Midweek Cafe and Lounge, Vol. 261

Hi.

It’s been quite a week. I’m just supposed to be light entertainment, but it’s been a hell of a week. I don’t think I have that in me, to be blunt. I’m barely too young to remember the pre-Roe-v-Wade times. I have to rely on elders to understand what that was about. It appears we are going to revert to those bad old days again, in the midst of several other crises, including a potential world war. There was a line in a decade-old film Argo, where one of the characters laments that “even when there’s good news, there’s bad news.” That seems to be the lot of our lives now. Betty White’s in the ground for just a few months, and everything goes to hell. I just don’t know what else to say. Aside from this space being a bit of a respite from the left-wing nationalist crowd (that is really a thing, if you think about it), I tried to keep it light. Those days are over. For all the roasting I took advocating for HRC’s election, and I got a lot of torment in 2016 in a variety of forums, I will conclude by saying that she was right. The courts were the end game. Most of those who stuck to the whole “I want my purity pony” perspective seem to be gone now, and good riddance. In the meantime, not only do we have to be very worried about reproductive health for women, but also the civil liberties of the LGBTQ community, those who married from different races or ethnicities, etc., based on the logic that underpinned Roe v Wade. We are entering a dark era. I know no comic relief. I know no songs that would offer solace. It’s time to fight.

The Only Way to Fight Back Against a Radicalized Supreme Court

My head is swirling with reactions to the leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s ruling that, if legitimate, will overturn Roe vs. Wade. While it’s likely that some of the wording might get changed before a final version is released by the court, I don’t think there’s much doubt that four justices are prepared to join Alito’s draft.

One of my reactions is to note that a lot of people are suggesting that those of us who are pro-choice must organize to protect women’s reproductive freedom. But if Alito’s draft – which specifically sends this issue back to the states – is legitimate, it’s too late for that, as the Guttmacher Institute previously pointed out.

If Roe were overturned or fundamentally weakened, 22 states have laws or constitutional amendments already in place that would make them certain to attempt to ban abortion as quickly as possible…

By the time the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the Mississippi case, there will be nine states in this group with an abortion ban still on the books from before Roe v. Wade, 13 states with a trigger ban tied to Roe being overturned, five states with a near-total abortion ban enacted after Roe, 11 states with a six-week ban that is not in effect and one state (Texas) with a six-week ban that is in effect, one state with an eight-week ban that is not in effect and four states whose constitutions specifically bar a right to abortion. Some states have multiple types of bans in place.

In those 22 states, it would take affirmative legislation to strike down those bans in order to protect a woman’s right to chose. Given that they are all either red or swing states, that isn’t going to happen. So if you live in one of them, women’s reproductive rights will be gone once Alito’s opinion is released. There are an additional four states that, given their political composition and history, are likely to ban abortion as soon as possible.

So to be completely clear, we will NOT be in a position to “protect” women’s reproductive rights, but to fight to get them back. That is a monumental shift that we all have to grapple with.

Given the current make-up of the Supreme Court with its lifetime appointments, the place to fight back won’t be in the courts. That is why this part of President Biden’s reaction to the leaked draft is so important:

[I]f the Court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.

To bolster that argument, it is important to remember how we got here. Ever since Barack Obama was elected president, Mitch McConnell’s plan has been to abuse the filibuster to obstruct the passage of legislation. Even when Republicans were in the majority and Trump was president, McConnell was content to neuter congress on pretty much everything other than tax cuts for his wealthy donors.

Meanwhile, the Republican leader of the senate set out to stack the courts. We all watched as he cynically refused to even hold hearings (much less a vote) on Obama’s nominee. That wasn’t because of some issue with Merrick Garland. Republicans like the late Senator Orrin Hatch had previously claimed that Garland would be a consensus nominee before Obama chose him. Instead, it was a blatant attempt to stack the court with extremist conservatives, which McConnell went on to claim as his “most consequential political accomplishment.”

The result was a neutered congress and an empowered Supreme Court. That is exactly what McConnell’s plan was all about and we’re now experiencing the disastrous consequences of that strategy.

