It seems like a lot of people are observing the psychiatric wreckage of the American right and wondering out loud if the president bears any special responsibility for this emotional crackup. It got to the point last week that Obama actually had to answer a question about this. He said the theory was “novel,” and then he dismissed it.
There are a lot of theories going around, actually, and none of them seem to have a complete explanation. That the president is a biracial black man certainly has caused a reaction, but it’s a pretty incomplete theory, and one that by its own terms precludes the president from bearing any possible responsibility. No one chooses their parents.
At the Washington Monthly, we just ran a piece on the startling fact that middle age white men are now more likely to commit crimes than young adults. Kevin Drum thinks the current generation of young adults are less violent because they weren’t exposed to as much lead as children. Either way, the hollowing out of the manufacturing base and loss of good-paying blue collar jobs should be a pretty important component of any theory about why older whites without high school diplomas are flocking to a charlatan like Donald Trump.
The places where Trump has done well cut across many of the usual fault lines of American politics — North and South, liberal and conservative, rural and suburban. What they have in common is that they have largely missed the generation-long transition of the United States away from manufacturing and into a diverse, information-driven economy deeply intertwined with the rest of the world.
“It’s a nonurban, blue-collar and now apparently quite angry population,” said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution. “They’re not people who have moved around a lot, and things have been changing away from them, but they live in areas that feel stagnant in a lot of ways.”
Mr. Trump has his share of support from the affluent and the well educated, but in the places where support for Mr. Trump runs the strongest, the proportion of the white population that didn’t finish high school is relatively high. So is the proportion of working-age adults who neither have a job nor are looking for one. The third-strongest correlation among hundreds of variables tested: the preponderance of mobile homes.
Needless to say, the Great Recession did these folks no favors. And the way they express their angst and dissatisfaction may not be rational, but the objective facts of their lives are such that there’s a very rational basis for their anger. It may even be a perverse form of progress that the current objects of their strongest derision are Republican elites like John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Mitt Romney, and the Bush family. Donald Trump is their way of saying ‘fuck you’ to a lot more people than just the president.
By identity, experience, temperament, and style, it’s obvious that Barack Obama is “not one of them,” so it would never have been easy for him to become their champion. He’s done what he could for them, and it’s been considerable. Where their governors have permitted it, they have full access to Obamacare, even if they need to go on Medicaid to get it. Their communities are less poisoned, although that doesn’t mean that they live in healthy communities. They have much better protection against predatory businesses and the credit card industry. Many fewer of their kids have been maimed and injured in ill-advised military adventures under Obama’s leadership than the leadership of his predecessor.
But the Republicans have ignored them throughout this presidency, even as their communities have been ravaged by the opioid epidemic and an inexorable process of globalization and energy-greening that is leaving them and their communities behind. On Nov. 2, 2015, Anne Case and Angus Deaton published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences called “Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century.” The findings were alarming:
If the white mortality rate for ages 45−54 had held at their 1998 value, 96,000 deaths would have been avoided from 1999–2013, 7,000 in 2013 alone. If it had continued to decline at its previous (1979‒1998) rate, half a million deaths would have been avoided in the period 1999‒2013, comparable to lives lost in the US AIDS epidemic through mid-2015. Concurrent declines in self-reported health, mental health, and ability to work, increased reports of pain, and deteriorating measures of liver function all point to increasing midlife distress.
Simply put, a population that makes up the core of the Republican base has been committing suicide, overdosing on opioids, and drinking itself to death at a rate comparable to the AIDS epidemic. And the Republicans not only spent zero time trying to help them during the Bush and Obama years, they didn’t even seem to know that this was happening to them.
It seems to me that this is a tremendous failing. As president, Obama is responsible for all Americans and American communities, but these people aren’t his core base of support. They by-and-large did not vote for him or the Democratic Party. The first responsibility here is for the Republicans to talk to their supporters, figure out what they need (and, no, it’s not Wall Street deregulation and tax cuts for the rich) and take some proposals to the president.
I’m sure that President Obama would have, for example, been very amenable to a big program to help coal-country inhabitants transition to a clean energy economy.
None of this happened, which is why I believe that we’re not just seeing a reaction against the president. We’re seeing a wholesale rejection of the Republican party establishment that decided to oppose everything the president would seek to do even before he was inaugurated.
It’s exactly what they’re doing now in refusing to consider a Supreme Court nominee before they even know who that nominee will be.
