Someone is still at work:
And:
FACT SHEET: President Obama Designates National Monuments Honoring Civil Rights History
In celebration of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, today, President Obama is designating three new national monuments honoring our country’s civil rights history and taking new steps to promote diversity in our national parks and other public lands. Building on the Administration’s commitment to protecting places that are culturally and historically significant and that reflect the story of all Americans, today’s designations will protect historic sites in Alabama and South Carolina that played an important role in American history stretching from the Civil War to the civil rights movement.
The new monuments are the Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument, Freedom Riders National Monument and Reconstruction Era National Monument.
· Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument: The Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument will protect the historic A.G. Gaston Motel in Birmingham, Alabama, which served at one point as the headquarters for the civil rights campaign led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that helped lead to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The monument will also tell the stories associated with other nearby Birmingham historic sites, including the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church– which was the site of a bombing in 1963; and Kelly Ingram Park, where Birmingham Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor turned hoses and dogs on young civil rights protesters.
· Freedom Riders National Monument: The Freedom Riders National Monument is located in Anniston, Alabama and contains two sites that help underscore the Freedom Riders’ importance to the civil rights movement. The monument includes the Greyhound Bus Station where a racially integrated bus of Freedom Riders attempting to test desegregation was attacked in the spring of 1961, and the site where the same bus was firebombed and burned some minutes later.
· Reconstruction Era National Monument: Located in coastal South Carolina, the new Reconstruction Era National Monument encompasses four sites throughout Beaufort County that tell the vibrant story of the robust community developed by freed former African American slaves in the Reconstruction Era South. This designation includes the Brick Baptist Church and Darrah Hall at the existing Penn Center on St. Helena Island as well as the Old Firehouse in downtown Beaufort and parts of Camp Saxton in Port Royal where the Emancipation Proclamation was read on New Year’s Day in 1863. These sites establish the first unit of the National Park System focused on telling the story of Reconstruction.
Protection for these sites is strongly supported by the local communities, elected officials, and a wide variety of stakeholders including civil rights organizations, environmental justice groups and historic preservation groups. Each designation was also supported by legislation introduced by members of the Alabama and South Carolina delegations.
Promoting Diversity and Inclusivity in Managing Our Public Lands and Water
President Obama is taking new steps to promote diversity and inclusivity in our nation’s system of national parks, national forests, monuments and other public lands and waters. Today, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum directing the agencies charged with managing the vast majority of America’s public lands and waters – the Department of the Interior, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – to work to ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to experience our great outdoors and engage in decisions about how our public lands and waters are managed. The Memorandum also directs agencies to prioritize building a more inclusive Federal workforce that is reflective of the diversity of our Nation.
Expansion of National Monuments Protecting Natural Resources in California and Oregon
In addition to the new designations honoring African American history, today, President Obama is expanding two existing national monuments to protect critical biodiversity, important historic and natural resources and vital wildlife habitat in California and Oregon.
· Expansion of California Coastal National Monument: Today, President Obama is expanding the existing California Coastal National Monument by 6,230 acres to include six additional coastal sites proposed for protection in legislation introduced by members of the California Congressional delegation in 2015. The monument was originally designated in 2000 by President Bill Clinton and expanded by President Obama in 2014 to include Point-Arena-Stornetta in Mendocino County. Today’s expansion will protect incredible coastal natural resources, scenic views, and areas of cultural and historical significance, including sites that provide insight into the Native peoples who first lived along California’s coast and places still important to local tribes today.
· Expansion of Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument: Located in southwest Oregon and northern California, the current Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument protects the significant biodiversity at the intersection of three distinct bioregions, including wildlife habitat for nearly 200 species of birds. Drawing from two different reports compiled by the scientific community as well as a legislation introduced in the Senate in 2015, today’s expansion will protect more than 42,000 additional acres of public land in Oregon and approximately 5,000 acres in California to increase vital habitat connectivity, watershed protection, and landscape-scale resilience for the area’s unique biological values, particularly in the face of growing impacts from climate change.
And:
The Obama administration on Thursday will terminate the so-called wet foot, dry foot policy that allows Cubans who arrive on United States soil without visas to remain in the country and gain legal residency, a senior administration official said, in an unexpected move long sought by the Cuban government.
The action, first reported by The Associated Press, will come through a new Department of Homeland Security regulation and an agreement with the Cuban government. Details of the decision were disclosed on the condition of anonymity to avoid pre-empting a formal announcement expected later Thursday.
The Obama administration had long insisted it was not planning to change the policy after President Obama’s move in 2014 toward normalized relations with Cuba. But the thaw prompted speculation that once diplomatic relations resumed, as they did in 2015, the arrangement would end.
Under the current policy, Cubans detained at sea who are trying to reach the United States must return to their country, but those who make it onto American soil are allowed to stay and eventually apply for legal permanent residency. The unusual arrangement has been unique to Cuban refugees.
One week left folks. Hope everyday is as productive as today.
I just watched that Biden video at Ballon Juice.
The country is going to so miss them.
.
At least the sane part of the country will.
Still no public option, I see….