Given that it will takes years (and possibly even decades) to rebalance the court, the one way to fight back is to ensure that pro-choice Democrats keep their majority in the House and make significant gains in the Senate. Since gaining a 67-seat majority is unlikely, the goal should be to elect Democrats who are willing to overturn the filibuster and pass legislation that restores women’s reproductive freedom.

But every election in every state will be critical, including those for governor and state legislators. That is because Alito’s draft makes it clear that overturning Roe is just the beginning of what this Supreme Court will attempt to do. He claims that, while the Due Process Clause in the 14th Amendment (on which the Roe decision was based) might guarantee some rights that aren’t mentioned explicitly in Constitution, such rights have to be “deeply rooted in this nation’s history and tradition.” That is a terrifying position.

https://twitter.com/SKenson/status/1521302204845637636?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1521302204845637636%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fimmasmartypants.blogspot.com%2F2022%2F05%2Fthe-only-way-to-fight-back-against.html

In other words, all of the blood, sweat, and tears that have been spilled over the years in order to build “a more perfect union” could be sent down the drain by this group of extremists on the Supreme Court. That is the gauntlet that has been thrown down by the radical right at this moment in time. It is what will be on the ballot in every election going forward – starting with this November – as long as they hold a solid majority on the Supreme Court.

The Republican reaction to this news provides a slight glimmer of hope. Rather than celebrating the seeming demise of Roe, they are entirely focused on ginning up outrage over the leak of Alito’s draft. In other words, they’re signaling that, coming six months prior to the midterms, this ruling is very likely to upset the dynamics that had them counting the days until they won majorities. It is incumbent on us to ensure that their newly-found concern is justified.

I Wish It Had Never Come to This

It’s incredibly sad that our country has been taken over by religious zealots.

I most likely have been infected with some kind of coronavirus, although not COVID-19, fortunately. This is one of the worst “common colds” I’ve ever had and it keeps getting gradually more miserable despite all my efforts at mitigation. It’s one of those deals where you can’t sleep because you can’t breath through your nose, and your nose is also on fire. It’s also like you only have access to your thoughts after you’ve looked through a fish bowl. It’s not optimal for writing, to say the least.

What deep insights can I offer on the revelation that, as I expected, the Supreme Court is about to completely eviscerate women’s reproductive rights? For some reason, my overriding emotion is just shame. I’m not happy to be associated with these bastards through my white male identity. I, once again, have seen my pride and gratitude in being an American take a gigantic hit. I shouldn’t feel guilt but somehow I do–much more than anger at all the people who didn’t take this threat seriously enough.

But I don’t even want to talk about how this impacts me. I’ll never be impregnated or share my body and nutrients with a fellow traveler. And I’m not really interested in assigning blame, either. I could vent about Ralph Nader or Jill Stein or Susan Collins, but what’s the point?

Of course, we only know for certain that Roe v. Wade is about to be overturned because someone leaked a copy of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft majority opinion. A lot of people are distracted by that, trying to surmise who could be responsible. I kind of want to know, just out of natural curiosity, but I also don’t much care.

It’s true that the Supreme Court will be roiled by this transgression since it’s hard for them to function normally if they have to worry that their drafts will go public. I suppose that’s a significant part of this story even if it feels utterly beside the point. What matters is the shitty opinion, not when or how we learned of it.

Of course, Alito’s draft is just that–a draft. It’s an incredibly radical document which is likely why it was leaked. The eventual majority opinion may be quite different although the basic outcome is not in any doubt. It’s not the right time to delve too deeply into the political implications, but this should reshuffle some things. It will impact relative enthusiasm in the midterm elections. There will be some party shifting. The balance between federal versus state and local politics will be different.

Frankly, I don’t know how strong and immediate the blowback will be. I wish I didn’t have to find out. I’m basically just sorry this is happening. If I could make it go away, I would.

Does It Matter If Hitler Was Part Jewish?

His family tree has no bearing on what happened in Nazi Germany or what is happening in Ukraine today.

