New Jersey Governor Chris Christie had a good reason to be far from the Manhattan courthouse today where his pals Bill Baroni and Bridget Anne Kelly are being sentenced for their roles in the closing of lanes on the George Washington Bridge in 2013. He was in the White House meeting with the president as he announced a very underwhelming plan to combat the nation’s opioid epidemic.
Christie must be glad to have the distraction. Bill Baroni was his choice to serve as the Deputy Executive Director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and Bridget Anne Kelly served as his Deputy Chief of Staff. While Kelly’s sentence has not yet been announced, Baroni just got two years in the hoosegow, and while he was appropriately contrite, he did not fail to allude to the fact that Christie belonged in the courtroom right along with his two former allies:
Update [2017-3-29 15:15:8 by BooMan]: Bridget Anne Kelly received 18 months in the slammer.
“That is why I regret, more than anything, that I allowed myself to get caught up in this and fail to help those who need it,” Mr. Baroni said, as he read from a prepared statement. “It was my job to protect them and I failed.”
He added: “I let the people in Fort Lee down. They deserve someone in my position to have tried to stop this. But I didn’t stop this. No one else is responsible for my choice.”
…“While a number of people outside of this courtroom were involved in what happened in Fort Lee that day, some charged, some not, that does not change the fact that I failed,” Mr. Baroni said in his statement. “I made the wrong choices, took the wrong guidance, listened to the wrong people. I was wrong and I am truly sorry.”
His speech may have won him a measure of leniency since the prosecutors were asking for a sentence of 37 to 46 months. They are asking for the same sentence for Kelly, but she’s hoping that her situation is sympathetic enough that she’ll avoid jail time altogether. She’s a single mother with four children, which does tend to differentiate her from others who have been caught up in this scandal. Former New Jersey attorney general David Samson, already pled guilty to bribery in a case arising out of Bridgegate, and Christie’s high school friend David Wildstein pled guilty to counts of conspiracy to commit fraud and conspiracy against civil rights.
Somehow, Christie has avoided taking any criminal responsibility for his actions, and he’s sitting in the White House while his former Deputy Chief of Staff wonders who will raise her four kids if she has to go to prison.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s effort to combat opioid addiction is very disappointing even though one nice thing I can say about Christie is that he fully understands the issue and even excels at knowing how to talk about it.
Unfortunately, he’s not being empowered to do much of anything about it:
According to sources familiar with the draft executive order calling for the creation of the commission, the primary goal of the President’s Commission on Combating Opioid Abuse, Addiction, and Overdose would be to compile a report on the state of the opioid epidemic—along with recommendations for responding to it—by October. Members of the commission will include Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price, Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis. The members would not be paid, but funding for the commission costs would be paid for by the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
The commission would be specifically tasked with identifying “federal funding mechanisms” for addiction prevention and treatment, assessing the availability of addiction treatment services, identifying best practices for addiction prevention, recommending regulatory changes in federal criminal law, reviewing barriers to response by the health care system, and evaluating existing federal programs to combat addiction and overdose.
This might sound like something significant, but it’s really not:
Skeptics maintain that the executive order is simply lip service: “If you’re serious about a commission, show me your budget and your plan to put it into action,” said one source familiar with the draft. On the campaign trail, the president vowed to spend money on addiction treatment. Yet the administration’s actions so far don’t match the promises: Repealing the Affordable Care Act would have left millions without mental health and substance abuse services. The president’s proposed budget would cut funding for the Department of Health and Human Services by 18 percent.
Furthermore, critics say, there’s the issue of redundancy: The surgeon general’s office under President Barack Obama published a very similar report in November 2016. Meanwhile, Trump has yet to appoint a director to the Office of Drug Control Policy, which is charged with evaluating and overseeing anti-drug efforts.
And I probably don’t need to mention it, but I will. There isn’t a person in a position of responsibility in the entire country who gets addiction less than Jefferson Beauregard Session III. GQ‘s Jay Willis put it well when he said of Sessions’ announced anti-drug policies: “This is what happens when law enforcement policy gets entrusted to a bigoted septuagenarian who learned everything he knows about drugs from D.A.R.E. and that very special episode of Saved By The Bell, and does not care to educate himself any further.”
