Reading the New York Times last night and this morning, I felt like I had been plagiarized. It seems that what was once a lonely voice is rapidly becoming common wisdom. It’s been a recurring theme of my analysis for months that the Trump administration had blundered badly by marrying his unorthodox and in many cases heretical campaign for the Republican nomination and presidency with a strategy that is wholly reliant on conventional conservative Republicans for implementation and passage.
In particular, the decision to sign off on the never-before-attempted plan to pass two budget reconciliation bills in a single fiscal year is beginning to look like a narrow-alley dead end in a very bad neighborhood. The idea was that the Republicans could take advantage of the fact that since they never did their budget work last year they still had the opportunity to finish that up with a health care bill that only requires fifty votes to pass (with the vice-president breaking any tie). They could then use the same legislative trick to pass tax reform in this year’s budget plan at a fifty vote threshold. Without getting into all the parliamentary rigamarole that’s involved, the most significant consequence of adopting this plan was that the administration believed and acted as if they would never need a single Democratic vote for anything, ever.
The first problem with the plan was two-fold. First, by relying only on Republican votes in the Senate, they assured that they would get only Republican votes in the House, too. In itself, that wouldn’t be a problem except that it gave House Republicans permission to pass the most right-wing health care bill their moderates could stomach. That bill had no relationship to the promises Trump made on the campaign trail where he said he would protect Medicaid and not leave people dying in the street.
The plan relied on Republican unity. With only 52 votes in the Senate, any health care bill would have to win the support for virtually all of their members. But many of their members represent states that expanded Medicaid. If Trump had learned nothing else about Congress during the Obama years, he should have known that they have factions and are hard to lead. Did he not notice that Speaker of the House John Boehner lost his job because his own members refused to follow his leadership and rebelled when he had to go to the Democrats repeatedly to pay our bills on time and keep the doors to the government from being shuttered?
Trump put his health care agenda in the hands of conservative Republicans and then relied on a disunited party to act with complete discipline. This was a recipe for a bill that polls about as well as a case of genital warts and that cannot win passage because it is so heartless.
The second problem is more general. By acting as if the Democrats don’t matter and have nothing to contribute, the Republicans (both in the congressional leadership and in the White House) badly alienated a group of senators who might have been willing to lend Trump a hand on at least some of his agenda. And he has an agenda besides Obamacare repeal and tax reform that will need to get sixty votes in the Senate. In other words, he needs eight Democratic senators to sign off on anything he wants to do that isn’t contained in one of his two budget reconciliation bills. This was never going to be easy, which is kind of the point. To succeed, Trump couldn’t adopt a hard right agenda or think he could rely on that large of a rump of Democrats to back him in fulfilling the GOP’s longstanding wish list.
Now that McConnell has failed (at least, for now) to implement the dual budget reconciliation bill plan, he’s confessing that he’ll need Democrats to help him fix the damage his party and his strategy have done to the health care exchanges of the Affordable Care Act. Of course, that’s going to come at a price.
“At this stage,” said Senator Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, “there is general agreement among Democrats that it would be premature to meet with Republicans. We have to know that this repeal bill is dead.”
In this case, Sen. Schatz is merely keeping true to Chuck Schumer’s admonition and guidance to his caucus:
Rather than taking advantage of his honeymoon phase to pick an issue on which Democrats from conservative states might be amenable — fixing the nation’s crumbling infrastructure, cutting taxes or stiffening immigration laws — Mr. Trump raced toward the most partisan corner of the room, pushing to repeal the health care law with no input from Democrats, in a manner that has proved deeply unpopular.
Democrats, watching Republicans careen around in search of a health care solution, honored the demand of Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, that they stick together in their refusal to lift a finger to help until repeal was taken off the table.
And perhaps most important, Mr. Trump has rarely bothered to ask.
If that looks familiar it’s because I’ve written essentially the same thing over and over again. It’s not just health care and tax reform that are in peril. If Trump attempts to raise the debt ceiling using nothing but Republican votes, he will fail, too. If he tries to pass appropriations bills without any Democratic support, the government will either shut down or be funded on continuing resolutions that keep Obama’s priorities in place. He will not get an infrastructure bill without significant Democratic input and support.
