U.S.: Iran giving weapons to kill troops.
That’s the headline given this Associated Press story posted online at the Houston Chronicle website. Here’s the relevant excerpt:
WASHINGTON — Deeply distrustful of Iran, the White House expressed skepticism Monday about Tehran’s plans to greatly expand its economic and military ties with Iraq, where the United States has accused Iran of supporting terrorism and supplying weapons to kill American forces. […]
“If Iran wants to quit playing a destructive role in the affairs of Iraq and wants to play a constructive role, we would certainly welcome that,” National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. But, he said, “We’ve seen little evidence to date (of constructive activities) and frankly all we have seen is evidence to the contrary.”
The White House says there has been growing evidence over the last several months that Iran is supporting terrorists inside Iraq and is a major supplier of bombs and other weapons used to target U.S. forces. In recent weeks, U.S. forces have detained a number of Iranian agents in Iraq.
Please note very carefully, what the Bush administration reportedly stated to this AP reporter. They have “seen evidence” and they claim there is “growing evidence” that Iran is supporting “terrorists inside Iraq” by supplying them with “bombs and weapons” to be used against “US troops.” This is a masterful example of how to spin a “story,” or more accurately promote a lie.
(cont.)
What and Where is the Evidence?
We are not told what “evidence” has been discovered, seen, found, examined, what have you, by the Bush administration, our intelligence agencies or the military in Iraq which supports this claim. Presumably, if they had solid evidence of these “bombs and weapons” Iran is providing, the US military commanders in Baghdad, or Pentagon officials would “show” that “evidence” to the press, would they not? In the past, we have certainly seen enough “dog and pony” shows by the Pentagon, Defense department officials and even the odd Secretary of State when they claimed to have evidence of WMD, or proof that the US military forces had targeted military, as opposed to civilian, targets. So if there is evidence, where is it?
This is not a mere trifling objection. We have seen too many examples over the last few years where the Bush administration and/or the military has lied or misled the American public about what is happening in the “War on Terror” and specifically with regards to Iraq. Here’s a few examples of things we have been told by our President, his senior officials and/or the US military that later proved to be false:
We were told that there was no doubt Saddam had WMD which could reach British troops in Crete within 45 minutes and that they knew where these monstrous weapons were stored.
We were told there would be only 30,000 US troops in Iraq by the end of 2003.
We were told US troops did not use white phosphorus munitions in its assault on Fallujah.
We were told the abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib was just the fault of a few rogue National Guardsmen” deployed there as military police.
We were told there was no massacre of Iraqi civilians by Marines in Haditha.
We were told that an Iraqi police official, a source for stories the AP office in Baghdad reported, did not exist.
Well, you get the point. And that’s a short list of the many lies, evasions and untruths that our government has told us regarding the Iraq war. So excuse me if I want something a little more than mere allegations by Bush and his officials that Iran is providing these weapons. In short, show me the weapons that are coming from Iran, if you have them, or show me whatever other evidence (photographs, witnesses with personal knowledge, etc.) that supports these claims.
Is that really too much to ask? Especially when very similar claims were debunked by our coalition allies as recently as 4 months ago:
ON THE IRAQ-IRAN BORDER — Since late August, British commandos in the deserts of far southeastern Iraq have been testing one of the most serious charges leveled by the United States against Iran: that Iran is secretly supplying weapons, parts, funding and training for attacks on U.S.-led forces in Iraq. […]
There’s just one thing.
“I suspect there’s nothing out there,” the commander, Lt. Col. David Labouchere, said last month, speaking at an overnight camp near the border. “And I intend to prove it.”
Other senior British military leaders spoke as explicitly in interviews over the previous two months. Britain, whose forces have had responsibility for security in southeastern Iraq since the war began, has found nothing to support the Americans’ contention that Iran is providing weapons and training in Iraq, several senior military officials said.
“I have not myself seen any evidence — and I don’t think any evidence exists — of government-supported or instigated” armed support on Iran’s part in Iraq, British Defense Secretary Des Browne said in an interview in Baghdad in late August.
