So far, I cannot discover why or how Alex Oronov died on March 2nd. If you want to know why I am trying to figure this out, you should read Josh Marshall’s excellent piece on Trump’s longtime consigliere, Michael Cohen, whose brother is married to Oronov’s daughter.
It’s fatiguing to even contemplate trying to put all the pieces together here. It’s a labyrinth filled with mirrors.
At some point, I may make the effort, but for now it’s enough to just lay this out in the most basic terms.
Alex Oronov is dead. He was the father-in-law to Michael Cohen’s brother.
According to Ukrainian parliamentarian Andrii Artemenko, it was his relationship with Mr. Oronov that enabled him to set up a meeting in late January with Michael Cohen at the “Loews Regency, a luxury hotel on Park Avenue in Manhattan.”
In that meeting, Mr. Artemenko was joined by former Trump Corporation employee Felix Sater, a known mobster and FBI informant. They presented Mr. Cohen with some kind of dossier that included a peace plan for settling territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine, as well as allegedly compromising information on the current president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, that they hoped would force his resignation.
Mr. Cohen took their peace plan and their compromising information and forwarded it on to then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
After news of this meeting was reported in the New York Times, the Ukrainian lawmaker Mr. Artemenko was accused of committing treason at home. And after his friend Mr. Oronov suddenly died on March 2nd, Mr. Artemenko took at least partial blame, writing on Facebook:
I have always thought, and continue to think, of myself as a strong person. However, what is presently unfolding in my life is a true endurance test, not only in matters of political action and liability, but in life’s fundamental existential struggle. To enter and exit trying moments with one’s humanity intact is no easy task. An article published in the New York Times on February 20, 2017 divided my life into two distinct parts, a ‘before and after’, if you will. The impact of this most recent watershed on my life is comparable to a surgeon’s knife on a haemorrhaging body, a judge’s sentence on an innocent man, or the pain of loss and the injustice of existence that together account for a child’s first teardrops. With the deftest of touches, New York Times journalists interpreted my words before throwing them on the same chopping block that holds President Trump, a victim of their ruthless war with his administration. They pared down our complicated discussions on the establishment of an alternative negotiation platform with the participation of deputy signatory countries, owing to the failure of a member of the Budapest Memorandum, the termination of the undeclared war between Russia and Ukraine, and the return of our land finally. They teased out and reinterpreted only the most convenient and newspaper-worthy morsels of information from my interviews. In Russia the now proven link between the Trump administration and Russia provides justification for my attempts to lift sanctions against this country. My homeland of Ukraine as does my proposal to lease Ukrainian territory to the aggressor, which caused some to level accusations of treason against me. My own faction, the RPL, has failed to pass this test, as it were, expelling me from their ranks and labelling me a traitor. This is quite an extraordinary accusation, given that I have not once caved in to temptations of money, corruption and increased power, nor to pressure from ‘cynical dealers’ urging me to ruin the faction from the inside out. God alone can judge them. I am confident that everything will find its rightful place in the future, and I wish all of you, including my friends and enemies, health, wealth, peace and prosperity.
I have been able to survive and cope with all of the above successfully, until death itself came, nay barged, into my life!!! The mysterious death of my faithful assistant, Alexander Tikhon, was the first such instance. He was a man who had served not only myself but the entire city of Nikopol, fearlessly crusading against embezzlement and theft on the part of local officials. His death was not in vain and the guilty parties will be punished. I will find those responsible, no matter what it takes, so long as I am alive and breathing. But more on that later.
The second instance occurred when I found out that Lump, the rock, had passed away.
Alex Oronov!!!He was an American citizen who for the last 20 years had given his life to Ukraine and had invested in its prosperity, selflessly sacrificing his wealth, nerves, soul, and, finally, body! He created one of Ukraine’s most successful agricultural holdings, BZC – Baryshevskaya Grain Company, which was renamed Grain Alliance after it had attracted Swedish investment. He did not die of old age, nor by accident or from illness, but at the hands of American journalists who had intervened in his life!!! Worse yet, I am guilty as well. After all, I mentioned his name in response to an American journalist who had asked me, “How are you acquainted with Michael Cohen – President Trump’s personal lawyer?” Yes, I named Alex Oronov, my partner, mentor, teacher and friend. Alex was a relative of Michael Cohen and he was one of those who organized my meeting with him. From that moment onward, his life, and my own, became a kind of hell. Thousands of calls, harassment on the streets, email queries, calls to friends, relatives and acquaintances. And all of it comes with an important subtext – we have now finally confirmed the link between the Trump and Putin administrations, thanks to his Ukrainian deputy! I have endured all of this along with my family, who can testify to the depth of this harrowing experience.