Who lets a mother of four children go to jail for eighteen months just to avoid taking responsibility for his own actions?
A Republican.
I do hope her children will be taken care of adequately. This whole affair seemed to take forever. Justice was slow but we got there, except they missed Christie.
I don’t recall did either of these two have a chance to turn on Christie or were they soldiers right into prison?
They were probably offered plea deals, I have to believe. Still, you think there would be enough to charge The Big Chicken.
I remember she was going through a child custody suit with her ex. Chances are that not only is he getting custody but that she will be lucky to get visitation when she gets out.
Come on. Christie placed in charge of the anti-opioid effort? Trump doesn’t care about this program so much as just creating a showy charade. If he had any real interest in it, he’d have appointed his SIL Kushner to head the effort. You can already hear the flush and feel the swirl on this program.
This is a straight up nothing job. The current GOP congress will never fund any program Christie comes up with.
http://federalnewsradio.com/workforce/2017/03/opm-tells-agencies-get-ready-workforce-reorganization-
furloughs/
They are planning on “drowning the government in a bathtub”.
OPM federal workforce 1962-2014 (US population 1960 – 179 million; 2017 – 326 million
Executive branch – civilians
1962 – 2.485 million
2014 – 2.663 million
Military
1962 – 2.8 million
2014 – 1.5 million
Leg/judicial
1962 – 0.03 million
2014 – 0.06 million
(Note in 1960 there was no Medicare/Medicaid and the role of several departments and agencies was expanded after 1960.)
So much for creating new, good paying jobs. They’ll continue the outsourcing of government functions which won’t save the federal budget a dime but will turn median income jobs into low income jobs and enrich CEOs and stockholders.
It would have been helpful (to me, anyway) if you had included total federal employment in 2008. I’ve seen a number of mentions (sorry, no links) that Obama cut the federal bureaucracy more than any other president. I know that for a while total federal, state, and local employment was way, way down.
The link to the OPM 1962-2014 report wasn’t good enough?
btw Clinton was the big job cutter. Who needs federal regulators anyway? They just get in the way of bidness maximizing profits by cutting corners that crash the US financial system.
2008 total: 4.206 million
2014 total: 4.185 million
That’s the last number we have from OPM.
It looks like Nixon, Carter, Bush I and Clinton cut more. And of course St. Ronnie’s government grew quite a bit
https:/www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/federal-employment-reports/his
torical-tables/total-government-employment-since-1962
it seems to be more of an effort to blow up the last big union in this country, which will help the people you mention even more
Say it again! Say it often!
With an 82% population increase ’60 to 2017, it’s insane that the federal civilian workforce has only increase by 7%.
The military brass was happy to reduce troop levels in favor of more high-tech toys, fewer and larger US installations, and outsourcing grunt work such a KP.
Army and Air Force Exchange is a business (annual sales $8.5 billion). Defense Commissary Agency a bit less so (annual sales $5 billion)
Did the figures you quoted include the Postal Service? Since the ’70s, automation has drastically reduced the number of postal workers. Most people think mail is still sorted by an army of clerks throwing mail into pigeonholes as it was in Ben Franklin’s day and still was until the late 1970s. Gradually the process was automated and today two clerks (one clerk if management had it’s way) run a machine that sorts and collates thousands of pieces per hour. I confess I forget the exact rate and it varies by the machine generation (I through VI). Our facility, one of four similar sized facilities in the Chicago area, had 65 of these machines, along with others that sort larger “flats”, such as magazines, catalogs, and clasp envelopes. The sole facility in Wyoming, in contrast, has only half a dozen machines, reflecting the vastly different volume. If I recall correctly, the PMG’s hit list would have eliminated the Wyoming facility and had the mail sorted in Colorado and then trucked in.
I did ask myself that question, but a brief check on it suggested that I’d have to put real time into getting the answer. OMB should have been using “apples to apples” in the chart which would mean that the postal employees have been included or excluded for all of those years. However, as you know, data collection and reporting by institutions aren’t without efforts to make someone look good. Would Nixon, or any later president, missed the opportunity to pull postal workers out of the numbers (assuming the legislation or amendments didn’t strictly define their categorization)?
A lot of the mechanization and reforms at the postal service seems to have improved service and employee morale, but I’ve never agreed that it should be self-supporting and the workforce head count not include some slack or contingency surplus.
