Before I really knew anything about Islam or Saudi Arabia or Mecca or the Hajj, I was given a reading assignment in high school that gave me a (basically) first impression of those things. It was a letter than Malcolm X wrote in 1964 from Mecca back to some of his associates in Harlem. Here it is:
“I have been blessed to visit the Holy City of Mecca, I have made my seven circuits around the Ka’ba, led by a young Mutawaf named Muhammad, I drank water from the well of the Zam Zam. I ran seven times back and forth between the hills of Mt. Al-Safa and Al Marwah. I have prayed in the ancient city of Mina, and I have prayed on Mt. Arafat.”
“There were tens of thousands of pilgrims, from all over the world. They were of all colors, from blue-eyed blondes to black-skinned Africans. But we were all participating in the same ritual, displaying a spirit of unity and brotherhood that my experiences in America had led me to believe never could exist between the white and non-white.”
“America needs to understand Islam, because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem. Throughout my travels in the Muslim world, I have met, talked to, and even eaten with people who in America would have been considered white – but the white attitude was removed from their minds by the religion of Islam. I have never before seen sincere and true brotherhood practiced by all colors together, irrespective of their color.”
“You may be shocked by these words coming from me. But on this pilgrimage, what I have seen, and experienced, has forced me to rearrange much of my thought-patterns previously held, and to toss aside some of my previous conclusions. This was not too difficult for me. Despite my firm convictions, I have always been a man who tries to face facts, and to accept the reality of life as new experience and new knowledge unfolds it. I have always kept an open mind, which is necessary to the flexibility that must go hand in hand with every form of intelligent search for truth.”
“During the past eleven days here in the Muslim world, I have eaten from the same plate, drunk from the same glass, and slept on the same rug – while praying to the same God – with fellow Muslims, whose eyes were the bluest of blue, whose hair was the blondest of blond, and whose skin was the whitest of white. And in the words and in the deeds of the white Muslims, I felt the same sincerity that I felt among the black African Muslims of Nigeria, Sudan and Ghana.”
“We were truly all the same (brothers) – because their belief in one God had removed the white from their minds, the white from their behavior, and the white from their attitude.”
“I could see from this, that perhaps if white Americans could accept the Oneness of God, then perhaps, too, they could accept in reality the Oneness of Man – and cease to measure, and hinder, and harm others in terms of their ‘differences’ in color.”
“With racism plaguing America like an incurable cancer, the so-called ‘Christian’ white American heart should be more receptive to a proven solution to such a destructive problem. Perhaps it could be in time to save America from imminent disaster – the same destruction brought upon Germany by racism that eventually destroyed the Germans themselves.”
“Each hour here in the Holy Land enables me to have greater spiritual insights into what is happening in America between black and white. The American Negro never can be blamed for his racial animosities – he is only reacting to four hundred years of the conscious racism of the American whites. But as racism leads America up the suicide path, I do believe, from the experiences that I have had with them, that the whites of the younger generation, in the colleges and universities, will see the handwriting on the walls and many of them will turn to the spiritual path of truth – the only way left to America to ward off the disaster that racism inevitably must lead to.”
“Never have I been so highly honored. Never have I been made to feel more humble and unworthy. Who would believe the blessings that have been heaped upon an American Negro? A few nights ago, a man who would be called in America a white man, a United Nations diplomat, an ambassador, a companion of kings, gave me his hotel suite, his bed. Never would I have even thought of dreaming that I would ever be a recipient of such honors – honors that in America would be bestowed upon a King – not a Negro.”
“All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of all the Worlds.
Sincerely,
Al-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X)
For context, it was roughly three months after Malcolm X penned this letter that Lyndon Johnson was able to sign the Civil Rights Act into law. Another year would pass before Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act.
Because my first real education on Islam and the Hajj came through this route, I probably have had a kind of idyllic idea in my head about the post-racial Kumbaya post-sectarian aspects of the world’s second-largest religion. Or, maybe things today are just a lot more difficult and tense than they were in 1964.
What I do know is that it makes me sad to contemplate the prospect that Syed Rizwan Farook, who took so many lives in San Bernardino, was radicalized when he went to the Hajj in Saudi Arabia to meet his wife, Tashfeen Malik. Since she appears to have pledged her loyalty to ISIS on her Facebook page, maybe she was the vehicle of his radicalization.
