I don’t know what I was expecting to see when I watched the dashcam video of Tulsa police officers killing Terence Crutcher on September 16th. I guess I expected to see something a little more suspenseful instead of just a mundane segment of footage of a seemingly non-threatening person being executed for no apparent reason.
In fact, the first time I watched it, I completely missed the shooting because it didn’t seem imminent and I was momentarily distracted. (If you don’t want to watch someone die, don’t watch the following footage).
According to the news reports, he was tasered and shot in quick succession, although it’s impossible to tell from the video. All you see is him drop to the ground. Then you see the police fail to render him any assistance for about three and a half minutes.
I went and found the helicopter cam video to see if I could learn more.
It didn’t help. I saw a man who had his hands on his car who was clearly shot and killed for no apparent reason. I couldn’t even see any reason why he might have been tased.
It certainly doesn’t show Mr. Crutcher reaching into his car as a Tulsa police spokesperson initially said.
Tulsa Police Chief Chuck Jordan called the shooting “very difficult to watch” and called for an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Before the video of the incident was made public on Monday, police spokeswoman Jeanne MacKenzie told reporters that Crutcher “refused to follow commands given by the officers.”
She added, “They continued to talk to him. He continued not to listen and follow any commands. As they got closer to the vehicle, he reached inside the vehicle, and at that time there was a Taser deployment, and a short time later there was one shot fired.”
I could talk about Mr. Crutcher here, since he had no weapon and wasn’t doing anything obviously wrong. But that would be a disservice because based on his behavior, he could have been a mass murdering cannibal and it wouldn’t have justified this shooting. We can’t judge police behavior based on the moral character of the people they exterminate. They don’t have the right to act as judge, jury, and executioner, so all that matters is whether they were justified in using violence to protect themselves.
In this case, I can see no justification whatsoever. At the very worst, Mr. Crutcher may not have been responding the way they wanted him to to their verbal commands. But he was not any kind of threat. He made no threatening moves.
The woman who killed him, Officer Betty Shelby, may be incompetent or there may be a worse explanation. But she hopefully won’t get away with the excuse that Mr. Crutcher was acting like a man on PCP.
What’s probably the most disturbing part of this is that he was being treated like a suspect in the first place. His vehicle broke down in the middle of the road. He needed assistance. Yet, he’s there from the first moment of the video with his hands up and a gun drawn on him.
Maybe he was acting strangely. I have no way of knowing how he was behaving before the videos begin, although it appears he was on his way home from the local community college, so I don’t know when he was supposed to be doing the PCP.
I just can’t imagine the police treating me this way if my car breaks down and I’m looking for a helping hand. Most likely, they would have helped me get the car on the shoulder and radioed for a tow truck. And if I seemed impaired or something, they would have given me a field sobriety test, not drawn a gun on me.
Back in about 1995, I was in the passenger seat of a car being driven by a black friend of mine when we got pulled over on Route One in New Jersey. I thought I’d helpfully get his insurance information and opened his glovebox. He reacted with furious terror and told me to shut the glovebox and keep my hands in sight.
That was my introduction to the difference between driving while white and black. Even then, I thought he was being a little paranoid.
I don’t think that anymore.
I am sure you recall Senator Scott – amazing that he was not shot as well . . . .
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tim-scott-pulled-over_us_5786bfffe4b08608d332eaa0
In the first year after being elected to the U.S. Senate he was pulled over for DWB seven times.
I have been pulled over 7 times in 40 years of driving while white. (Two speeding tickets, and five equipment violations (taillight or headlight out.)) And each time I was treated courteously.
More to your point – why was this person treated and approached as a dangerous criminal when he was simply (from all appearances) a stranded driver?
Almost as appalling as the summary shooting was the very conscious decision to not render aid after the shooting. Sometimes something as simple as applying pressure to a wound will buy enough time to get the patient transported and saved.
Hey, if he goes ahead and helpfully dies, he can’t tell a different story from the one the police concoct, now can he? Not that anyone ought to pay any attention to what some thug has to say, but still! Ya never know when some bleeding heart liberal will actually pay attention to that stuff.
/sarcasm
I watched the footage on the news last night. It was a complete fail on the part of the police. I cried because this man, seeking help from people we’re supposed to be able to trust, was shot and killed in cold blood. He wasn’t doing anything threatening or suspicious, he didn’t do anything wrong.
No wonder this country is in such a state of distrust and anger. And worse still, it keeps happening.
So long as we have a person like Trump preaching hate constantly this will continue.
It’s sad, but I now automatically start steeling myself for what has become the inevitable conclusion of a “justifiable use of force” and that the officer “properly followed department protocol for dealing with a perceived deadly threat”.
The information on forms to be used for deadly incidents involving “scary, big, black guys” is probably already pre-populated in the PD’s files.
You’re wrong, Mike. The info on the form just needs to say: Black Male.
Forget words like scary or big. This happens to anyone DWB, especially if male.
It’s Out. Of. Control.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/national-police-union-endorses-donald-trump_us_57dc3890e4b08cb14
095ba1a
The Fraternal Order of Police has endorsed Trump.
