Corporate law can be confusing. For example, former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen H. Weisselberg was forced to pay two million dollars in back taxes and fines after he was convicted on Tuesday of “a ‘systematic’ scheme to defraud state and federal tax authorities spanning more than 15 years.” Yet, when the Trump Organization itself was sentenced for the same crime on Friday, and received the maximum allowable fine, it only amounted to $1.61 million.

It’s true that Weisselberg also received a five month sentence on Riker’s Island, while the Trump Organization only received the ignominy of being a felon. But that adds to the disparity in the sentences. The scheme obviously benefitted more than one employee as well as the Trump Organization as a whole, so it seems unreasonable that the financial penalty for any single employee would be greater than for the corporation as a whole.

It’s also weird that a corporation can be called a felon. No matter what any judge says, corporations are not people. Proof of this is that Weisselberg can be incarcerated while the Trump Organization cannot.

In this case, the judge agreed with New York prosecutors that although it “may have limited impact on a multibillion corporation, this court should nonetheless impose” the maximum fine. But why is the law set up so the the maximum penalty for a felony will have a limited impact?