They could exert their influence to get a Justice more to their base’s liking, but they’re giving up their influence just so they can appear to be maximally opposed to Obama.
This hasn’t helped their voters who continue to commit suicide, and drink and drug themselves to death.
So, you can say Obama drove people nuts with his bloodless Mr. Spock routine and that he doesn’t get the emotional needs of the country, but that is a very partial explanation for what we’re witnessing.
When the Republicans cannot even identify an AIDS-size epidemic in their communities and give up on the political process as a way to help their people, their people turn to an anti-political movement. You cannot expect people to remain dedicated to democratic institutions when their representatives are unwilling to use those institutions to better their lives.
What you get, then, is support for fascism. You get people semi-rationally calling for a strong man who will smash the weak legislature and stick a boot on the necks of their elites who have abandoned them.
The GOP isn’t only vulnerable to Fascism, though. It is also vulnerable, because of its culture, to charlatans and grifters such as the Ben Carson phenomenon. This will continue as they don’t appear to have any answers they can embrace, this is their future.
They mined the Mega-church methods back in the day of Abramoff and weasel, Ralph Reed.
The best description of the bait and switch going on in both parties is this, seen in a comment thread on EV:
mulp said in reply to Barkley Rosser…
“But in reality, all the labels have become meaningless since the 80s as the billionaire think tanks of the pillage and plunderers have paid millions to word smith propagandists to try to buy the authoritarian government that best transfers all wealth to them.”
I grew up in the 50s and 60s when today’s “leftists” were moderate to conservative, and today Reagan would rationally be called a leftist based on his speeches and statements written by establishment conservative authorities of the early 21st century. Even Newt Gingrich needs to reclassified as a leftist since 2009.
Can we stop saying this about Reagan? He was bigoted racist who talked in 1980 about welfare queens driving Cadillacs and began his general election campaign in the birthplace of the KKK. He was a loud opponent of Civil Rights – far beyond anyone who has succeeded him.
Racism encourages displacement–legitimate anger is directed away from the real culprits.
Predatory capitalism is advantaged by our lawmakers and their crimes are ignored or facilitate by pliant judges. I will never forget the first judge to hand over pension funds to corporate raiders.
Thanks for your comments, but not every issue is related to “predatory capitalism”. There are multiple evils in this world of ours and there’s no single cause for all the world’s problems.
Racism (to give one example) has its own independent historical existence. There were judges handing Africans over to Europeans long before there were pension funds or corporate raiders.
LOL Like slavery was never about theft of labor. There are more humans in slavery right now, today, than ever existed at any time before in our history.
It is always about the Benjamins when it is systemic.
The is a dramatic oversimplification of trends and maybe I should just write the author. On twitter Xenocript (a must follow for anyone) has been plowing through these numbers.
A couple of things to note:
I am skeptical about the crime rate story being told in that story.
The story of declining violence generally is ignored completely. The conclusions one draws from it (neither declining religious belief nor economic dislocation seems to matter much) challenge too many preconceived notions. The link between lead and violence is statistically interesting, but the discussions I have had with people who work for the EPA and in Pediatrics make me skeptical (the cause and effect chain is pretty long).
At best it explains about half of a change that no one saw coming.
The link between increasing death rates for middle class whites and economic dislocation is compelling. Bernie Sanders made the argument in 1988 that those under stress are more likely to eat high-fat foods which in turn has a number of physiological effects, none of them good. He also argued processed foods were much cheaper than pre-processed foods in relative terms. Like so many of the arguments he made I was skeptical at the time – damn tree huggers.
But now I think he is probably right.
Neo-liberals have failed utterly in maintaining a standard of living for many Americans. Wages have stagnated and economic insecurity is multiple times higher than it was 30 years ago.
It is the insecurity I think, that is the most important factor, and yet almost impossible to quantify. Marriage counselors will tell you money is one of the number one causes of marital strife. The effects of divorce are will known. So you have a toxic brew of economic insecurity and wage stagnation, with results both predictable and hard to quantify directly.
The argument against Obama is simple: his policies are simply inadequate to the problem.
Honestly though it doesn’t seem to bother neo-liberals much. The keep saying the same things they always have. Their proposed solutions are not close to the problem.
Could this have anything to do with those declines?
Job Loss Due to President Bush’s Trade Policy (http://www.epipolicycenter.org/blm-trade_and_jobs.pdf)
Combine this with the levels of borrowing against assets used to just maintain.
