The Impeachment Vote is Less About Trump Than the Future of White Supremacy

The Republicans worry that they cannot win without Trump’s base, but they may not be able to win with it.

Historian Kathleen Frydl argues in The American Prospect that “whiteness” has been the one constant in American politics: “Since the country’s founding, one organized political faction has been dedicated to preserving institutionalized racism, whether slavery or its successors.”

Of course, the whiteness faction hasn’t organized itself strictly within party lines, nor has it ever had complete control of either of the two major parties. The closest we’ve come to that is the pre-1960’s Southern Democrats and today’s Republican Party, both of which are strongly identified with the supremacy of whites and white culture.

As Frydl surveys the near-future of the GOP, she hears echoes of the cleavage of the Whig Party, which broke into pro- and anti-slavery factions in the mid 19thCentury before collapsing and giving way to the Party of Lincoln.

This is not a strategy for victory for today’s Republican Party which has lost the popular vote in seven of the last eight presidential elections. Its diminished strength in the Sun Belt, particularly Georgia, Arizona and Texas, is now threatening to remove what’s left of its Electoral College advantage. This lack of presidential viability will present its own problems, but it’s really driven by something much more fundamental–what Frydl sees as not only a white agenda but also “falsehoods” and “baseless conspiracy theories.” She puts it this way: “They cannot win national office without endorsing fabulist conspiracies, and they cannot win national office if they do.” Molly Ball of The Atlantic frames the question in a similar vein: “[Donald] Trump may be done with Washington, but Washington—and particularly his adopted party—is not done with him…”

Republicans can’t put off the question of how to deal with the Florida retiree. Trump will go to trial in the U.S. Senate for incitement of insurrection, stemming from his refusal to concede the election results and attempts to prevent Congress from counting the Electoral College votes on January 6th. If Trump is found guilty, a second vote to prevent him from ever enjoying another “position of honor, trust or profit” would preclude him from making a future run for the presidency.

Many Republican senators, all of whom will be jurors, are saying that the party cannot convict Trump and survive. They are particularly worried that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell will vote to find Trump guilty.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is explicit on this point, arguing earlier this week that “any Republican-leader type who embraces [conviction] is doing a lot of damage to the party,” and “for the party to move forward, we got to move the party with Donald Trump. There’s no way to be a successful Republican Party without having President Trump working with all of us and all of us working with him. That’s just a fact.”

Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin went further, saying “No. No. No.” when asked if he could still support McConnell as caucus leader if he finds against Trump.

Alabama Freshman Sen. Tommy Tuberville, the former head football coach at Auburn University, says a conviction “wouldn’t be good” because “the whole thing is about a team, and if you start separating the team, then it just tears it up.”

These arguments have literally nothing to do with Trump’s guilt, innocence, or suitability for future office. They are solely dedicated to politics, and specifically to the impossibility of the Republican Party being a contender for power if they don’t retain the lion’s share of Trump’s loyal base.

Yet, Trump’s base is virtually synonymous with what Frydl calls the perennial organized faction in American politics that has always “been dedicated to preserving institutionalized racism.” A decision to convict Trump and prevent him from ever running again is therefore not just a vote about one man but about the future of the party. In this case, Trump is the bathwater you want to throw out, but the whiteness faction is the baby you want to keep.

When Frydl says the Republicans “cannot win national office without endorsing fabulist conspiracies, and they cannot win national office if they do,” this isn’t because QAnon is an irreplaceable constituency but because straightforward honest racism isn’t politically palatable and must be channeled and disguised. Presently, the whiteness faction is disguised as a Trump cult of personality and what Graham, Johnson and Tuberville are essentially arguing is that Trump’s hold on that faction is real and unchangeable. If they throw out Trump, they’ll throw the party’s only avenue to power out in the bargain.

Perhaps this is true, but white supremacy has more staying power than a de-platformed ex-president. It may find a more comfortable home than the Republican Party, but it won’t disappear.

McConnell speaks for a different faction. This faction sees Trump less as the representative of a core constituency than an embarrassment and an aberration. Whatever the party’s current problems and future vulnerabilities, it can’t move forward until it is rid of him. The January 6 attack on the Capitol was the final straw, and the institutions of government need to be protected against populist assault. This doesn’t mean that this faction is politically stupid. They, too, are weighing the costs of convicting Trump and wondering if their careers can survive the backlash that would inevitably come.

Yet, they’re also balancing Frydl’s observation that Trumpian “ideas are deeply repellent to the independent and suburban voters Republicans need in order to win many elections.”

In the end, very few Republican senators will base their impeachment vote on Trump’s guilt or innocence, but rather on their assessment of the best way to regain power.

However the senators vote on Trump’s impeachment, their verdict will divide the party from key constituencies it needs to win. Either way, the party will be more divided after Trump’s second impeachment than before it.

Both guilty and innocent verdicts will invite strong third party challenges in the next election, especially if reports about Trump forming some kind of Patriot Party prove true. But the real driver of this crackup is probably not personality-driven. It could be that for the first time in American history, white supremacy is no longer an organizing principle that can bring victory.

