Billionaire Philip Anschutz’s DC Media is a parent to both the Trump-critical Weekly Standard and the pro-Trump Washington Examiner. It’s not surprising that they’re looking to expand the Examiner and shutter the Standard.
As Jim Antle, editor of The American Conservative, told Politico’s Jason Schwartz, “I think, in general, people don’t visit conservative websites and read conservative magazines to read that the president is terrible. So what do you do when your writers and editors have concluded the president is terrible?”
It’s a little different on the left. I can tell you from experience that it’s easier to get traffic on the left by trashing the Democratic Party and its leaders than it is to praise or defend them. But it’s still generally true that partisans are looking for some kind of orthodoxy from publications before they will consider them allies or recommended reading. The Weekly Standard has evidently run afoul of this principle, although there is some dispute over the exact cause of their demise. For me, it would be related to the fact that its founder Bill Kristol may be the most famously and reliably wrong person in America.
That’s not it, however.
And despite the Standard’s dwindling circulation, unnamed staffers told Vox’s Jane Coaston last night that the magazine’s closure would reflect corporate infighting more than untenable financial pressure (MediaDC, in any case, has deep pockets: its parent company is owned by the billionaire Philip Anschutz). As one source told Coaston, “This isn’t a natural death.”
Maybe there is an editorial reason for killing off the Standard. It could be that Mr. Anschutz has decided that displeasing the president isn’t a good investment. Someone should look into the possibility that some business of his or another is negotiating something important with the administration.
I won’t miss the Weekly Standard even a little bit, as I have never considered it an honest enterprise. I do understand the longing some people on the left have to find some decent interlocutors on the right, but God help them if they ever thought Stephen Hayes and Bill Kristol fit that bill.
It’d be nice if someone would pay right-leaning journalists to do honest work, but I’ve seen no evidence that that ever occurs. And since it doesn’t, there is no such thing as an honest debate on the issues between the left and right. If the Standard dies, nothing of real value will be lost and we can be grateful that they won’t use an opposition to Trump as a cover to advocate for the things that Neo-conservatives really care about, like permawar in the Middle East.
When little Billy Kristol organized the Republican plan for total resistance to Clinton’s health care reform efforts, he showed the world what he is. A partisan who cares more about maintaining low taxes on his rich friends than promoting a society in which everyone can access health care. In other words, who cares if other people’s children are dying?
. . . It will never be possible to quantify how much innocent blood Hayes and Kristol of the Weakly Substandard have on their hands over their enabling of the Iraq Invasion War Crime. But it’s a lot. For which they’ve never faced any significant accountability.
I think it might well just be a continuation of the streamlining and coalescing of the alternate reality that is necessary to perpetuate the important narratives within the right wing bubble. It makes perfect sense, as we watch the streaming exodus from politics of anyone within the GOP who might say ANYTHING against this President, and Trumpism in general, that an emblem of the “old guard” of Republicanism would be shuttered. Not to say that Weekly Standard was in any significant way an anti-Trump rag, but absolute fealty is, more and more, becoming the absolute benchmark that every entity which exists and functions within the right wing must meet. And with its historical association within the establishment GOP it is, no doubt, viewed with great skepticism within the modern Republican Party and its newly crowned leader, Donald Trump.
There is simply no space within today’s GOP ecosystem for any organization that might question the moral correctness or political expediency of Trumpism. I remember reading Weekly Standard in the 1980’s, and while I disagreed with almost every perspective, it often gave me at least some food for thought which forced me to at least ponder my points of view. But today, even the most remote possibility of anything which pushes back against the absolutism of the Trump philosophy is simply not allowed anymore in the Republican sphere.
Bottom line, if you know what is good for you, you defer to the wishes of The Dear Leader. If you don’t, well, there are consequences.
When did some minimal semblance of “principles” evaporate from the Republican swamp?
Was it the passage of William Buckley Jr.?
Now we have the likes of Dinesh D’Souza instead!
It’s a little different on the left. I can tell you from experience that it’s easier to get traffic on the left by trashing the Democratic Party and its leaders than it is to praise or defend them.
What proof do you have of this? Raw Story must be doing great traffic and it has turned into a party cheerleader. What about TGOS? Markos is now barring the gates that he once tried to crash. Is his traffic suffering because of it? Lets face it. The Democratic Party’s leaders on the whole suck. Pelosi? She’s okay. Hoyer? He sucks. Schumer? Sucks? Tom Perez? Haha!! Jerry Brown? Mediocre at best. Hickenlooper? Hideous? There is a reason why Sanders got 46% of the vote, I believe, in the 2016 primary.
>>it’s easier to get traffic on the left by trashing the Democratic Party and its leaders
if this were true, c99 would be busier than it is.
just for fun I looked up the stats on Alexa.com.
dkos ranking in US ~1000
bootrib ranking in US ~37000
c99 ranking in US ~436000
What is c99?
>>What is c99?
https:/caucus99percent.com
home of the “Hillary would have been worse” faction.
Yes, what is c99?
caucus99
https://caucus99percent.com
.
Probably in reference to ostensible leftists like Glenn Greenwald and publications like the Intercept. Web visits probably don’t reflect their reach because a lot of this type of criticism (honest or not) is propagated via social media.
you don’t think he has his own data to fall back on? posts that are positive of the Dem party/leaders and posts that are negative
wouldn’t that make more sense to the article he just wrote?
What’s `strange’ about that is the inclusion of Tom Perez and Jerry Brown on that list. As near as I can tell, the `crimes’ of Tom Perez is he won an election to run the Party for the 2018 elections. But he then did what everyone claimed they wanted…….he led a blue wave, by fighting everywhere he could. Personally, I would call that a success. Was it perfect? No. But he did not fail the Progressives.
And Jerry Brown? He’s not really a national figure. He was years ago, but these days he’s just been our governor, and pretty quietly at that. Even in CA, he’s kept a pretty low profile. And during his terms…..the Republican Party has been completely destroyed in CA, which is supposedly what the complainers desire over everything else. Is he responsible for CA sending 46 (out of 53) Democrats to the House in January? Of course not…..but he certainly did not get in the way.
Maybe including them is a preemptive strike, just in case both are going to run for POTUS in 2020. Set the same `mood’ that the same people did with Clinton. That’s my guess. But if that is true…it shows the moral bankruptcy of those proponents, to attempt to wreck two democrats who just did good, simply to advance a different candidate….who more than likely has done less.
Same shit, different cycle.
.
And to your earlier post, with the demise of the WS there’s now one more question mark in front of who the Rep party will be without Trump.
The WS’s last gasp under Kristol has largely focused on anti Trumpism and a whole lot of whining for real Conservatism.
The identity crisis is still expanding for the Rep’s it hasn’t reached it’s ceiling.
As has been mentioned here and elsewhere any number of times, Trump is simply the culmination and the apotheosis of the “Reagan Revolution”, the 40 years of reactionary white supremacy, wealth worship and corruption that the GOP has increasingly embraced over this period at the state and federal levels. Without Trump, the GOP would simply seek another candidate with the same views but presumably one who wasn’t such a transparent idiot and enfant terrible.