And top with the cherry of the 2007-2016(so far) Long Recession.
Little wonder that livers are shot.
In quantitative terms the MFN deal with China in ’99 or ’00 dwarfs Nafta. There is enormous complexity in the factors that have lead to wage stagnation and economic insecurity. Part of it is trade. Part of it is immigration – particularly at the bottom end of the scale. Part of it is automation and technology. Part of it is the shift in employment from manufacturing jobs, which tended to be union, to service jobs which are not.
It all matters, and you can argue about which is the biggest.
What you cannot argue is that the policy response, both implemented and proposed, has been pathetic.
Wonder how much of our trade deficit reduction has been in manufactured goods and how much NOW is resource extraction, like a developing country.
I thought our trade deficit was almost entirely driven by resource extraction (oil from Canada especially).
Manufacturing is less uneven than we’re lead to believe — it’s just that the US had such an outsized presence in manufacturing for so long that any decline was going to feel catastrophic for many.
We are very close to being oil independent. I just wondered if our decreasing oil imports were obscuring larger drops in our manufacturing exports? We are experiencing lower imports due to decline in consumer demand.
“Deficits in U.S. petroleum trade have been equal to a large fraction of the imbalance between U.S. imports and exports. Yet as of early 2014, U.S. oil trade deficits were projected to decline considerably, leading to claims that the overall trade deficit will decline sharply too.”
Brad DeLong, back in 2010…how the kludge is made:
Obama is ruling, or trying to rule, by taking positions that are at the technocratic good-government center, and then taking two steps to the right – sacrificing some important policy goals – in the hope of attracting Republican votes and thereby demonstrating his commitment to bipartisanship. On all of these policies – anti-recession, banking, fiscal, environmental, anti-discrimination, rule of law, healthcare – you could close your eyes and convince yourself that, at least as far as the substance is concerned, Obama is in fact a moderate Republican named George H.W. Bush, Mitt Romney, John McCain, or Colin Powell.
Now, don’t get me wrong. My complaints about Obama are not that he is too bipartisan or too centrist. I am at bottom a weak-tea Dewey-Eisenhower-Rockefeller social democrat – that is, with a small “s” and a small “d.” My complaints are that he is not technocratic enough, that he is pursuing the chimera of “bipartisanship” too far, and that, as a result, many of his policies will not work well, or at all.
Thanks for your comment. For what it’s worth, I don’t think you have to worry that President Obama is “pursuing the chimera of ‘bipartisanship’ too far, and that, as a result, many of his policies will not work”.
1 – It’s pretty clear (isn’t it?) that Obama’s response to the 2014 elections was to just start using whatever powers he had at his disposal to advance his agenda, now that it was clear to all who had eyes to see that Republicans would never compromise with him. (Also know as the “no more f***s to give” stage of the Obama presidency.)
2 – You’d think Glenn Beck and all those conservatives in 2008-09 who were reading Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and saying it was the playbook for what Obama would do as president would be better prepared strategically for how the president cut issues, but they weren’t. Obama’s bipartisanship presented Republicans with two losing choices: cut deals with him and he’d get most of the credit for whatever was accomplished, or oppose him and drive themselves and their party ever further to the fringe (which is what they’ve done).
Not my point.
“Clumsy but temporarily effective” also describes much of American public policy today. To see policy kludges in action, one need look no further than the mind-numbing complexity of the health-care system (which even Obamacare’s champions must admit has only grown more complicated under the new law, even if in their view the system is now also more just), or our byzantine system of funding higher education, or our bewildering federal-state system of governing everything from welfare to education to environmental regulation. America has chosen to govern itself through more indirect and incoherent policy mechanisms than can be found in any comparable country.” (http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/kludgeocracy-in-america)
A big part of the problem, I think, is that the White Republicans see that they are losing control of the nation. They also see no likelihood that they can regain the control they have been losing as long as a Democrat can remain as President.
They have hope, based on the gerrymandered House seats and the Constitutional preference for small rural states in the Senate, that they can regain control of the federal government if they can discredit the Black Democratic President.
So McConnell has concluded that only a scorched earth refusal to work with Obama will succeed in letting them regain the Presidency.
The only route they see back to the Presidency is to depend on the one political power they have repeatedly demonstrated – control of their members in Congress. Any cooperation with Obama weakens that control, so they don’t dare cooperate with Obama.
That’s not, in my opinion, nuts. That’s desperation.
