Devin Nunes is a Dunce

So, Russian bots have been promoting the release of a memo that pertains to Carter Page, a man they recruited to spy for them which caused the FBI to intervene in 2013. Page met with known Russian intelligence officials and members of the Russian administration during a supposedly non-campaign related trip to Russia and then again right after the election. He reported back to the Trump team on at least the first of these trips. He traveled to Hungary during the campaign where he does not deny meeting with Russian-allied members of the administration in the presence of at least one Russian. He was identified in the Steele dossier as a key player in the collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign, which is an awfully big coincidence if all of these behaviors were innocent. But Devin Nunes thinks that the FBI was out of line to get a FISA warrant on the guy, and that they improperly relied on the Steele Dossier.

Again, Russian bots are promoting this memo.

A Better Future for Russians, Americans and the World

U.S. Embassy Moscow

Ambassador Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. was sworn in as the United States Ambassador to the Russian Federation in October 2017.

    IMAGE 1

He began his career in public service as a staff assistant to President Ronald Reagan.  He has served each of the five U.S. presidents since then in critical roles around the world, including as the Ambassador to Singapore, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Asia, U.S. Trade Ambassador, and most recently, U.S. Ambassador to China.  In all Senate confirmations, he received unanimous votes.

We Can and Must Improve Ties With Russia (Op-ed) | Moscow Times – Jan. 26, 2018 |

Reflecting on my first three months as U.S. Ambassador to Russia and looking forward to the prospects for 2018, I remain convinced that, not only can we improve the U.S.- Russia relationship, but we must.

We are making progress, and there is much more we can achieve by rolling up our sleeves and finding a constructive way forward. We all know that the road ahead will be a difficult one, and that the issues that have come between us are complex.

For a better future for Russians, Americans and the world, we have to begin to find solutions to the common problems that confront us around the globe. How do we get there? I think it all comes down to two things: trust and results.

More below the fold …

It’s no secret that our relationship is at the lowest point in years. People in the United States have made it clear that they expect and demand an improvement in the U.S.-Russia relationship.

It’s part of my job as a diplomat to get results, and I have pledged that I will do whatever I can in an honest, open, and transparent way to work with my Russian counterparts to discuss the hard issues related to our bilateral relationship the same way that I’m sure Ambassador Antonov is doing in America.

America and Russia can do extraordinary things when we cooperate, whether in space, in concert halls, in laboratories, or in business. This cooperation is the essence of people-to-people diplomacy, which forms the bedrock on which Russia and the United States have built lasting cooperation.

We want for as many Russians as possible to visit the United States and meet Americans so that we understand each other better as a people.

That’s why, despite a two-thirds reduction in mission staff, our embassy and consulates are working so hard to accommodate visa demand in Russia. It’s why we opened a new consular facility in Moscow earlier this month and are continuing to promote robust educational and cultural exchanges.

And yet in politics and sometimes in diplomacy, we don’t always collaborate as well as we should. We can take a lesson from effective U.S.-Russian interplay in areas like culture, arts, research, science, technology, and business, because so much is possible when we recognize the common ground that unites Russians and Americans. It is far greater than that which divides us.

As in any relationship, when times are difficult and we don’t see eye-to-eye, we need more communication, not less. As two great civilizations we should be maximizing our relationship, not minimizing it.

We need to take it to a higher level of trust. And once we achieve greater trust, more doors will open and we’ll be able to do more together.

There’s a Glimmer of Hope in U.S.-Russia Relations (Op-ed)

I moved to Moscow 30 years ago because of a diplomatic staffing spat between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. I’m still here. And we have again found ourselves at a low point in Russian-American relations, with consulates crippled and communications between Moscow and Washington almost non-existent.

    IMAGE 2

But I see a glimmer of hope.

In 1987-88, as a driver at the U.S. Embassy, I chauffeured negotiators working on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. Тhe INF treaty marks its 30th anniversary this week, even though it is now gasping for life.

But its gestation serves as a model for diplomacy between adversaries. And its birth was followed by two decades of unprecedented cooperation between Russian and American military, diplomats and business people.

