I’m not sure how much more bad news my readers or I can take, but one thing that certainly cannot be ignored is Steve Bannon’s intention to focus the bulk of his energies on undermining liberal democracy in the West by going to Europe and organizing all the far right nationalist parties into a cooperative he calls The Movement.
You might remember what Bannon said last year while addressing Marine Le Pen’s Front National in Lille, France:
Up on stage he told the crowd: “You fight for your country and they call you racist. But the days when those kind of insults work is over. The establishment media are the dogs of the system. Every day, we become stronger and they become weaker. Let them call you racists, xenophobes or whatever else, wear these like a medal.”
Bannon was shocked to learn that the Brexit campaign had been so cheap:
The sight of Brexit virtually upending the entire European Union with a campaign spending cap of £7 million ($9 million) was a great inspiration. “When they told me the spending cap was £7 million, I go, ‘You mean £70 million? What the fuck?!’ £7 million doesn’t buy anything. It doesn’t buy you Facebook data, it doesn’t buy you ads, it doesn’t do anything.”
“Dude! You just took the fifth largest economy in the world out of the EU for £7 million!”
So, now he’s going to address one of the far right’s weaknesses:
Up until now insurgent populist groups across Europe have often suffered from similar problems: lack of expertise and finances. Le Pen’s party was kept afloat by Russian loans back in 2014, when French banks refused to extend lines of credit for the Front National. Le Pen was back in Moscow shaking Putin’s hand before last year’s French elections, which the NSA subsequently revealed had been hacked by the Russians.
The Movement plans to research and write detailed policy proposals that can be used by like-minded parties; commission pan-European or targeted polling; and share expertise in election war room methodology such as message discipline, data-led voter targeting and field operations. Depending on electoral law in individual countries, the foundation may be able to take part in some campaigns directly while bolstering other populist groups indirectly.
If the following sounds like a conversation between Vladimir Putin and his intelligence chiefs, that’s no accident:
[Bannon] describes [Germany’s Angela] Merkel and Emmanuel Macron, the French president who crushed Le Pen in a runoff election last year but has since flagged in the polls, as vulnerable figureheads of establishment Europe. With Britain voting to quit the E.U., Merkel and Macron’s vision of a united continent will be put to the test at next year’s elections.
Bannon is convinced that the coming years will see a drastic break from decades of European integration. “Right-wing populist nationalism is what will happen. That’s what will govern,” he told The Daily Beast. “You’re going to have individual nation states with their own identities, their own borders.”
The grassroots movements are already in place waiting for someone to maximize their potential. “It will be instantaneous—as soon as we flip the switch,” he said.
Bannon will do anything to distract from the Russophilic aspect of his mission. He echoed Trump’s criticism of Merkel, accusing of her selling out to Russia because she hasn’t cancelled a gas pipeline that was set in motion by her predecessor Gerhard Schroeder . He ignored the Russian role in funding Brexit and he’s done the same with the recent Italian elections:
Bannon went to Italy to observe the campaign earlier this year as populist parties surged in the polls despite their tiny operations. “Look at Five Star and the Northern League,” he said. “They used their own credit cards. They took control of the seventh largest economy in the world—on their credit cards! It’s insane.”
And how has the Italian coalition behaved so far?
The two anti-establishment parties reached a coalition agreement that made Matteo Salvini deputy prime minister and put him in charge of the interior ministry two months ago. He has since shut Italy’s ports to NGO ships carrying rescued migrants and called for a census of the Roma community that may lead to mass deportations. Last year, he called for a radical crackdown on immigrants. “We need a mass cleansing, street by street, piazza by piazza, neighborhood by neighborhood,” he said.
Bannon sees Salvini as a model for his future Movement partners to follow. “Italy is the beating heart of modern politics,” he said. “If it works there it can work everywhere.”
While the Italian government wants a census of the gypsies, an idea that already has currency in Hungary and Romania, a state minister from Austria’s far right co-governing Freedom Party has proposed creating a registry for anyone who wants to buy Kosher meat.
I’m not the only one warning about the resurgence of fascism, but I don’t feel like we have enough voices attuned to the threat. Steve Bannon is announcing his intentions to destroy liberal democracy and that just so happens to be exactly what his former boss in the White House and the president of Russia are working on in tandem.
This is not a drill.
Ugh these assholes. Hope the alcohol kills him before somebody needs to put a bullet in him.
If the potential consequences weren’t so dire, I’d find some humor in the notion that the same people who cry about national identity and are afraid of Muslims implementing Sharia law in the U.S. are going to other countries to impose their views on the populations there.