It ticked me off a few years ago when automation replaced power company meter readers. I was only thinking in terms of jobs being disappeared. But it occurs to me that there was an unseen safety component in having workers as a normal part of daily activities. The milkman, bread man, meter reader, newspaper delivery, and telephone repair/installation.
The Postal service is self-supporting! Many people don’t realize this. No tax money is used, just revenue from the sale of stamps and services. This despite heavy subsidies to corporate mailers and politicians (that’s why your stamps are so high, you are subsidizing the junk mail and all the crapola that comes from your Congresscritter and the political mail at election time also has a subsidy (plus priority).
All the talk you hear of postal losses is SOLELY caused by Congress’ fairly recent requirement that the USPS pre-fund employee health care for 70 YEARS! Or as the union puts it “prefund health benefits for employees that haven’t been born yet”. This was one of those budget deals that made tax cuts for the rich appear revenue neutral. USPS actually runs a profit but sends the profits plus to the Treasury to make the budget look good.
Federal Almanac used to have those employment figures broken out fifty years ago. I don’t know about now.
Yes, understand all that and knew that you didn’t need reminding of any of it, but other readers here might find it informative.
Thanks, Marie. It’s one of the great rip-offs that democrats agreed to. they should hang their heads in shame. The APWU union only endorsed ONE Presidential primary candidate in it’s entire history, Barack Obama, and what did he do for us? Turned his back, that’s what. No wonder I heard other postal workers going tea Party and endorsing Trump. Unions are just a source of money and manpower for the Democrats, then they laugh with their Wall Street buddies all the way to the bank.
Well, maybe someday workers will take back control of their unions. That was how it was supposed to work. But complacency and griping is so much easier.
Unions are between a rock and a hard place. Democrats use and abuse them but let them live. republicans want to kill them. they could support a more socialist third party but then the Democrats won’t care if the Republicans kill them. The (D) party is the only game in town, so they are captured.
The Obama endorsement was an aberration. In 2016 the APWU returned to their no primary endorsement plicy, but did endorse HRC in the general. I don’t recall APWU ever not endorsing the Democrat in the general.
IMHO, APWU is heavily AA so that drove the Obama over Clinton endorsement. Having the first black President was a very emotional moment for my black friends. One quite Left friend (was a W.E. B. DuBois club member) was very disappointed in Obama after he went all out in donations of money and time to his 2008 campaign and refused to work on the 2012 campaign. He confided this to me, but in the presence of other white people he vigorously defended Obama.
DoD has been seriously outsourced. Don’t believe the talk about cost savings, either. In the ’70s when we selected a government or contractor work facility we were told (in wring by OMB) to subtract the employee SS taxes from contractor bids because that was a revenue to the government (and the benefit obligation was not a liability?). Next we were told to subtract pro rata state and local taxes from the contractor costs. Anything to make them look cheaper than in-house work.
And yes, this accelerated under Jimmy Carter, although it shot up like a rocket under RR. A lot of the “base closures” talked about in that era weren’t forts and the like as people think. It was work facilities like the Brooklyn Navy Yard, the Boston Navy Yard and similar facilities. The last I knew (1990’s) we had only two Navy Yards left, Long Beach and Norfolk. I suspect there are none now and we pay contractors profits to do work with government furnished tools in government built facilities. Profit without investment, a corporate
dreamreality.How is it that Christie somehow escaped this, did folks forget who the Governor was/is??
True, but it took him out of the running for the one job he really wanted, led him to kissing Trump’s behind in hopes of getting the second banana job that he would have taken, groveling to get a plum Trump admin job and the humiliation of being passed over, and now reduced to being tossed whatever stuff TrumpCo has no interest in and won’t be acted on. Don’t think that Christie doesn’t think about what could have been every time he sees Trump gloating in/from the Oval Office. Are Trump/Bannon/Kushner enjoying kicking Christie around and having him come back and ask for more?
Oh, come on, BooMan. He’s a former U.S. Attorney. He has connections in the Justice Department. He has friends. Of course, Jared Kushner hates his guts and will keep trying to get him indicted, but I don’t think that’s going to work. It’s the same thing when a cop is accused of something. The prosecutor is very, very reluctant to find evidence.