Beasts and scum beware!!!I have survived, I am surviving and I will fight!!!
Unfortunately, his heart could not endure it.
He died!
Overvoltage, nerves, injustice, resentment and suspicions based on a grave misunderstanding.
Friend, your death will not have been in vain, nor will the deaths of tens of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians during this wild, undeclared war!
Rest in peace and forgive me if you can, as difficult as that may be!
He followed this up by publishing a second piece, ostensibly written by someone else named Sergei Bykov. It may interest you to read that posting as well. I have been unable to conclusively determine the identify of this Sergei Bykov character, although I am not sure that it is important.
Again, to understand the potential import of this, you need to read Josh Marshall’s piece that was published the day before Mr. Oronov died. Was it a heart attack, as seems to be implied? Or something else?
In any case, Marshall had concluded that Michael Cohen’s extensive ties to Ukraine made him a logical entry point for anyone “looking for the trail of money from the former Soviet Union into The Trump Organization.” That’s certainly a conclusion that is merited by looking at the British dossier composed by former MI6 Russian expert Christopher Steele who reported that Cohen had met secretly in Prague in late-August with Kremlin officials in order to clean up the fallout from Paul Manafort’s unceremonious flameout as Trump’s campaign chief. That allegation has been hotly contested and Cohen seems to have an alibi for the time period in question, but his name didn’t come from nowhere.
Josh Marshall made the connection on March 1st and Oronov was dead on the 2nd.
Someone might want to figure out the actual cause of death.
We are now nearing Vince Foster land.
Really?
Let me ask you a question.
Did Vince Foster meet with Russian mobsters and Ukrainian parliamentarians and pass on their efforts to topple their own government to Clinton’s National Security Adviser?
Was Foster ever named in an intelligence dossier as a likely conduit of Chinese money to the 1992 presidential campaign?
Was the FBI, NSA, DNI, CIA, and Treasury department investigating Vince Foster at the time of his death?
Was Vince Foster related to any Ukrainian businessmen who were connected by marriage to Clinton’s top private lawyer?
Did that business man turn up dead at the same time that he was being investigated by American journalists and our intelligence community?
Finally, if you shoot a watermelon in your back yard, will it help you answer any of these questions?
I used the analogy, of course, to highlight an obsession with conspiracy theory.
What I see is a parallel between the conspiracy theories that were alive on the right with those at play today.
I get it: you think that all of this will bring down Trump and result in his impeachment.
I think you are dead wrong, and in the process ignoring the real danger: the actual policies Trump is proposing.
Moreover you are making the same fundamental mistake you made through out 2016.
But this time real people are going to get hurt. Real people are going to suffer from the actual policies that will be enacted while you spend all of your time on this Russian stuff.
The analogy is flat because there was zero evidence that HRC murdered Vince Foster. There is significant circumstantial evidence that Trump and/or his associates have been playing footsie with Putin. And the very well reported article from the current New Yorker (which boooman cites below) indicates that Russia fiddled in our election and is currently fiddling in others.
As stated in Marie3s linked tweet from St. Glenn the Infallible, it is possible to hold two thoughts in ones head at the same time. It is possible to believe that Trumps policies are a disaster for the country, work to defeat (or mitigate) them, AND believe that the Russian malfeasance needs to be addressed, and soon.
A question for you in case I’ve missed something: that New Yorker article — does it contain any cites for some of us to check out their assertions? I didn’t see any when I glanced at the piece a few days ago. Seemed like just a longer rehash of other unsubstantiated MSM pieces.
Read the article, rather than “glance” at it and then tell me what you think. It doesn’t rely solely on unnamed sources, and dives pretty deep into the backstory.
Glance was shorthand for I read for about 10 minutes, then scrolled down to see if there was any end to it. I scrolled a long time; I think it eventually had an end, but not sure.
Sorry, but if I’m not going to spend more than 10 min slogging through a lengthy* article that doesn’t tell me where the authors are getting their info and factual assertions. Especially from a MSM source.