Not to make light of fascism returning to power in western democracies, but serious question:
Is Bannon a serious person or is this just where the fast, easy, no-receipts-needed money is after proving too incompetent even for the Trump administration and Mercer cutting him off?
I get how the Brexit vote happened for $7 million…but the actual exit hasn’t happened yet and the cost to maintain a resulting Fortress England will be exponentially higher. The Far Right in France and Germany will face very similar challenges should they ever catch the car.
I think this is a pretty critical point. The EU as the EU is pretty much the co-equal of the USA and China. Reverting to individual states perhaps without even a Customs Union gives these states zero leverage on the world stage and will have a devastating impact on all their economies. Russia would be delighted, of course.
I think the Euro “Establishment” understands this and are a lot smarter, in general, than the US GOP ever will be. But, while Brannon is basically a blowhard, the defenders of democracy need to mobilize firmly against Putin and his many puppets like Bannon, Le Pen and UKIP, AfD and the Italian fascisti. Not to mention Hungary.
I’m not generally worried about the break-up of the EU. Bannon and his cronie fascist wannabes like Farage underestimate its resilience. If there was a time to be worried it was the financial crisis, double dip recession, and Greece. But Greece was made an example of, since without changing the rules what Tspiras was asking for would in effect “kick out” Greece. And he folded (he made the right choice). The U.K. is more like the late Soviet Union. Party’s over, they just don’t know it yet. Idiots voted for Article 50, and you can be damn sure EU isn’t going to fold over their bullshit demands. They’re going to make it painful to just stay in, which looks less unlikely by the day. But life will move on without them; they ain’t an Empire anymore.
I think it’s possible Europe also moves on with a “post NATO” Europe and begins planning their own defense. Germany’s Green Party is the only one planning for this future, and they’re standing up for refugees — their polling is also going up. Meanwhile AfD makes it clear where they stand on immigration and EU, while Die Linke and other social democrats try to play pattycake with fascists on immigration. Luckily they’re a minority in Die Linke, but they’re also the same people sympathetic to Russia.
Agreed. My point, which I may have made poorly, is that the EU is established and that the stupid anti-EU movement (to the extent that it really exists) is stupid and destructive of all the economies of Europe (as Britain is about to find out). The EU is a version of the USA without a Constitution and a real federalist system. They may and should get there. And that’s one of the things Putin fears.
The Euro establishment doesn’t have to deal with our evangelicals.
Well they did, in a sense
1562-1598
1618-1648
1639-1653
Missed a few, I’m sure
For this reason, I get so pissed at performances such as this recent by one Nick Cooke in Richmond, who is either an (undisclosed) friend of Bannon’s or merely an idiot.
I linked to the MHP page instead of one from the corporate media because, unlike any of the latter, it exposes some of the problems with Cooke’s action and words. We don’t, however, learn what Cooke would say to the observation that Bannon is doing his best, out in the open, to create a world in which bookshops that “are all about ideas and tolerating different opinions” do not exist. What a tool.
The pieces in the corporate media, like others about Bannon, run under images of him that make him look dignified; the practice is disgusting.
I’ve never understood corporate media’s fascination with Bannon. It is not like selling racism and fascism to fascist racists is a hard thing to do or requires much intelligence. The only explanation I can think of is that their editors demand he be taken seriously as to avoid threatening phone calls from the upstairs corner office.
Bannon leveraged Mercer’s money and influence to get out onto center stage under the bright lights…..and promptly shit himself. So I have a hard time seeing this as anything other than a failed celebrity trying to find another market for his bullshit.
I think it’s the figure he cuts — the strange clothes; the unkempt appearance; the coarse language; the obscure “intellectual” namedropping — that gulls people into thinking, Here’s someone who’s not the usual cookie-cutter politico; ignore him at your own peril.
I’m reminded of a profile Tom Wolfe wrote of Marshall McLuhan in the late ’60s (“What If He Is Right?”) about exactly the same phenomenon — McLuhan was so dotty, and so sure of himself, and had the ears of so many influential people, that nobody dared write him off.
They see him as a friend and/or fellow traveller
I thought I’d make note that up until this year’s Italian elections, the line I often would hear or read was that Five Star Movement was progressive. And yet Five Star partnered with Northern League once the proverbial rubber met the road, resulting in some of the policies against refugees and Roma that now exist. I really hate being right about Five Star, but they’ve shown their colors.
. . . infuriates me:
And . . .
[I get that neither of these is your usage, nor is it the focus of your piece, with which I otherwise agree.]