That treaty brought me to Votkinsk — Tchaikovsky’s birthplace and home to a nuclear missile factory. I fell in love with a factory worker, her family and the country. So, I made a life here.  

Although now a Russian citizen, I will always be a “former foreigner.” It’s an incongruous status, like “former KGB officer.” That said, I have become rather plausibly Russian. And by our nature, we Russians love to give advice. Understanding our take on recent history, along with our current sentiments and frustrations, is essential for improving relations with the West.

Justin Lifflander is a dual U.S.-Russian citizen. He worked as an inspector on the INF Treaty, is a former business editor at The Moscow Times and author of “How Not to Become a Spy: a memoir of love at the end of the Cold War.” The views and opinions expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.  

American Diplomacy

John Quincy Adams on U. S. Foreign Policy
“She goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy”

    John Quincy Adams,” wrote James E. Lewis, Jr., “was raised for greatness.” His record of service to our country may be unparalleled. At age 14 he was secretary to the U.S. minister to Russia. Two years later, in 1783, he served as secretary to his father in France. President Washington appointed him minister to the Netherlands, and later minister to Portugal. President John Adams, his father, named him minister to Prussia.

    John Quincy served in the Massachusetts state senate and the U.S. Senate in the early 1800s. Under President Madison, he served as minister to Russia, helped to negotiate an end to the War of 1812, and in 1815 became minister to Great Britain.

Putin Does What Trump Wants To Do

Vladimir Putin doesn’t like protests. He’s arrested opposition leader Alexei Navalny and some of his associates after they called for a boycott of the upcoming presidential election. He also raided his headquarters.

Russia police have raided the Moscow office of opposition leader Alexei Navalny as demonstrations calling for a boycott of Russia’s presidential election take place across the country.

A video stream Sunday morning from Navalny’s headquarters showed police entering the office. One broadcaster on the stream said police apparently were using a grinder to try to get access to the broadcast studio.

The anchors said police said they had come because of a bomb threat.

Trump continues to complain that his own internal security forces won’t lock up his political opponent and that the press is able to use the first amendment to publish things he dislikes. So far, however, he hasn’t banned the Democrats from fielding a candidate against him or raided the offices of MSNBC.

Salman Building a New Alliance with Israel and US

Two sources for rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and the Jewish State of Israel …

Israel and Saudi Arabia: Is the Enemy of My Enemy My Friend? | INSS – Dec. 2013 |

Recent reports and commentaries have suggested that a rapprochement between Israel and Saudi Arabia is underway. Indeed, both countries are eager to prevent Iran from achieving military nuclear capability and would like to curb Iranian attempts to attain regional hegemony. In addition, both are perturbed by recent developments in US policy, particularly the reluctance to use force against Iran and Syria, and signs of a gradual shift away from the problems of the Middle East. However, in spite of the convergence of interests between Israel and Saudi Arabia, full normalization is not on the agenda as long as there is no significant political breakthrough between Israel and the Palestinians. At the same time, there is a wide range between full diplomatic relations and a total lack of contact, and the two countries can take advantage of this.

With the publication of the Fahd initiative in 1982, Saudi Arabia abandoned, at least officially, the policy that had until then rejected Israel’s right to exist. Following the Madrid conference in 1991, a certain rapprochement took place between the two countries, and they participated in five working groups to deal with regional issues water, the environment, economics, refugees, and arms control. The Abdullah initiative of 2002, the basis for the Arab Peace Initiative, [included Iran!] went a step further, promising Israel “normal relations” with the Arab and Muslim world if it met a number of conditions.

More below the fold …

Israel initially rejected the initiative as a basis for dialogue with the Arab world, though subsequently a number of senior Israeli officials, including President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, expressed support for the positive aspects of the initiative while mindful of the problematic issues (e.g., normal relations were made contingent on completion of the peace process, a withdrawal to the June 4, 1967 lines, and a solution of the refugee problem on the basis of UN General Assembly resolution 194).

