This is something that has been on my mind for some time, yet I still haven’t quite figured out where I am going with it. Over the past decade, this country has fallen from grace in a big way. Granted, “grace” is overstated, since there were many stains on the integrity and hypocritical nature of what we say as opposed to what we do long before Mister Bush took office in 2001.
But even taking that all into consideration, the way that this country’s promise and opportunity was hijacked – not by “republicans” or “Democrats” or even “neoconservatives” per se – since 2001 makes one (or at least makes me) look at what has gone on and how much respectability has been lost and wasted by a combination of greed, money, arrogance and wanton disregard for the rule of law.
In 2004, I thought that things would get better once Kerry was elected. Or, at least, it wouldn’t continue to get worse. Sadly, even if Kerry did win, much would still be the same – sure, there wouldn’t be such a mess of the Justice Department, and there would be two people other than John Roberts and Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court, and we wouldn’t be dumping hundreds of billions into Iraq and a good number of other horrific things that are a direct result of the abomination that is the current Executive Branch.
But most of the problems facing Americans would still be big, regardless of who is in the White House – just a degree of how big.
That being said, it isn’t really worth playing the “what might have been” game, because Bush is in office, not Kerry. And with the way that Bush and many in Congress have been acting, the “just wait until Democrats are in the majority” line of thinking has been an even bigger disappointment when it comes to just how far we have to go in order to regain any respectability or advance any real progressive causes.
There is no credible explanation other than “they don’t represent us” that would explain the capitulation on Iraq funding or on FISA and the failure to have any meaningful consequences from the investigations that have been launched, nor the interest in stopping torture (or at least bringing this to light when it was first learned), the selling out of the middle class for oil and gas companies on the energy bill, the reckless disregard for the budget deficit on the AMT legislation or the challenges by Democratic party “elite” to progressive candidates by the DLC.
It’s even worse on the “other side” as the number of republicans who aren’t absolutely repulsive has dwindled to, at best, a single digit number. Stopping legislation that would help the middle class, that would be fair on wiretapping, would eliminate unnecessary and unaffordable tax cuts for special interests, stonewalling and lying and withholding documents and looking the other way about crime, corruption or the favored few are just a few of the many anti-American things that are done.
All just to show that they can obstruct everything because if they can’t get exactly what they want every time then nobody will get anything.
The same tools that wouldn’t be used by Democrats when they were in the minority (specifically by Reid and a few other Senators) are being used at every turn. Even Presidential candidates who are standing up for the Constitution are being railroaded by their own party “leadership”, while a number of impeachable offenses have occurred and been uncovered since last November with no consequences.
The same special interests are being rewarded and sheltered from accountability while not being prosecuted or seriously investigated for their complicity in violating federal law or international treaty. The election in November 2006 was supposed to take care of this. The election of 2006 was supposed to change the status quo and bring us in a new direction. Yet, impeachment was taken off the table immediately, and there has been little in the way of accountability.
Almost two years later, things have most certainly not changed – in fact, you can say that they have gotten worse. We have learned that many more of those Democrats that would make it all better were either liars or inept. We saw a party that turned its back on the winner of the Connecticut Democratic Primary for Senate for one of “its own” – a man who has only proven to be a power hungry egomaniacal liar and is actively supporting a republican (McCain) and will hopefully be kicked out of the Democratic caucus, and stripped of his seniority – yet that isn’t even a definite and it has gotten to this point without any semblance of major pushback. This is not nearly the first time that Lieberman has done this, yet he was welcomed with open arms by Senate Democrats over a progressive candidate that their own party’s voters wanted to represent their state.
We have been told that 2008 is the year that will change everything. Yet, there has been disappointment after disappoinment – on Iraq, on FISA, on things as silly as condemning MoveOn.org to more recent comments by Harold Ford that were as tepid of a defense of Obama as I have ever seen when it comes to smears, lies and distortions by republicans, the media and the McCain campaign. Similarly, there has been little push against all of the egregious things that McCain has said or done – now it can’t really be done by Obama, but it CAN be done by other prominent Democrats.
when one of the strongest remarks from House Democratic leadership was Rahm manuel saying that he won’t be buying the New Yorker anymore, how does that demonstrate leadership, and what message does that send to the American people?