I’m a “populist”, but I abhor what those identified as “populist” in those two quotes are about and up to.
To me, “populist” just means what it literally means (see populus), i.e., the only legitimate purpose of government is to serve the interests of the governed, i.e., “the people”.
Tha’d be all the people.
Not just those of white European descent.
Not just the 1% (or more to the point, the .01%).
But only the people — the actual people, the humans — i.e., excluding the “corporate person” legal fiction.
That our government is supposed to be — inherently — “populist” gets strong support from our founding documents and our greatest President:
It is an abomination doing great violence to the language, and a mortal insult to many millions of actual “populists” worldwide, to apply “populist” to the bigoted, far-rightwing, fascistic, “white-nationalist” movements Bannon seeks to empower to rule the world.
….to create a perception that fascism has majority support in each country and deflect blame from each nation’s 0.01 percent who, along with Putin, bankroll Farage/Le Pen/Trump/Bannon/etc.
This is probably the most commonly used understanding of populism and I doubt it’s worth reclaiming the term when you can disaggregate the “elites” and talk more usefully about economic divisions- to whit, class divisions with the uppermost of wealth holders using their financial influence over government to capture ever-increasing amounts of national and global income.
Shoddy over-broad identifications like “populist” that can include ideologies as diverse as ethnic nationalism and traditional socialism lead to muddled analysis and conspiratorial thinking.
I’m less concerned with reclaiming the term than “not all populists are fascist, and I’d like the current danger to be defined accurately.” These are not `populists’, they’re not `anti-establishment’. They are fascists and Nazis, and/or National Bolsheviks. Fascist works best even if it’s similarly broad and somewhat ill-defined because the reader generally understands what is meant by “fascism”.
I agree, referring to right-wing racist authoritarians as “populists” elides what they’re all about, while Fascist confronts it squarely.
. . . the term to mean what it actually means. If it were possible.
And certainly preferable to the usages I quoted, where it serves to euphemize deplorables simultaneously with committing violence against the plain meaning of words.
Which is not to say I’m sanguine wrt prospects of success for any campaign to thus reclaim it. (See, e.g., the “success” of my campaign to reclaim the name “football” for the sport that is the original, and is its rightful owner.)
I’m certainly not the first to suspect that the noise factor of Trump where people jump on the evil of the moment, fact checking becomes a blur and the arguing with the trolls or MSM trying to correct the record is a calculated part of a larger picture, a larger c change manipulation of culture and societies.
The more we allow the distractions to take up our time, the more we allow ourselves to become reactionary because we’re being manipulated by the fire hose of gawd awful news, the less we recognize what’s obvious from 30,000 feet.
Putin may be relying on Ilyin’s historical authority, but Bannon is every bit as much reliant on generating economic inequality. Oligarchy is the shared goal of both Putin and Bannon for as soon as social mobility stalls, democracy bows to oligarchy.
Do not make the same sort of mistake that you did when you underestimated Trump.
Bannon is not a fool, and the fascist movement in Europe is gathering a head of steam even faster than it is in the U.S.
Please.
Remember Hitler and Mussolini.
They were mocked too.
Until it was too late.
AG
For Christ’s sake, who’s “underestimating” Trump? Certainly nobody here.
You’re so simple-minded in your thinking that you can’t get your head around the fact that everyone here (and elsewhere) is simultaneously remarking on Trump’s severe, profound limitations, while fully acknowledging the grave danger he and his movement represents — and the degree to which that danger has been repeatedly and disastrously encouraged or opposed in ineffective ways.
Whenever anyone calls Trump “stupid” or ineffectual in some area you’re right there like clockwork, needlessly warning us to reassess him as powerful/important etc. because of the “peril” of underestimating him. For Christ’s sake, we know we get it. He can be both things — stupid and dangerous. Please give it a rest.
Might as well ask the tide not to come in today, please.
. . . light and heat these long summer days. Couldja maybe give it a rest and not rise in the east tomorrow?
Aside from immigration, the EU suffers from what some belief is a deadly problem. You can ask Spain, Portugal, Greece and Italy about it too. There is no fiscal authority. They all use the same currency ( Britain was an exception). And they all are bound by rules governing their debt. Some believe that is ineffective and makes the union unstable. Well, not Germany so much. So they will need to address their own policies or let Bannon figure it out for them.
What stops any foreign country from declining Bannon entry? He has a stated purpose of opposing the current democratic governments in Europe. I would not let him off the plane in the Ukraine.
Why isn’t this carpetbagger stuck at home, worrying about his personal freedom?