Need I say more?
I think not.
Rauner and Pritzker want to keep their offshore money a secret. Here’s what we know.
When it comes to their money, Republican Bruce Rauner and Democrat J.B. Pritzker operate from the same financial playbook often used by the super rich, one that relies heavily on secrecy.
Both candidates for [Illinois] governor have released vague and incomplete information about their wealth. Both have declined to provide their entire federal and state income tax returns so that voters might see where the two politicians’ financial interests intersect — or potentially conflict — with the business of the state of Illinois. And both have investments in opaque offshore tax havens — holdings that are more extensive than previously known, the Tribune has found.
Rauner and Pritzker have investments registered at the Ugland House, a five-story building in Grand Cayman that thousands of companies use as their address to minimize taxes. As he sought to crack down on offshore tax havens in 2009, President Barack Obama called the place either “the largest building in the world or the largest tax scam in the world.”
Daniel Berman, a former deputy international tax counsel for the U.S. Treasury Department, said places like the Cayman Islands are known for secrecy, lax regulations and little or no taxes. He said that does not mean people are breaking the law, noting that avoiding taxes — as opposed to evading them — is a fully legal tax behavior.
The candidates’ tax returns could provide voters a fuller explanation of how Pritzker and Rauner use offshore financial strategies to avoid taxes and hide assets from public scrutiny as they seek to occupy the Governor’s Mansion and make decisions about spending and how much others will pay in taxes.
READ MORE: Democrat J.B. Pritzker has poured a record $146 million into his Illinois governor campaign. He won’t provide details on where the money is coming from. »
READ MORE: Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner has criticized J.B. Pritzker for offshore investments but has millions of dollars invested offshore himself. »
“It’s not the case that every investment in the Cayman Islands is abusive,” Berman said. “It can be a legitimate business in the Cayman Islands, if you report income and assets and are complying with the tax law. Of course, they won’t show their full tax returns, so we don’t know.”
Pritzker and Rauner are the wealthiest individuals to ever seek the governor’s office in Illinois. If elected, Pritzker would become the nation’s richest governor, eclipsing Tennessee Gov. William Haslam. Forbes last week pegged Pritzker’s wealth at $3.2 billion, while Haslam, whose family owns the Pilot Flying J truck stop chain, is worth an estimated $1.8 billion.
Rauner did not make the magazine’s list of the world’s billionaires. In 2014, he told the Tribune he’s worth at least $500 million. Last month, Rauner declined to reveal a specific number, saying his net worth is “less than one-third” of Pritzker’s.
The Tribune sent detailed questions to both campaigns. Neither Pritzker nor Rauner would directly answer questions about their fortunes, nor would either say how much he was worth. Instead, both campaigns issued responses attempting to distance their respective candidate from offshore investments.
“Gov. Rauner has already gone far beyond what is required regarding his tax filings and statement of economic interests,” Rauner campaign spokesman Will Allison said. “Beyond that, all of the governor’s investments are in blind trust procedures and he would not be able to discuss with specificity the details of those investments.”
—snip—
Where’s Pritzker’s campaign cash coming from? He’s keeping that a secret.
Experts say investing offshore typically gives no tax advantages to U.S. investors like Rauner and Pritzker. Income from offshore investments is still subject to U.S. taxes, but investing offshore is secretive and conceals the nature of the investments.
Some of that is done at Ugland House, the Grand Cayman building that’s the listed address for about 18,000 companies and investment funds. None of the companies registered there are physically housed in the building. Maple and Calder, an international law firm with clients around the world, is the building’s sole tenant. The firm has said Ugland House has been unfairly criticized by the media and politicians who do not fully understand offshore investing.
Steven Rosenthal, a tax lawyer and senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center in Washington, D.C., said funds are set up in places like the Cayman Islands to attract foreign investors and tax-exempt U.S. investors such as pension funds and university endowments.
Typically, investments are handled through partnerships, and one would need to see the detailed tax schedules for Rauner and Pritzker to better understand their financial ties to offshore investments, Rosenthal said.
Rauner and Pritzker each have released the first two summary pages of their tax returns, but have declined to release the lengthy schedules that would provide greater detail about their capital gains, dividends, deductions and business partnerships.
—snip—
David Yepsen, former director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University, said Rauner and Pritzker owe it to the public to disclose more about their wealth. He favors candidates’ providing statements of net worth, which would include the value of property they own, and list who owes them money and who they owe money to.
“Everybody knows these two guys are rich,” Yepsen said. “We need to understand where that wealth is. Political leaders need to take steps to restore confidence in government and nowhere is that more important than in Illinois.”
Pritzker has poured a record $146 million of his own money into his campaign, despite reportedly earning $28 million over the past three years. So where’s all the campaign cash coming from? »
Rauner often attacks Pritzker for secret offshore dealings, accusing him of hiding money to avoid taxes. But the governor won’t talk about his own Cayman Islands funds, including one invested in after he took office.
WTFU.
You been had.
From both sides!!!
AG
○ London remains a safe haven for the world’s dirty cash | The Guardian Opinion |
My earlier diary on the ethics triangle London – New York – Tel Aviv …
○ Laundering a Russian Oligarch through Israeli Citizenship
It’s really quite amazing, isn’t it Oui?
The entire official anti-Trump thing barely mentions the massive corruption…not in DC and not in TrumpLand, either…that is going on. Instead, it’s all about “Russian interference in U.S. elections.”