Not only can he not govern successfully using this strategy, he cannot govern at all. This is why I foresaw that his administration would crack up on the shoals sometime this summer, and certainly no later than September when the fiscal year ends and the debt ceiling becomes critical.
Most concerning was the prospect and likelihood that he had painted himself into a corner and would discover that he had no way of recovering from the mess he’d made. As McConnell’s plan for Obamacare repeal faltered, he began warning his caucus of exactly what I am explaining now. But it was too late and the plan was never going to work anyway. The only thing that McConnell had to use in support of a bill that the people hate was the direness of the consequences of failure. But either he doesn’t understand the severity of the problem or he was unable to communicate it effectively enough. Perhaps it’s just not salvageable on any level, since the only way to delay their fate is to pass a bill that would strip 22 million people of their access to health care.
The consequences will begin to pile up now. Trump will lash out in ever more confusing and bizarre ways. And then the indictments and plea deals will start to flow in from Special Counsel Bob Mueller’s shop. By Thanksgiving, if not before, the nation will be confronted with the urgent need to remove Trump from power and I suspect there will be more consensus about it by then than most people can imagine right now.
“Trump will lash out in ever more confusing and bizarre ways.”
Did you post this before the ‘facelift’ tweet?
I was aware of that when I was writing this, but that’s not unusual for him. It will get much worse.
Ah! I thought you were turning into some Insta Nostradamus.
The worse thing* about the Trump administration is that it’s making me side with fuck knuckles like James Comey and Mika Brzezinski.
* not nearly the worst thing.
nice to know Mika can push him over the edge like that. Hope she continues to exercise her powers.
Heh. While I really, really hope that Booman is correct and we all get a Thanksgiving to be truly thankful for, Joe and Mika will be just a little sad.
Trump has sold a LOT of ads for Morning Joe, both during the campaign where they gave Trump 10’s of millions of dollars worth of free positive airtime, and now, when they are trolling him masterfully.
Oh God, how long have Mika and her staff been holding onto that Cheerios ad, waiting and waiting, and waiting, and then BOOM! I just picture the high-fives in that office. 🙂
And since Trump lacks political awareness and basically any social awareness at all, his lashing out is going to be spectacular. His tweets about Morning Joe and Mika border on psychotic and his lack of understanding of government is causing blowups in his own administration, leaving spokespeople floundering for explanations.
Trump has never been concerned about telling the truth, not as an independant businessman, not as a candidate, and certainly not as president. All of his lies are piling up and coal miners, Carrier employees, Medicaid patients, and a whole lotta average folks are going to rebel. He has his diehards, and there’s no shaming them because they are both brainless and heartless. But if he keeps charging around and breaking things, his own party is gonna shut him down.
I must say, I relish every moment.
It’s all fun and games until you pass nothing, default on the nation’s debt, and can’t keep the government operating.
This is the core of the problem. So far, nothing’s really happened, so natural consequences can’t operate.
We see a big risk for a major disaster (what am I saying? many disasters) ahead and we want to reduce that.
What we see time and time again is an immovable set of people who can’t anticipate future problems very well. They don’t come around to seeing the point of a health care system until something bad happens to them (v David Jolly). Climate change. Austerity. Iran. They don’t believe in the anvil until it lands on them.
Lucky us!
How do we shift some of that Trump base? I am very fearful this will go on otherwise. The republican con-gress will enable Trump to govern from prison if necessary.
Maybe 10 members, at most, in Congress from either party want to see Trump finish his term. Some are in denial, but mostly they have no use for the guy and can’t wait to be rid of him.
Their problem is that Trump is far more popular with Republican voters than they are.
If Democrats don’t vote for a clean bill, they will own debt default. What happens if 45 republicans vote to raise the debt ceiling and no Democrats? Who will be blamed? The seven Republicans? Or the 48 Democrats?
A clean bill mind you, no riders. Then Democrats have an excuse.
The Democrats have made it clear that they’ll vote for a clean bill. I think Booman believes that the Republicans can’t produce one.
