own power structures and party apparatus, more power to them; if they’d like to work outside of electoral politics altogether, then again, more power to them as well. Working outside electoral politics definitely can pay dividends, but we still need to be wielding the power to implement the change we want to see. Republicans cannot be pressured no matter what the electorate says; the Democrats, at least some of the time, can be moved.
There are far better avenues to criticizing Bernie Sanders than “he’s working within the Democratic Party!” Shakesville has done a brilliant piece of investigative reporting of Bernie’s past, how he came to be where he is, his problems with race/gender and class intersectionality, his choices of compromises as a politician, and how far he has to go and learn. I recommend anyone boarding his train to read it and understand that there are no “heroes” in electoral politics.
The Shakesville piece is four parts, linked below.
Looking for Bernie, Part 1; Sanders, ’72
Looking for Bernie, Part 2; Mr. Sanders Goes to Burlington
Looking for Bernie, Part 3; Sanders ’90
Looking for Bernie, Part 4; Turning Right Towards 2016
Part 4
What I find interesting, Mr. AG, is that somehow Rand Fucking Paul doesn’t get the same concern trolling post that you bring to the fore with Bernie Sanders. Rand Paul, who is actively goading for War with Iran. Rand Paul, who fully supports the drone war. Rand Paul, who does not agree with civil rights legislation. Actually, maybe I shouldn’t find it that curious…
Also, fuck Ralph Nader. He doesn’t even walk the walk with respect to union-busting.
Just brings to mind Phil Ochs, as usual:
Right.
I’m a Rand Paul “supporter,” so I should go fuck myself.
Nader’s an asshole.
Rand Paul is a warmonger.
Lenin is a tragic figure, a hero. Dead like a motherfucker, co-opted by vicious sociopaths.
All true.
I refer you to my sig.
It will all work out as it must.
I’m just an interested and intelligent observer.
Ignore me.
Please.
AG
Rand Fucking Paul is already many sheckels behind.
Paul entered the race April 7
Sanders entered April 30
1st quarter contributions:
Paul $5.3 million
Sanders $13.7 million
(And Paul’s campaign had the advantage of picking up where Papa Paul left off in 2012.)
BT wouldn’t seem to be the best place to beat the drums for Paul 2.0.
Obama donors flocking to Sanders; Romney’s going to Rubio
Would be more interesting is those were Obama 2008 and Romney 2012 primary cycle donors. Even more interesting if they were early donors 2007 for Obama and 2011 for Romney. As it is not surprising that a relatively small number of Obama and Romney 2012 donors would split up like this in the early going.
Entirely possible that the Clinton donors were with her in 2008 and Carson is snagging Herman Cain donors, Cruz and Rubio are snagging Perry, Bachmann, Romney, and Newt donors, Jeb’s getting Mitt, Pawlenty, and Huntsman donors,
One thing we can extrapolate from this is that those who have shifted to Sanders are mostly small donors.
Many in Hollywood moved early to Clinton. For example, George Clooney was an early 2007 maxi supporter of Obama and this year pledged to Clinton.
I don’t give a flying fuck whether Rand Paul wins big, loses big pr anywhere in between.
All I really care about is the survival of this country and by (practical) extension the survival of the human race.
Sanders for preznit?
Great.
Paul for preznit? Equally great.
The overriding question remains…who is going to blow us out of the failing position in which we find ourselves and how the fuck does he or she think that they are going to go about doing so?
The centrists…HRC and Jeb Butch, basically…either think that jiggering the status quo will do this or they don’t really give a damn one way or another.
The others?
Pick ’em.
Bernie is too old and too mainstream?
Paul is too young and too radical in his disagreements with the system as it now stands?
Great.
Gimme a practical suggestion other than HRC or another Butch.
Please.
I’m all ears.
Bet on it.
(Betcha can’t…)
AG