I’m generally positive about minor parties.  However, they will not solve all political problems, as I described in On American political parties held captive by their interest groups and ideologies on my own blog.  One of the problems I did not mention appeared in a video I used in a comment on Republicans Will Have to Make a Choice here at Booman Tribune.

“I await a third party movement.”

I’ll let Ezra Klein of Vox answer that for me.

Here is Third parties are the underpants gnomes of American politics.

Could a third party fix the hellscape of fail that is the United States Congress? Ezra Klein explains.

My summary was “No, although that’s not really what I think you’re after.” My response could have been more pointed.  I could have done for liberals what Pizza Man Cain wants a third party for conservatives, never mind three already exist did for conservatives, pointing out that the Green Party already exists and he could join them.  He could also join the Working Families Party, which exists in the state which he resides.  Because of that state’s fusion ballot, he can actually have an influence on one or the other major party through cross endorsing.  That’s better than in California, where the primary system effectively excludes minor party candidates from the general election ballot for nearly all offices other than President.  It’s also a way to fill in step 2 of the Underpants Gnomes’ business plan.

That’s the con argument.  Follow over the jump for the pro.
For the pro argument, watch Vox’s How to break the two-party hold on American politics as it explains how proportional representation can solve gerrymandering and help minor parties.

Replacing our current system with proportional representation will make more room for the wide range of views in US politics.

Matthew Yglesias expands on this video in The real fix for gerrymandering is proportional representation.

Creating majority-minority districts to ensure racial representation can look a lot like “packing” Democratic voters into lopsided seats. Aiming at fair fights sounds nice but will end up violating communities of interest. Aiming for partisan fairness will necessarily involve some odd squiggles, since neighborhood-level partisanship can be very disparate.

So I asked this scholar: “What about proportional representation?”

She said that when she teaches redistricting law, she does proportional representation last because it solves all the problems and the point of the class is for the students to work through the different complexities and legal doctrines governing the American system. That seems smart as a pedagogical approach, but as an agenda for political reform, solving all the problems is a good idea.

This is a solution that would address several issues I’ve explored on my blog, redistricting/gerrymandering, Duverger’s Law, and minor parties.  It would make the first essentially irrelevant, it would eliminate the conditions for the second (single-member districts with first past the post winners), and would allow people to cast votes for minor parties without “wasting their vote.”*  It’s also a really radical solution by U.S. standards, but a Crazy Eddie like me might just approve of a radical solution to preserve and improve democracy.

As for the result, it might look like this, which could better reflect America’s political diversity.

*I disagree with this characterization.  To me, the person who wastes a vote is the one who stays home.  At least people voting for the Libertarians, Greens, or Constitution Party are making a point.

Modified from Ezra Klein of Vox explains how third parties are the Underpants Gnomes of U.S. politics and Vox explains how proportional representation can solve gerrymandering and help minor parties at Crazy Eddie’s Motie News.