Author: BooMan

Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.

18 thoughts on “The Impeachment Vote is Less About Trump Than the Future of White Supremacy”

  1. If McConnel hadn’t just been reelected, he would likely be singing a different tune. He’s almost 80 and presumably he won’t even be on the ballot next time around. He can afford to take a longer view because he won’t be around for much of the short term either. Lindsay Graham, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley are probably going to be running again.

    This might be a moment in which a little gerontocracy isn’t the worst thing. Well, we work with what we have.

    1. His age could be a factor but I don’t see it. To me, it’s Mitch’s normal cold calculation. There may even be a glimmer of love of country. Perhaps he’ll violate every norm in the book but is not willing to go full scale authoritarianism. Maybe! Or maybe he’s scared to see what full scale insurrection looks like. My guess is he’ll realize there’s no way to dump Trump with out dumping the voters necessary to maintain the current coalition. I doubt he’s thinking in terms of beginning to build a new one. It’s all short term with Mitch, all about holding together what’s already there.

  2. Great article, Martin. This is precisely why so many Republicans begged for “unity”. “Please don’t impeach Trump; it will force us to make impossible choices!.” I’m glad Democrats aren’t too inept or incompetent to force this exact vote. It’s great that they get to control the trial too because I’d hate to be reliant on Mitch’s good intentions. Unlike last time, he might have prevented it from coming up for a vote by claiming the House lacked jurisdiction to bring an action against an ex-president.

    Republicans made the choice back in “68 to exploit the Democratic party’s choice to push through the Voting Rights Act. Nixon managed to cobble together a winning coalition and Republicans have been exploiting it ever since. As you point out, McConnell doesn’t want to repudiate that coalition; he just wants to get rid of Trump. Back in 2012, SNL had a sketch in which Romney, during a debate, said, “We’re Republicans. We don’t make racist claims. We imply them.” He wants to bring the Republican party back under the genteel umbrella of terms like busing, welfare queens, Willy Horton, 47 percent, death panels and the like. Trouble is the base adores Trump. I don’t see how they Republicans can get that toothpaste back in the tube. So it’s a full-scale embrace or repudiation of not just Trump but Trumpism and the racism that goes with it is demanded of them. Rock meets hard place.

  3. Part of what I’m reading in this post is that “White Supremacy”, which has basically existed in this country since before it was a country, is being replaced and Republicans aren’t sure what to do about it.

    Another blogger I read and whose links I link here occasionally, is setting up a series of posts about that issue. That White Supremacy as a narrative and myth holding “America” together, and that it should be replaced with a different narrative/myth to hold it together. Here is a link to an outline of the posts, that haven’t been posted yet. Also, I highly recommend reading his blog, he’s a former Republican who was one of the sane ones, who finally quit the party in 2015…late, sure, but his sane opinion is worth something.

    https://www.politicalorphans.com/progress-report/

    Anyway, the Democrats need to bust their asses making the case to convict Trump. If Trump actually got convicted by pulling away a few Republicans, it could be enough to kill off the Republican Party of the past 40+ years and give our country enough time to stop the current collapse.

    1. Thanks for the link. Checked it out. Interesting. I’ve bookmarked it and will return.

      As for the path least (or most) likely to destroy the Republican party, I’m not sure. I see risks both ways. Convict him and piss off a big chunk of your base. Don’t convict and maybe he runs again, stoking Democrats into a frenzy and continuing to alienate a segment of the Republican party. I don’t see a way out for Republicans. I’m not saying there isn’t. Perhaps someone more insightful will see one. Perhaps they’ll stumble blindly into one. Perhaps facts on the ground will cut their way. I just don’t see it.

      1. I would love to see Republicans Convict Trump because I think it would be the most likely way of splitting the party right down the center/center-right, so that Republicans start facing 3rd party challengers in the primary that will win, and then lose in the more purple/sane states.

  4. Terrific post, thank-you.

    One minor historical note: it wasn’t just “pre-1960s Southern Democrats” who were the party of white supremacy. It was the entire Democratic party from its inception up until…well, there’s vigorous debate about this but let’s say 1948—when Hubert Humphrey led the successful effort for a strong civil rights plank in the party’s platform at its national convention, sparking a walkout by the “Dixiecrats”.

    1. 1948 is where I start the clock on the Democratic Party losing it’s southern white supremacy contingent. Strom Thurmond running as a Dixiecrat started the crack-up, and the CRA in ’64 made it all but inevitable. In a brief time period Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren were Republicans, while Strom Thurmond and Rick Perry were Democrats.

  5. I recall a time when republicans came to embrace the south which was always part of the democratic party before then. I recall it around Nixon but no matter, they are now the party of white and Graham is probably right. Trump is very important to them which is why I doubt they will get a conviction. Whiteness seems part of their DNA now with all the joy that comes with it. I wish I knew how to excise it with some super crisper. But no such luck it appears. It carries with it this predilection to lie and even to overthrow the government to keep the myths alive.

Comments are closed.