Merriam Webster defines smoking gun as “something that serves as conclusive evidence or proof (as of a crime or scientific theory).” In politics, it has often been used to describe evidence that sways even members of the party of the person under investigation.
Most notably, “smoking gun” was used to describe the release of tapes from Nixon’s Oval Office conversations immediately following the 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters at the Watergate Office Building. In particular was one that captured a discussion between Nixon and his chief of staff H.R. Halderman. The two discussed asking the head of the CIA to put pressure on the FBI director to halt the bureau’s investigation into the Watergate break-in because it was a national security matter. On August 4, 1974, the tape of that discussion was made public.
At that point, Nixon’s remaining political support on Capitol Hill all but disappeared. The 10 Republican members of the Judiciary Committee who had voted against impeachment in committee announced that they would now vote for impeachment once the matter reached the House floor.
Nixon lacked support in the Senate as well. Sens. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.) and Hugh Scott (R-Pa.), the minority leader, told Nixon that no more than 15 senators were willing to even consider an acquittal.
But that was 47 years ago. Things have changed. If you’re waiting for a smoking gun to bring down Trump and his enablers, it is beyond time to recognize that it isn’t going to happen. That’s not because there is a lack of conclusive evidence that the former president and his allies repeatedly obstructed justice, abused power, incited a riot at the Capitol, and attempted a coup to overturn an election. Instead, it is because no amount of evidence is going to shake Republican support.
As just one example, both during and immediately after the January 6 insurrection, Trump’s enablers in Congress and right wing media knew that he had incited the riot and that he might be the only one who could end it. That is what the texts to Mark Meadows indicated as they practically begged the chief of staff to convince Trump to stop it.
On January 13, Kevin McCarthy said, “The president bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters.” Similarly, Mitch McConnell made it clear that “There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.” Even so, neither of these Republican leaders have done anything to hold the former president accountable. Instead, they’ve done everything in their power to protect him from the consequences of his actions.
I suspect that most Republican politicians know the danger Trumpism poses to our country. But they also know that, with the grip the former president has on the GOP, taking him down would mean that the entire party goes with him. That’s not something they’re willing to risk. As Jamie Raskin pointed out,”fascism is not an ideology; it’s just a strategy for taking power and maintaining it.”
The one thing the fascists have today that Nixon didn’t is the epistemic closure created by an entire network of right wing news outlets. They create a path for the fascists to take, while providing cover for criminality. As long as Republican voters buy into that distorted reality, their leaders won’t challenge it. In other words, there is a self-reinforcing feedback loop between right wing media, Republican voters, and GOP leaders. Anyone who dares to step out of that loop (ie, Liz Cheney) is vilified and excommunicated from the cult.
All of that is why there will never be a smoking gun that brings the whole thing down. I am reminded of the fact that, prior to the 2016 election, we all heard audio tape of Trump bragging about being able to “grab p***y.” That didn’t stop almost 63 million Americans from voting for him. The one time he told the truth was when he said that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue in broad daylight and his supporters wouldn’t abandon him…even as he held the smoking gun.
Some Nazis never backed off. They gave the Hitler salute just before swinging from a rope. The reason is clear enough: there’s no coming back from Nazi crimes. You can’t admit that you were wrong, seek forgiveness, make amends, and be reintegrated into society. There’s no pathway for that. But on the whole, Nazism was defeated militarily and when West Germans found they could build a decent life through western-style economics and politics, they embraced it and did their best to forget the war until their kids got old enough to call them out for it.
I don’t know if there are any lessons for us in that. Trump was defeated electorally, but that wasn’t enough. I think going abroad for analogies is probably a mistake. The defeat of Trump is more like the defeat of the Confederacy. It didn’t bring an end to the ideology and white supremacy entrenched itself for several generations after the defeat of the South. Confederate-style thinking has been a curse on our politics from the foundation and it isn’t going away any time soon.
Spot on.
I agree with your analysis except the part where you equate Trump’s “defeat” to the defeat of the Confederacy.
The Confederacy surrendered. Their ideology remained, but they had their entire way of life overthrown and altered permanently.
Modern US Fascists have only barely lost a small battle and have learned a lot from their mistakes. They barely lost the Senate, barely lost the White House, and GAINED House seats.
The only way we keep fascists from taking the government and holding it until we forcibly take it back is winning in 2022 and 2024. If by February 2025 Republicans control all three branches of the Federal Government and a majority of state governments, don’t expect them to give back power by any other means than force.
I agree with that. I think the electoral defeat of Trump was only a minor setback for them. My comparison was of type, not magnitude. I think we very likely will enter an era a lot like post-reconstruction and Jim Crow. But it will be a different sort of Jim Crow and it may not be as durable. The Civil War was traumatic and it was an experience that entrenched an identity that the North – victorious and interested in reconciliation – was willing to tolerate.
What strong and durable identity has been created via Trumpism and how durable is it? Generations after the Civil War, white southerners would (and probably still do) talk about their ancestors and their heritage, because the experience was so intense. So once this new Jim Crow regime is in place, I am not convinced that it will be as durable because the coalition that brought it about is not bound together by anything very significant. The southerners of post-reconstruction were upset that their family and neighbors had fought, died, and lost. That’s a real and intense feeling.
The Trumpists of today are upset about whatever they are hearing on Fox News. Fox News is effective only in so far as it can cover over the incompetence of guys like Trump.
If the new Jim Crow regime sucks for everyone, it will last about a decade.
A decade is still too long. But agree there was no war behind the Trump anger, but an awful lot of hurt feelings and beliefs. It is hard to accept the irrational response to the election loss in the face of the poll results. Are they all suffering from narcissism or just ignorance? Or like the response of many states simply angling for unquestioned power? it is all so ugly and seemingly no way to end it.
I don’t know how many smoking guns it will take, but we’ve seen several already.
The problem is that Democratic leadership refuses to make Trump and the Republicans pay for their treason.