Apart from the Abdullah initiative, Saudi Arabia has remained on the sidelines of attempts to promote the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians (and Syria as well). Perhaps, then, the initiative was intended to counter the kingdom’s negative image following the attacks of September 11, 2001. Oman and Qatar, which are generally outside the consensus in the Gulf Cooperation Council, had formal – albeit partial – relations with Israel. Israel had diplomatic missions in both countries that were ultimately closed in the wake of the second intifada and Operation Cast Lead.

Rapprochement with Israel carries a heavy price tag for Riyadh | Middle East Monitor – Nov. 13, 2017 |

Riyadh is convinced that rapprochement with Israel is the cornerstone of its desperate attempts to achieve any victory for Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman before he officially takes the throne. Many Arabs did not believe the Israeli Prime Minister’s statements over recent years that there was a great understanding between Israel and a major Arab country; they were a clear reference to Saudi Arabia.

Observers believe that Riyadh has lost the battle with Tehran in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. The Saudi stalemate in Yemen cannot be said to be close to a resolution, unless Riyadh makes painful concessions; if they are made, then the Saudis cannot claim that the objectives of Operation Storm of Resolve have been achieved. However, among the ruling elites in Saudi Arabia, there are some who believe that relief will come from Tel Aviv. The Israelis believe that the opportunity to attack the exhausted Hezbollah may not come again so easily; were they to eliminate the Lebanese movement it would be a serious blow to Iran. Saudi Arabia is enthusiastic about this and is trying to remove any cover for Hezbollah by encouraging the resignation of Saad Hariri as Prime Minister of Lebanon.

Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner [profile NYT], is the godfather of the Saudi-Israeli rapprochement. In an unannounced visit by Kushner, during which he met Bin Salman, the US envoy proposed the establishment of formal relations between Riyadh and Tel Aviv. Israeli calculations – which are very close to Kushner’s — are based on the assumption that the more tension there is between Riyadh and Tehran, the more that the Saudis will converge with Tel Aviv. It is no secret that this would gain Israel some much-desired “legitimacy” from Saudi Arabia, with all the religious symbolism that would represent; at the same time, the Palestinians, who still live under the world’s sole remaining colonial occupation, would not gain anything.

Crown Prince Salman who turns the other cheek to Israel’s existence and the cruel occupation of Palestinian land, can not accept dissent, Iran is enemy number one and the KSA will work with the US of Donald Trump, Jared Kusner and Greenblatt in addition with Israel’s Netanyahu, Lieberman and Bennett to overthrow the Islamic regime in Iran. Clearly the tiny Kingdom of the desert sees the well educated Iranians as a serieus threat. Everyone absolves the Saudi Kingdom for the Al Qaeda jihadists rooted in the Wahhabist religion that sowed terror across the globe: from New York WTC / Washington DC, Western Europe, Russia’s Caucasus, through the MENA states, SE Asia, Indonesia and Southern islands of the Philippines.

Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed freed after ‘settlement’ | AFP/Dawn |

Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal was released on Saturday after nearly three months in detention following a “settlement” with authorities, as a sweeping anti-corruption campaign targeting the kingdom’s elite winds down.

Prince Alwaleed, dubbed the Warren Buffett of Saudi Arabia, was the most high-profile detainee among 350 suspects rounded up since November 4, including business tycoons and ministers, who were held in Riyadh’s luxury Ritz-Carlton Hotel.

The prince was released following an undisclosed financial agreement with the government, similar to deals that authorities struck with most other detainees in exchange for their freedom.

“The attorney general this morning approved the settlement with Prince Alwaleed bin Talal,” paving the way for his release, a government source said without disclosing figures.

When asked whether the prince was still the head of his publicly listed Kingdom Holding Company, the source replied: “For sure.” A business associate confirmed to AFP that the tycoon had been released. The Saudi information ministry did not respond to requests for comment.