These people were never remotely in control of the nation. The most you can say is(and it’s actually a lot) is that they vicariously identify with people who are control of the nation, who are screwing them and at the same time pretending to be their friends.
They’ve turned on the obvious ones, but all the rest are cheap grifters. And Trump is the king of grifters.
Like most of us they’re wage slaves and they had a good run from 1935 to at least 1975. They assumed that the good run was of their own doing and not directly tied to the New Deal. They’re ID voters.
Yet, so much of the ire of Trump’s supporters would appear to be directed at Hispanics, blacks, and Muslims…
So, the Republicans’ ignoring middle aged, uneducated white men can’t be more than a part of the story
Remember back in the beginning of the Obama admin. he talked about empathy. Conservatism has no empathy in its ideology. The right has reduced conservatism to nothing but personal freedom. A personal freedom that is put above the life/well being of their definition of a stranger.
Booman at his best, and why I come here.
.
This.
What’s missing here is the media environment of these small towns. They get nothing on the “news” radio except hate talk, 24/7. Clear Channel owns this population.
They may be justifiably angry, but it’s the demagogues in the media that have lead them to a fact-free fury.
That fury become addictive. And is very bad for health.
A prime example of the empathy deficit for their own:
A rejection from wingnut welfare recipient Kevin Williamson:
If you spend time in hardscrabble, white upstate New York, or eastern Kentucky, or my own native West Texas, and you take an honest look at the welfare dependency, the drug and alcohol addiction, the family anarchy–which is to say, the whelping of human children with all the respect and wisdom of a stray dog–you will come to an awful realization. It wasn’t Beijing. It wasn’t even Washington, as bad as Washington can be. It wasn’t immigrants from Mexico, excessive and problematic as our current immigration levels are. It wasn’t any of that.
The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible. The white American under-class is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Garbutt [a blue-collar town in New York].
Williamson stepped right into “A Modest Proposal” territory with that piece.
They are angry, frustrated, and feel trapped. Where the generation before for the most part worked one factory production job for numerous years and received a pension.This one has had to work numerous jobs mostly part time no benefits of any kind. They are coming toward retirement with nothing more then receiving Social Security. They know it does not pay for what they need. Thus they are scared.
Curious, if marijuana were removed from federal regulation in total, as Bernie proposes, would that invalidate state laws that depend on that Scheduling?
How many might be eligible for release from state incarceration, if it did?
Not just coal. The Gulf Coast is dependent on oil, especially Louisiana. And fracking states like North Dakota and Oklahoma have essentially found gold in the desert. With the price of oil dropping these places are going to hurt.
The bully pulpit exists to lead people. This I’m sure that President Obama would have, for example, been very amenable to a big program to help coal-country inhabitants transition to a clean energy economy. is following and not leading.
For fifty years the GOP has been directly people to consider all sorts of social arrangement and conditions that at least superficially did exist during a period of economic prosperity that led to a higher rate then ever of economic security as what is needed to return to those days of small improvements year after year. Most of those factors were irrelevant. Yet, the GOP flock continues to believe that garbage and the worst they fare economically the more they double down on investing in those faux solutions.
DEMs offer alternative social arrangements which does make the daily lives of millions less burdensome and that improvement reverberates through the lives of the families, friends, and co-workers of those that were relieved. On an individual and familial basis that has improved the economic well-being of many as it opened doors to more education and less discrimination in schools and workplaces. Thus, fewer people were left behind.
However, both parties have been ignoring and exacerbating the conditions that lead to being left behind. Thus, the political divide among those that feel or actually have been left behind breaks down along racial and to a lesser extent gender lines because that conforms with the personal experiences of people, is easy to abstract, and is reinforced by BOTH political parties.
Another component that both drives and feeds off the craziness is the right wing noise machine. I know lots of people who listen to hate radio all day long, every day. That’s going to rot your brain.
Also, the repubs made a conscious decision to turn away from science, in order to court religious nuts and, for example, kowtow to their masters in the fossil-fuel industry who remain in denial about global warming. They ignore reality. That’s not a good way to stay sane.
Doesn’t just rot the brain but fuels increased states of anger and that stresses a body which seeks all sorts of forms of relief.
It’s clinging to the Whiteness.
When you’ve been fed and believed all your life..
” Well, at least I’m not a Nigger.”
And, then the answer to the question:
” What do you call The President of the United States”
is now “Nigger”
They can’t cope.
They were fed a line of bull for generations. They wrapped themselves in it…and it turned out to be hogwash.
