Your required reading this morning is a column Sally Quinn wrote hack in November 1998 about how the Washington elite was coping with the unfolding l’affaire Lewinsky. You should read it this morning even if you’ve read it many times before. Once you do, its relevancy will be apparent to you.
It will help you understand the seemingly curious phenomenon you’re seeing in your social media feeds at the moment, where one Beltway insider after another races to defend the honor of Sarah Huckabee Sanders against the “mean” and “cruel” jokes that were told about her at last night’s Nerd Prom.
The comedienne hired for the occasion, Michelle Wolf, continued what is by now a well-established tradition. She accepted an invitation to appear at the White House Correspondents Dinner. She proceeded to point out how incredibly fucked up our politics have become and to point her finger at the primary culprits, including a supine media more interested in access and ratings than in telling truth to power. Her jokes were suitably biting, and not really intended to get laughs unless through cringing clenched teeth.
The guests of this annual gala should know this is coming because it happens every year. Some comics are funnier than others, but for the people in the audience it is an exercise in self-flagellation. And it’s not a good-humored roast, even if the jokes are often just as nasty. It’s a barely disguised bitter condemnation. Basically, they hire someone to come in and tell them how horrible they are.
Of course, the grimmer the picture in our capital at the time, the more brutal the act. Start a war based on lies and get hundreds of thousands of people killed while destabilizing a whole region? That gets you the Stephen Colbert treatment. Things have gotten worse since then.
But whatever faults President Trump may have and however deceitful and contemptuous his press secretary may be, they are citizens of The Village and there are limits on how much disrespect you can show them.
By taking some personal shots at Huckabee Sanders, Michelle Wolf caused a defensive reflex. In part, the correspondents are afraid that if the Trump administration doesn’t see a tweet in their feed in defense of Huckabee Sanders that there will be negative repercussions for their access. But it’s also just a standard part of this ritual. The comedian arrives, insults people primarily by telling the truth about them, then the media criticize the comedian for being impolite and not all that funny. They usually don’t express outrage about the shots that were aimed at them because that would draw more attention to those criticisms. Instead, they deflect people’s focus onto how the president or members of his administration were mistreated.
A lot has changed since Sally Quinn wrote that piece in 1998. For one, the Village had higher standards back then. They expected more from their president than tawdry furtive Oval Office blow jobs from unpaid interns. At this point, that kind of behavior would be a welcome improvement. Bush’s failures and Trump’s presidency have beaten them down.
But their world still revolves around 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and they still want to maintain a certain majesty to the place bolstered by myths they feel morally and patriotically bound to concoct and promulgate. They know it’s a sham and that they deserve criticism for it, which is why they keep going back to Nerd Prom every year to get their dose of abuse.
While they were listening to Michelle Wolf tell them what shits they are last night in Washington DC, the president was telling them what shits they are in Washington Township in Michigan.
That they’re responding by defending the president’s press secretary shows less sense of self-awareness and preservation than Patty Hearst demonstrated during her Symbionese crime spree.
Their salaries are at stake.
End of story.
AG
There’s more to the story.
Well, that and they truly believe that they are Royalty of sorts and fear that the peasants laughing at them will diminish their deserved respect as People Who Know Better Than Us…
The classic Brooks joke comes to mind…
(Mel, not David)
The evil of access?
Sanders put herself on that stage and the stage in the WH. She looked uncomfortable last night….pained. Unable to control the conversation she had no business on the stage last night. Total fool’s errand probably set up by the WH. Result, Sanders got her first positive coverage from the Beltway.
I found it funny and Michelle was brave to do it. No guessing this was going to have blowback. But it was funny. When someone like Sanders gets up there day after day and smugly lies, she deserves it. Maybe Trump just stayed away ashamed of his own disgraceful conduct over the past year. The whole affair should have been over for him when he mocked that disabled man, and if not then, at the Access Hollywood tape or his disgraceful banning of Muslims. And she was right about the press. They gave him billions of dollars of free time and pilloried Hillary over the fucking e mails repeatedly. Fuck them all, nice job Michelle.
PS And I also liked it when she told the democrats they have done nothing about anything.
Calling Democrats out for being pussies is always spot on. Would have liked a swipe or two about the lack of sincerity. Both the Clinton Foundation and Chuck Schumer have a history of taking large sums of money from Donald Trump.
Speaking of which:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/frank-rich-roy-cohn-the-original-donald-trump.html
Lays out the NY political scene pretty well. It’s why I don’t trust BdB one bit, despite his one time support of the Sandinistas.
I loved Wolf’s remarks, she went easy on the whole rotten bunch of them. They should be grateful. Personally I would have hired Al Pacino to get up and do his Scent of a Woman monologue. “If I were the man I was five years ago I’d take a FLAMETHROWER to this place!’