Billionaire Prince Al-Waleed released: sources | Gulf News |

In his first interview since his arrest .. #Al-Waleed bin Talal: He still insisted on his innocence of any corruption:

In his first interview since he was taken into custody in November, Prince Alwaleed told Reuters he was continuing to maintain his innocence of any corruption in talks with authorities. He said he expected to keep full control of his global investment firm Kingdom Holding Co without being required to give up assets to the government.

Asked by Reuters about the anti-corruption investigation, he said, “That’s the big title: anti-corruption. But many people left here with no charges at all – zero. Clearly because I am involved in so many projects nationally, regionally, internationally, so many interests, so I told them: `Please, take your time. Look at everything. I have nothing to hide.”

Speaking about rumours he said he was upset with, Alwaleed noted: “I saw them [rumours] on the BBC and others, that Alwaleed was sent to some other place, the main prison, and that he’d been tortured. All lies.

“It’s very unfortunate … I was planning to do an interview when I got out … But I decided to accelerate the process and accept this interview today because these various rumours took place. They’re unacceptable completely. They are just a bunch of lies.”

The wealthy prince and the $10m donation to mayor Giuliani for the 9/11 monument I New York …

A NATION CHALLENGED: THE DONATIONS;
Citing Comments on Attack, Giuliani Rejects Saudi’s Gift | NY Times – Oct. 12, 2001 |

Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani said yesterday that the city was rejecting a $10 million donation from a wealthy prince from Saudi Arabia who criticized the American government’s policies in the Middle East.

The donor, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Alsaud, was one of many foreign visitors who have gone to ground zero with the mayor since the trade center attack last month. Yesterday, the prince, who is the chairman of the Kingdom Holding Company and was No. 6 in July on the Forbes list of the world’s richest people, attended a memorial service at the site with Mr. Giuliani. There, he gave the mayor a check for $10 million for the Twin Towers Fund, a charity set up by Mr. Giuliani primarily for survivors of uniformed workers who died.

Mr. Giuliani initially accepted the check, as he has several others from government and private industry leaders. With the check was a letter from the prince, in which he expressed his condolences for ”the loss of life that the city of New York has suffered.”

The letter continues, ”I would also like to condemn all forms of terrorism, and in doing so I am reiterating Saudi Arabia’s strong stance against these tragic and horrendous acts.”

But the letter did not say what a news release attached to a copy of the letter did:

    “However, at times like this one, we must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack. I believe the government of the United States of America should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause.”

The release attributed the statement to the prince. The sentiment reflected the tack the Saudis have generally taken, condemning the Sept. 11 attack while trying to be supportive of the Palestinian cause.

    “Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis
    while the world turns the other cheek,” the release read.

The mayor, who was told of the news release just moments before his daily briefing but after receiving the check, was visibly annoyed by it.

”I entirely reject that statement,” Mr. Giuliani said. ”That’s totally contrary to what I said at the United Nations,” he added, referring to his address on Oct. 1.

Keif El Hal: First Saudi Feature Film   by marco @EuroTrib on Nov 12th, 2006

The company that produced the movie, Rotana, is owned by the King of Saudi Arabia’s nephew, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.  Talal may be in it for the money, but it seems like the prince, a vocal supporter of women’s rights who hired the first female airplane pilot in Saudi Arabia, may truly care about the issues portrayed and dealt with in this film.

The film’s Saudi associate producer, Haifa al-Mansur, the “highest profile Saudi woman involved in films”, had made a controversial documentary which “caused an uproar among the hard-line clerical elite”, as in it “a reformist cleric declares that it is not mandatory for women to cover up their faces.”

I was not aware that King Abdullah was initiating “reforms”, but according to Ms. Mansur:

    Mansur said she was optimistic about her country’s prospects in the light of reforms
    initiated by King Abdullah and wants to continue making films in Saudi Arabia.

We Knows Not What He Does

It’s already clear to me from watching Jonathan Turley defend the president against obstruction of justice charges that the criminal defense for Donald Trump is going to rely on the fact that a person who doesn’t know right from wrong doesn’t necessarily have criminal intent if they do wrong. Turley, for example, blandly explained that the way that Trump acted towards Mueller isn’t much different from how he acts against any number of officials who he fires or threatens to fire. He’s always pissed off. He wants to fire John Kelly and Don McGahn and Jeff Sessions, but he doesn’t. He’s always doing improper things that violate norms, so it’s not necessarily true that his intent is to intimidate career FBI officers into not testifying against him when he names them publicly and sends his goons after them.