Oh well.
This has been another edition of “what Rikyrah said”.
Failure of trickledown.
We were promised economic success and security if the rich paid lower taxes. Instead we lost jobs, pensions etc
From the moment he was elected Obama’s mere existence has driven the Right into irrational behaviour, root and branch. I’ve been saying for years the destruction of their malignant artifice would be his enduring political legacy.
Great post, true on all counts. Booman, your coverage of this election has been superb, thanks!
The Right didn’t give a toss about AIDS, it would be strange indeed if suddenly ‘compassionate’ conservatism discovered a heart.
So it’s a good comparison, excellent in fact. Why should they care? Bootstraps etc. They’ve always reliably voted against their best interests from genetic bloody-mindedness and religion, no easier votes to garner…
Just keep them alive enough to vote, that’s been the republican way. Now they’re really dying in droves, and those that are still kicking are flocking to their avatar, leaving the complacent, entitled republicans in the lurch.
Couldn’t happen to a nicer, more deserving bunch of old rich white zombie ghouls still drunk on Reagan’s rancid koolaide.
We do have our own Marie Antoinette candidate, Larry Summers:
“One of the reasons that inequality has probably gone up in our society is that people are being treated closer to the way that they’re supposed to be treated.”
Booman, the record is clear that they were against Obama from day one, they blamed him for an economic crisis that he not only wasn’t responsible for, but couldn’t possibly have been responsible for, and they blamed him for just about everything else that was wrong with the country.
Meanwhile he was elected and re-elected by a SOLID majority of their countrymen.
He managed to get through a bigger stimulus to the economy than was done in anay other country. It wasn’t big enough, but he was (again this is totally on the record) prevented from doing more to help the country by the very people they elected.
What you find with this part of the electorate, where myth “trumps” reality again and again, is that while they are burdened by terrible problems, yes, they don’t have a clue what the real causes of those problems are, or how to solve them. So they are easily manipulated.
The Democratic Party is by no means free of blame. Especially Bill Clinton and his pals, the DNC. But even they could not come close to what Bush 43 and his crew did. Not to mention St. Reagan.
And as far as attacking Bernie Sanders, well there are few people in American politics who bear less blame for any of this. But Trump wants his goons to attack Sanders.
Meanwhile Trump himself gets rich off products manufactured in China, Bangladesh, and Mexico.
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/donald-trump-promises-to-bring-jobs-back-from-china-while-
having-his-trump-ties-made-there
This phenomenon of Trump (who had rarely attacked Sanders) suddenly turning on him — after being attacked by so-called “Sanders” thugs, in circumstances that could easily have been staged; and at least a few Hillary supporters jumping on that particular bandwagon, blaming Sanders for inciting violence; all at the very moment when Sanders is emerging as a serious problem for both of them — is, shall we say, interesting.
Not jumping to any conclusions, but I would ask everybody to watch this aspect of the situation very carefully.
I can’t forget that Trump has a long history of friendship with and support for the Clintons; that Trump’s daughter, with whom he is on very good terms, is a close friend of the Clintons’ daughter. Just a coincidence, I suppose.
The idea is by no means original to me. Jeb Bush has already blamed his loss on it. For more, google “Trump-Clinton conspiracy” .
possible that are agents provocateurs from the GOP causing problems at Trump rallys, blame Sanders is icing on the cake. how does an HRC Kasich matchup look?
Wouldn’t place much credence in the GE match-up polls. Outside the always vote DEM or GOP portion of the electorate, few are able to imagine what they’ll do in November. That said, HRC loses to all the possible GOP candidates except Trump.
I never dismiss the possibility of agent provocateurs being in the mix when crowd conflicts arise. My impression in this instance is that it wasn’t present. It was organic and an opportunity for a community with a large Mexican/Latino population with substantial support from other young people to protest the filth that Trump and his supporters were peddling. As Bernie supporters made themselves more identifiable, Trump seized the opportunity to trash Sanders. Had HRC supporters been the one that were easy to identify, Trump would have gone after her. Of course, the HRC folks jumped on it and followed Trump’s lead. Most likely because this is the demographic that’s impeded her coronation.
Be that as it may, look, it’s already starting, here comes the Trump-Clinton tag team:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/13/politics/clinton-sanders-democratic-town-hall-duplicate-2/
Bernie, as you’d expect, is ready to make it a teaching moment:
https:/www.rawstory.com/2016/03/bernie-sanders-rips-into-donald-trump-everybody-knows-this-man-cann
ot-stop-lying
Sorry, please disregard the first paragraph above, I misread the article. Today has been a very long day (seriously). Hillary is attacking Trump, not Sanders.