And, no, I’ve never been impressed by David Remnick.
* granted, not quite as lengthy as many book-length pieces in the old, better New Yorker of yesteryear.
Plus….EMAILS!
Am I right fladem, am I right?
.
I read the Marshall article and I can believe there’s some “there” there. If the Russian Connection is to be defined and investigated, you have to start with the principle characters and work back.
Following the money is a good way to do it, and ignoring statements given by Trump and his minions to the press as deflection is also a must.
Anything that can be done to throw a wrench into the deceitful workings of this administration should be done. Work all the angles, talk to everyone who hasn’t been murdered yet, and get some hard evidence.
Please do not forget Putin disappeared all in Russia who were involved in the hack.
There are not enough coincidences in the Western World for this man to have died of “natural causes.”
well he was 70 yrs old so natural causes are totally plausible. but with all his shady connections I’d also guess murder is more likely.
I find the fact that casino boats were part of the network of contacts interesting and not unexpected.
I find the story by Mr. Artemenko as Byzantine as Ukrainian politics seem to be. I’m not exactly clear from his account which side he is on besides one of the several networks of Ukrainian (and possibly Russian) oligarchs and with connections in the Ukrainian-American community.
I find Marshall’s trope of “former Soviet Union” less than informative. After 25 years, it makes a difference whether the oligarchs are Russian, Ukrainian, Kazakh, or Belarussian–to highlight some diversity. So far, I’m reading Russian and Ukrainian and only particular strands of Russian and Ukrainian into this story. Are there other former Soviet Republics involved?
Both Cohen brothers are married to Ukrainian spouses unless Wikipedia’s summary of the Forward’s article has them mixed up. We can be pretty sure that Cohen himself has made a few trips to Ukraine. Cohen has also resided at Trump properties, again according to Wikipedia.
The superficial reading is that Flynn’s courier work is responsible for Oronov’s demise.
And what’s the deal with Alexander Tikhon?
Marshall’s trope of “former Soviet Union”
No credible journalist would use “former Soviet Union” when the subject is contemporary Ukraine. He’s pushing the Trump-Putin-Russia meme and it works so much better to refer to Ukraine as “former Soviet Union.”
Not having a baseline knowledge of politics in Ukraine, the Ukrainian oligarch players, including the ex-pats, the wealthy and non-wealthy Ukrainian ex-pat communities in the US, UK, and elsewhere, anything can be made to look suspicious.
So, why aren’t we looking at Nuland, Kagan, and associates Ukrainian ties — including Clinton and McCain? They’re the ones that want to establish an outpost in Ukraine from which to take on Russia.
Oronov may or may not have had enemies that wanted him dead. However, it’s irresponsible to suggest that he was murdered in the absence of identifying any enemies. More ludicrous is the suggestion that he was murdered by team Trump to cover up an alleged tie to Putin. Oronov was older than Churkin — why no idle speculation as to his death?
And look at what was released tonight! Ryan/TrumpCare!! Pay for insurance but get nothing in return!! That’s what Paul Ryan has proposed for Ryan/TrumpCare.
Oh oh, me, me, me! I know this one!
Because Nuland is no longer in government service? Because Kagan is a private citizen? Because Clinton is not POTUS?
Besides, we never found out who that woman was holding Clinton’s hand after she fainted.
Am I right Marie, am I right?
.
While we are at it, support for actual McCarthyism. I don’t think Glenn will be writing a 3,000 word polemic on this, though. Better to defend poor helpless Donald from The Deep State.
Another example of kneejerk partisanship on your part. Glenn loathes Trump and his merry band of creeps as much as you do. He doesn’t give them a pass on anything and writes about it continuously.
Glenn
“‘Deep State’ has become a term people use to imply conspiracy theories w/o articulating those theories in details that might be embarressing”.
Alex Burns.
.
Definitely see the concept bandied about a lot more than it used to be. Call it the mainstreaming of a conspiracy theory. Media Matters covers its use as a means of excusing SCROTUS’ worst excesses. In US lore, the “deep state” seems to have gained currency in fringe conspiracy theory circles in the aftermath of JFK, but probably originated with the foundation of the CIA. Seems like the sort of thing we’d see depicted on The X Files.