What’s really driving ISIS is less their animosity to the West than their desire to win a sectarian war against Assad’s Alawite regime and the Shiites of Iraq. So, in a way, the blowback we’re getting isn’t just explained by our decision to shatter the status quo in the Middle East by invading Iraq and toppling the Sunni-dominant Baathist regime there. It’s equally explained by the internal sectarian strife that is roiling the Muslim world right now. The former may have lit the spark that ignited the latter, but it alone doesn’t fully explain what is happening. The rift within Islam goes back to its very beginnings. And the animosities between Arabs and Turks and Kurds and Persians existed long before Malcolm X visited Mecca in 1964, and they persist to this day.
In other words, things were never as peaceful and lacking in acrimony and prejudice as Malcolm X portrayed them. Yet, I think his letter is a good reminder that Islam at its best is a powerful uniter of peoples and cultures. That’s America at its best, too.
New converts tend to overestimate all the good they see and feel about their new found religion. Malcolm X was like many men and women.
Interesting fact about KSA pilgrimages – IBTimes – Saudi Arabia: Hajj application for Muslim pilgrims asks ‘are you Shia?
I’m not sure what to make of that but I see something else in that you do not mention. Both Shia and Sunnis are welcome. One must be Muslim to participate. If you’re a convert, you have to show papers verifying you’ve taken shihada with a respected shaykh.
My guess is the difference in women needing to be accompanied has to do with differing regulations in the two main Islamic factions. Within Sunni Islam (which is what I’m a part of), there are five schools of thought. All are equally respected and typically one can take rules from any of the five (even mixing and matching) and most everyone will say you’re practicing correctly. Therefore, one may say that petting a dog breaks wudu (ritual ablution done before prayer) and another will say it does not. I take the easiest from each. That’s perfectly acceptable among the vast majority of Muslims. Fundamentalists are a very small minority who make a whole bunch of noise.
What’s to “make of it?” Seems clear that Sunni women are required to be accompanied by a related male “protector” to perform Haji and Shia women aren’t.
wrt picking and choosing among five different schools of Muslim religious thought, similar to adherents of other religions. Lots of books in the Bible from which people pick and choose and mix up.
Parallax, Which one of the five goody boxes permits homosexuality? If none, I would not be able to join the club and make the grand-gala trip to the Saudi money spigot known as the hadjj in Mecca.
My shaykh had many gay and lesbian students. He treated them just like anyone else with one notable exception. He wouldn’t marry them to others of the same gender. If asked why, he would say “This is not our way.”
He never made them wrong or lectured them or withheld love or support. If one tried to dig deeper into why he wouldn’t marry people of the same gender, he would deflect the question. I’m not sure if it was simply because he would lose credibility at home (he was a very prominent shaykh in Jerusalem) or if there was something else behind it.
I will say this. The level of politeness in Muslim society is way higher than anything we know in our culture. There’s an open-heartedness that’s also uncommon here. There is a different view of homosexuality than we hold and a different view of sexuality generally. In those cultures, you won’t find much screwing around. People don’t even want to. There’s a way in which sex is seen as something sacred, a sacrament, something to be shared within the confines of a relationship sanctioned by God. All of this is very foreign to us.
With one foot in both worlds, I can honestly say both views can be twisted into something very unholy. There, if not held really well, it can lead to oppression of women and those of different sexual orientation. Here, it can lead to a loss of the potential of sexuality to be something beautiful and intimate, and also to a coarsening of culture where people become objectified and everything comes to be seen as a commodity.
I have some familiarity with Moslem society in Syria and Iran. Yes the level of politeness is much higher than we’re used to, and the level of hypocrisy may be too. Did the gay students confide in the shaykh? I’m curious to know how that all worked out and how their sexuality came out. Which of the five Sunni divisions did your shaykh belong to?