The second point is good, though.
Yes, this would back up your interpretation:
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/how-bernie-sanders-supporters-shut-down-donald-trump-rally-chicago#
That link didn’t load for me, but here’s one that did.
I only got part of it right — didn’t realize that it had been so well organized and MoveOn contributed to the organizing. Now let’s see them turn out en masse to vote. The numbers for the 18-29 age group have been good for Bernie in several states, but they are still only participating at a rate similar to their percentage in the population. Not punching above their weight like those >64.
It worked OK this time, because The Donald didn’t handle it well, while Bernie and Hillary did. But I don’t think MoveOn should be encouraging this sort of thing. I hope Bernie told them that.
Other than bashing his GOP weenie contenders, Trump hasn’t handled anything well. He has been ratings catnip for the MSM because people love train wrecks.
Chicago may have been the only place in this country where such a protest could have worked. Just the right mix of Trumpsters and right population that could come together quickly to outnumber them. Would be difficult to replicate anywhere else; so, Bernie doesn’t need to tell his supporters not to do it again.
A praiseworthy photo from Nancy Reagan’s funeral. A clear message that HRC supporters can’t see, and now that the Bush’s are dog meat with the GOP base this will reinforce their what in an inchoate form they do see.
There’s no conspiracy here; the people causing violence are Trump’s people, responding to Trump’s violent rhetoric. Everything else said about it is just bullshit.
I think it’s nice that the Establishment has its collective panties in a twist because the Republicans, bless their hearts, have now gone officially nuts. Oh, the horror, the humanity. Who’s to blame? We should by all means; blame the patient, those poor misguided Republicans. Obama did what he could but those mean people wouldn’t even pass those things he never proposed.
What’s the matter with those nutty angry people on the verge of nominating the vilest person one could hardly imagine? What’s the matter, don’t you like neoliberalism? It’s good for you. Don’t you know the stock market is booming? This has been great for business, just ask the 1%. While we were waiting for this to trickle down, you Republicans went nuts, totally ahead of schedule. By the way, Obama had nothing to with any of this and neither did his handpicked successor our base is currently trying to choke down. Something may be wrong though. The dogs don’t want to eat the dog food.
Sorry to break this to you but the Republicans didn’t go nuts. All they did was to align their party with their base including a good deal of white working people, a fundamental feature of our political system, something the Democrats are corrupt enough to never allow to happen. It may look a bit ugly at first but as Martin nicely puts it, “Donald Trump is their way of saying `fuck you’ to a lot more people than just the president.” Now that is what I call aligned with the base, the most promising hand they’ve had in a long time.
I wonder if the Democrats will wake up in time to realize what they thought was nuts was actually the face of a real populist rebellion. The people who are actually nuts are the Democrats who want to counter this populist revolt with the neoliberal architect of the bad trade deals that took so many of their jobs and so much of their livelihood they are literally self destructing. And they’re doing this in a election year of change.
Trump has already made the great pivot. Did you notice how nice he was in the last debate? As he completes his lock on the nomination he’ll just say, sorry I had to say all those horrible racist things to get the nomination, you understand, don’t you? The real issue isn’t white supremacy, the wall or any of those things. My real issue is with those awful trade deals and the stupid weak people who made them. Trump then walks into a debate against Hillary (not Bernie, he hopes) to say:
“Let me understand. You were for this before you were against it? So … will you be for it again next year? I’m just trying to understand.”
This is a great piece by Gaius Publius: When Trump Talks Trade, Voters Listen
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/03/gaius-publius-when-trump-talks-trade-voters-listen.html
White males over thirty years of age have seen their 401 k’s depleted, their house values plummet, and their state taxes rise. Scott Walker’s ascendancy in Wisconsin was fueled by jealousy mixed with contempt for public service sector unions for police officers and teachers because the pensions for public sector jobs weren’t hit too badly by the 2008 collapse. White males, now well into their forties and fifties know they are in very bad shape for retirement in the next ten to twenty years, if they can even hold onto a fully salaried position.
