I have never been invested in the Armenian genocide controversy. I understand why many people insist that America acknowledge the historical record, and I also understand why policymakers have historically balked when faced with threats of Turkish retaliation. When there are two defensible and opposing arguments on an issue, I generally don’t take a hard line even if I have a clear preference.

My preference will always be on the truth and for promoting human rights. For this reason, I agree with Daniel Fried that the Biden administration’s decision to finally acknowledge the genocide is the right one. As Fried explains, Turkey was given a prolonged a patient chance to take control of the narrative themselves by admitting what was done and reconciling with Armenia. They spurned it.

Truthfully, the argument for appeasing Turkey has been weakening as Erdogan’s time in power has moved Turkey away from its traditional close ties with America and towards a less secular and less-western outlook. It’s no longer clear what it is that Turkey offers that we’re afraid to jeopardize by being honest about the historical record.

Most of all, I’m just unsympathetic to Turkey’s position on the issue. It’s similar to how I feel about Americans who don’t want to reckon with our history of slavery and our decimation of the Native American population. I’ve never understood what is really gained by whitewashing history. America is not defined by the worst elements of its past, and Turkey is no different. Instead, the risk is that past sins continue to burden us because we won’t come to terms with them.

I don’t judge Turkey by what they did to the Armenians during World War One, but I do judge them by their lack of contrition and their bullying efforts to prevent their friends from stating the obvious.

There will be blowback, but I don’t think the blowback will last long or match the worrywarts’ worst fears.