It’s become a phrase used by those with little analytical ability. A word a not smart person thinks a smart person would use.
Really, very similar to anybody who takes Greenwald seriously.
.
Yep. It is a term that is more or less devoid of meaning, and regrettably there are some people who really should know better who have allowed themselves to get swept up into some serious hardcore nonsense. For the fringes in US politics, it serves their respective narratives, I suppose. I’ll stick to reality, thank you.
Reality is more than just what’s printed in the NYT or asserted on CNN or proclaimed by various govt officials.
DS term came, most likely, from Peter Dale Scott, prof emeritus of English at UC Berkeley, former Canadian diplomat, political analyst and poet. Author of several Deep Politics books re JFK assassin from 20 yrs ago and a more recent book on the Deep State etc.
Very progressive leaning academic intellectual. Hardly a lightweight or fringe type or X Files guy.
Until the latest round of anti-Putin/Russia charges leveled by the Hillary/Dem forces against the Donald, the Deep State term had been used more and more frequently in the progosphere prior to 2015, without much if any objection, by anon commenters and named serious authors alike, to describe various horrors occurring domestically and with US policy abroad. Then with the latest round of anti-Putin hysteria aimed at Donald, the Right latched on to it, along with a small but impressive segment of the progressive left.
Here is another DS reference by a non-fringey liberal, Mike Lofgren, ex Congressional staffer and author of a DS book, article appearing at the Bill Moyers site. Moyers, another non-fringe liberal and someone progressives have admired for decades.
Interesting (see footnotes) that Lofgren traces use of the term Deep State to Turkey; also to a book by John LeCarre (ex intel agent) wrt UK intel/private industry forces with considerable unaccountable power being given highly-classified access above many intel agents.
Along with “neoliberal” and “coronation.”
I haven’t seen “coronation” used on this blog, but then again, I probably ignore a good deal. Something tells me I am not missing much in that case. “Neoliberal” has been practically unavoidable, on the other hand, and as a pejorative should be laid to rest. That said, there was a pretty good conversation about its more proper usage (oaguabonita deserves some serious props, btw), and more importantly which party is largely responsible for running on and implementing neoliberal policies in the US (hint: it ain’t the Dems!). So it goes.
My favorite during the presidential campaign was the species of commentary that characterized Hillary Clinton as both a neoliberal and a neoconservative.
Ah, yes, the despicable coronation of Queen Neolibcon was a much-loved topic of outrage, wasn’t it?
Maybe a year ago, BooMan made a post saying that any time someone trotted out the “N word”, in our case “neoliberal”, it was the equivalent of going Godwin and that the poster automatically lost the argument.
Should have bookmarked that particular post because it’s proved itself true time and time again.
Here’s the link. Bookmark to your heart’s delight. I know I have.
You’re welcome. š
If people are asked to explain what they mean by “deep state”, then the terrorists will have already won.
How dare you question the integrity of The Sage of Rio de Janeiro.
No — it wasn’t a topic you viewed worth discussing when they were in power and fomenting a coup and war and wouldn’t be if they were still in power and continuing their plans to drag us to war through Ukraine. Nor was/is Uranium One, the Clinton Foundation, and deal with the “former Soviet Union” (Kazakhstan). Bill Clinton can give a speech for $600,000 in Russia — no big deal. But an Clinton opponent that does the same is labeled a Putin stooge.
I detest double standards. No Americans (whether native born or nationalized) should be meddling in the internal affairs of other countries. Let them be.
If I speak out when partisan Republicans attack others for what they also do, intellectual honesty compels me to speak out when partisan Democrats do the same thing. Republicans seek to give Republicans a pass for wrong doing and Democrats give passes to Democrats. Both are wrong. But that might be too principled and complex for you to comprehend.
“The alchemist picked up a book that someone in the caravan had brought. Leafing through the pages, he found a story about Narcissus.
The alchemist knew the legend of Narcissus, a youth who knelt daily beside a lake to contemplate his own beauty. He was so fascinated by himself that, one morning, he fell into the lake and drowned. At the spot where he fell, a flower was born, which was called the narcissus.
But this was not how the author of the book ended the story.
He said that when Narcissus died, the goddesses of the forest appeared and found the lake, which had been fresh water, transformed into a lake of salty tears.
‘Why do you weep?’ the goddesses asked.
‘I weep for Narcissus,” the lake replied.
