One of PM Tony Blair’s advisers has revealed that in January, 2003 President Bush told Blair in a telephone call that he “wanted to go beyond Iraq” in dealing with the spread of illicit weapons, and mentioned Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in a list of countries posing particular problems” according to this article in the International Herald Tribune by Douglas Jehl of the NYT.
This might shake up those allies a bit…
The comment appears in the new American edition of the book Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules from FDR’s Atlantic Charter to George W. Bush’s Illegal War by Phillipe Sands.
According to the article, the secret notes were taken by Matthew Rycroft who was Blair’s private secretary at the time and the author of the now infamous Downing Street Memo.
Although the exact meaning of the comment is vague, it appears in the context of a two page document that says “Bush wanted to go beyond Iraq in dealing with WMD proliferation, mentioning in particular Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea and Pakistan”.
Remember the A Q Khan fiasco? And what of Saudi Arabia? What does Bush know that he’s not telling us? According to GlobalSecurity.org, the Saudis don’t have any WMD but newspapers in 2003 were buzzing with Saudi Arabia’s plans to acquire a nuclear bomb – long after Bush’s January, 2003 comments to Blair.
As for the move towards the war in Iraq:
But Bush was also said to be “worried about Saddam playing tricks” and the possibility that Hans Blix, the top United Nations weapons inspector, would report “that Saddam was beginning to cooperate.”
“His biggest concern was looking weak,” the British document said, describing Bush.
It said that the two leaders had agreed that United Nations inspectors in Iraq should be given “weeks not months,” to complete their work.
The fix was indeed in. If Bush’s biggest concern at the time was not looking weak and that was one of his justifications for the illegal war in Iraq, I’d say he has a helluva lot of explaining to do the the families and friends of the now almost 2,000 US soldiers who have died and all of the coalition members – not to mention the thousands wounded and the uncounted Iraq casualties.
Very interesting! To say the least…
Great diary Catnip!
Thanks. I posted it late last nite when I was really tired and should have been in bed so it’s a bit repetitive and doesn’t have much extra research to it ie. what is Saudi Arabia’s weapon status these days? Afaic, the more secret tidbits that leak out about Bush, the better.
Thanks for the diary. Something I did not realize, Pakistan has substantial oil fields. Hmm, might that have something to do with this too?
http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2005/10/07/afx2266186.html
our friends at Powell’s Books, Gerald Posner’s book Secrets of the Kingdom: The Inside Story of the Saudi-U.S. Connection:
According to the review in the Washington Post, Posner writes that:
So, even if Saudi Arabia does not currently have a nuclear explosive device, they sure can make life miserable for the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Always was the plan, not new. According to Gen’l Clark, The Pentagon was abuzz with plans to “drain the swamp” from Syria to Morocco iirc, and they were making war plans for a seven nation “tour”. They expected it all to go like Afghanistan but got bogged down in Iraq……and as soon as they get unbogged, I think it will be game on.
In a weird sense, we got lucky with Iraq because it bought us time to actually examine the policy.
Parenthetically, I might add, this may be the draw for the so-called foreign fighters in Iraq. Because this has all been out in the wind for a while. In theater foreign fighter recruiters in the other five countries may well be saying to the recruits, ” Better to fight them over there in Iraq, than to fight them here at home.”
And they have had “operatives” in Iraq forever, and RentaKurds for over a year.