I think it’s 3:1 that Booman is right. They will just have to add some anti-abortion rider or tax cut or EPA cut or something else beyond the Pale. But in the event that the leadership forces them to be sane for ten minutes while they vote…
An endless series of continuing resolutions wouldn’t do the GOP any harm, embedded Obama spending priorities or not.
The status quo produced a climate where people felt safe enough to roll the dice with Trump, unlike 2008’s free-fall, where people who would never vote Democratic again voted for that colored boy.
Their voters’ votes are based on emotion, affect, tribe, religion — anything except dispassionate assessment of policy alternatives.
Maybe, but it would roil their caucus and cause all manner of wailing, gnashing of teeth and infighting.
The House Freedom Caucus and their brethren in the Senate want to end the CR’s so they can cut spending more bigly. These majority Caucusmembers can deny majorities in each Congressional body, and they don’t appear to see any problem in shutting down the government. These legislative arsonists might even want to force a government shutdown, particularly if they don’t get their total ACA repeal and preposterous tax cuts. They’ll be pretty pissed come the end of the summer if the train wreck continues.
It doesn’t matter what they want if they can’t agree among themselves and they can’t. All they have to do is pass a spending bill through the House and they don’t need all the rigamorole. Only they can’t get it together to pass anything. Hence the problem.
The fringies don’t care. Anybody in the rest of the GOP who has to defend a contestable seat has to look at the numbers today and ask what they look like if you throw in a recession…
I’m down with all of this, and that’s why I read this blog.
Except… what makes you think that Mueller will be cutting deals and indicting people within the next few months?? The Watergate inquiry took much longer. I know we have some reporting indicating that this probe is moving faster, but we don’t know how much faster. Unless you got some inside info.
He has Flynn dead to rights. Probably Manafort, too. Don’t imagine it will be too much longer before they plead to some charges unless they’re really going to take the president down in return for their freedom.
This is one of those posts that I read and then make the sign of the cross, saying “Dear God, please let it be as BooMan is prophesying.”
To carry the hypothetical further, how might Trump “lash out?” North Korea? Iran? How bad does it have to get before Mattis resigns and the Republicans in Congress find a backbone?
And, to risk putting the cart before the horse, how do Democrats get ready to deal with a President Pence? He will have a wall of evangelical voters behind him, more united and motivated than they were for Trump. I think your long article about appealing to the working class without sacrificing principles still applies, but I’m not sure you can strip enough of them away.
Sad to say, but we should be lucky to have such problems as a President Pence. We’ll worry about that later.
speaking of cart before the horse, President Pence – he’s evidently implicated, so that’s not going to happen. not clear how this will all shake out.
If you’re right that means President Zombie-eyed Granny-starver. Will Ezra Klein go back to slobbering all over him in that case?
we really do not know. you’re assuming succession. but this is a constitutional crisis. it depends on basis on which T is removed
Tillerson will leave first. Mattis will not leave and leave the military exposed to the whims of the donald.
One of the few times Trump has got applause from the media was when he sent 59 missiles at a Syrian airbase. And recently there was some White House tweet claiming Assad was going to use chemical weapons again, so perhaps Trump is going to lash out through more missiles?
From a parliamentary standpoint, the problem is obvious. There are two large parties, neither of whom commands an absolute majority. There is also a splinter party, just larger than the difference between the other two.
The Democrats are the largest party, but they cannot form a government because they have no possible coalition partner.
The Republicans are the second-largest party and are running an informal coalition government with the splinter. This coalition gives them a majority, but the splinter can prevent anything they want to prevent.
This is already the ultimate parliamentary nightmare, but to make matters much worse, the splinter party, despite having their own leadership, their own whips, and their own platform, are dishonestly pretending to still be part of the large party that they split off from.
Not really. This pretends that the “rest” of the GOP is somehow different from the Tea Party but the Tea Party has never been a real party, just the hard right of the GOP. They haven’t changed much in 50 years. There are just a lot more of them so they can cause more problems. Even then it wouldn’t be a problem for the GOP if they were willing to govern by consensus, but this violates the “conservative principles” (hah!) of the rest of the GOP.