The press calls this woman out for having gone too far for calling someone like Sanders out for going too far? Would be nice if they were one tenth as outraged at Sanders for speaking nothing but lies. Exhibit A in how our media has failed us.
You know, I haven’t watched a single second of the broadcast, just have listened to a little of the commentary on it this morning, but there is only one response I have to all those people in the beltway media, and the Trump/Republican circle, tut-tutting their outrage about how “out of bounds” this was and way too personal
F@#K YOU!
F@#K YOU!
F@#K YOU!
We didn’t start this shit. Suck it up and deal with what you have enabled. What was done was the appropriate response to the shithouse that is the GOP. You deserve every bit of this, and much, much more. Deal with it.
I try not to use the heavy vulgarities but the complainers are the biggest bunch of cunts I’ve seen in years. Same fuckwads that cried like babies over Colbert.
They can all eat shit for all I care, and I am particularly happy that Michelle Wolf responded directly to Haberman and called her “Mags”. Classic.
Anybody who represents Wolf’s joke as being a joke about Sander’s appearance is either being deliberately deceptive in order to run cover for her relentless dishonesty or is too stupid to edit your local high school newspaper.
Maybe both.
Michele explicitly denies it has anything to do with her appearance in a tweet.
” Why are you guys making this about Sarah’s looks? I said she burns facts and uses the ash to create a perfect smoky eye. I complimented her eye makeup and her ingenuity of materials. “
Not good enough I guess.
. . . as you allow, the two are not mutually exclusive.
It may be orthogonal to Mr. Longman’s point, but there is a real case for getting rid of the WHCA dinner altogether or seriously changing its format — a case that has been pressed by Margaret Sullivan and Jay Rosen (two of our most thoughtful media analysts) for some time, and which she repeated in her POST column today. Rosen has two tweets up that express worthwhile views:
“The @whca is screwed with this damn dinner. As the Trump emergency grows, any comic they invite will burn, eviscerate and offend. They’re for free speech, so they can’t edit it. If they go milquetoast they degrade themselves in a different way. Have to alter or abandon the event.”
“Let me clue you into something, Washington press corps. Because you may cover politics, but you have no political sense of self. The people who support what you do are outraged by @PressSec’s normal behavior. The people who support @PressSec’s normal behavior are outraged by you.”
The second tweet gets at a point Rosen has made elsewhere: it doesn’t matter how good a job the press is doing, if people aren’t paying attention. (That’s the weakness of Marty Baron’s response to Trump’s attacks: “We’re not at war; we’re at work.”) There is nothing about Michelle Wolf’s nasty and (to me) largely unfunny performance at the WHCA dinner that would encourage anyone not already sympathetic to the press to become so; indeed, since she was WHCA’s paid speaker, her bilious outlook inevitably attaches to them as well. To the extent that the country needs a degree of trust in the press to provide a factual basis for political exchanges, that’s a disservice to the country and an own-goal for the press.
Rob Reiner has this tweet:
“I attended the WHCD last night. Donald Trump has so poisoned the atmosphere by attacking the disabled, gold star parents, Muslims, Mexicans, Blacks, women, the press, the rule of law that a comedian who simply tells the truth is offensive? She’s joking. He’s not.”
And yes, they ARE nerds. Bitter, angry, envious,entitled, elitist nerds. Thin-skinned too
Quite a bit like the incel movement, now that you describe it.
.
“…they are citizens of The Village and there are limits on how much disrespect you can show them.”
I am not so sure anymore:
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mo-brooks-suggests-that-republicans-are-leaving-congress-out-
of-fear-of-assassination
I hope everyone keeps their heads and wits about them. These are truly disturbing times.
Mo’s afraid of “leftists”?
He must think that internet weather service “Weather Underground” is the ole’ militant radical leftist’s group from the University of Michigan?
Angry Teacher gives you an A+ for paying attention in class. And for giving me a laugh. When I make jokes like this, my students get none of my references.
Or, maybe I’m just not funny. That’s my wife’s diagnosis…
“But their world still revolves around 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and they still want to maintain a certain majesty to the place bolstered by myths they feel morally and patriotically bound to concoct and promulgate.”
“Think, gentlemen, of the old Monarchy: it was stronger than you are, stronger in its origin; it was able to lean more than you do upon ancient customs, ancient habits, ancient beliefs; it was stronger than you are, and yet it has fallen to dust. And why did it fall? Do you think it was by some particular mischance? Do you think it was by the act of some man, by the deficit, the oath in the Tennis Court, La Fayette, Mirabeau? No, gentlemen; there was another reason: the class that was then the governing class had become, through its indifference, its selfishness and its vices, incapable and unworthy of governing the country”
Rich Little is still alive. Maybe the WHCA can bring him back like they did in 2007. Safe, boring and unfunny seems to be their comfort zone.
and the jokes keep comin’, this one from the event host itself, the whca:
[rimshot!]