I’m not sure. He was very prominent as a shaykh, an attorney and a judge. For many years he was caretaker of the al-Asqa mosque, one of the great holy places in Islam. I knew him because in later life he “came out” as a Sufi teacher. In Islam Sufism is in some places controversial. By the standards of his culture be was way out there. That he would come to the west and work patiently with American students who were by the standards of his culture living lives of debauchery says much about him. He cared not what anyone thought of him. He simply followed his guidance and, as deep in prayer as he lived, his guidance was extraordinary.
By the way, he was very loving and patient with us. You could tell him anything and he wouldn’t so much as blink, no matter how shocking it might be to an ordinary Muslim shaykh. He would just talk to us and very patiently allow our hearts to find out deepest truths. Over time I have up swearing and sleeping around because I saw it wasn’t the deep truth of my heart. When my wife and I married, our first kiss occurred when he finished the ceremony.
At one time I would have thought that crazy. Turns out it was amazing and so is out seed life. It’s not the hottest sex I’ve ever had. Not even close. But it is the most connected and beautiful. I would not go back to my old life.
Sorry for the typos. I’m writing from my phone. Hopefully you can figure out what I meant to say.
You’re lucky to have found someone so tolerant. That sufism is often controversial is to put it mildly. Saudi wouldn’t tolerate it for a second, to name the most obvious example. Anyway, keep well and loving.
The true spirit of Islam is in Sufism. Unfortunately, as I’m sure you know, the Wahabis (in a devil’s pact with the royal family) control Saudi Arabian culture and education. The Saudis have paved over many Sufi shrines and made a point of erecting public toilets on the site. But the Saudis are not the last word on Islam. Despite all the money and influence the lunatics have, the vast majority of Muslims are moderate. In Egypt, though few would call themselves Sufi, Sufism is woven into the daily practice of Islam. In Moracco and many other places, Sufism is alive and well.
There is a battle taking place for the soul of Islam. I do not think the fundamentalists will prevail because the Qu’ran itself is against them and anyone who can read knows it. Just as the fundamentalist Christians cannot wipe out the message of Jesus.
Many jihadis, many motives, many goals, caliphate seen as a means and then an end (for religious reasons). A movement within even jihadi Islam. And how convenient for a DAESH woman to appear just after the news media had an article on “The Women of ISIS”.
My current thought is that we are seeing an FBI sting that went bad. Why else would the FBI be so careless as to let the media have free range of a crime scene still under investigation without supervision.
The Wall Street media’s little foray today will set the “evidence” going forward.
…we are seeing an FBI sting that went bad
If it was, then the FBI “operative” went rogue on them and is now at large.
Did observe how the LA FBI guy wanted to take center stage in the investigation and the SB PD chief pushed back on that.
FBI is like that. They’re glory hounds.
tension between the local cops and the FBI who parachute in is standard. One or more of the groups may be glory hounds, especially a sheriff or DA thinking of the next election.
[my late father was FBI, 20+ years in that same L.A. office]
It was the SB City Police Chief that pushed back on the FBI guy.
One of my favorite people in the world started his FBI career in the LA office. Recently retired 20+ years from a senior position. But like all organizations the cream almost never rises to the top. They are the ones that keep operations going well enough that the top and the bottom incompetents and crazies down burn down the place.
From a total of 23 years of federal employment, I can vouch that your words are golden.
No offense to your father intended. It was a general observation. Not everyone in an organization approves of the culture.
didn’t mean to sound like I’d taken it that way. I meant i’d personally heard this story before.
Looks like the SB Sheriff got disciplined by the national media today.
Just bureacratic infighting shenanigans or something else? Politics or covering up a failure?
Honestly don’t have a clue. Does any sheriff department or local PD prepare for the national media breaching a sealed investigation site? Doubt it as they are used to working with local media people and a degree of mutual respect exists.
Personally, I’m not smelling an FBI sting, but wouldn’t discount that the agency is attempting to manipulate the collection and release of information to mask the fact that they were completely clueless and unaware of the perpetrators of the attack even though the geographic source of this one points to the same place almost all of them do, KSA and Pakistan.
Too much currently remains unknown and some of what has been released as information is contradictory which may mean that it’s not accurate or even true.
But but but Pakistan is our ally! Our partner in the “War on Terror” ™
Just because the ISI couldn’t find Osama bin Laden, the most hunted man in the world, living across the street from a major military base, doesn’t mean anything, does it?