I hope the standard Obama has set for the presidency stands the test of time. We’ve been so lucky. Obama has been, no comparison, the best president of my lifetime.
Higher bars than those set by Obama have stood the test of time. His will as well.
I love Joe Biden. I love Barack Obama. They are good, honest, smart, and hard-working men who sacrificed so much to make this country as good as they were allowed to. I have often said that I would have loved the country we could have had if they had been allowed to run the country the way they truly wanted.
Honestly, none of us can predict what lies ahead, but the odds are not in our favor. I am hanging onto memories like this one with both hands.
No day will be as consequential as the day he appointed Comey.
All of this is not as important as releasing the thousands of people who have been given ridiculous and inflated sentences. How many people who were convicted of drug crimes in states which now have liberalized marijuana policies would be convicted today? Many fewer.
I’m a little skeptical about the Biden thing, too.
The OGE guy’s remarks are here and are good reading.
We agree with the people we don’t agree with.
…Mr. Obama does, it won’t help us to recover what he lost endorsing Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders last year.
Enough. Lies and bullshit about a dozen other things that may have lost us this election, Obama’s support of Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders was the deciding factor that lost the presidency for our party last year. Were it not for the Democratic Party leadership’s blindered campaign against Sanders, Trump would not be president now. You all know it. You’re just to chickenshit (you too Longman) to admit it.
Longman? Why not just Johnson? Keep it simple.
STFU
President Obama did not endorse Secretary Clinton until June 2016 which was long after Senator Sanders had a path to victory. Was his preference for Secretary Clinton out there all along? Sure but he didn’t formally endorse her until June.
Beyond that why wouldn’t his preference be obvious? Sanders talked about primarying him in 2012 while Clinton worked as his SoS.
Obama’s failure to instantly recognize the transcendent rightness of the Bernie way calls into question the essential soundness of his judgement.
Falsum in uno, falsum in omni.
(on Thur., June 9) only
I thought he was pretty respectful of Bernie. It is clear where he sympathies lay, but he didn’t intervene in a way that mattered.
I also have heard through the grapevine that he was pretty surprised how well Bernie did.
Bernie lost because he could not solve his problem with the African American vote fast enough.
I was an Iowa Sanders precinct coordinator. I could go on at some length at the absurdity that happened there.
But in the end when we had enough money we lost North Carolina, Ohio, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania and California. We had our victories to be sure, and as time passes I think the reality is increasingly obvious that Bernie has a LOT of power within the Party.
But when the fight was engaged, and when there was time for us to make our case, we lost more than we won.
If only some of his more ardent supporters don’t ruin that for him. Senator Sanders rightfully has a lot of power in the party now BUT some self proclaimed “Berniecrats” are not helping him use that power effectively. Their crusade to drum anyone out of the party who does not see Senator Sanders as the second coming will only hurt him in the end.
I don’t think this is right really either. I don’t see his supporters doing what you are suggesting.
On some votes, the drug importation bill for example, he is calling out some Democrats, but it is worth noting that the vast majority of the Caucus was for the drug importation amendment.
If you go to Caucus99 you see some of it: but they don’t represent many of Bernie’s supporters, and they certainly don’t represent Bernie himself.
Every day all day long. They make EVERYTHING about Senator Sanders. From this drug vote to the upcoming DNC chair. For them it is Senator Sanders supports Ellison so anyone who doesn’t support Ellison is a neo-liberal sell-out.
Me personally? I think if we go by experience in party building Buckley is a better choice than either Ellison or Perez but if we go by platform I support Perez because he has made fighting voter disenfranchisement a cornerstone of his platform.
Who is the they you refer to?
Buckley’s weakness is ironically the same as Sanders is : a lack of experience dealing with POC.
But there is a contingent of his supporters who make everything about Senator Sanders and have basically said he holds all of the answers. Senator Sanders also comes across that way at times. My contention has always been there are lessons to be learned all around from the 2016 election. More for those who supported Clinton, of course, but also for those who supported Sanders.
For example people are still clinging to single payer as the only path forward for universal healthcare. Its resounding defeat in colorado should have everyone rethinking that but Senator Sanders and his more ardent followers are trying to double down on it.
This should not need to be pointed out again, but most of us that supported Sanders for the nomination supported him because his policy prescriptions matched those that we had held for decades; and he presented them in no uncertain terms as we had hoped a Democrat would (again) since Carter lost to Reagan. The platform he proposed is one that even now, almost 2/3 of Americans support. Most of us, I believe, would have preferred Warren to be the standard bearer (the Ready for Warren contingent became Sanders base almost overnight); so it was never about Sanders himself. It was always about the policy that a majority of Americans agreed with, not Sanders himself.
Obama had a deal with Clinton that he would get his endorsement were she to run again in 2016; he’s all but admitted it.
prior to 11/8 that we should all vote for Hillary? Guessing some of “those” you refer to didn’t think he had “all the answers” in that instance?
Single payer isn’t the only path forward, just the most rational one.
Political achievability and outcomes seldom (never?) conform to what’s most rational, though. So there’s that.