‘Ah, it is no surprise that you weep for Narcissus,’ they said, ‘for though we always pursued him in the forest, you alone could contemplate his beauty close at hand.’
‘But… was Narcissus beautiful?’ the lake asked.
‘Who better than you to know that?’ the goddesses asked in wonder. ‘After all, it was by your banks that he knelt each day to contemplate himself!’
The lake was silent for some time. Finally, it said:
‘I weep for Narcissus, but I never noticed that Narcissus was beautiful. I weep because, each time he knelt beside my banks, I could see, in the depths of his eyes, my own beauty reflected.’
― Paulo Coelho, The Alchemist
If you are referring to Michael Flynn as the Putin stooge and comparing the money he received to the money that Bill Clinton received, I should probably remind you of a few things.
What Flynn did in accepting money from Putin was actually a crime as far as the Pentagon is concerned. It’s also highly improper, for obvious reasons, for a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency to behave in the manner that Flynn behaved, and I mean that on the whole spectrum of his behaviors, but particularly for his decision to accept money for going on Russian television and then criticizing U.S. policy in ways pleasing to his hosts, and also to sit at the head table with Putin and give him a standing ovation.
Meeting and communicating with the Russian ambassador repeatedly while a private citizen (only informally aligned even with a presidential campaign) is also a huge no-no for a recently departed spy.
Some of this only applies to Flynn because of his former position, but it’s dubious for anyone.
And it is hard to not call it stooge-like even if you’re trying to be generous.
How embarrassing this has all been for the useful idiots.
That statement is incredibly obtuse on so many levels. It’s a pretty desperate attempt a ‘both sides Broderism’.
There just is no rhetorical bottom of the barrel.
.
I’ll accept that you believe you are upholding a certain set of principles. But what I’ve never understood is what agenda you believe you are advancing by the relentless criticism of damn near everyone.
PURITY!
UBER ALLES!
Dealing with Our Progressive Betters is not unlike dealing with your usual glibertarian. I use Charlie Pierce’s Five Minute Rule: For the first five minutes of any substantive conversation with them, your reaction is “well, that does make sense”, then they go off the rails on whatever pet issue(s) they have.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a24952/the-latest-from-liberty-land/
Substitute names from The Usual Suspects here for the Rand Clan in the above quote and it’s the same thing. What I don’t get is why these people don’t simply find their own blog to inhabit instead of inflicting their horseshoe theory of lefwing political purity on the rest of us. It’s clear they have no desire to fix Democratic Party issues from within and yet, here they remain.
There’s an addictive rush from demonstrating one’s superiority to the common ruck of deluded tools and fools around one.
I hope you are well paid, Mariya.
They say that history is written by the winners. I sincerely hope that 50 years from now, the canonical history of this era is not published in Moscow.
Trump’s penchant for making deals with the underbelly of global business came up again tonight on Rachel’s show. She highlighted a mega piece from The New Yorker
If you’re Trump, this is a pretty gawd awful story, but it does make me wonder with all of the deals coming to light that Trump has struck with mobsters, oligarchs, felons and soon-to-be felons one would think that his Enforcer would be uncovered. Lots of people dropping dead lately.
Mmmm, mmmmm, mmmmm, mmmm, mmmm.
Litmus tests and neo-conservative foreign policy. Just like the disasters in Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, and Syria never happened or that there’s a DAESH/ISIS/ISIL so-called “Islamic State” that still has to be cleaned up with the help of Russia, Iran, and Turkey (and Afghanistan and now Pakistan).
But snap-to progressive Democrats. Hop on board the Restoration.
Another reminder that the economy of the Russian Federation is smaller than the economy of California. And the best way to rid oneself of the threat of nuclear weapons is to negotiate them away.
And another reminder that the civil service has expertise and has stood firm on sanity in some key moments in history.
What we’ve seen however from A. Mitchell Palmer through Wild Bill Donovan and J. Edgar Hoover, from Allen Dulles, on through George H. W. Bush and George Tenet are growing secret state power in the intelligence, law enforcement, and counterintelligence establishments that are less interested in threats to the United States and more interested in competition against their political ideologies. And one major thread throughout that history is opposition to desegregation and the end of racism in America. The covert and clandestine agencies have been harbors of white nationalism and white suprmacist activities directed from the top. There is no evidence that this has changed during the Obama administration.