Self-important people at a dinner of no importance to anyone other than themselves got upset because someone told them the truth. Sorry I can’t join in the outrage.
Having read a transcript, it seems Wolf’s approach is clear: The 46% intentionally placed a sexualized misogynist vulgarian into the WH, and the WH press corps then normalized him. So her sexualized routine simply mirrored the tenor of the times, duh. That the WHPC can’t see this simple reality shows how oblivious they are.
In all honesty, the barbs at the appalling Hucksterbee seem so tame that the level of feigned outrage is awe-inspiring. She is a humorless tool, a poor man’s Goebbels who happily walks out and insults every sensible American’s intelligence every day with egregious falsehoods that are about on step away from the master of the game, Conway, and constitute simple propaganda.
Hucksterbee simply has no intellectual integrity whatsoever, and being called a “liar” is so weak as to be almost a compliment. It is OBVIOUS she is a brazen liar, and delighted to be one. This fact hardly merits comment, let alone phony outrage. And commenting on Hucksterbee’s hilarious eye shadow incompetence is somehow beyond the pale? That is a pain and personal insult too great to be bear? Jeebus, spare me.
Also, too, congratulations, useless corporate media on making sure a secondary attempt to skewer the monstrous regime of Der Trumper becomes about the comedic messenger–who, say what you will, couldn’t be expected to come and play the disgusting “Normalize Trump” game. That the nation’s comics come closer to revealing the truth and closer to informing the people than the press has been the story of the catastrophic 21st Century….
I came to US in 1980 awestruck by the power of media to have brought down the most powerful man in the World – having seen All the Presidents Men in India.
The Indian media by comparison was in bed with the Indian government: see https:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Delhi_Times_(film), for a fictionalized version of what was evident to most educated Indians.
In a strange twist of fate, the Indian media now seems to be more fierce in its pursuit of government malfeasance than here!
But I wonder where we are headed in this country, specifically referring to the trust/distrust of the media by a majority of citizens. My thought was triggered by our daughter telling us over dinner this past weekend that she felt a large part of the middle country was not being properly reported on in the NY Times. (Part of this is coming from her ex boyfriend, who being from Indiana, and now working in SFO, feels this cultural divide among the coastal liberal states and the middle.)
We tried to reason with her that NY Times does report more on the “economic anxiety” of mid America than it does about concerns of the coastal democrats. Whether this anxiety is real, or a cover for more deeply racist concerns (see https:
http://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/24/us/politics/trump-economic-anxiety.html), and whether DJT is a proper outlet for their concerns – she seemed willing to listen to that. She is a democrat and having worked in both Berkeley Free Clinic and Tulane Medical school, she understands the social needs much better than her ex-boyfriend.
But last night Anthony Bourdain’s Parts Unknown went into deep West Virginia with exactly this purpose – https:
/www.eater.com/2018/4/29/17291412/anthony-bourdain-parts-unknown-west-virginia-recap-season-1
1-episode-1
The Trump voter has been sceptical of media for a while, and becoming more so with his daily tweets.
With the drummed up controversy over WHCD roasts, now trust in some of the journalists, who are perceived as not doing their jobs of holding this White House to honesty, will also be mistrusted by liberals.
Overall it is a vicious cycle! Unless we change the house and perhaps the senate in January, I don’t foresee how we come out of this!
digby nails what’s so fundamentally dishonest/hypocritical about this annual Kabuki theater ritual, which makes the case (as have others) for ending it.
But get a load of WHCA Preznit Margaret Talev’s pathetically chickenshit disavowal of Wolf’s Truth-to-Power (including the Powerful of the Worse-than-Useless Corporate media):
Can you spot the self-contradictions in there [I helpfully provided some emphasis to that end]? I knew you could.
digby concludes:
C’mon guys. Everyone is forgetting about where the “smokey eyes” came from. https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/01/white-house-makeup-artist-sarah-huckabee-sanders-anthony-sc
aramucci
During his brief tenure in the White House, Anthony Scaramucci hired Katie Price, a hair and makeup artist to make Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Kellyanne Conway, Mercedes Schlapp and other Trump Administration women more presentable. Price was the creator of the “smokey eye” phenomenon. I did not hear Michelle’s “smokey eye” joke as a comment on Sanders’ personal appearance at all — it was a comment on the unique relationship between lies and presentation that has characterized the present administration.
where the “smokey eyes” came from
I think its amusing that nobody in the press has mentioned the “shirts and skins” barb, a reference, I think to SHS’s humiliating command on Thanksgiving that the WH press corps needed to say what they were thankful for, before asking questions. A reference also, to their shameful compliance.
Since Mags was the first to tweet condemnation, it’s interesting that while the Times has published an article and an opinion piece on the roast, so far nothing has been written which will allow commenting from readers. I guess they are afraid that 10,000 of us will say what we think of the inbred writers of the Opinions section.