By this point most are aware of Trump’s idiotic and false statement about the UK spying on Trump on behalf of Barack Obama. As Politico notes:
Larry Johnson, a former CIA analyst and blogger, acknowledges he was one of the sources for Fox News commentator Andrew Napolitano’s claim — later repeated by the White House — that British intelligence services spied on Trump during the election. The U.K. has rejected the claims and the White House has appeared to distance itself from the specific accusation, putting the onus on Fox News…
Johnson, a key source for the report that was roundly denied by U.K. and U.S. officials, told POLITICO on Saturday that he received his initial tip from a Democrat who is not in the intelligence community but has ties there. “He was alarmed at what he saw as this meddling in the election,” Johnson said, declining to cite the individual involved.
Are you fucking kidding me? Larry Johnson used to post on DKOS. He was one of the more unglued Clinton supporters. He said, and he said it at DKOS, that Karl Rove was aiding Back Obama. The link to that post gets a 404. All of this serves to remind me just how much uglier 2008 was than was 2016.
The American Prospect give the full story of this idiot:
It was months later — in late April — that the “whitey tape” rumor started, mostly among pro-Clinton Democratic donors in New York. One of the earliest versions of the rumor, according to one reporter who heard it in April, was that researchers for Rudy Giuliani had their hands on a tape of Michelle Obama at Trinity United giving a speech where she attacked white America using the word “whitey.”
Johnson told me over e-mail that he heard the rumor for the first time in early May. On May 16, he claimed to “have it from four sources (three who are close to senior Republicans) that there is video dynamite — Michelle Obama railing against ‘whitey’ at Jeremiah Wright’s church.” The next day Johnson posted a fresh rumor of “an ultra conservative Republican billionaire” who “hates John McCain” and had put out a $1 million bounty on the tape.
The new story came from a “major Republican operative” who told Johnson that “Karl Rove and his political allies control the tape.” It was corroborated by “a retired CIA buddy” who was “friends with a lawyer who saw the tape.” Two days later, with this story still uncorroborated, Johnson speculated that Barack Obama’s angry response to criticism of his wife came from fear of “the ticking ‘whitey’ time bomb.”
All of this was, of course, complete bullshit. He made the whole thing up. Later he claimed that that he been used by Republicans.
THIS is the source that was behind Trump’s accusation that the UK had been spying on him.
Larry Johnson is a nut job. He came completely unhinged in s008.
Just the kind of nut job a a guy like our President, himself a nutjob, would rely on.
For the record, Larry Johnson said the source of the Whitey tape was David Brock. Who the hell knows who made that rumor up. But at no point did Johnson have 4 sources for it.
A kind of update. My memory of 2008 is mostly at a now defunct website (openleft). I had forgotten this, but who took up the “whitey Tape”?
Roger Stone
Roger Stone, master of right-wing political hit jobs, helped a push rumor that’s been creeping through the blogosphere the past couple weeks, in which Michelle Obama used the word “whitey” on a panel at Trinity United. If that’s not enough, supposedly Louis Farrakhan was also on the panel, according to blogger Larry Johnson (a former CIA analyst and Clinton supporter).
“At least seven news organizations have contacted me, wanting to know how to get their hands on this tape, giving me more information than I had after I’ve spoken to each one of them,” Stone told Gerald Rivera yesterday on Fox.
“I now believe the tape exists,” Stone added.
So the Johnson rumor went to Stone. And of course Stone said he had SEVEN sources, which is three better than Johnson said he had.
This was all, most assuredly, fake news. What is surprising in retrospect was how much circulation it got, and how little impact it had on Johnson’s ability to get stories circulated broadly.
I suppose Johnson had his connections to far right nutjobs back then, but I find the connection interesting.
Stone of course had some sort of connection to Wikileaks, and Johnson and Stone both firmly deny that Russia was behind the Wikileaks.
We learn tonight that Napolitano is off the air at Fox. For how long The Hill doesn’t say. My guess is Napolitano is off because British conservatives got angry, and Sir Rupert is a bit sensitive about his reputation in the UK.
One of the finest moments by Martin Longman here @BooMan …
My vague memory of Johnson was that he seemed to express some outrage about the outing of Valerie Plame. He and Susan Hu (later SusanUnPC) were front-pagers here for a bit prior to 2008. They went full-on PUMA and from there let their wingnut freak flags fly – especially on Johnson’s excuse of a blog. They rode the anti-Bush wave until it was no longer useful for them. At least that was the impression I was left with. If a few liberals and leftists got used along the way, they were just mere collateral damage. That is my impression of how they treated folks here on this blog. Not sure how much expertise either of them had, other than being really good opportunists. Perused NoQuarter for the first time in a long time recently. Johnson might be slightly saner than Alex Jones, but that is not really saying much.
an interesting variety of people and viewpoints have passed through this place, haven’t they?
Ha ha. Oh yes. It’s been a gas, to say the least!
How does Napolitano have any credibility with anyone?
Something about Larry Johnson always seemed “off” to me — long before the “whitey tape.” Of course I’ve learned to be skeptical of anyone touting “fmr CIA analyst” as a calling card with liberals, as well as those that get instant acceptance from liberals.
Checking just now I see that his formal or official tenure in government service was 1985-1993. Why such a short stint? Hardly enough time to develop expertise and relationships to get an inside track. Sure looks like a garden variety DC-centric opportunist to me. The only consistency that I can see — and in real time is less apparent because he moves around in pundit-land — is pure camp Clinton.
Johnson apparently remains useful to plant disinfo (to an idiot) and this one worked like a charm because tRump doesn’t expect “FakeNews” that can bite his butt to appear on Faux.
Louise Mensch twitter February 24, 2017:
Buzzfeed – Russia Critic Sparks Feud At The New York Times
Maybe now Democrats won’t be so quick to approvingly quote this British expat. (That is not be construed as an endorsement for other fake news at the NYTimes.)
gawd, who is this woman? just another professional flake? this year’s Orly Taitz?
>>”In November, I broke the story …”
if by “broke the story” you mean “made unproven accusations”.
She surfaced after the election and gained instant credibility among flipped out Democrats that retweeted her anti-Putin crap and linked to whatever she wrote on the subject. (Including Booman.)
It’s applicable to this diary because Johnson got that same instant credibility over the Plame affair. And it is another example of the ease with which Democrats can be suckered.
“Larry Johnson, a former CIA analyst” Right there it is very scary, and a lesson in “CIA sources said…” That people like that have a crucial role in government policy in BOTH parties’ administration is extremely scary.
You’re not supposed to notice, and even less mention, that Democrats have dirty hands.
Geez Louise….he has a Wikipedia page with all of this history.
Wikipedia: Larry C. Johnson
BTW, why is the link to his BooMan Tribune post an .rtf file?
Of course, not much of a Wikipedia page:
“A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia’s content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page.”
Just the hall-of-mirrors story that information warfare leads to.
Seems to specialize in seductive distractions.
He posted here? That nut job?
It was pretty obvious the guy was a lunatic.
He IS a lunatic.