I see comments from this demographic on Facebook all the time. My progressive/ liberal friends from high school, college, and blogs like Daily Kos ask me why I keep such horrible company in my social media. They catch glimpses of the anti Obama comments that are outright racist, and even some gay baiting, because good old Facebook loves to share posts with completely disparate individuals when they should not be sharing, despite constant tweaking of their filters. Part of my answer for not creating blocks is, I want to keep tabs on friends whose personal stories the last twenty five years or so, help me to understand what’s driving their hatred of Obama and the Democratic Party in general. I live in Japan, and the advent of social media has helped me to reconnect, which I could only manage to do every ten years at high school reunions. Neither CNN nor the BBC help me to get inside my friends’ heads! I was more than a little bit shocked by the number of really pissed off white males from my high school days in the early 80’s in the suburbs of Chicago. The stories are similar: Spiraling college costs for their kids, declining property values as Illinois’ manufacturing base is hollowed out with factories relocating to Mexico, high state taxes with a budget crisis always pending, and on and on. Amongst those friends, the Praise Jesus® element has increased. It wasn’t that way in high school. And the praise of gun ownership combined with low tolerance and fear for African Americans is on the ascent. I’m kind of disappointed how many of them turned out. I was a cynical punk rocker in high school who despised Ronald Reagan. My high school buddies were prosperous optimistic Reaganites with rosy futures. They were by turn dismissive of my cynicism. Many of them were forced out of commodities trading on the Chicago Board of Trade over the years, and ended up as salesmen at department stores! Strange to see how much the tables have turned as their cynicism for Obama (nay absolute hatred of the man) resembles my disdain for Reagan.
My high school buddies were prosperous optimistic Reaganites with rosy futures.
Doesn’t that mean that they haven’t changed at all? Continuing to suck down on the rightwing Kool-aid (and yes in 1980 Reagan was rightwing) despite their once “rosy futures” didn’t work out that way and they are now not prosperous and continue to scapegoat all the same groups that they did in the ’80s.
I get why they’re angry; although they did have inflated notions of their own talents and worth and were all too happy to step on others to achieve and maintain a superior status and economic well-being. What they don’t get is that they can’t afford their racism. POC in the US aren’t the ones that have stripped them of their once rosy futures. If they (and DEMs) could recognize the real enemy of the people, those forces cannot survive if the people find common cause.
The twist of language and fates: The felt they were entitled, as they heaped scorn on entitlement programs.
From the comments on the Chait piece….
MikeA2:
“40+ years of poor whites in decline. Yes, their political establishment has lied to them but they still refuse to see that their condition is the same as the minority “freeloaders” they’ve been spitting on for decades.
Trump is their bizarro MLK.”
The predators are consuming higher and higher deciles. This was totally predictable.
A more serious answer for you Marie. Our high school was complicated. If we played football against Evanston Township with its mostly black team, our teachers would get stern with us in class before the game, and warn us against any racist remarks. They were good that way, the old Baby Boomer guard. These were the teachers who lived through civil rights and Vietnam. They were most commendable in that sense. In contrast to all of that were the corporate transplant kids who moved to the Chicago suburbs with their families from places like Texas. They would chew tobacco and start in with the racist remarks. That didn’t sit well with almost all of us, and the Jewish kids were the first to call them on that bullshit, thank god. What I get, and don’t like from Facebook is this new pugnaciousness that wants desperately to use the “n” word on Obama, but they censor themselves because they know their old friends are lurking. This is why I describe myself as “disappointed.” The white males I know were actually more tolerant as teenagers.
Understand. Shouldn’t be at all surprising. Those that had agency through most of their early year and never considered that it could be stripped from them are poorly equipped to meet the challenge. Men tend to fare less well than women because it’s not as easy for them to retreat to home and adopting a traditional role as wife/mother and extol the virtuousness of that new role. Confronting the challenge that demands fundamental change in who they are and how the exist in the world is difficult. Easier to adopt coping mechanism. Religion (maybe if they’d prayed harder when they were young, god would have better protected them and/or if they pray hard now god will rescue them). Alcohol, drugs, etc. Blame preexisting societal scapegoats — all the “isms” that were present in their early years and are therefore, easily accessible to their consciousness. The pugnaciousness is verbal to cope with both the loss of agency and physical decline that reduces their ability to go kick some butt if they so chose to do. (Guns are another coping mechanism) They hurt and have turned that hurt into anger against the other.
