One piece of change I can believe in is that the White House reached out to me and many other bloggers today and invited us to participate in a conference call with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Peter Orszag, who explained the administration’s budget proposals and took several questions. The whole experience was a little like being transported into an episode of The West Wing where you go over public policy and legislative strategies in a context where it actually means something. Of course, in this case, the decisions have already been made, but the effect is similar.
Director Orszag has the ability to explain complex budgetary decisions in everyday terms, which makes him a valuable spokesman for the administration’s policies. One interesting thing he discussed was a provision they plan on placing in the tax code which will make 28% the maximum rate at which you can make itemized deductions. This is a tax hike that will only effect people paying a higher marginal tax rate, and the additional revenue will go to making a ‘down payment’ on the health care reforms. As Orszag explained, this is a tax hike that was not a part of Obama’s campaign, but which is made necessary by the economic downturn so as to not have to water down Obama’s health care proposals.
We also discussed other reforms that will raise revenues, including new provisions that will examine business expenditures to see if they really serve a legitimate business purpose, or are only made to exploit tax loopholes. He mentioned another proposal that would eliminate the ability of corporations to keep foreign-based profits off their books and thereby indefinitely postpone paying taxes on them.
Orszag emphasized that the health care reforms are aimed at saving money in the long-run, and he went over provisions to save money in the Medicare system, and to incentivize hospitals to save money on end-of-life care, among other reforms.
A lot of what he had to say is available in the public domain or was stated earlier at this morning’s press briefing with Council of Economic Advisers’ chair Christina Romer. But it is a sure sign of the administration’s interest in reaching out to the party activists that they set aside time to talk directly to the blogosphere. It’s an impressive change and a personal honor to be invited to participate in these kinds of calls. I want to personally thank Jesse Lee for the opportunity.
The administration is definitely making an effort to understand and work with new media outlets, and we’re all going to benefit from it.
Policy wonk boners all around, eh?
For things being as bad as they are, there is so much to be hopeful for when democracy actually functions.
Paging Josh Lyman.
Is there a list of who gets to participate?
congrats!
it’s invitation only, but I’m unaware of any list. People that I heard ask questions were: mcjoan from Daily Kos, Johnathon Singer from MyDD, John Aravosis from AmericaBlog, Chris Hayes from The Nation, and someone from a blog named something like writehowItalk. There was probably one or two others I’ve forgotten.
Anybody on the right side of the blogosphere invited?
I know Aravosis was screaming about the lack of this kind of involvement with the blogs during the transition and first weeks of the Administration, so I hope he notes the change.
What I hope is that the “new media” people don’t start acting like the old media people and be so honored to be “included” that they become stenographers for the party line being put out by the White House.
I’m not saying that happened this time but it certainly seems a risk to me. Because making an effort to understand and work with new media outlets can also be phrased as making an effort to use new media outlets to get out their message in the form that they want disseminated.
And I don’t think that should be the job of any media outlet. Old or new. The 4th estate should not be a limb on the administrative branch.
I hear you. But don’t expect me to take it for granted that I’m supposed to be such calls. It’s an honor, and that’s all I’m saying.
It’s a way cool honor, BooMan!
I hear you.
But it’s a duty too.
The way the Associated Press people who are honored to be invited to press briefings also have a duty to the rest of us.
At least that’s the way I look at it.
In the past, the Washington Press corp has dined at the homes of Washington’s Policymakers. How many of you would attend dinner at a friend’s house one night, and then blast them online the next over a policy disagreement? That’s largely why it doesn’t happen.
I think for Booman it would take more than being invited to the calls. But I do think it would also have somewhat of a chilling effect. If you blast the plan, you’re not likely to be invited to the next call. Or maybe I’m thinking of past situations. Maybe the Obama team would be braver in that regard. Hmmm.
Congratulations, BooMan.
Must drive the Fox News type outfits mad to realise they are being downgraded to the level of low life bloggers. Soon the message will be out: tradmed isn’t where its at and really doesn’t matter all that much any more. What these high maintenance types – and their corporate sponsors – fear most of all that they will cease to be relevant in the greater scheme of things. What Napster did to the music industry, you can do to the MSM.
I hear Martb2004’s fears of co-option, but I don’t think that will be a big issue. The blogosphere is so varied that trying to get it to project just one message is like herding cats – and some pretty wild ones at that.
Congratulations and keep up the good work.
Cool! Thanks for the report, Booman. You weren’t wearing your pajamas were you?
Well, Obama relaxed the dress code. I hope Andy Card won’t be horrified to learn I wasn’t wearing a jacket and tie. No pajamas though, and I wasn’t in my mother’s basement.
kudos! boo.
hey that IS good news, both for you specifically and gthe blogosphere as a whole.
one question i have is if SS reform came up. Jane Hamsher has been fairly critical of Orzag, but to be honest I have been way too busy myself to follow the story. Atrios has had a few words as well… did it come up? and what was said, if you can speak to that?
Social Security did not come up.
Hmm, I have yet to see much listening however. That I have a front row seat to be lectured is interesting but considering the DFHs have been right almost every time since 2001 I’d like a little more than being talked at.
I suppose I should add, I’m glad this happened as far as it went and it’s better than what has gone before.