Steve Bannon’s Fascist Academy Needs a New Home

The fascist government of Italy says he can’t open a fascist school in an ancient monastery because he’s a crook and a fraud.

Back in July 2018, I told you that Steven Bannon wants to lead a European fascist movement. If you read Israeli newspapers you could have known this as far back as March 2018. Some people said he wanted to establish a Nazi Academy, although I think that’s overstating things a touch. He wasn’t thinking of extermination camps, at least not openly. He was more focused on good old fashioned white nationalism and supremacy. He wanted to call the place the Academy for the Judaeo-Christian West and his plan involved buying an old monastery in Italy.

One recent morning, Benjamin Harnwell, the Bannon acolyte, grabbed his ring of keys and moved from one building to the next, through hidden passageways and into frescoed rooms, where he said the next mission at this site was about to take form.

Soon, he said, the monastery would be filled with students who wanted to master the tools of populist politics. The halls with centuries-old oil paintings would serve as classrooms where students could learn “the facts” — the worldview espoused by Bannon, who, since being booted from the White House and Breitbart News, has turned to fomenting right-wing populism in Europe and beyond.

Can a place where monks once upheld vows of silence now produce the next generation of Matteo Salvinis and Viktor Orbans? Harnwell is still recruiting teachers. He hasn’t yet received accreditation. He has yet to test whether students will want to venture up into the Apennine Mountains for such an education.

But if all goes well, Harnwell said, a new generation of leaders will spend time here and then descend back down the mountainside road, returning to Rome, to other European capitals or to Washington, helping to ensure that Bannon’s version of a revolt might last for decades to come.

Fortunately, it’s all come to grief.

The Italian government has delivered a potentially fatal blow to Steve Bannon’s plans to transform a medieval monastery near Rome into a training academy for the far-right.

Italy’s cultural heritage ministry announced on Friday (May 31) that it would revoke a lease granted to Bannon after reports of fraud in the competitive tender process.

Something about bank fraud:

But earlier this month, Italian newspaper Repubblica reported that a letter used to guarantee the lease was forged. The letter had the signature of an employee of Danish bank Jyske, but the bank said that employee hadn’t worked there for years, and called the letter fraudulent.

The Economist reported last week that Benjamin Harnwell, the director of the institute, was surprised by the revelation. Bannon, meanwhile, claimed the letter was “totally legitimate.”

“All of this stuff is just dust being kicked up by the left,” Bannon said at the time.

They say they’ll fight this in court and start their classes in the fall as originally scheduled. But I wouldn’t bet on that.

This is only the latest hurdle that Bannon is facing in his attempt to help the far-right grow its reach in Europe. His funding of extremist parties ended before it even started last year, after the Guardian revealed that foreign donations, like the ones the millionaire was planning to make, would break electoral laws in a dozen European countries.

It’s pretty sad that Bannon is too much of a crook to pursue fascism in Italy at a time when the fascists are already running the place.

Our President Has Shit for Brains

My 9 year-old son knows considerably more about the Constitution and how impeachment works than the current president of the United States.

My old friend noz has helpfully done a grammatical deconstruction of the wording of impeachment in the United States Constitution:

It is true the Constitution says “high crimes and misdemeanors.” But what is the larger context? Let’s look at the whole sentence:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Did you see that? There is actually an “or” in there. The sentence says that the President can be impeached for Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The “and” between “crimes” and “misdemeanors” doesn’t mean you need both. Because it is part of a larger disjunctive clause, it means that any single high crime, high misdemeanor, instance of bribery, or treason would be enough to impeach.

On the one hand, you’re probably asking yourself, “Who cares?” On the other hand, the president seems to care.

Reporter, May 30: Do you think they’re going to impeach you? Do you think they’re –.

Trump: I don’t see how. They can, because they’re possibly allowed, although I can’t imagine the courts allowing it. I’ve never got into it. I never thought that would even be possible to be using that word. To me, it’s a dirty word, the word impeach. It’s a dirty, filthy, disgusting word and it had nothing to do with me.

So, I don’t think so, because there was no crime. You know it’s high crimes and, not with or or, it’s high crimes and misdemeanors. There was no high crime and there was no misdemeanor, so how do you impeach based on that?

Yes, I know that the “and, with or or” comment was not the most submental thing that the man said. His remark about “the courts” not allowing him to be impeached set a Guinness Book of World Records mark for arrested development in an American male.  My nine-year old son heard that remark on the television and put down his book in frustration: “That’s not how it works! The House of Representatives does the impeaching!” Then he grumbled under his breath, raised his book, and said, “And the Senate holds the trial…”

He’s just finishing up third grade, but he knows his Constitution. For example, there’s Article I, Section 2, Clause 5:

The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

And there’s Article I, Section 3, Clause 6:

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

The only role “the courts” have at all is that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the Senate trial.  But, he does this is a mainly ceremonial capacity and, in any case, by the time there is a trial in the Senate, the president has already been impeached in the House.  Also, that thing about the House having “the sole power of impeachment” makes it plenty clear that “the courts” can’t do a damn thing to stop them.

But Trump managed to get elected president without learning a damn thing about the Constitution, and that also helps explain why he thinks he has to commit both a high crime and a misdemeanor in order to be impeached. I can imagine him shooting someone on Fifth Avenue and then defending himself by saying he’s paid all his parking tickets.

The man’s brain does not function properly. He thinks the House is “possibly” allowed to impeach him but he’s “never got into it.”  Millions of Americans with much less urgent reason to care have “gotten into it,” and they’re not confused. He never thought it was possible to even use the word “impeach” because it’s such a dirty filthy word and has nothing to do with him.

Excuse me while I interject a little aside about filthy words.

Trump: I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.

Unknown: Whoa.

Trump: I did try and fuck her. She was married.

Unknown: That’s huge news.

Trump:…I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

As I was saying, someone injected shit in this man’s cranial cavity. He has committed many demonstrable and blatantly felonious acts, as attested to by (checking my notes) over 1,000 former federal prosecutors who unanimously say “the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”

Yet he thinks “there was no high crime and there was no misdemeanor, so how do you impeach based on that?”

Every single thing he said in that brief response to a reporter’s question was dumber than the dumbest episode of Fox & Friends. There’s only one thing in the impeachment clauses of the Constitution that should give the president comfort, and that comes in the part about the Senate trial:

…And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

He has the undeserved advantage of having a supine majority of Republicans in the Senate. That is his only shield. You’d think he’d be keenly aware of this. It’s the only thing preventing the House from impeaching him the next day they’re in session. It’s the only thing between him and an ignominious exit followed by some serious jail time.

He’s a criminal through and through, and has been since at least the moment he met Roy Cohn back in 1973 and asked for his help beating a housing discrimination rap.  He’s also got shit for brains.

 

Saturday Painting Palooza Vol.720

Hello again painting fans.

This week I will be continuing with the painting the Grand Canyon. The photo that I’m using (mine) is seen directly below. I’ll be using my usual acrylic paints on a 6×6 inch canvas.


When last seen the painting appeared as it does in the photo seen directly below.


Since that time I have continued to work on the painting.

I’m in the process of figuring which colors work best with the various elements. I’m going with a darker brown color for the buttes, some of which is seen in the photo. The more distant rocks will have a lighter version of the same brown. Ochre highlights will be set off nicely.

The current state of the painting is seen in the photo directly below.


I’ll have more progress to show you next week. See you then.

Earlier paintings in this series can be seen here.