Reading Ken Klippenstein’s piece on Elliott Broidy is quite an experience. The criminal and unethical and, frankly, frightening behavior pours forth from the page at a relentless clip. While you’re looking at the article, please remember that until very recently, Elliott Broidy was a deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee.
He got that job because he was effective in raising money for Donald Trump’s campaign at a time when most bigwig Republican bundlers were keeping Trump at arm’s length. But this is a guy who was convicted in 2009 for “bribing a New York government official in a case involving state pension funds.” That was an indication that he wasn’t the kind of person you should employ or entrust with positions of responsibility.
The Klippenstein piece focuses on how Broidy’s company, Virginia-based Circinus LLC, has people armed with AR-15’s running around in Florida serving as private security forces without any permits. But that barely scratches the surface of what should concern us. Here’s one example:
In March, The Wall Street Journal reported that Broidy at one point discussed a deal in which he would seek to help get the Justice Department to drop its investigation into a Malaysian government-owned investment fund’s multibillion-dollar graft scandal. Broidy potentially stood to gain tens of millions of dollars in fees from one of the figures at the scandal’s center if he got the investigation dropped.
I wrote about that case in March.
Here are two more areas of concern:
Broidy resigned from the RNC last month after a report that he paid $1.6 million to a former Playboy model he had impregnated. Broidy also has close ties to United Arab Emirates adviser George Nader, who is now cooperating with the Mueller investigation.
Paul Campos made an incredibly compelling case in New York magazine that Broidy is not actually the person who impregnated Playboy playmate Shera Bechard. He pointed the finger at Donald Trump and all I can say is that you should look at Campos’s argument because he convinced me that this is quite likely the truth of the matter.
As for George Nader, I’ve called him a legendary pervert whose fairly well known proclivities towards child pornography and pedophilia have somehow not prevented him from operating as a globetrotting dealmaker and Washington insider for decades. I would not be shocked if a lot of Trump, Cohen and Broidy’s problems originated with Nader after he was arrested and became a cooperating witness in Mueller’s probe.
Broidy’s main connection to him concerns business opportunities and security contracts in the United Arab Emirates.
A top fundraiser for US President Donald Trump received millions of dollars from a political adviser to the United Arab Emirates last April, just weeks before he began handing out a series of large political donations to US lawmakers considering legislation targeting Qatar, the UAE’s chief rival in the Persian Gulf, an Associated Press investigation has found.
George Nader, an adviser to the UAE who is now a witness in the US special counsel investigation into foreign meddling in American politics, wired USD 2.5 million to the Trump fundraiser, Elliott Broidy, through a company in Canada, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
They said Nader paid the money to Broidy to bankroll an effort to persuade the US to take a hard line against Qatar, a long-time American ally but now a bitter adversary of the UAE.
A month after he received the money, Broidy sponsored a conference on Qatar’s alleged ties to Islamic extremism.
During the event, Republican Congressman Ed Royce of California, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, announced he was introducing legislation that would brand Qatar as a terrorist-supporting state.
In July 2017, two months after Royce introduced the bill, Broidy gave the California congressman USD 5,400 in campaign gifts the maximum allowed by law.
You can choose what to be most worried about, whether it’s private armies operating domestically without permits or corrupting the Justice Department to cover up foreign financial crimes or corrupting politicians and directing the foreign policy legislation they introduce or bribing state officials in New York or selling access to the president and vice-president or having connections to a creep like George Nader and his nefarious wheelings and dealings, or potentially faking his paternity of a child in order to cover for the president’s infidelity and involvement in an abortion.
Again, until a few moments ago, this guy was a deputy finance chairman for the Republican National Committee. The same is true of Michael Cohen.
The swamp has never been more expansive or rancid.
And the deplorables don’t and never will care about any of this, if they even ever learned of any of it, because MAGA. The rule of law, the ethics of morality, are dead.
From NY Times story
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/us/politics/trump-homeland-security-secretary-resign.html
I think this is all the Trump voters care about at this point!
It is all they care about, including Nielsen. She has found herself in the job that will allow her to fulfill her long ambition to harass and deport every brown person she can find, including American citizens.
No amount of yelling will cause her to quit that job, one reason being she has seen every cabinet member get their turn, but the main reason being that she gets to go back to her office and play Reinhard Heydrich, which in her preferred crowd is the ultimate cosplay.
Quit, my ass.
.
If Nielsen engaged in such cosplay, would she remind people of Sybil Danning and Sherie Moon Zombie in “Werewolf Women of the S.S.”?
There, I saw your Nazi comparison and raised you with some sexual objectification.
61 percent of the Trump Party think the FBI is setting up the president.
https://www.vox.com/2018/5/10/17340200/poll-republicans-trump-fbi-mueller-witch-hunt
I don’t care what the members of the trump cult think about anything. We don’t need them to pay attention or care. What matters is what the rest of America thinks about all this.
So do I have this right? Broidy paid off the woman for $1.6million that Trump impregnated? And that money also went through Cohens slush fund? So we don’t yet know where it came from.
The other part that has yet to be explained…there was $4.4 million in the acct. Stormy got $130,000 and the playmate got $1.6 million…what happened to the rest?
Surely after these facts are presented the US patriots who sent Trump to DC to drain the swamp will see the error of their ways.
The mask is off the Republican Party, revealing the truth that rules of law do not matter and the party exists to win at any cost to make money for those who support them. Ryan and McConnell can stop posturing about deficits and budgets and taxes because they have gotten what they wanted with zero consequences.
We can see the future, where newly appointed Federal judges will be casting their spin on cases for human rights and abortion legality and immigration. It’s already in motion.
Republicans do not give any shits about money laundering or Russian influence in our government. They’re squawking about how long the witch hunt is taking, but the results don’t matter now. If Trump gets removed, his fans will rage, but the Party will continue to create damage and chaos to our democracy.
I know it sounds grim. But until we can take back the Senate and House, we lack leverage to make things right, and even then, how long will it take to repair the damage already done? Is that even possible?
I’ll keep fighting, calling my Congressmen, voting. But it’s more uphill battles as time goes on. I would like to think we prevail, but I don’t know.
I read the Campos article when it was originally posted, and I thought where is the media curiosity? If Bill Clinton had this kind of arrangement with a lawyer like Cohen and there was a similar arrangement with a seemlingly compliant and duplicitous lawyer that represented Daniels, McDougal, and Bechard, the media would have been off to the races with resources spent to find out what the Clintons were hiding and attempting to prove that he was the actual father.
This has been going on ever since Trump entered the race. They protected him when both McDougal and Daniels were shopping their stories in 2016 by killing the stories and not reporting on their allegations. Could you imagine them having the same courtesy if the allegations were against one of the Clintons or Obama?
. . . one of those stories (McDougal? I think?) was bought by Trump’s butt-buddy at National Enquirer specifically to kill it.
So don’t think that one can be laid at the doorstep of “the media” generally. Yeah, they’re awful, generally, but don’t think they can be blamed for that particular instance.
My last comment was a reply to yours.
Eventually, the NE spike is true. However, I was under the impression the gaggle of reporters following the campaign knew about her, and her allegation. In the case of Daniels, Slate’s Jacob Weisberg definitely had no interest in Daniels story. They were protecting him, and I find it completely at odds with how they used Ginnifer Flowers and Whitewater to throw everything at Bill Clinton during the `92 Campaign and during his first term until a Special Prosecutor was named. Then Fox and MSNBC were free to impugn Clinton and Gore with any speculation Matthews and O’Reilly wanted to engage. The NYT and WP were also in on the hunt as well.