It’s not unusual for people to make shit up about political leaders. In America, we recently went through the Birther drama, where Barack Obama was alleged to have been born in Kenya rather than Honolulu, and therefore was somehow an illegitimate president. The truth about Adolf Hitler’s family tree was a subject of speculation and propaganda throughout his public life. This was in large part because his father was a bastard and the identity of his paternal grandfather a mystery.  Opponents of Hitler therefore could speculate freely with whatever theory they thought would hurt him most with a given target audience. Was he the product of incest? Was he part-Jewish?

The idea that Hitler grandfather might have been a Jew, and that Hitler was therefore one-eighth Jewish, was used to attack his credibility. The idea was offensive to everyone. The Nazis saw it as a calumnious lie. Jews saw it as a way to blame them for their own persecution. Hitler himself was worried enough that the rumor might be believed (or even be true) that in 1930 he asked Hans Frank to investigate the claim. For anyone who thinks the truth of the matter is of any great consequence, it’s important to realize that Hitler didn’t know the answer.

The subject is in the news today because Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made the following remarks on Sunday during an interview with an Italian media outlet.

When asked how Russia can claim that it is fighting to “de-Nazify” Ukraine when President Volodymyr Zelensky is himself Jewish, Mr Lavrov said: “I could be wrong, but Hitler also had Jewish blood. [That Zelensky is Jewish] means absolutely nothing. Wise Jewish people say that the most ardent anti-Semites are usually Jews.”

Those remarks evoked swift condemnation from the Jewish community and especially the Israeli press, which is treating the matter of Hitler’s alleged “Jewish blood” as utterly without foundation. Yet, the Jerusalem Post took the question seriously in August 2019 when they reported on a new study that claimed to confirm the allegation.

Now, Hans Frank went on to be an important architect of the Holocaust and he was tried at Nuremberg and hanged in 1946. In 1953, his memoirs emerged, along with his claim that his investigation in 1930 had confirmed that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was a Jew. The proof was that a Jew had made child support payments.

“Frank wrote in his memoir that he conducted an investigation as Hitler had requested, and that he discovered the existence of correspondence between Maria Anna Schicklgruber – Hitler’s grandmother – and a Jew named Frankenberger living in Graz. According to Frank, the letters hinted that Frankenberger’s 19-year-old son had impregnated Maria Anna while she worked in the Frankenberger household: …that the illegitimate child of the Schickelgruber [sic] had been conceived under conditions which required Frankenberger to pay alimony.”

Sax writes in the study that according to the letters in Frank’s memoir, “Frankenberger Sr. sent money for the support of the child from infancy until its 14th birthday.”

These allegations have been questioned on the theory that no Jews were known to be living in Graz, Austria at the time. The 2019 study supporting the allegation is based on new evidence that there actually was a small Jewish community living there. But, of course, that proves nothing.

Under the race laws extant under the Third Reich, a one-eighth Jewish Hitler would have been a candidate for his own death camps–certainly some kind twisted irony, as well as a world historical double standard and example of rank hypocrisy. These things certainly mattered politically at the time but I don’t see how they make any moral difference now.

Hitler’s race theories were bunk, and we should no more apply them to him in retrospect than he should have been applied them at the time.

If you’re interested in the truth, however, there are more facts of interest. William Stuart-Houston (born William Patrick Hitler) was the son of Hitler’s half-brother, Alois. He was raised in Liverpool, England, but went to Germany when his uncle came to power. Dissatisfied with the banking job he secured he actually had the temerity to threaten “the Fuhrer” with blackmail on the matter of his paternal grandfather. He eventually wound up a U.S. citizen and fought against Hitler during the war.

Now the Russians are reviving this theory to suggest that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, like Hitler, is a self-hating Jew who embraces Naziism. That’s a truly despicable charge. It’s flatly untrue that Zelensky in running a Nazi regime even if he tolerates some neo-Nazis in the armed services–primarily in the Azov regiment which is presently being wiped out in Mariupol.