If there is an impeachment trial, I expect that Turley will defend the president. He’ll be a lot more effective than Dershowitz would be, I think.

SPP Vol.650 & Old Time Froggy Botttom Cafe

Hello again painting fans.

This week I will be continuing with the Cape May, New Jersey street scene.  The photo that I’m using is seen directly below.  I’ll be using my usual acrylic paints on a 5×7 inch canvas.

When last seen, the painting appeared as it does in the photo directly below.

Since that time I have continued to work on the painting.

For this week’s cycle I’ve concentrated most of my efforts on the fencing, steps and plants in the vicinity.  I’ve now added the vertical fence pickets and the steps to the rear.  Note the shadows and lit portions of the fencing.  I’ve also started the shadowed portions of the bushes.  These will have much more in the way of refinement by next week.

The current state of the painting is seen in the photo directly below.

I’ll have more progress to show you next week. See you then.

Earlier paintings in this series can be seen here.  (Currently under construction.)

Casual Observation

With the news that the Paris zoo has shut down because more than fifty baboons escaped from their enclosure, at least the French now have a better feeling of what it feels like to be an American.

A Concise History of the CIA

Meet the CIA: Guns, Drugs and Money, by Jeffery St. Clair + Alexander Cockburn.

Read this article in its entirety the next time you are tempted to believe anything told to us by any intelligence service anywhere in the world. Lying is Job Description 101 as far as secret organizations of this kind…including the FBI…are concerned.
A couple of random snippets:

On November 22, 1996, the US Justice Department indicted General Ramón Guillén Davila of Venezuela on charges of importing cocaine into the United States. The federal prosecutors alleged that while heading Venezuela’s anti-drug unit, General Guillén smuggled more than 22 tons of cocaine into the US and Europe for the Calí and Bogotá cartels. Guillén responded to the indictment from the sanctuary of Caracas, whence his government refused to extradict him to Miami, while honoring him with a pardon for any possible crimes committed in the line of duty. He maintained that the cocaine shipments to the US had been approved by the CIA, and went on to say that “some drugs were lost and neither the CIA nor the DEA want to accept any responsibility for it.”

The CIA had hired Guillén in 1988 to help it find out something about the Colombian drug cartels. The Agency and Guillén set up a drug-smuggling operation using agents of Guillén’s in the Venezuelan National Guard to buy cocaine from the Calí cartel and ship it to Venezuela, where it was stored in warehouses maintained by the Narcotics Intelligence Center, Caracas, which was run by Guillén and entirely funded by the CIA.

To avoid the Calí cartel asking inconvenient questions about the growing inventory of cocaine in the Narcotics Intelligence Center’s warehouses and, as one CIA agent put it, “to keep our credibility with the traffickers,” the CIA decided it was politic to let some of the cocaine proceed on to the cartel’s network of dealers in the US. As another CIA agent put it, they wanted “to let the dope walk” – in other words, to allow it to be sold on the streets of Miami, New York and Los Angeles.

When it comes to what are called “controlled shipments” of drugs into the US, federal law requires that such imports have DEA approval, which the CIA duly sought. This was, however, denied by the DEA attaché in Caracas. The CIA then went to  DEA headquarters in Washington, only to be met with a similar refusal, whereupon the CIA went ahead with the shipment anyway. One of the CIA men working with Guillén was Mark McFarlin. In 1989 McFarlin, so he later testified in federal court in Miami, told his CIA station chief in Caracas that the Guillén operation, already under way, had just seen 3,000 pounds of cocaine shipped to the US. When the station chief asked McFarlin if the DEA was aware of this, McFarlin answered no. “Let’s keep it that way,” the station chief instructed him.