KSA is also our ally.
Occurs to me that in general at the ballot box, voters also reject the “cream.” How could Tsongas and Clinton beat out Harkin? Why Jackson and Dukakis and not Simon? (Any GOP “cream” is before my time.)
My friend did well at the Bureau because he’s really smart, competent, and well-liked. Job/task oriented, with high ethical standards and low ego (attention) drive.
Maybe the PP assault was an FBI sting also, on such flimsy evidence.
The media didn’t rush in to destroy evidence and bias the case in the Planned Parenthood shooting. On the contrary, they would not even call the guy a terrorist.
It’s today’s media rush into the house and the FBI’s weasely statement on the day it happened that raises suspicion about FBI failiure. FBI failure, as it happens, does not automatically exonerate the perpetrators. They did indeed kill 14 innocent people and lay IEDs in the building.
It fuzzes up where they might have gotten the technical assistance from. And who might have provided them the technical assistance to break the sting if they were not clever enough on their own to play the FBI.
That’s the scenario. The only evidence so far is a muddled FBI statement and the ability of national media to screw out the crime site before the county sheriff was apparently done. The formal statement of the FBI is that they had released the site.
The media’s behavior is not inexplicable. How they were able to get away with it in a high-profile investigation is what requires explanation.
What is now true is that every person that media showed of the couple’s photos is now identified as a terrorist in people’s minds and the couple’s child is now in danger from a media rush or from a wannabe avenger.
My insistence on the possibility of the FBI being played goes to the fact that the FBI has been abusing the way it does stings, doing things without probable cause that later shake out to be false. And getting past an FBI screen is likely a major to-do on DAESH’s list for attacking the US. A sloppy FBI that tramples on Constitutional rights is not an asset in this situation. Either a false negative in the screening or Constitutional backlash can shut them down completely in particular cases. Better screening is what is needed; what we have seen is bending the rules in order to be sloppy.
you’ve lost me.
Just saying that someone should investigate the possibility that a reportedly radicalized couple were being tracked by the FBI in a sting operation and that the FBI lost control.
An eff-up in the control of a crime site affects the results of an investigation into a crime that likely will not lead to any indictments because the perpretrators are dead. But the conclusions of the investigation are of political importance as is any possibility of sting operations actually increasing rather than lowering the danger.
There are these possibilities:
The media has focused on 5. The second most popular hypothesis is 2. The general pattern in the US is 1, which is the default narrative for non-Muslims. The media now is shifting in the direction of 3. Prove 4 is not a possibility and also tighten up the FBI.
For now, I’m still going with 1 because we have not solid information that points further.
Show me actual evidence and I’ll consider it. Otherwise warm bucket of spit.
I’ll grant that it may be a warm bucket of spit.
But the media breaking and entering of a house and broadcasting all sorts of private identity information is certainly out of the ordinary. Where was the law enforcement on this.
But I was sceptical at the time for the need of the full lockdown of metropolitan Boston after the Boston Marathon attack. And the national security establishment had reportedly in further investigation been tipped off and screened the elder brother, thinking him not dangerous. There has not been sufficient accountability for these security failures, just as there were not for 9/11.
Agree completely on the insufficient accountability issue. As I said below: WTF are our tax dollars going for in terms of paying for all of these alleged National security agencies – not just the NSA but the lot. WTF are they doing?
The Fibbies get caught leading on mentally retarded people to attempt to blow up a bridge (or something) in Ohio. Yet they seem to let others who end up being quite dangerous slip right through the dragnet.
What’s the point of this? And where’s the accountability? Never happens.
Where’s the accountability for permitting anyone to legally buy so many arms and ammo? It’s not just possible ISIS-influenced people who do this. There are white Christians who do the same thing, although we aren’t allowed to view them as terrorists.
Crazy.
The Constitution grants the right to keep and bear arms, but is silent on limiting types and quantities, so that is a fair area for legislation. Do we have a right to own an H-bomb? An ICBM? A Battle Tank? A SAM?
A Court might rule limiting purchases of ammunition to say one box a month as unreasonable but surely acquiring thousands of rounds is unreasonable.