The Azov regiment was initially created in May 2014 as the Azov Battalion, named for the body of water where Mariupol and its now-destroyed port are, to defend the city when it came under attack by pro-Moscow forces. At the time, it was known for its nationalist, far-right members, which has been used by the Kremlin to justify its military campaign as having “antifascist” aims.

The group’s controversial reputation lingers, and though it still has some nationalist members, analysts say the unit, now called the Azov regiment, has evolved since its was incorporated into the regular combat forces of the Ukrainian military.

Lavrov’s comments deserve the strong condemnation they’re receiving, but not because it’s outrageous to suggest that Hitler might have been part-Jewish. They’re outrageous because he accuses Zelensky of being an anti-Semite, and because he suggests that Hitler was motivated by self-hatred when the evidence indicates he was as unsure of his lineage as historians are today.

Most of all, it doesn’t matter who Hitler’s true grandfather was because Hitler is responsible for his own actions. The horror of the Holocaust is not heightened nor mitigated, let alone explained, by the answer to this question.

It is interesting to consider, however, that Hitler’s “official” grandfather was named Johann Georg Hiedler and “Hitler” seems to have been some kind of bureaucratic transcription error. So, Adolf Hitler should have gone in history as a Hiedler–and ostensibly the product of first cousins. Alternatively, he could have kept his grandmother’s name of Schicklgruber. And if his grandfather really was a Jew named Frankenberger, well, he could have been known by that name.

As for his nephew, William Patrick Hitler, who changed his name to William Stuart-Houston, he had four sons (including one born in 1949 named Alexander Adolf) but none of them had children. According to disputed reports, this was a result of pact between them. The idea being that, experiencing it themselves, they shouldn’t burden anyone with being a relative of Hitler.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the fewer biological heirs to Hitler there are, the better.

The People Are Shrugging Off January 6

Despite mounting evidence that congressional Republicans are implicated in the coup, the public is gearing to put them in power.

On Saturday, all the Bluegrass Republican bigwigs got together in Smithfield, Kentucky to have a big rally for Senator Rand Paul’s reelection bid. Sen. Paul promised, if given a third six-year term, to get to the bottom of the origins of the COVID-19 virus Soon-to-be (probably) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell promised that Paul will become the chairman of the Senate Health (HELP) Committee next year and thereby be in a perfect position to conduct his inquiries.

At the Kentucky GOP rally for Paul, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, the state’s senior senator, also pointed to Paul’s opportunity to lead a committee if the GOP wins Senate control.

If that occurs, he said, Paul would become chairman of “one of the most important committees in the Senate — in charge of health, education, labor and pensions.”

McConnell was upbeat about Republican prospects in November.

“I’ve never seen a better environment for us than this year,” said McConnell, who is in line to again become majority leader if the GOP reclaims the Senate.

The article cited above is from the Associated Press. McConnell’s optimism is buttressed by the latest NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll which shows for the “first time in eight years…Marist’s survey has found Republicans with an advantage on the congressional ballot test.” As things stand, the Democrats are on course to get slaughtered in the midterm elections.

The AP is also running this story right now.

…a batch of startling evidence…shows the deep involvement of some House Republicans in Trump’s desperate attempt to stay in power. A review of the evidence finds new details about how, long before the attack on the Capitol unfolded, several GOP lawmakers were participating directly in Trump’s campaign to reverse the results of a free and fair election…

…The Republicans plotting with Trump and the rioters who attacked the Capitol were aligned in their goals, if not the mob’s violent tactics, creating a convergence that nearly upended the nation’s peaceful transfer of power.

“It appears that a significant number of House members and a few senators had more than just a passing role in what went on,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, told The Associated Press last week.

There’s some modestly good news in the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll which finds that President Biden’s approval numbers have improved a bit over the last two months, but not enough to project success for his party at the ballot box.

What we’re dealing with is an electorate that is not responding to evidence that the Republican Party tried to overturn a presidential election and install a dictator by force.

Maybe that will change when the January 6 committee holds its public hearings beginning in June and lays out its evidence but the current situation is absolutely appalling and terrifying.