But that’s how the “big lie” technique works. You don’t stop telling it when confronted with contradictory facts, you just keep repeating it over and over, in order to drown out the truth and firmly fix the lie in the minds of those who are gullible and fearful, and this willing to accept rumor as fact, and unproven assertions as gospel.
Who are the Terrorists receiving Iranian weapons?
Please note the nomenclature employed to describe the recipient of these “weapons” which are used “to kill” our troops. Iran is not claimed to be providing arms to the Sunni insurgents, nor to Al Qaeda in Iraq or even to foreign fighters. Iran is not even described as having provided Shi’a militias with these weapons. Instead, the vague, but definitely loaded term, “terrorists” is used to define those who are claimed to be the beneficiaries of Iran’s largesse. Because terrorists are always the enemy.
It really doesn’t matter that the situation in Iraq is divided among a myriad of factions, some who are fighting each other, some who are fighting our soldiers there, and some who are even working with our troops to kill their sectarian or factional rivals. Let’s just refer to them all as terrorists. That’s simpler, easier for those who don’t wish to understand the true situation in Iraq to digest. It’s a battle of good and evil. Insurgents, competing Shi’ite militias, Iraqi police units, interior ministry sponsored death squads, the small number of foreign fighters — they’re all terrorists. So to whomever Iran may be providing assistance doesn’t really matter. Whoever it is, they must be evil, they must hate us, and they must be killing Americans.
That’s what terrorists do.
The Disinformation Campaign Re: Iran.
As for any proof that Iran is handing weapons to terrorists who are using them to kill our troops, that isn’t deemed necessary, apparently, by the administration. We are supposed to take their word for it. Just like we took their word for it that Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda, had a viable nuclear program, had sought to buy uranium from Niger and had WMD ready to be deployed at a moment’s notice. All claims made by them in the run-up to the Iraq war
But these accusations regarding Iran is just a continuation of a long running disinformation campaign by the administration and the Pentagon which has been targeted, not at our enemies, but at you and I and every other American citizen. Initially it was aimed at justifying and rallying public support for an invasion of Iraq in the wake of 9/11. Now it is directed to achieve the same goals for an long planned for attack on Iran.
We are now seeing many published stories in the media which support this campaign to misinform and mislead us into another Middle Eastern conflict. I’ve blogged about it before (most recently here, here, here) and here), and probably will again.
This AP story, which essentially provides the White House the opportunity to freely spread these unsupported allegations without any comment form those with differing opinions, and without reference to stories which contradict the Bush administration’s preferred narrative that Iran is now the “clear and present danger” to our “liberties and freedoms,” is just one more example of the information war being waged against the American people. And It won’t be the last.
Because this Big Lie isn’t going to stop until Bush leaves office or we attack Iran.
[PRESIDENT BUSH] “The Iranian regime and its terrorist proxies have demonstrated their willingness to kill Americans — and now the Iranian regime is pursuing nuclear weapons. The world is working together to prevent Iran’s regime from acquiring the tools of mass murder. The international community has made a reasonable proposal to Iran’s leaders, and given them the opportunity to set their nation on a better course. So far, Iran’s leaders have rejected this offer. Their choice is increasingly isolating the great Iranian nation from the international community, and denying the Iranian people an opportunity for greater economic prosperity. It’s time for Iran’s leader to make a different choice. And we’ve made our choice. We’ll continue to work closely with our allies to find a diplomatic solution. The world’s free nations will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.”
Also available in Orange
We’ll I’m not going to believe the White House until I hear a tape recording of the Iranians moving weapons across their border into Iraq. And then when Gates goes on TV and say he knows exactly where those weapons are and being shipped.
But common sense tells me if the Iranians are smuggling weapons over their border into Iraq then why isn’t the Air Force turning the smuggler routes in 20ft craters?
.
Why on earth would two UC Brit SpecOps guys be dressed as Arabs and carrying explosives? Isn’t there an ongoing problem in Iraq with guys dressed as Arabs blowing things up?
I guess this lends credence to the U.S. official line that most of the violence is being perpetrated by “foreign infiltrators.” I just had no idea that the UK was part of the global Jihad network, durned Anglicans.
by Cicero on Mon Sep 19th, 2005 at 06:43:55 PM PST
The following story- or lack of story- has got me wondering.