One problem is that a hundred rounds could easily be shot in a day of competition, but also would suffice for a mass massacre.
So, they thought they had ‘control’ over these folks, but the folks went and did something before they could haul them in, and now they’re in CYA mode?
could be.
Raw Story — Pandemonium as media mob ransacks shooters’ home on live TV without FBI permission
Media ghouls unleashed.
Regardless of whatever formal position the FBI had wrt to this property, there are other controlling agencies, the Redlands PD and San Bernardino Co Sheriff’s Dept.
It was not only Keystone Kops. The reporters and the landlord broke CA law, according to a prominent TGOS poster. Also, too, they doxed the guy’s mother on live TV. They put her license and Social Security card on the screen for all to see. It was disgusting frankly. The TV in this country lacks and decency and common sense. The apartment would be cleared less than 48 hours later after such a crime? Really?
CNN, MSNBC, etc. should be expecting a large lawsuit from the estate of the deceased. The only potential bright spot in this whole sorry tale over the past few days because that would mean adequate funds for the care and education of the six month old orphan.
I just saw a clip on MSNBC where they rushed into the couples apartment as if on a treasure hunt. The baby’s room was delightful as was the map on the wall. Just a map nothing on it and a baby’s crib. WTF were they doing in there? Really, a treasure hunt? Breaking and entering? Imagine if they found the letter from ISIS telling them to go do it, or somethin’.
Discounting the obvious LEO trashing of the place, the home was clean and orderly. Nothing like that of people losing a grip on reality or a future.
Why are we paying a lot of our taxes to have the NSA spy on US citizens?
I ask in all seriousness. We hear credible, proven reports about FBI sting operations that are so out of control nutso, that I have to ask: what are we paying those dolts for?
There’s a bit of a stench around this latest highly regrettable massacre. Beyond the obvious loss of life, one has to wonder what the heck’s going on in San Berdoo.
Fibbies are saying that they “got everything they needed,” so, who cares of the jackals and hyenas in our lousy, putrid, filth called the 4th Estate break and enter and begin to show photos, drivers licenses, SSNs, etc, for all the world to see. This, of course, after Fascist Trump has adjured his jack-booted thuggish fans that it’s A-OK to murder the families of terrorists.
The Fibbies just shrug their shoulders and go: eh? Not my problem, dude.
Totally unreal. Totally out of control. Just totally horrible. But also like someone’s got something to hide.
Then, too, there’s the issue that this couple, I believe, bought most of their guns and ammo legally. And this, somehow, is OK, too. Sheesh. But it’s way too soon to discuss gun control… ever.
I just heard from “Thoughts and Prayers.” They said: stop bothering us. DO SOMETHING!
Why are we paying a lot of our taxes to have the NSA spy on US citizens?
Probably paying a bunch of people to find and watch homemade porn, dick pics, and nubile twerkers. Otherwise they’d have to admit that their “get it all” electronic dragnets are useless.
If co-workers and family saw nothing strange about Farook freely traveling to KSA (so he told them) in 2013 and 2014, returning the second time with a fiancee, and growing out his beard, what exactly were the spy agencies supposed to pick up on and monitor?
btw, The NYTimes (FWIW) report says that Farook or a family member purchased the handguns legally and the two assault weapons were purchased by another person that they are in contact with.
That while suicide itself isn’t a mental disorder incidents of mass shooting or violence like this on flimsy ideological or theological grounds probably warrant a second look. Perhaps a more open question than one assumes on first principles:
Anyone?
Thanks for the link and quote. I don’t have much to add other than it’s the Republicans (with the D party pretty hiding behind their skirts) who legally forced the CDC to stop ever doing any studies on gun violence. They were forced NOT to do that.
Gee, wonder who paid to have that happen?
Let’s face it: we live in a country that uses FEAR first, foremost and always to drive significant portions of the hapless populace to a frenzy. The results are erratic but predictable.
Yet when citizens call for saner gun control measures, it’s simply not permitted to happen with the usual suspects in the media and in Congress offering up the usual claptrap. The D-Team, who’s just as bought off by the NRA, makes pitiful noises and wanders off with their tail between their legs.
And nothing happens.
Both parties TALK about mental illness.
