Let’s weigh in on the debate.
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
I’m not an HRC fan, but she is a good debater, and has a strong, well-articulated presence on the stage.
So what, she’s a good actress.
HRC could not have asked for a better situation than a foreign-policy debate. She is strong, clear, and well-articulated. I am warming to her.
Never! She has a warped mind on foreign policy, indebted to those who funded husband Bill’s Clinton Foundation. Her tenure at State was a disaster for America and the Middle-East.
○ HRC Gambled On Muslim Brothers and Lost
HRC is following the Bzrezinski doctrine of Afghan War against the Soviets and the Bosnia cooperation with arms delivery undercutting the UN weapons embargo.
O’Malley has just made a very nice comment about the fact that soldiers are not “boots”.
Classic indirection.
O’Malley has just made a very nice comment about the fact that soldiers are not “boots”.
I was asleep, just woke up when they were debating single payer. Ridiculous that this is the Democratic Party forum. Nothing but personality politics here, but that’s not surprising at all. Clinton could (and essentially did) repeat Republican talking points and get loud applause lines just because she’s Clinton. That’s politics sometimes, and it sucks. But it still is annoying.
I probably fell asleep about when you woke up. All in all, a snoozefest.
I fear that Americans deserve the government they get.
It seems now they want Bush in a skirt.
Well then they’ll get a female Bush in pants.
Paraphrased from the debate == “I get money from Wall Street because of 9/11.” And “I’m a girl.”
Yes, she’s girly, immature. She coyly waves the flag of 9/11 pretending that she helped rebuild NY as an excuse for taking bribes from Wall Street. Is she just plain dumb or as sneaky and manipulative as can be? May someone dig their investigative teeth deep into the family foundation. Conflicts of interest anyone?
A majority of Democratic voters do seem as incapable of processing who and what the Clintons stand for and are based on their own words and deeds as the Trumpsters and Carsoniacs.
Perhaps she does reflect that the majority of Democrats are as nasty as the Republicans but are too polite to be as blatant about it. That would explain their complacency wrt the election of Reagan, theft of the election by GWB, and a GOP controlled Congress for most of the past twenty years. Doesn’t seem as if the dynamics have effectively changed since 1972 except for more Democrats being on the side of what was the exclusive domain of Republicans.
Never get quite what they want, do they?
We don’t yet know what “Americans” want. OTOH, a majority of Democrats seem to want more power for corporations, more war (warhawks at dKos are out again with the Paris attacks, just as they were with US intervention in Libya), and a nod to mushy “liberalism” or most of the majority is simply ignorant and/or has bought into the notion that a woman is automatically more caring than a man, but that too is evidence of ignorance.
Over half a century on from the beginning of the second wave of feminism and this is the best woman we could come up with? A spouse legacy from a second rate president and with a poor record of her own and display of extremely poor judgments.