All that said, I haven’t a clue how to reach such people. I’ve been concerned for years at how DEMs and liberals have dismissed the deteriorating plight of white men. It was never going to be easy for men to lose privilege over others as a society began to seek more equity for all. They should have been winners along with everybody else, but the winning needed to be different from what it has been in the past. Instead most of us are losers in this neoliberal economic world. Still for those that never had much to begin with, the fall isn’t dramatic enough that one can accommodate to the new reality without experiencing it as a psychic or ego wound. The incidence of suicide among middle-aged white men appears to have increased and far too many are taking their families along with themselves. And the thing is that objectively, they’re lives are decent enough.
From that Gaius Publius piece….”Shorter Thomas Frank: It’s easier for liberals to blame Trump voters for racism than to blame themselves for the job-loss and pain of the working class.”
Democratic Town Hall: CNN’s Reality Check Team vets the claims
Bernie scores 100% true.
Pago Valano – photos of The Big Club
George Carlin did try to tell us.
Breitbart meltdown going very public; Ben Shapiro and the reporter, Michelle Fields, resigning very noisily:
And more. Yikes. There is ugliness about in the councils of the Right.
Indeed, the job is to manage the devolution without breaking the china. Foucault.
Jonathan Chait has a new piece out about the Trump threat and it’s a serious must read.
I was just going to post this! Chait losing his nerve about trump as a “vaccine”. But I think he was right before and wrong now. There is a good discussion in the comments about the ethics and consequences of disrupting Trump’s “first amendment rights”, and I think some of the commenters have pwned Chait pretty well.
Booman please discuss.
Im pretty intetested if Obama’s humiliation of Trump during Bin Laden killing weekend is really what launched his serious efforts at becoming a candidate. Fascinating if true.
Here’s another issue that hasn’t really been addressed in quite some time; home values. For many people, their home is their only major asset. In many places, the value of that asset was destroyed in 2008. We’ve since seen a recovery, nationally at least, but average appreciation rates disguise the fact that there’s a huge divergence in where appreciation is happening (cities) versus where it’s not (suburbs, exurbs particularly). For people living in those areas — those fortunate enough to own an home — they haven’t seen the value that they poured into their home come back. And they may never, because right now, no one wants to move out there.
I hope you like ths picture of George Bush and Hillary Clinton hugging and smiling at Nancy Reagan’s funeral. Now we can start trying to explain how the whole ‘left wing’ went nuts. Has anyone ever heard of FDR, I wonder?
https://twitter.com/DavidChalian/status/709200276226449408/photo/1
Too bad the link probably does;t work. Try to find a way to see this sorry spectacle of Mourning in California!
Here’s one courtesy of The Hill
(My link above to the photo didn’t work either.)
Makes me sick, her little girl act.
Think we’re going too far in trying to understand Drumpf phenomenon. His voters surely are responding to his overt bigotry, etc., but not all of them.
The problem is twofold. First, Drumpf supporters are reacting to the same inequality that animates not just other voters in the US, but so many millions around the world. We seem to have a lack of empathy for these folks’ plights that we don’t have for, say, the Arab uprisings. Our tribalism is not helping here.
Secondly, these folks are constantly accused of being overt racists. But that is not something that they see or understand (excepting that flat-out white supremacists who are a disturbingly large chunk of his support). In their (not entirely unreasonable) view, they are being unfairly tarred with the charge of racism — further evidence, in their view, that the left hates them and is not trustworthy.
You hit on something big when you said you cannot help but see this as a failing. It is. I grew up in a blue-collar town that became pretty deep-red. The people haven’t changed all that much. They’re still prone to more-than-casual racism, are suspicious that fancy people from big cities even think about them and their needs, and, like everyone, have seen the institutions of their lives crumble. (Whether or not one thinks that they caused their own demise, their experience is that they don’t think they ruined their own lives, and even so, when did we start expecting perfection from each other)?
Our side has a fever of a kind as well. I tend to (uncharitably, and regretfully) call it “grad student-ism,” and it’s the same tendency — dare I say style or mood? I dare! I dare! — that makes NPR sound so weird. Far too many people on the left seem unable to speak to people without coming off as condescending. We seem dead convinced that we’re smarter, more experienced — dare I say savvy? I dare! I dare — better educated, etc., so that our tone demands a sort of deference. Which can be pretty insulting.
(Sadly, HRC seems to be literally made out of the stuff. Can’t get a sentence out that isn’t patronizing (matronizing?)).
I get that the right seems a lot more nuts than they’ve been. But remember that Drumpf is looking at 40% of Florida GOP-ers voting for him. They ain’t all in the Klan….