The amount of “House” cleaning that needs to be done is massive. The balance of whose interests are being served is highly skewed. The current two parties have their differences but on the big picture and issues that are vital to the American people, there is more common ground with each other than with We the People. Not wanting to make moderate changes to the status quo or not wanting to tackle the big issues isn’t much different from willfully obstructing the passage of legislation that would make moderate changes to the status quo. Both result in nothing. We talk about more and better Democrats. And in some cases, the more part gives us a Jim Webb or a Jon Tester – not the ideal progressive by any stretch but certainly 100 times better than George Allen or Conrad Burns. But we also run the risk of electing the next Steny Hoyer or Jay Rockefeller, who are certainly not necessarily “better” Democrats, and can actively hinder progressives, Democrats and America as they become more entrenched.
How different will 2008 be? Or 2010 and 2012, for that matter. Will there be enough progress on global warming or healthcare or our education system or energy independence or our deteriorating infrastructure? Will we be any closer to withdrawing from Iraq? Will we be bogged down elsewhere, or still debating which Middle Eastern country we need to attack rightfuckingnow? Will the US dollar continue to be as weak, will the job market be any better and will the economy be any better? Will the US Justice Department be cleansed of its partisan ideology? Will our election system still be the laughingstock of the civilized world?
So much has happened that has done so much damage in so many ways. And it will take more than elections or incremental change to bring back any semblance of respectability for this country.
I shouldn’t say “this country”, as it isn’t the country itself – there is still opportunity and a lot that is right and good about it. I should say our “system” and our leadership with respect to their priorities and reputation. But we have seen very little change of direction as compared to what was promised in 2006. And our reputation is damaged beyond levels that would never even be considered a few years ago.
I do have faith that things can change – that things can get better again and at least there will be some accountability or change of direction. Certainly, and despite what some people think, Barack Obama is a HUGE step in the right direction – not my first choice as a candidate, but light years better than McCain. There is no other option than to do whatever we can to get him elected – and no, that is not mutually exclusive from holding him accountable in the blogosphere or even on MyBO (again, despite what some think).
But with Democratic leadership being as pitiful as it has been (I don’t think I ever saw a republican say that they needed a veto proof majority or a filibuster proof majority), more and more however, I am realizing just how far we have to go to get there.
We’ve slid back a long way, haven’t we? Not to make light of a tragic situation, but sometimes it reminds me of an old movie – one of my all-time favorites. My way of dealing with it is to mock the bastards every chance I get.
It is so much about the same subject as your post (from another angle) that I think I will.
Salt to taste, peeder? Not anymore. The tongue? It’s just the new appendix. Think well and prosper.
We need a reformation.
A renaissance.
A new beginning.
Can Obama provide the leadership and vision that will remake this system?
We can only hope that he can, because if he cannot we are headed down the sinkhole of history.
Good luck.
We are all going to need it.
Bet on it.
Later…
AG
P.S. Tips? Recs? We are all going to need them, too.
this is nice article, just a common refrain from all what I’ve heard from Americans for a long time.
Mr Obama
– you need not only to leave Iraq in 16 months (better in 6 months), leave Afghanistan also. You may pretend that you will boost American presence in this wretched country but make sure you leave it. This war is unwinnable.
Remember what Soviet Union learned – it dragged the war in this country for long 10 years and its economy crumbled. Surely American economy is much stronger than Soviet’s but it’s still vulnerable, signs are everywhere, financial sector, mortgages etc.
Already people start talking how American/NATO troops earn money from flourishing drug trade. It will be worse in years to come.
I have to wonder how much it really helps for people like us to get sucking into politics as usual under the Lesser-Evil theorem. I’m still not conviced that Obama falls under that definition, but it’s certainly more than likely, given the history of this system.
So what’s the alternative? Maybe it’s to agree that yeah, we stay involved in electoral politics, but spend our time, energy, and resources specifically changing the system. Which is to say, single-mindedly fighting to take the money out of politics. Completely. No exceptions. America’s descent into overt bribocracy is the root that enables most of our other self-destructive political behavior.
It’s time to bring back single-issue politics that uses every means available to put an end to bribery. No more contributions. When your term is over, you retire on a generous pension. No job, no consulting, no “gifts”. It’s your opportunity to do charity like you always pretended you wanted to. If you can’t handle that, stay out of politics. There are plenty more where you came from, and they’re almost certainly better.