Do you, or anyone else, know anything about it?
“Iran ‘supplies infra-red bombs’ that kill British troops in Iraq
By Toby Harnden, Chief Foreign Correspondent
(Filed: 21/08/2005)
This story has been temporarily suspended.”
by rom wyo on Mon Sep 19th, 2005 at 01:28:38 PM PST
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
The print and media lapdogs once again are going to have blood on their grimy corporate hands. This massive sellout has become a real abomination perpetrated on the mainly unsuspecting public.
These articles are so vague that only the dumbest anymore would read them without question. Are we going to see Rice ala Powell give some sort of phony presentation or has bush decided he doesn’t even need that pretense to convince the public. It certainly seems as if him and cheney think they don’t need to bother much with getting anyone’s permission to carry out their insane plans. The ‘Decider-in-Chief’ has decided so the rest of us are irrelevant
It’s kind of amazing how many lies bush can get into one or two paragraphs when talking about Iran and making it sound also that the whole world is behind us on this…when as usual the opposite is true.
At this point if bush said the sky was blue and my blog name was chocolate ink I’d automatically say he was lying.
“Our drug policy grants huge subsidies to our enemies.”
The U.S. is funding bin Laden and the Taliban by its support of the drug war. As long as the drug war continues Afghan heroin will continue to flood into the U.S. and Europe. alQaida and the Taliban can buy all of the bombs and bullets they want to direct at American and allied troops.
“The international drug control regime, which criminalizes narcotics, does not reduce drug use, but it does produce huge profits for criminals and the armed groups and corrupt officials who protect them. Our drug policy grants huge subsidies to our enemies.” Afghanistan expert and New York University Professor Barnett Rubin, Sept. 21, 2006 testimony before the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Dr. Rubin concluded: “If it were not illegal, it would be worth hardly anything. It’s only its illegality that makes it so valuable.”
Defending the right-wing drug war
Our border is a mess not because of immigrant workers but because the drug war creates a $ 144 billion retail black market for drugs in America that enites entire industries dedicated to circumventing our best border security.
In a story titled “Burdened U.S. military cuts role in drug war”. Air and sea patrolling is slashed on southern smuggling routes, on January 22, 2007 the Los Angeles Times reported that the U.S. military has, for several years, been quietly retreating from drug war duty on America’s borders. “Stretched thin from fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military has sharply reduced its role in the war on drugs, leaving significant gaps in the nation’s narcotics interdiction efforts.”
These gaps are wide open holes in our border that bin Laden has free access to as a supplier of literally tons of heroin coming to America from Afghanistan each year.
Drug War Causing National Security Vacuum
If Iran is supplying their allies in a civil war conflict it is no different from the U.S. supplying Israel against the Palestinians. Or the U.S. supplying the Colombian army against their civil war opponents. Or the U. S. propping up South Vietnam against the North Vietnamese.
If they get caught they get busted.
No big deal. Its war.
The U.S. is usually the asshole spewing violence on the rest of the world so it does not surprise me that some folks have tried to confront the big bully on the block.
America has been the big bully on the planet for a long time. Republicans and Democrats alike. Can the nation that locks up and denies millions of its citizens suffrage really be a champion of anything other than gun-barrel democracy around the world?
Of course, all CBS is doing is simple stenography, repeating the propaganda they’ve been fed and offering no significant reporting to support these assertions.
Seems to me, free trade and a porous border would explain the evidence pretty well, and the implication that the Iranian government is directing or financing the actions of private individuals or groups is not supported. Though that is the impression that the government seeks to leave by issuing this kind of propaganda.
What was funny was how the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff – the highest military officer in the USA – flatly contradicted the Secretary of Defense (Rummy) in front of the media, by stating that no, he does not actually have evidence of Iranian weapons entering into Iraq as the Secretary of Defense had just claimed!
And that the knowledge to make the IEDs actually come from…the UK itself thanks to a botched IRA sting!
See also Gareth Porter’s article