Over the next three years, more than 22 tons of cocaine made its way through this pipeline into the US, with the shipments coming into Miami either in hollowed-out shipping pallets or in boxes of blue jeans. In 1990 DEA agents in Caracas learned what was going on, but security was lax since one female DEA agent in Venezuela was sleeping with a CIA man there, and another, reportedly with General Guillén himself. The CIA  and Guillén duly changed their modes of operation, and the cocaine shipments from Caracas to Miami continued for another two years. Eventually, the US Customs Service brought down the curtain on the operation, and in 1992 seized an 800-pound shipment of cocaine in Miami.

One of Guillén’s subordinates, Adolfo Romero, was arrested and ultimately convicted on drug conspiracy charges. None of the Colombian drug lords was ever inconvenienced by this project, despite the CIA’s claim that it was after the Calí cartel. Guillén was indicted but remained safe in Caracas. McFarlin and his boss were ultimately edged out of the Agency. No other heads rolled after an operation that yielded nothing but the arrival, under CIA supervision, of 22 tons of cocaine in the United States. The CIA conducted an internal review of this debacle and asserted that there was “no evidence of criminal wrongdoing.”

A DEA investigation reached a rather different conclusion, charging that the spy agency had engaged in “unauthorized controlled shipments” of narcotics into the US and that the CIA withheld “vital information” on the Calí cartel from the DEA and federal prosecutors.

Disingenuous denial has long been a specialty of the Central Intelligence Agency.

—snip—

In 1976, at one of the most fraught moments in the Agency’s relationship to Congress since its inception, Director William Colby (who had earlier blown the whistle on Helms’s lies about Chile) went before the Select Committee on Intelligence being run by Senator Frank Church of Idaho. This time the mood of Congress was sharper, prompted by Seymour Hersh’s exposés in the New York Times of domestic spying and also by charges that the CIA had been running an assassination program overseas.

Yes, Colby said, the possibility of using assassination had been entertained at the  Agency, but at no time had it ever reached the level of successful practical application. As for domestic spying, there had been programs of mail surveillance and the like, but they were far from the “massive” operations alleged by Hersh, and they had long since been discontinued.

Colby was being typically modest. The CIA, through Operation CHAOS and similar programs, had compiled files on more than 10,000 Americans and kept a database with more than 300,000 names in it. It had wiretapped the phones of American reporters, infiltrated dissident groups and tried to disrupt anti-war protests. It spent $33,000 in support of a letter-writing campaign in support of the invasion of Cambodia.

As with the charges of complicity in drug running, the CIA’s role in assassination is one of those topics gingerly handled by the press or Congress from time to time and then hastily put aside, with the habitual claim that the CIA may have dreamed of it, thought about it and maybe even dabbled in it, but had never actually gone successfully all the way. But, in fact, the Agency has gone all the way many times, and we should look at this history in some detail since the pattern of denial in these cases strongly parallels the CIA’s relationship with the drug business.

There’s no dispute that the CIA has used assassination as a weapon lower down the political and social pecking order, as no one knew better than William Colby. He had, by his own admission, supervised the Phoenix Program and other so-called “counter-terror” operations in Vietnam. Phoenix was aimed at “neutralizing” NLF political leaders and organizers in rural South Vietnam. In congressional testimony Colby boasted that 20,587 NLF activists had been killed between 1967 and 1971 alone. The South Vietnamese published a much higher estimate, declaring that nearly 41,000 had been killed. Barton Osborn, an intelligence officer  in the Phoenix Program, spelled out in chilling terms the bureaucratic attitude of many of the agents toward their murderous assignments. “Quite often it was a matter of expediency just to eliminate a person in the field rather than deal with the paperwork.”

—snip—

There’s more, of course.

Much more.

Read it and weep.

Or better yet…given the current disinfo campaigns being run on every available level of public discourse in the U.S.A…read it and WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!

Thank you and good night…

AG

Lame

TPM: “Rep. Joe Kennedy III of Massachusetts will deliver the Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address next week.”

I don’t mean any serious disrespect to III but, really, do we want to signal that this is the year of the rich white man?