Secrecy without real accountability and the absolute doctrine of state secrets abets this.
My sense is the debate about the “deep state” has more to do with how monolithic it is, how totally divorced from Presidential and executive agency control it is. There is little doubt that it operates extraconstitutionally with respect to US citizens and even criminally. Indeed, some boosters maintain that being the nation’s mob is exactly its function. And that padding its budget with drug sales is admirable no matter how many lives that trade destroys domestically.
I find Trump’s charges and paranoia fascinating for that–seeming having gotten hooked up in the wrong mob — more than an eminent threat, save from a massive nuclear exchange, on Russia’s part.
What we have seen is that the GOP has checked Trump on some things, but the Wall Street media are still complicit because the big-wigs want that Trump tax policy that will ruin the nation and make incredible sums for them. And will institute a regime that irreversibly fails to tax them.
How some Russians understand the current situation in Ukraine.
The Saker, Unz: The Donbass is breaking away from an agonized Ukraine
How does this little bunch of Ukrainians and Ukrainian-Americans play into the nationalization (Russianization and expropriation from Ukrainian ownership) as the conflict with Ukrainian nationalists in the east continue?
Who is a “true Ukrainian” in all of this internal political turmoil?
And who is the market for coal that the Novorussian activists and Trump see Putin’s help useful in securing?
It looks like the Breitbart-o-Trumpkins are about to have a bit of a mess on their hands.
How many military-age folks do you know who are eager to do in Kiev and the shadow of Chernobyl what their elders did in Cam Ranh Bay, Haiphong, Suleimaniya, Fallujah, and Tikrit? Or the Helmand Province in Afghanistan? Under much dicier geopolitical circumstances?
Technically what is happening here is a search for stable boundaries between powers. It is occurring exactly at the time when the allies of the US are for their own reasons in shakier conditions than they have been for the past quarter century. They could wise up after seeing the US experience with Trump and start redirecting their policy in more stabilizing directions. That is looking as unlikely as sanity returning to US politics. Are we to the point of expecting the assigned staff at NATO headquarters to keep their heads when their political principals (like Trump) lose theirs?
Of course Putin is taking advantage of US weakness and pushing the boundary issue back from the US’s very aggressive moving it from Checkpoint Charlie to the Russian border in the past 26 years. The current impasse with its “you’re either for me or against me” mindset on both sides means there is not the diplomatic space for neutrals as political buffers and economic entrepots that reduce frictions. There was a time when both the US and Russia saw Ukraine (and Belarus) possibly fulfilling that role. Different internal politics in both states defeated that illusion.
I wrote a diary recently in which I noted another item by The Saker that used explicitly antisemitic language. I can resupply the link if you wish.
You think that it was not obvious to me? I’m not advocating the Saker’s view of the world. I’m saying that his explanation of his view is a way to understand where Russian expats think Putin is going with his policies and how the mess in the Ukraine will unfold.
I’ve also noted that the Saker has begun this habit since Trump’s ascendancy in the US. I find that a significant assumption about US audiences.
I’m assuming you are talking about this passage:
I find “AngloZionist” gratuitous labeling for what is not necessarily connected at all with Jews by trying to attach a spurious connection.
I am also conscious that Unz Review is published by a quirky Trump-like would-be oligarch Ron Unz. And that there are a lot of similarities in this form of nationalism and the ideas of Lyndon LaRouche from 30 years ago.
My major interest is the Russian view of the situation in Ukraine (complicated), the very interesting foreshadowing of a coming nationalization of manufacturing in so-called Novorussia, and my questioning whether the Oronov death might be tied up in the political maneuvering in Kiev around these rumours.
Some of Netanyahu’s biggest fans in the Republican Party use explicitly antisemitic language.
There is a meaning of AngloZionism that does make sense because it describes one of my relatives who is in a James Hagee “Jews for Jesus” congregation. But I don’t think this is exactly what Saker has in mind. Not that apocalyptic vision at least. I read it as a label for the US-UK-Israel alliance that seeks to block Russia from support of governments in the Middle East. And reads back into some traditional Russian Orthodox attitudes from a century or more ago. And the Saker is a Russian Orthodox traditionalist.
The article I was referring to was THIS ONE. I have not done an exhaustive study of this writer’s works.