Why?
Because most of the controllers…in the UniParty political world, the spook world and the corporate world…are just as dirty as is Trump. Instead they poof around about piss videos and underlings who did or did not meet with other underlings from other countries to maybe possibly do something that might be illegal.
Sad.
AG
. . . line to troll slightly (but not substantively) differently . . .
. . . but it’s still dishonest trolling, so still gets an earned troll-rating.
I would be sad if you truly cut the shit! What a phony bs you are!
. . . troll-rated you except for blatant and dishonest trolling by you (like those signature lines!). I have validly and substantively critiqued stuff you’ve written here. Which you have routinely run away from, opting to abuse the rating system to troll-rate such substantive, valid critiques rather than respond substantively. As you’ve just done yet again here.
No shit. No bs.
. . . Performing exactly the pattern of abuse and cowardice I just described!
Perfect.
That reminds me of a scene from “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.”
Hafta start addressing oui (on the rare occasions there’s any reason to) as “Brave Sir Robin”!
Oaguabonita: you’re such a stupid character swelling in your arrogance and short-sighted judgment on others. I’ve been well received across the Big Pond @ET – 4 of the top 5 recommended diaries are mine. So I don’t need the trollish behavior of one or two idiots in this “community” of sorts. You’re eating your own!
I’ve been here @Martin’s BooMan from the very beginning. My record on opinion and analysis will last for a long time … I have no regrets. 🙂
○ Dina Powell is out of running to replace Nikki Haley as US ambassador to the UN, says White House
○ Dina Habib Powell A Rising NSC Star for Trump
○ Norman J. Pattiz – Chairman BBG Middle East Committee ¶ Al Hurra & Sawa [Nov. 2005]
In 2005 Martin got a legal letter from a very expensive law firm that I should stand down in my writing about Republican sources of wealth gathering: Texas education start-ups, venture funds an Wall Street and the Florida real estate market and mortgages. The same bunch of crooked politicians now sitting in the White House and U.S. Congress … but that’s been U.S. Democracy for the ages.
My most recent diary @ET …
○ What A Joke He Is!
Title fits you well!
So glad you found a better place than this, with all the nazi’s and fascists here.
You sound very bitter about something though, almost as if you feel like people should be more appreciative of how amazing you are.
It saddens me to see that, but i am sure the appreciation you get over there compensates for the lack there of here.
Bazzz from the very first moments you were way off your rocker … am truly surprised at your poor behaviour. I NEVER made any such general accusations about the BT community as I have known it.
If you base your opinion on lousy comments without further study as oaquabonita has admitted, that will explain the baseless accusations thrown at me. Over @ET, the European community, such writings and comments would not EVER be tolerated. Best you give me my personal space and don’t hijack Arthur’s thread as oaguabonita does repetedly … trollish behaviour.
Nope. That’s a lie.
. . . some point with that.
One can only guess that you imagine (or at least pretend to imagine) it to be your “Aha!” smoking-gun “proof” of me “admitting” to what you (in your usual incoherently inimitable fashion) lied that I had “admitted”:
The incoherence is, of course, your problem, not mine. But anyone who can read and comprehend can see that I did not “admit” to your incoherent claim.
Anyone who’s paid attention here also knows I have never “thrown” any “baseless accusations” at you at all! In sharp contrast to that lie, the accusations I have made have uniformly been the exact opposite of “baseless”, i.e., fully founded in and thoroughly, factually documented (with links!) by the record you have created here.
Just for a few examples!
Just giving you my analysis.
You could have explained in a clear way what you meant, but you miserably failed.
So i interpret it my own way.
But certainly, its not your responsibility, right?
You made a clear point that i was a piece of shit that you didnt have to give a crap about.
If i misunderstood that, feel free to set me straight.
Best to not try to impress me by telling me what to do, i dont give a shit about your superiority delusions.
You make your choice Oui, like we all make our choices.
Off my rocker?
God you are easily spooked.
Bruce Rauner started this fight when he spent millions of his own money to win the 2014 gubernatorial Republican primary and the general election. Then after he was elected, Rauner donated millions more of his own money promoting his anti-union/anti-little guy ‘turnaround’ agenda. Rauner even elicited $$ from other rightwing oligarchs in hopes of becoming the “Scottie Walker of Illinois”. Rauner’s agenda blew up in his face and I believe the good people of Illinois will engage in their own turnaround agenda Nov. 6.
“Since winning election, Rauner has given his campaign fund an additional $10 million in personal funds and two wealthy allies, hedge fund CEO Ken Griffin and businessman Richard Uihlein, combined for another $10 million. The $20 million is aimed at helping promote Rauner’s still-unstated agenda as governor and helping buttress Republican state lawmakers to support it.”
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-bruce-rauner-campaign-fundraising-met-0116-2015
0115-story.html
For those interested in Illinois politics, I recommend Rich miller’s capitol fax blog You will see both Democratic and Republican viewpoints, but the few Raunerites are hooted down. remember, Rauner almost lost his primary to a virtually unknown challenger from the Right. If she had been moderate on gays and abortion she would have won. Maybe being moderate on abortion alone would have worked. she lost suburban republican women that you would expect to support another Republican woman.
Not cutting into Booman’s business here. Rich Miller is strictly Illinois, while Booman is mostly national with an occasional local commentary on Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Thanks for the tip, Voice.
Thank YOU!