And nothing happens.
What are the connections between mental illness and gun violence? I don’t know, but surely it’s there.
But nothing happens.
With a populace riled up and ginned up and as polarized as we’ve become, it’s only natural that crap like this happens… and frankly, will continue to happen.
Eh? Whatever. The Oligarchs make money, while more useless eaters are taken out. Whoopee we’re all gonna die.
Believing in superbeings with magical powers is a mental disease.
I’m a white man, a European Jew, who took shihada and thus became Muslim (too) back in 2006. My wife is also a white Jewish convert to Islam (though neither of us feels any less Jewish, but rather that labels such as Jewish and Muslim are inherently limited).
Part of what drew me to Islam is that what Malcolm experienced is very real. When I go to a masjid I’m typically the only little-white guy there. And yet I’m always treated as a brother. The prophet Muhammed was really clear in his teachings that all people are brothers and sisters. The Qu’ran speaks of how God could have chosen to make all people of one race, one religion, one tribe and that, therefore, this multiplicity is God’s will and must be respected as such. We are urged to “not create separation” but rather to love everyone.
This is the true spirit of Islam. The overwhelming majority of Muslims subscribe to this tradition. Clearly there are those who see things differently but they are the exception. I would argue they are really confused about what teachings are most core to the religion.
Like Malcolm, I’ve never experienced anything like this anywhere else. Islam is beautiful in both its teachings and the way it’s practices. Hajj, with its millions of participants and an overwhelming vibe of love is the greatest spiritual festival in the whole world. Makes Burning Man look like nothing. You won’t find people naked because that’s prohibited. Instead you’ll find everyone wearing identical, simple white coverings because a part of the experience is seeing that every person is equal. So when you get there, you trade your clothes — whether they be expensive or mere rages — for what is essentially a sheet in which you wrap your body. And then everyone participates in the same rituals.
I’ve not gone (yet) but I very much want to go. I have friends who have been there and they returned radiating such peace, love and joy. It truly changes one. That we don’t know about it has much to do with deep prejudice against Islam embedded into Western culture which goes back centuries to the Crusades and beyond.
Would you please comment on your observations about acceptance or not of those who follow the Ahmadi branch/offshoot of Islam. My understanding is that Saudi Arabia regards Ahmadis as heretics and bans them from the hajj.
I don’t really know anything about them. I can say this, though. My shaykh recently died. For those of us who were close to him, there’s a natural tendency to cling to his memory in a way that can become a form of idealization (or idolatry if you will). There are some amazing religious leaders, people who are deeply connected to God energy or spirit or whatever you want to call it. They can do freaky things, like clue you in to stuff that they can not possibly have any direct knowledge about. It’s like God shows them stuff. And we who are not so deeply connected to spirit get attached to that.
When such a person dies, it’s really important to let go and to realize it wasn’t the person himself or herself that was great but rather that person’s ability to connect to God. Everything in this life is temporary. If we cling to something too much, it becomes a kind of false God that takes us away from true reliance on spirit. There is no foundation in this life on which to stand other than God itself.
Islam is really big on this. When Muhammed himself died, there were those who wanted to worship him. One of his wisest followers made clear that it’s a dead end to worship any man or any phenomenon. The key is to keep one’s heart to the source of all men and all phenomena.
I think Christianity has gone astray among its fundamentalists by turning love of Jesus into a kind of personality cult. I do not believe he would have wanted anything to do with that. I recall how much shaykh, whom I sure was nowhere near the level of mastery of a true prophet such as Muhammed or Jesus, would shut one down really quickly if you began making too much of him. He wanted to bring his students to God; not become a veil between them and God.
My sense is that a group like the Ahmadis, rightly or wrongly, is likely seen by some, particularly the fundamentalists, as having strayed from the path of Islam be elevating a person too high. That’s my best guess from the paragraph I read about them on Wikipedia a few moments ago and my limited knowledge of Islam. I could of course be totally off base. Consider it a slightly educated guess.
One the interesting historical theories about Islam is that most of its regimes were relatively transitory because of that egalitarianism. Favoring one group gave another leave to rebel and there was no reason a different people couldn’t rule because they were as justified to it as other Muslims.