Trump: “This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier.”
[REUTERS Fri Apr 28, 2017]
Well it’s really Obama’s fault–he made it seem so effortless.
Trump: “This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier.”
[REUTERS Fri Apr 28, 2017]
Well it’s really Obama’s fault–he made it seem so effortless.
We have an armada, very, very powerful …
We send Assad a message with 59 Tomahawk missiles to destroy their air power …
Our generals are very, very smart. They send a warning to the Taliban in Afghanistan spelled m.o.a.b.! They can do that without me knowing about it.
My generals are very smart, I might have tweeted about it before the bomb hit the target. My generals are very secure … all very smart. I don’t want to know about that intelligence stuff every day.
○ Trump says ‘major, major’ conflict with North Korea possible, but seeks diplomacy
I won’t take questions about Mike Flynn … he’s gone, he’s a loser. I fired him for telling lies. Now listen to me …
On every topic Trump opinioned during the election campaign, he has second thoughts …
○ “I was psyched to terminate NAFTA …”
I was wrong. He is a politician! He lies whenever he opens his mouth.
Thx … I needed that chuckle for the day.
Hold that thought:
If that idea is true…if a necessary part of the definition of the word “politician” is “Someone who always lies,” then how do we choose which politicians to support? Or is it all a useless farce which works its way to its various punchlines and conclusions without any need for a given individual to be involved in any way? If that is so, then why do the most intelligent among us always seem to feel the need to support a given politician or political idea? Is it that some compulsive liars seem to continually show better results than others?
However, if is not true…if some politicians at the very least lie less than others…should we support them no matter what results they get? How about if we agree with the general political position of a total, compulsive liar and disagree with the position of someone who lies…”less?”
Or what if there exist politicians who choose never to lie…to tell the truth as they see it always and forever, no matter what results they may achieve…should we support them on the basis of the blessed nature of truth upon which Gandhi based his whole political life?
Thorny questions, these.
I have no answers.
Just questions.
Later…
AG
Same here.
That’s because he was a better liar.
A lawyer liar.
AG
P.S. Funny…I never before noticed how much the words “lawyer” and “liar” resemble each other aurally.
Hmmmm…
Donald Trump’s first 100 days have been a moneymaking success story