Thus the only way they can do it is if the Democrats were to take so many seats (but not a majority) in the next election that they would have to have Democratic votes. In that scenario, their leadership could form a “moderate” block of conservative Dems and “moderate” Republicans and ignore the Tea-lunatics. Only their base would explode in rage if they did that.
So, their best bet would actually be to lose power and be a pure opposition party again, since they are not ready and incapable of governing. This is what they will eventually wind up doing whether they intend it or not, since they can’t accomplish anything useful.
But, they can do incredible damage in the meantime. The only thing stopping them is their own incompetence.
they – the twitter wise ones – have been expecting something this week. and we have a new troll diarist laying out the [bizarro world] T talking points just in time to follow along.
Hoo boy, you wonder who they think they’re fooling.
indeed
One other thought.
If Trump is removed from office via impeachment or the 25th Amendment, the alt-right crowd will go bananas.
I live in a fairly blue area, but in October, I told my wife that I thought we should plan to not stray far from home for a few days after the election – avoid crowded places, etc. I assumed that Trump would lose, and I was expecting a scattering of militia/white supremacist nutjobs to carry out acts of violence because Hillary “stole the election.”
If a President Trump were removed from office, Alex Jones and his crowd would actively incite violence, and many poor, deluded souls will follow his lead. It will be scattered, and random, and the authorities will deal with it, in time. However, we might have some very unpleasant weeks after the removal of Trump. I’m not suggesting that progressives should turn themselves into “preppers,” but it is something to ponder.
If it looks like this administration might end quickly, I’m going to make sure I have supplies (library books, some new jazz albums, whiskey, wine, coffee, meat for the grill, and toilet paper) so I don’t have to go out for a while.
Cheers,
They are already planning for the day they have been dreaming about since at least November 2008. And they are literally salivating at the coming opportunity. They are absolutely fucking nuts.
Mike, I saw this on someone’s social media feed a couple of days ago. Honestly, I wondered if it was genuine. If the NRA really made this, they’ve dropped the last shreds of pretense that they are an organization for sportsmen. I guess it’s been that way for a long time, but Jesus, that’s terrifying.
Where do we start? How do you reason with that kind of thinking?
Yes, it is terrifying. To be truthful, I believe the number of NRA members who actually hold to most of these radical notions is relatively small. I believe the biggest danger is exactly the kind of thing that was observed in the Milgram experiment. It is relatively easy, with a dynamic leader and a volatile, visceral issue surrounding them, to get otherwise sane people to do insane things. Call it a “mob mentality”, or something else, it has been pretty much proven that it is easy to get people to do very violent things simply because they get caught up in the emotional tidal wave generated by those they feel are authorities, and whose opinions have sway over their baser emotions.
The answer? The only thing you and I can do is attempt to converse with our own individual acquaintances, friends, family members, and fellow citizens with whom we interact on a regular basis. This problem will not be solved or addressed by a movement, but by each of us as individuals. We have to first talk to those closest to us, and talk them off the ledge, if that is where we find them. That’s not a fancy answer, but I think it is largely true.
– MIB
Talk them off the ledge, sure. But many of those standing on the ledge will be in the process of pushing the good people off. Talk isn’t always enough.
Yes, talk is not always enough. One of the problems that has gotten us to this place is the assumption by people on both sides that everyone on the opposite side is as equally crazy as the most extreme case in their own particular group. The only way to find out where someone stands is to talk to them. So if we don’t start with that, at a minimum, then we have already lost.
It always begins with talking, but for some of these people, it’s as effective as talking to a crumbling brick wall.
I’m just saying, we have to be ready to not just talk, but actively defend the good people who may be targeted.
This. It was clear back in 2015.
Strongman Trump voters are right-wing authoritarians, proper. They have sought out and found a right-wing authority who has dropped the dog whistle and just shouts bigotry, which is what the right-wing authoritarians value most – clear authority.
I frequented Scott Adams’ blog back then, and received death threats from right-wing authoritarians itching for a race war, and I’m an enemy because I’m a traitor to my own kind, etc., ad nauseam.
If Trump is removed from office for any reason, there will be violence. And depending on how widespread it is, the good people have to be willing to do more than hide inside until it’s over.