The President of the FOP, Chuck Canterbury, was interviewed on NPR Sunday edition 2 days ago:
http://www.npr.org/2016/09/18/494451660/the-nations-largest-police-union-endorses-donald-trump
One thing that struck me the most:
“He [Trump] wants to work on the systemic causes of high crime, and Mrs. Clinton wants to work on police reform. And reform in a profession that doesn’t need to be reformed is not the answer to fight crime. What we need to do is have people that will partner with us in these neighborhoods, help reduce unemployment, get people jobs.”
** Why HOOOOW nice! Gee whiz. Where have I heard that before??? Oh, let’s see: millions of liberals have said this for years, and we’ve been bashed and kicked in the teeth for being socialistic, feel-good, do-gooder commies for daring to suggest that we work on systemic improvements in communities to reduce crime. But I see: fascist racist Trump blurts this out, and it’s All Good! And AS IF it’ll ever happen under Trump. Pull the other one.
I agree that citizens need jobs, and I agree that we need to work on these systemic issues. More, please.
But I think we can do two things at the same time. It’s beyond CLEAR that the PDs across this country have a HUGE problem. I don’t know if it’s training, if it’s because they’re hiring too many returned Vets with untreated PTSD, or what. But the Murdering Has. Got. To. Stop.
Outrageous.
This:
https:/medium.com@LaddEveritt/why-the-fraternal-order-of-police-endorsed-trump-d0d8b61efe#.aq8r6go
v8
goes along with your post. Money-grubbing racists. Almost always the same.
Try this link:
http://medium.com/@LaddEveritt/why-the-fraternal-order-of-police-endorsed-trump-d0d8b61efe#.aq8r6gov
8
The FOPA endorsement was made by its board; six of eight board members voted to endorse Trump. The eight board members aren’t exactly representative: two are from white suburban Detroit, three are from Kentucky, and the other three are from Southern Virginia. None are from large urban forces, and all hail from jurisdictions that reliably vote Republican.
Not that the results would necessarily have been different with more geographic diversity; these shootings, after all, happen all over the US. But the attention and credibility given the FOPA’s Trump endorsement seem all out of proportion to what it actually represents: a tiny and seemingly incestuous band of police union leaders
pretty consistently ID them as a beat cop’s worst enemy. Seems like there’s nothing, no possible misconduct (apparently, in their universe “police misconduct” is an oxymoron) that they won’t dismiss/excuse. Leaving the cops they supposedly represent tainted by their “representatives”. (Obviously, some deserve that taint, but not all.)
Paraphrasing this from a comment thread somewhere on the internet after the police union urged its members to boycott working security for Miami Dolphins games:
BLM- We’re not saying all cops are bad.
Police Unions- The fuck we’re not!
Back in Philly, this has left a [larger] rift between the FOP and the Guradian Civic League:
Also, Philly FOP head John McNesby is a pig.
It’s odd, this sense I have that I can trust that assessment at face value, despite never having heard of the guy.
OTOH, now that I think about it, perhaps the fact that the Philly FOP endorsed Trump is, in and of itself, fully sufficient validation of my impression and of your assessment.
Also, Philly FOP head John McNesby is a pig.
Is there anyone here from the Philly area that is surprised by the endorsement? Has anyone heard anymore about the Nazi cop?
CPD obviously thinks there’s a problem, they are issuing all police body cameras by 2018 and every member of the force is required to take a de-escalation training
It’s not enough but at least it’s an acknowledgement that there’s a problem and that’s a start.
The woman who killed him, Officer Betty Shelby, may be incompetent or there may be a worse explanation.
Her husband is supposedly the helicopter pilot in question. Do they dispatch the helicopter for small time things like this?
Maybe it was already in the area. I don’t know. Good question.
The officer’s defense was that the “suspect” did not respond to her demands to stop walking and then he reached into his car through the window. Police said there may have been PCP found in the SUV.
It would be like a joke if it wasn’t really happening. Also, his car window was rolled up, so he wasn’t reaching for anything. And his blood was all over that car window. sobbing
But, how come the terrorist who set off 2 bombs and more that did not explode, known to be armed and dangerous, shoot a cop, run away and shoot at other cops that responded survive the encounter with the cops? Must be Black Lives Don’t Matter.
“Also, got a feeling it’s about to happen. It looks like a bad dude, too. Might be on something.”
That’s part of the transcript from the helicopter.
Oh he’s got a feeling. And what exactly does it mean he looks like a bad dude? He’s not armed, what possible observations could we make from a helicopter that would allow us to determine that someone is a bad dude?
Anyone who doesn’t think racism is a problem in our justice system should have that statement printed out and stapled to their forehead.
another unarmed black man summarily executed by police.
When I see that (or even just ponder this nation’s 2-century+ history) what sometimes seems the real wonder to me is that African-Americans en masse (Native Americans, too) are not perpetually engaged in violent, armed insurrection.
I wondered that, too. The best I can explain why black folks haven’t gone all Stono Rebellion is that we’ve been successfully convinced to not do it because doing so would pave the way for widespread genocide. At least that’s the implication.
I don’t know how effective that all is, with what the slow-motion genocide picking off black men and women one at a time.