It counts as a service that Tom Rogan took the effort at the Washington Examiner to explain that Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against CNN is a load of crap and should fail. It’s rare to see anything produced for that audience that is level-headed and factual.

The suit, which takes issue with the on-air talent at CNN fairly consistently comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler, can’t overcome the First Amendment right to speak one’s mind. When it comes to public figures like the president of the United States, people have strong opinions and they’re allowed to express them provided there’s no malice. “Malice” is defined as knowing what you’re saying is false and not caring. But comparing contemporary political figures to historical ones isn’t subject to factual verification.

Rogan makes a straightforward case both for why Trump’s suit will not succeed and for why it should not succeed. He also knows who he’s trying to persuade:

In this case, Trump’s lawyers must prove either that CNN knew said statements were false or recklessly and deliberately aired them without concern for accuracy…

…In Europe, defamation lawsuits are used to deter reporting and commentary as much as to contend with it after the fact. The wealthy and powerful can threaten bankruptcy with legal fees and drawn-out proceedings, even if what was said is ultimately upheld. Were this standard applied to the U.S., vibrant conservative blogs and social media commentary would cease to exist in any form similar to today.

Europe is a constant punching bag of the right, but it’s true that the U.S. has more press freedom. It’s also true that U.S. conservative blogs and social media are so committed to recklessly and deliberately false activities that they’d face an existential crisis if held to a stronger defamation standard.

It’s ironic, but our country is struggling to contend with the repercussions of the right-wing’s commitment to misinformation. Most famously, this led to the mass-delusion coup attempt on January 6, 2021, after which Trump was suspended from Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Twitter.

The way I see it, the right has been abusing their First Amendment rights to such a degree that they’re responsible for restricting everyone else’s freedom of expression. This gives them little ground to stand on when complaining about comparisons to Nazis.

What they’ve done is force us all to consider the limits of free speech. We have a government to protect, and we can’t have insurrections based on nothing but lies. We also have to protect people from fraud and incitement to crime. How many people are on trial or have already been convicted of criminal activity related to January 6? Most of them were victims of The Big Lie.

Suspending people from social media for spreading malicious lies is one way of trying to deal with the problem, but it resets freedom of expression for everyone. It’s a sign that there are only so many lies the system can bear before it begins to crack.

Rogan didn’t raise these points, perhaps because he doesn’t agree with them, but also because his audience wouldn’t listen. But they might be receptive to the message that if CNN is restricted in what they can say, then they too will have their freedom of expression curtailed.