White House chief of staff John Kelly’s concerns about sending Ivanka Trump to South Korea are sound. As one unnamed administration official put it, “This isn’t like going to Italy. The stakes are far higher and more complex.” With a nuclear showdown looming and South and North Korea engaged in an unusual show of unity for the duration of the Winter Olympics, the peninsula is a minefield for even experienced diplomats and policy hands. Ivanka doesn’t have the right experience for the job, and there are unacceptable risks to putting her in a position where her words and actions could have far-ranging and even catastrophic consequences.
John Kelly was reportedly persuaded to shelve his objections on the theory that he had no way of winning a battle that would pitch him against the president’s daughter. That was probably astute, as least in its predictive value for any likely outcome. Of course, if he was concerned enough about it, he could have made a stand and then resigned in protest if things didn’t go his way.
What Kelly did instead is give himself the worst of both worlds. He didn’t try to stop the trip and protect our national security, but he still allowed his concerns to leak out to the press where the president can now read about them. The result is that there are stories about “tensions” in the White House. CNN writes “the blurred line between staffer and daughter has long irked Kelly” and that “Kelly has grown increasingly frustrated with Ivanka Trump.” Kelly has supposedly complained in private about Ivanka “playing government” as if she were playing House.
This is self-defeating. If Kelly knows enough not to get in between the president and his daughter about the trip to South Korea, then he should know enough not to allow his displeasure with the trip become a major story. He should be at pains to prevent his aides and associates from broadcasting his frustration and displeasure with Ivanka and her role in the White House. If he feels that way, he should tell the president privately and resign of he can’t some kind of satisfactory solution.
The way this appears, it seems like Kelly doesn’t have what it takes to confront the president in person, so he resorts to sending messages to him through the press. Either that, or he’s just trying to cover his ass in case anything goes wrong. This strikes me as dysfunctional and cowardly, either way.
And it weakens him because it certainly does not avoid the problem he sought to avoid, which is getting into a battle he can never win. If I were Trump, I’d probably fire him over this incident. He’d be justified in doing so. If Kelly wants to object to something Ivanka proposes, that should be done in private. Trashing the president’s daughter in the press is not something that should be tolerated in a chief of staff, and that is true whether the daughter is Malia, Sasha, or Ivanka. In most cases, Kelly should salute and get with the plan when he loses policy and strategy debates, but he can also resign if he feels strongly enough about it. By doing neither of these things, Kelly is basically begging to get canned.
He’s a coward like the rest of them. I never understood the great press he got, even from many liberals, when he was brought in as C of S. Just because he’s a general doesn’t mean he’s brave, well informed, capable of diplomacy, honest, compassionate, astute or anything else. What it does shows is that he mastered what it took to rise in the military, which is a much different world from civilian politics. And not one I have knee jerk admiration for.
Amen. I never understood all the accolades Kelly got when he took the job. He’s gone on to demonstrate that none of it was deserved.
If he had any integrity at all he would have never taken the job in the first place. In taking it he showed who and what he is, and all this incident does is provide more proof of it.
Agreed. I can’t remember the author, but a book came out in the last ten years specifically bemoaning how military command has degraded across the board under a cultural of failing upward in order to retain senior officers.
People who think Generals, by default, are capable of running a modern government are like those who claim that CEO’s innately can. Such ascertains only show the person speaking has not idea how the military, business, OR our government actually work.
And here I thought John Kelly was “the adult in the room”, “the stabilizing force in the White House”, and “the one with all the experience and aptitude to keep things under control”?
Sounds to me like he also tends toward being a bit of a petulant whiner mixed in with a dash of tone deafness about how to navigate the nut house on Pennsylvania Avenue.
VIDEO
They traffic in palace intrigue. Not interested. Let the Truth & Reconciliation Commission sort them all out…
Kelly’s just as bad & crappy at his “job” as everyone else in 45’s Administration. As has been said ad nauseum, no one with any legitmacy, true capablities, ethics, values, etc, would ever lower themselves to work for Dolt 45.
Ergo, Kelley is no better than any other self-serving low class unethical incompetent, possibly compromised, worthless jerk in this Admin.
Tell me something I don’t already know about the worthlessness of racist, sexist, homophobic, White Supremacist, Nazi John Kelley.
General? BFD. Means nothing. pfffft!
It’s migration season at the WH. If you think the people there now are bad, wait until their replacements. After the reshuffle, it’s going to be Hicks, Miller, Ivanka, and Jared running Trump. I would not be surprised if the new CoS is from that group.
Think about that.
.
In the White (nut)House of TrumpLand, there are two kinds of relationships with our tweet-happy Prince of Fools: sycophantic or dysfunctional. Doting daughter Ivanka and the Sonny Boyz obviously exhibit the former, and Trumpian fellow-traveler Kelly appears to be of the latter. Leaking is how he reveals his disapproval of some boobery other, for Der Trumper either to notice or ignore. (Also note the ex-general of Pentagonland imagining that HE is the one who is not “playing government”, haha. But I suppose in a profoundly militarist nation he has a point.)
Anyway, the sycophants stay on indefinitely, the dysfunctionals invariably fall away; everyone loses whatever personal dignity they ever had, this is the price of admission into the Great Man’s circle of fools and knaves. Kelly’s job security is that firing him would cause an uproar of anxiety and concern since Kelly has been gratuitously granted Adult-in-the-Room status—as have all of Trumper’s civilian-generals of course, along with errand boy Rexxon Tillerson. The thinking is that SOMEONE has to be non-deranged and marginally competent, right? SOMEONE has to be doing more than just “playing government”, right?
Who’s next in the CofS slot after Kelly? The Idiot Son? The corrupt son-in-law bankrupt? Basically we have a collection of “conservative” courtiers, cranks, cretins and bumblers all “playing government”, including you, General…keep rearranging those deck chairs!
Pruitt
Zinke
maybe even
Doofus Nooneytunes?
So bizarre to see a man with his military background consistently fall back on a passive aggressive position. I would have thought he would methodically present his case then move on. He’s obviously not up to handling the issue next of Jared’s security clearance and is simply praying it will resolve itself.
Have to say, this administration has sure pulled out a gaggle of weasel generals.
My cynical money is Kelly still there because Miller and him want to stay in the President’s ear to try and score the biggest victory for white supremacy since the Exclusion Acts of 1924.
To data, their immigration policy is already projected to delay America’s diversifying by 5 years. Imagine if they get their immigration program passed into law.
. . . more functional superego censoring the worst of his id.
As he proved in his despicable, lying attack on Rep. Wilson and subsequent refusal to accept account accountability for it: Evil Liar or Batshit Insane, A 4-Star General without Honor.
. . . “to accept accountability for it”, that is.